Acoustic Monitoring of Night-Time Respiratory Symptoms in 14 Patients with Exacerbated COPD Over a 3- Week Period.

Introduction: In clinical practice, wheezing and coughing represent a worsening of the respiratory situation of COPD patients and should be monitored long-term during and after an Acute Exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) to observe the therapy. We investigated if overnight monitoring of wheezing and coughing is feasible during AECOPD and whether automatic long - term monitoring enables an objective assessment during and after an AECOPD. Methods: In 14 patients (age: 56-80 years) with pre-existing COPD (stages B-D) nighttime wheezing and coughing events were monitored for a period of three weeks. The portable LEOSound® monitor recorded three nights into AECOPD (nights 1, 3 and 6) during the hospital stay, and the 20th night post- AECOPD ambulatory. Before each recording the subjective symptom severity was assessed by a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and a Modified British Medical Research Council (MMRC) dyspnoea index questionnaire. Results: In all 14 patients, lung sounds were recorded in good quality during each of the 4 recording nights. Wheezing ranged between 5% and 90% (79 -539.5 minutes) of the recording time on the first night. All patients showed some coughs, in four patients coughing was particularly pronounced and largely receding over the total investigation period. As group, the percentages of wheezing and the number of coughs did not show significant differences between the four recording times. The CAT scores (p<0.001) declined over the course of investigation period, suggesting a subjective improvement of symptoms. Conclusion: The observational study showed that standardized long-term recording can be performed in high-quality during acute COPD exacerbation as it does not require the patient's cooperation. The good-quality data of coughs and wheezing were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The long-term presentation of respiratory symptoms during an AECOPD offers the opportunity to evaluate factors that influence exacerbations and therapeutic approaches.

Sleep and rheumatic diseases.

This review article discusses various forms of sleep disorders associated with musculoskeletal diseases (MD). It presents the pathophysiology and interaction of sleep-related disorders and MD and summarizes clinical symptoms and therapies from a somnological perspective. BACKGROUND: A large number of patients suffering from MD report fragmented sleep with poor overall sleep quality. Sleep disorders often lead to increased symptoms such as daytime fatigue, depression, or increased pain intensity. In contrast, the perception of pain worsens the quality of sleep. Sleep is a complex regulation of hormonal and neuromodulatory influences to maintain regenerative processes and signal processing. Furthermore, interleukins (e.g., IL-6 and TNFα), messenger substances, or inflammatory markers (e.g., CRP) may have a regulatory influence on sleep. THERAPY: Sleep disorders in MD can often be treated with behavioral therapies or drug approaches. Another and very important influence is physical activity. In combination with training, regular physical activity can lead, for instance, to improved sleep quality, endurance performance, and reduced inflammation values. The change of lifestyle with regard to activity and nutrition is another key concept in the optimal therapy of patients with MD.

Validity and Usability of Physical Activity Monitoring in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of COPD patients do not achieve the recommended level of physical activity. It is suggested that feedback on the level of activity by using an activity monitoring device (PAM) increases awareness and may stimulate patients to increase their physical activity in daily life. Our objective was to assess the validity and usability of a simple and low-cost physical activity monitor (Polar A300™) when compared with the validated and established Bodymedia-SenseWear™ (SWA) device. METHODS: To assess the diagnostic equivalent, two different PAM devices were used in parallel in 20 COPD patients GOLD I to IV during 3 consecutive days of daily life. Both systems were compared in terms of steps, calories burned, daily activity time and metabolic equivalents using linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots. Practical usability was examined by a 16-item-questionnaire. RESULTS: High correlations of both devices were observed with regard to the sensed step count (r = 0.96; p < 0.01) and calories burned (r = 0.74; p < 0.01), and a lower correlation of daily activity (r = 0.25; p < 0.01) was found. Data analysis over 3 days showed that 90% of the steps (95% CI -4223 to 1887), 100% of the calories (95% CI -2798 to 1887), 90% of the daily activity data (95% CI -12.32, 4065) and 95% of the MET (95% CI -3.11 to 2.75) were within the limits of agreement. A favorable usability (system-, information- and interface quality) of the A300™ device was shown (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The A300™ device with easy practical usability was shown not to be inferior for assessment of physical activity time, step count and calorie consumption in COPD patients when compared with the SWA. It is suggested to consider widespread available devices as commonly used for monitoring recreational sporting activities also in patients for assessment of physical activity in daily life.