Postoperative urinary retention by void trial methodology following radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Radical hysterectomy is the standard of care for management of early-stage cervical cancer and is associated with postoperative urinary retention. No clear consensus exists regarding optimal voiding trial methodology for mitigating postoperative urinary retention. Our objective was to evaluate the association between type of postoperative voiding trial and risk of urinary retention after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for apparent early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO 2018 Stage IA2-IB2) between January 2014 and February 2023. We compared incidence of urinary retention and perioperative outcomes based on method of postoperative voiding trial (timed, autofill, or backfill). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine association of type of void trial with absence of urinary retention within 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 115 patients identified, 48 (41.8%) patients completed a timed void trial, 40 (34.7%) an autofill void trial, and 27 (23.5%) a backfill void trial. 44.3% of patients developed postoperative urinary retention with no differences based on void trial (p = 0.17). Urinary retention was more likely to resolve by 7 (p = 0.012) and 30 days (p = 0.01) for patients undergoing backfill voiding trials, compared to other trials. In multivariate models, backfill void trial was associated with absence of 30-day urinary retention, compared to other trials (aOR 15.1; 95% C.I. 1.5-154.9). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of urinary retention following radical hysterectomy do not differ based on postoperative void trial methodology. A backfill void trial following radical hysterectomy may lead to increased rates of resolution of postoperative urinary retention.

Public awareness and provider counseling regarding postmenopausal bleeding as a symptom of endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Our study aims to understand public knowledge of postmenopausal bleeding as an endometrial cancer symptom and how past provider counseling on postmenopausal bleeding affects knowledge and care-seeking behaviors related to postmenopausal bleeding. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey study of people assigned female at birth. Study participants were recruited at a university research facility located at the Minnesota State Fair in September 2021. Participants answered questions about demographics, endometrial cancer knowledge, whether they had received counseling about postmenopausal bleeding, and whether and when they would present for care after experiencing postmenopausal bleeding. RESULTS: Six hundred forty-eight surveys were completed and included in analyses. Sixty-three percent of participants identified postmenopausal bleeding as a symptom of endometrial cancer. Those who correctly selected this symptom were more likely to be born in the United States, have a college education or higher, and have private insurance. Of the 145 postmenopausal participants, 46.5% reported that their provider counseled them on postmenopausal bleeding. Fifty-nine percent of the postmenopausal participants reported that they would tell their provider if they had postmenopausal bleeding after only one episode. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for increased recognition of postmenopausal bleeding and provider counseling on postmenopausal bleeding, and educational interventions should focus on public and provider awareness of endometrial cancer risks and symptoms.

Patterns of Use, Outcomes, and Resource Utilization among Recipients of Commercial Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Tisagenlecleucel for Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B Cell Lymphomas.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory aggressive B cell lymphomas. We present a multicenter retrospective study among centers that prescribe either commercial product to evaluate usage patterns, safety and efficacy outcomes, and resource utilization. Data collection included all patients from 8 US centers who underwent apheresis between May 1, 2018, and July 31, 2019. Patient selection, toxicity management, and disease assessment followed institutional practices. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded according to American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy consensus criteria, and tumor responses were assessed according to the Lugano 2014 classification scheme. A total of 260 patients underwent apheresis, including 168 (65%) for axi-cel and 92 (35%) for tisa-cel. Among the infused patients, the median age was 59 years for axi-cel recipients and 67 years for tisa-cel recipients (P < .001). The median time from apheresis to infusion was 28 days for axi-cel recipients and 45 days for tisa-cel recipients (P < .001). Sixty-one percent of the axi-cel recipients and 43% of the tisa-cel recipients would have been ineligible for the ZUMA-1 and JULIET trials, respectively. Grade ≥3 CRS occurred in 9% of axi-cel recipients and in 1% of tisa-cel recipients (P = .017), and grade ≥3 ICANS was seen in 38% of axi-cel recipients and 1% of tisa-cel recipients (P < .001). Inpatient cell therapy infusion was common (92% in axi-cel recipients, 37% in tisa-cel recipients). The day 90 overall response rate was 52% in the axi-cel group and 41% in the tisa-cel group (P = .113), with complete response in 44% and 35%, respectively (P = .319). Twelve-month progression-free survival (42% versus 32%; P = .206) and overall survival (62% versus 59%; P = .909) rates were comparable in the axi-cel and tisa-cel groups. Baseline characteristics differed between the 2 groups, although response rates and survival outcomes were comparable, albeit lower than those in the pivotal trials. Safety and resource utilization appear to be key differentiators between axi-cel and tisa-cel.

The Incidence of Primary vs Secondary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Clinicopathologic Study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the change in the incidence rates of primary and secondary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) from 1994 through 2013 in Olmsted County, Minnesota, and to identify the clinical and biopsy characteristics that distinguish primary from secondary FSGS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Olmsted County adult residents with native kidney biopsy from January 1, 1994, through December 31, 2013, and FSGS as the only glomerulopathy were identified. The clinical and pathologic characterstics of primary and secondary FSGS were described and compared, and incidence rates were calculated. RESULTS: Of 370 adults biopsied, 281 had glomerular diseases, of which 46 (16%) had FSGS. From 1994-2003 to 2004-2013, there were significant increases in kidney biopsy rates (14.7 [95% CI, 12.1-17.3] vs 22.9 [95% CI, 20.0-25.7] per 100,000 person-years, 17% increase per 5 years; P<.001) and total FSGS rates (1.4 [95% CI, 0.6-2.2] vs 3.2 [95% CI, 2.1-4.3] per 100,000 person-years, 41% increase per 5 years; P=.02). Compared with patients with limited foot process effacement (<80%), patients with diffuse effacement (≥80%) without an identifiable cause had lower serum albumin levels (P<.001), had higher proteinuria (P<.001), and were more likely to have nephrotic syndrome (100% vs 4%; P<.001). Patients with diffuse effacement without an identifiable cause were classified as primary FSGS, which accounted for 3 of 12 patients (25%) during 1994-2003 and 9 of 34 (26%) during 2004-2013. CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of FSGS has increased, the proportions of primary and secondary FSGS have remained stable.

Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy after rituximab treatment for membranous nephropathy.

Rituximab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody frequently used for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and anti-neutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis. In addition, rituximab has recently been increasingly used as an off-label treatment in a number of inflammatory and systemic autoimmune diseases. It is advised that rituximab infusion may cause infusion reactions and adverse cardiac effects including arrhythmia and angina, especially in patients with prior history of cardiovascular diseases. However, its detailed cardiotoxicity profile and effects on cardiac function were not well described. We report a 51-year-old man who developed non-ischemic cardiomyopathy after rituximab treatment for membranous nephropathy. The patient experienced reduced cardiac functions within 48 hours after the initial infusion, which remained markedly reduced at 9-month follow-up. As the utility of rituximab expands, physicians must be aware of this serious cardiovascular adverse effect.