Presentation and outcome of central serous chorioretinopathy with and without pachychoroid.

BACKGROUND: The present study compared clinical features and outcomes of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) with and without pachychoroid. METHODS: It was a retrospective, longitudinal, record-based study which included eyes with CSC. Patients underwent spectral domain optical coherence tomography and differentiated between pachychoroid and non-pachychoroid groups. Eyes were divided into pachychoroid and non-pachychoroid groups based on the subfoveal choroidal thickness of 300 microns and the presence of pachyvessels. RESULTS: A total of 250 eyes of 250 patients were divided into pachychoroid and non-pachychoroid with 125 eyes in each group. Mean ages of patients in pachychoroid and non-pachychoroid groups were 45.7 ± 9.4 years and 47.4 ± 10.2 years, respectively. Mean initial best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.40 ± 0.42 in pachychoroid and 0.39 ± 0.38 in non-pachychoroid group (p = 0.9). Mean final BCVA was 0.37 ± 0.9 in pachychoroid and 0.21 ± 0.33 in non-pachychoroid group (p = 0.04). 36 (28.8%) eyes in pachychoroid and 60 (48%) eyes in non-pachychoroid group had spontaneous resolution of CSC (p = 0.007). A total of 39 (31.2%) eyes in pachychoroid and 13 (10.4%) in non-pachychoroid group had recurrent CSC at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSION: CSC eyes with pachychoroid had more recurrent episodes and less spontaneous resolution compared to CSC eyes in non-pachychoroid group. Final visual acuity was worse in eyes with CSC and pachychoroid. These findings need to be validated in a larger sample size with a prospective study design.

Pupil vignetting artifact on optical coherence tomography angiography.

PURPOSE: To discuss the features of an artifact on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), termed "pupil vignetting artifact," and describe how it may masquerade as true chorioretinal pathology. DESIGN: This was a retrospective, observational case series. METHODS: The authors studied 12 eyes at a vitreoretinal clinic in Eastern India, reviewing a dark shadow such as an artifact on OCTA images. RESULTS: In all 12 eyes, there was an appearance of a dark shadow on OCTA imaging, located at the macula, superior, superotemporal, or superonasal to the fovea, which did not correspond to any ischemic area responsible for flow-void or any media opacity casting a posterior shadow. It was believed to be an artifact caused by the vignetting effect of the pupil as the incident OCT beam clips the iris during OCTA scanning, and therefore reduces the amount of total light incident on the retina. The variability in the size, shape, and location of the artifact is contributed by a few factors such as variable angle of incident light on the pupil, pupillary dynamics, and curvature of the retinal surface. CONCLUSION: Pupil vignetting artifact is a unique undescribed phenomenon appearing at the macula on OCTA imaging that can masquerade as numerous true chorioretinal pathologies. This article aims to describe this artifact to avoid misinterpretation and further confusion in real-life clinical practice.

Angular Sign of Henle Fiber Layer Hyperreflectivity in Purtscher and Purtscher like Retinopathy.

ABSTRACT: Angular Sign of Henle Fiber Layer Hyperreflectivity (ASHH) is a marker of Henle Fibre layer ischemia. Our aim is to describe ASHH as a novel OCT sign in Purtscher and Purtscher like retinopathy. Here we present 3 Cases, one classical Purtscher Retinopathy and 2 Purtscher like Retinopathy who had ASHH on SD OCT imaging. Modalities like Colour fundus photography, cross-sectional OCT, OCT angiography (OCTA) and fluorescein angiography were used. Presence ASHH in Purtscher Retinopathy and Purtscher like retinopathy points towards a deep capillary plexus insult and has prognostic implications.