Effect of Dry Needling Injection and Kinesiotaping on Pain and Quality of Life in Patients with Mechanical Neck Pain.

BACKGROUND: Dry needling (DN) is a commonly used technique by clinicians for the treatment of mechanical neck pain (MNP) by targeting trigger points and nontrigger point structures. It is a skilled intervention that uses a thin ?liform needle to penetrate the skin and stimulate underlying trigger points, muscular and connective tissues without the use of injectate. Another popular treatment technique used in the management of musculoskeletal pathologies is kinesiotaping (KT). Although its popular, there is minimal scientific evidence supporting KT for neck pain. Although there are a few studies regarding KT for neck pain in literature, there is a lack of randomized, controlled studies evaluating KT for neck pain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of KT on posterior cervical spine and DN into a posterior paracervical muscle of patients with MNP. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical study. SETTING: Physical medicine and rehabilitation center. METHODS: Seventy-two patients (17 men, 55 women) were randomly assigned to DN or KT treatment groups. Numeric Rating Scale (NPS-11), Neck Disability Index (NDI), range of motion (ROM), Short Form-36 Quality of Life Scale, and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were assessed before the intervention and one month postintervention. RESULTS: Before treatment, there was no difference between groups in NPS-11, NDI, and BDI scores; however, ROM of the DN group was greater than ROM of the KT group (P < 0.05). After treatment, significant improvement was observed in all variables for both of the groups, except ROM in the DN group (P < 0.05). The KT group showed greater ROM compared with the DN group (P < 0.05). The pre- and posttreatment results showed that the KT group was significantly superior for the differences on ROM and NDI (P < 0.05); however, each group showed better results after treatment (P < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: First, we did not include a control or placebo group. Second, patients were followed up for only 4 weeks. Third, we used a sample of convenience from one clinic, which may not be representative of the entire population of individuals with MNP. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, both methods were found to be effective on pain, mood, and quality of life, and KT was found to be superior to DN in MNP in terms of increasing ROM and decreasing disability. KEY WORDS: Dry needling, kinesiotaping, mechanical neck pain, quality of life.

Predictive Factors for Inpatient Falls among Children with Cerebral Palsy.

OBJECTIVE: Inpatient falls are of significant concern. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the predictors of inpatient falls among children with cerebral palsy in a rehabilitation hospital. DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 93 patients with cerebral palsy were assessed based on history, physical findings, the Selective Motor Control Test, the Gross Motor Functional Classification System, the Berg Balance Scale and the Manual Ability Classification System. Previous history of falls/frequent falls, and any falls which occurred during hospitalization, were recorded. RESULTS: Of all 93 patients, 25 (27%) fell and 68 (73%) did not fall. The mean age of the fallers (6.3±2.0 years) was lower than that of the non-fallers (8.1±3.9 years). Behavioral problems according to the mother's statement (OR 26.454), not being able to maintain a long sitting position (OR 10.807), ability to balance on knees without support (OR 9.810), a history of frequent falls (OR 4.893) and a negative Thomas test (OR 4.192 fold) were found to increase the risk of inpatient falls. CONCLUSIONS: In these children with cerebral palsy, behavioral problems according to the mother's statement, a history of frequent falls, not being able to maintain a long sitting position, a negative Thomas test, and able to balance on knees without support were associated with the risk of inpatient falls. Children with cerebral palsy may experience inpatient falls. Further studies are required in order to develop prevention programs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: For patients diagnosed with cerebral palsy, these results may help identify possible inpatient fallers on hospital admission.

Effectiveness of Kinesiotaping and Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection in Shoulder Impingement Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether kinesiotaping or subacromial corticosteroid injection provides additional benefit when used with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. DESIGN: Patients with shoulder impingement syndrome were divided into 3 groups as follows: NSAID group (n = 33), kinesiotaping group (kinesiotaping + NSAID) (n = 33), and injection group (subacromial corticosteroid injection + NSAID) (n = 33). Outcome measures including visual analog scale, shoulder ranges of motion, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire, and University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) scale were evaluated before and after the treatment (fourth week). RESULTS: A total of 99 patients (21 male and 78 female patients) were enrolled in this study. Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of the groups (except for body mass index and visual analog scale at night, both P = 0.05) were similar between the groups (all P > 0.05). Clinical parameters were found to have improved in the 3 groups (all P < 0.001). While the kinesiotaping and injection groups showed similar improvements (all P > 0.05), each group had better outcome than did the NSAID group as regards pain (activity visual analog scale), ranges of motion, and Shoulder Disability Questionnaire and UCLA scale scores (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of kinesiotaping or subacromial corticosteroid injection to NSAID treatment seems to have better/similar effectiveness in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. Therefore, kinesiotaping might serve as an alternative treatment in case (injection of) corticosteroids are contraindicated. TO CLAIM CME CREDITS: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME CME OBJECTIVES:: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Delineate appropriate treatment options for shoulder impingement syndrome; (2) Identify treatment benefits of kinesiotaping and corticosteroid injections in shoulder impingement syndrome; and (3) Incorporate kinesiotaping and corticosteroid injections into the treatment plan for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. LEVEL: Advanced ACCREDITATION: : The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this activity for amaximumof 1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.