Utilizing previous patient opioid experiences for pain plan implementation: Role of opioid use categorization on inpatient and outpatient opioid use, length of stay, pain scores, and clinic resource utilization following elective spine surgery.

Background: A Pain Plan was formulated for all patients undergoing elective spine surgery at our institution. It was based on prior opioid experiences and developed collaboratively between the patient and the surgeon at a preoperative clinic visit. Category 1 patients had no previous opioid experience, Category 2 patients had remote previous opioid experience with acceptable pain control and no side effects, Category 3 patients had remote previous opioid experience with unacceptable pain control and/or side effects, and Category 4 patients had opioid use leading up to surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study comparing adult patients within four different pain plan categories over one year (n = 313) to determine if categorization is predictive. Demographic data collected included age, gender, ASA class, BMI, smoking status, insurance status, substance abuse, and comorbid psychiatric diagnoses. Demographic factors between categories were compared and controlled for as covariates within analyses. Outcomes measures comprised self-reported pain scores and functional measurements, including inpatient opioid use, outpatient opioid prescription quantities, and postoperative healthcare utilization. Results: Inpatient and outpatient opioid use were statistically significant amongst the categories, with prescription quantities greatest in Category 4, followed by Categories 2, 3, and 1, respectively. There was no difference in LOS or complexity of communication encounters amongst any of the groups. Patient-reported pain scores showed statistically significant differences and followed the same trend as opioid quantities, 4, 2, 3, and 1. The number of communication encounters was significant exclusively for Category 3 vs. 4. Conclusions: The use of categorization in Pain Plan formation has been a helpful tool for postoperative pain management at our institution. Categorization is predictive of pain scores and opioid use after surgery, allowing the surgical team to tailor their care and counseling towards individual patients. In addition, the plan's collaborative nature enables patients to be involved in their pain management decisions while also setting limits and expectations.

Pain Plan Implementation Effect: Analysis of Postoperative Opioid Use, Hospital Length of Stay, and Clinic Resource Utilization for Patients Undergoing Elective Spine Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The Pain Plan was developed collaboratively and implemented a unique systematic approach to reduce opioid usage in elective spine surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing patients who underwent elective spine surgery before and after Pain Plan implementation. The Pain Plan was implemented on May 1, 2019. The experimental group comprised patients over the subsequent 1-year period with a Pain Plan (n = 319), and the control group comprised patients from the previous year without a Pain Plan (n = 385). Outcome variables include hospital length of stay (LOS), inpatient opioid use, outpatient opioid prescription quantities, number of clinic communication encounters, and communication encounter complexity. Patients were prospectively divided into three surgical invasiveness index subgroups representing small-magnitude, medium-magnitude, and large-magnitude spine surgeries. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in hospital LOS ( P = 0.028), inpatient opioid use ( P = 0.001), and the average number of steps per communication encounter ( P = 0.010) for Pain Plan patients and a trend toward decreased outpatient opioid prescription quantities ( P = 0.052). No difference was observed in patient-reported pain scores. Statistically significant decreases in inpatient opioid use were seen in large-magnitude (50% reduction, P < 0.001) and medium-magnitude surgeries (49% reduction, P < 0.001). For small-magnitude surgeries, there was no difference (1.7% reduction, P = 0.99). The median LOS for large-magnitude surgeries decreased by 38% (20.5-hour decrease, P < 0.001) and decreased by 34% for medium-magnitude surgeries (17-hour difference, P = 0.055). For small-magnitude surgeries, there was no significant difference ( P = 0.734). Outpatient opioid prescription quantities were markedly decreased in small-magnitude surgeries only. The total number of communication encounters was not statistically significant in any group. However, the number of steps within a communication encounter was significantly decreased ( P = 0.010), and staff survey respondents reported more efficient and effective postoperative pain management for Pain Plan patients. DISCUSSION: Pain Plan implementation markedly decreased hospital LOS, inpatient opioid use and outpatient opioid prescription quantities, and clinic resource utilization in elective spine surgery patients.

A Multicenter Evaluation of the Feasibility, Patient/Provider Satisfaction, and Value of Virtual Spine Consultation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, patient/provider satisfaction, and perceived value of telehealth spine consultation after rapid conversion from traditional in-office visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Data were obtained for patients undergoing telehealth visits with spine surgeons in the first 3 weeks after government restriction of elective surgical care at 4 sites (March 23, 2020, to April 17, 2020). Demographic factors, technique-specific elements of the telehealth experience, provider confidence in diagnostic and therapeutic assessment, patient/surgeon satisfaction, and perceived value were collected. RESULTS: A total of 128 unique visits were analyzed. New (74 [58%]), preoperative (26 [20%]), and postoperative (28 [22%]) patients were assessed. A total of 116 (91%) visits had successful connection on the first attempt. Surgeons felt very confident 101 times (79%) when assessing diagnosis and 107 times (84%) when assessing treatment plan. The mean and median patient satisfaction was 89% and 94%, respectively. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher for video over audio-only visits (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was not significantly different with patient age, location of chief complaint (cervical or thoracolumbar), or visit type (new, preoperative, or postoperative). Providers reported that 76% of the time they would choose to perform the visit again in telehealth format. Sixty percent of patients valued the visit cost as the same or slightly less than an in-office consultation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility and high patient/provider satisfaction of virtual spine surgical consultation, and appropriate reimbursement and balanced regulation for spine telehealth care is essential to continue this existing work.

Improving Secondary Fracture Prevention After Vertebroplasty: Implementation of a Fracture Liaison Service.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate a multidisciplinary fracture liaison service (FLS) to improve osteoporosis treatment and secondary fracture prevention for patients after vertebroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of consecutive vertebroplasty patients from January 2016 to January 2020. FLS began in December 2016 allowing for before-and-after comparison. Statistical analysis included patient demographics and procedure characteristics. Proportion of patients evaluated by the FLS clinic and treatment modification were evaluated. Opt-in versus opt-out referral strategies were compared. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scans or vitamin D levels within 3 months before or after vertebroplasty were assessed. Time to event analysis was used to evaluate secondary fracture occurrence. RESULTS: There were 137 vertebroplasty patients, 39 before FLS and 98 after FLS, included. Only 15% of all patients were already being treated in a bone health clinic. Of those referred and evaluated by the FLS, 73.0% had their osteoporosis treatment modified. Patients evaluated by the FLS were more likely to have a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scan or a vitamin D level drawn (P < .001 for both). The opt-out referral was more effective with a 75.0% referral rate (P = .71). Secondary fracture of any kind occurred in 23.4% of all patients. Time to event analysis demonstrated a trend toward a reduced risk of secondary spinal fractures in the fracture prevention group with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.39 (0.13-1.11, 95% confidence interval). DISCUSSION: A multidisciplinary FLS can be implemented for patients after vertebroplasty to evaluate osteoporotic risk factors and optimize osteoporosis therapy, both of which are important factors in preventing secondary vertebral fractures.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Lateral Interbody Fusion for Adjacent Segment Degeneration.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Assessment of outcomes in patients undergoing lateral interbody fusion as part of the surgical treatment of adjacent segment deterioration after previous lumbar spine fusion. METHODS: Adult patients with previous lumbar posterior spinal fusion who presented with adjacent segment degeneration and stenosis refractory to nonoperative treatment and who underwent lateral lumbar interbody fusion were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed and comparisons made between preoperative baseline and postoperative values. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration at 46 motion segments were included. Thirty (83.3%) of the 36 patients had complete relief of both preoperative lower extremity pain and back pain at the time of final follow-up. Six (16.7%) of the 36 patients had persistent pain, though in all 6 cases, the pain was less postoperatively than preoperatively. Oswestry Disability Index scores were improved significantly at final follow-up (P = .001). Compared with preoperative baseline parameters, initial and final postoperative radiographs had an increase in segmental lordosis (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively), increase in overall lumbar lordosis (P < .05 and P = .094, respectively), decrease in segmental coronal angulation (P = .63 and P < .01, respectively), decrease in overall coronal angulation (P = .063 and P = .009, respectively), and increase in intervertebral height (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion achieves favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes for the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration after previous lumbar fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous needle aspiration of posterior epidural abscesses: a report of two cases.

Introduction: Spinal epidural abscesses are most commonly treated with surgical decompression and antibiotics or in specific instances managed medically with antibiotic therapy alone. Image-guided percutaneous aspiration as an alternative to surgery has only rarely been reported in the literature. Case presentation: We report two cases of successful fluoroscopy-guided needle aspiration of posterior epidural abscesses. Case 1 is a 48-year-old man who presented with several days of escalating back pain and constitutional symptoms with MRI showing a posterior epidural abscess at L2-L3 causing spinal stenosis. The patient remained neurologically intact. Percutaneous needle aspiration of the collection provided dramatic pain relief with the aspirate growing methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. The patient made a full recovery on antibiotic therapy. Case 2 is an 81-year-old man who presented with worsening upper back pain and was found to have osteomyelitis/discitis with a large posterior epidural abscess in the thoracic spine. Needle drainage was performed with the sample growing Bacteroides fragilis. This patient also responded successfully to nonsurgical management with full recovery after appropriate antibiotic therapy. Discussion: In carefully selected patients, image-guided needle aspiration of posterior epidural abscesses may be a viable and less invasive alternative to surgery.

A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Value of the On-Call Orthopedic Resident.

BACKGROUND: Funding for graduate medical education is at risk despite the services provided by residents. OBJECTIVE: We quantified the potential monetary value of services provided by on-call orthopedic surgery residents. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter cohort study design. Over a 90-day period in 2014, we collected data on consults by on-call orthopedic surgery residents at 4 tertiary academic medical centers in the United States. All inpatient and emergency department consults evaluated by first-call residents during the study period were eligible for inclusion. Based on their current procedural terminology codes, procedures and evaluations for each consult were assigned a relative value unit and converted into a monetary value to determine the value of services provided by residents. The primary outcome measures were the total dollar value of each consult and the percentage of resident salaries that could be funded by the generated value of the resident consult services. RESULTS: In total, 2644 consults seen by 33 residents from the 4 institutions were included for analysis. These yielded an average value of $81,868 per center for the 90-day study period, that is, $327,471 annually. With a median resident stipend of $53,992, the extrapolated average percentage of resident stipends that could be funded by these consult revenues was 73% of the stipends of the residents who took call or 36% of the stipends of the overall resident cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The potential monetary value generated by on-call orthopedic surgery residents is substantial.

Mediating the Secondary Effects of Spinal Cord Injury Through Optimization of Key Physiologic Parameters.

Spinal cord injury remains a challenging clinical entity with considerable socioeconomic impact on patients, their families, and the healthcare system. Advances in medical care and rehabilitation continue to improve, but treatment outcomes following tissue regeneration for spinal cord injury remain dismal. Therefore, attempts at mediating the secondary effects of spinal cord injury remain the mainstay of current treatment. Recent studies evaluating the timing of decompression suggest improved neurologic recovery with early surgical decompression and the maintenance of mean arterial pressures >85 mm Hg. With systemic and local treatments, including riluzole, minocycline, GM1 ganglioside, BA-210, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, remaining in their infancy, randomized controlled trials demonstrating efficacy are needed before adopting their widespread use.