Home-Based Titration with Duodenal Infusion of Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel in People with Parkinson's Disease: An Observational Feasibility Study.

Background: Testing and titration of the right levodopa equivalent dose are usually performed during a hospital admission. However, optimal dose titration in people with Parkinson's disease (PwPs) may depend on home environment, emotional stress, and physical activity of everyday life. Objective: Firstly, to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a home-based LCIG titration program and patients'/caregivers' satisfaction. Secondly, to identify barriers and facilitators for home-based titration. Method: This study assesses the feasibility and safety of home-based titration of levodopa duodenal infusions with the use of self-reported evaluation questionnaires with open-ended questions included, registration of total time used, and number of contacts/visits. A telemedicine solution was used to remotely monitor the patients, adjust treatment, and provide support and guidance to patients and caregivers. Results: Ten of 12 PwPs (5 females and 7 males) completed the total titration program. Eight of the 12 PwPs were dependent on help. These 8 PwPs also had a high burden of nonmotor symptoms (NMS). Cognitive impairments varied in severity (range 16-30). Time spent with home visits was on average 93.4 minutes (ranging from 35 to 180 minutes), and the length of the total titration (LCIG initiation to termination of titration) was on average 3.4 days with 2-5 (mean 3.2) contacts/visits with PD team members. The average score on the satisfaction evaluation questionnaires was lower in the caregiver group (mean 31.8) than the PwP outcome (mean 36.2). Conclusions: Telehealth-assisted home-based titration programs are feasible due to the length of the titration period, number of contacts, and time spent in PwPs' private homes, are rated satisfactory and safe by PwPs and caregivers, and may be a substitute for in-hospital treatment. Clinical recommendations including facilitators and barriers from a patient/caregiver perspective are displayed. This trial is registered with NCT4196647.

Comparison of two types of extension tubes for people with Parkinson's disease in advanced treatment with levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel infusions: a prospective, crossover quality study.

BACKGROUND: Within Parkinson's disease (PD) management, a pivotal juncture often arises when individuals with PD (PwP) necessitate advanced therapies to stabilise symptom fluctuations and reduce off-periods, which are intrinsic to living with PD. One such intervention is the infusion of duodenal levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG), which confers a more dependable levodopa plasma concentration compared with conventional oral therapy. It involves the insertion of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (PEG-J) tube, facilitating direct access to the stomach and jejunum. Then, a slender tube extends into the small intestine, facilitating the continuous delivery of LECIG via a portable pump. The PEG-J incorporates an extension tube that permits patients with PD to connect the medication pump. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess and compare two types of extension tubes a standard; a standard tube and the ENFit extension tube. METHOD: Employing a prospective, crossover design at a single centre in Denmark. Each participant evaluated both extension tubes for 14 days. The primary outcome measure was patient-reported evaluation measures through a nine-item questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale and 10th open-ended qualitative question. RESULTS: Of the 12 recruited PwP, 10 successfully completed both testing periods and submitted self-reported questionnaires. The participants, with an average age of 70.3 years, comprised three men and seven women. Among them, five had a spouse or cohabitant, while five lived independently (with one residing in a nursing home). The average duration of PD diagnosis was 16.4 years, with an average of 2.6 years since the implantation of the medication pump. The ENFit tube outperformed the standard tube across all nine evaluation criteria, particularly excelling in terms of usability (items 4-6), safety (item 2) and overall product preference (item 9).

Perineural injections of incobotulinumtoxin-A for diabetic neuropathic pain of the lower extremities: protocol for a phase II, single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (the PINBOT study).

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic neuropathic pain (DNP) is a debilitating complication affecting 15-20% of people with diabetes and is a predictor of depression, poor sleep and decreased quality of life. Current pharmacological treatments are often insufficient and have significant side-effects. Subcutaneous or intradermal botulinumtoxin-A (BonT-A) is an effective and safe treatment for neuropathic pain but is limited by the need to cover the entire affected area with injections. For large cutaneous areas, infiltration of the sensory nerve supply with BonT-A could provide similar effects, with a single injection. We aim to investigate the safety, efficacy, and effects on quality of life, physical activity, depressive symptoms and activities of daily living of perineural injections of BonT-A in patients with DNP of both lower extremities. METHODS: This study is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. 80 participants with moderate to severe DNP of both legs will be randomised 1:1 to receive injections of either 100 units incobotulinumtoxin-A or a saline placebo around each distal sciatic nerve for two cycles of 12 weeks. Average daily pain scores will be recorded once a day from 1 week prior to the first treatment and through the entire study period. Primary outcomes are differences between groups in daily and weekly mean pain scores. Secondary outcomes are levels of physical activity, depression scores, health-related quality of life, activities of daily living, sensory profiles and motor function, recorded at baseline, 4, 12, 16 and 24 weeks. The use of rescue medication and adverse events will be recorded throughout the study period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Danish Committee on Health Research Ethics and the Danish Medicines Agency. EU-Clinical Trial Information System (EU: 2022-500727-68-01), clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT05623111). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals in open-access formats and data made available in anonymised form. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05623111.

Patients' and Family Members' Experiences of a Novel Nurse-Led Intervention Using Family Conversations Targeting Families Afflicted by Chronic Non-Cancer Pain.

Purpose: To explore patients' and family members' experiences of participating in an intervention using nurse-led family nursing conversations (NLFCs) targeting families affected by chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), including the perceived impact of the intervention on the individual and the family. CNCP substantially impacts patients and families. Due to a lack of simple treatment solutions, the condition needs to be managed rather than cured. Family involvement seems a promising tool, but research evaluating specific approaches is limited. Interventions based on the family systems nursing framework by Wright and Leahey have been helpful in other populations. Nonetheless, the approach warrants further investigation and evaluation in patients with CNCP. Patients and Methods: A phenomenological hermeneutical design was applied, and individual interviews were conducted with ten patients and ten family members who received the intervention. The analysis was inspired by Ricoeur's philosophy of text interpretation. Findings: Three themes emerged during the analysis. "Taking part in the intervention while being affected by previous experiences" showed that patients and family members were affected by different experiences and burdens and therefore entered the intervention with varied starting points. "Being empowered through validation and understanding" showed that participants mainly viewed the intervention as beneficial, increasing patients' and family members' mutual understanding and underpinning acceptance of the chronic pain condition. "Being receptive to the intervention - mechanisms contributing to achieving benefit" identified contributing mechanisms influencing patients' and family members' experiences of the intervention. These mechanisms included confidence in the nurses' facilitation of the intervention, the timing of the intervention, the participant's level of acceptance, and readiness to engage in the intervention. Conclusion and Relevance to Clinical Practice: The intervention was mainly experienced as helpful. Thus, healthcare settings treating CNCP should consider implementing NLFC in clinical practice with adjustments to meet the vulnerability of the CNCP population.

Late onset ataxia, chorea, and dystonia due to CANVAS.

In this case report, we present a case of a 62-year-old woman with unsteadiness due to CANVAS. In addition to sensory, cerebellar, and vestibular affection she had unusual features in the form of chorea and facial dystonia. Moreover, she had cervical dystonia which, to the best of our knowledge, has not previously been reported in CANVAS.

Dose per muscle in cervical dystonia: pooled data from seven movement disorder centres.

AIM OF STUDY: Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) injections are the established treatment in cervical dystonia (CD). But clinical practice regarding the choice of muscles into which injections are made varies between centres. Until now, there have been no dose-per-muscle recommendations based on 'searching the dose' clinical trial data. CLINICAL RATIONALE FOR STUDY: We therefore examined the dosages under real world conditions at seven international movement disorders centres, using an identical clinical approach. RESULTS: We examined 305 patients with CD (55.6 ± 13.2 years, 204 female). The most commonly injected muscles were the splenius capitis (84.9%), sternocleidomastoid (80.3%), trapezius (59.7%), levator scapulae (49.8%), semispinalis capitis (39%), and obliquus capitis inferior (36.7%). The mean total dose per treatment session with aboBoNT/A was 652.5 (SD = 285.5), with onaBoNT/A it was 159.5 (SD = 62.4), and with incoBoNT/A it was 173.4 (SD = 99.2) units. The doses injected into each muscle in the ona- or incoBoNT/A groups were between 19.7 and 48.2 units, with the highest dose for the splenius capitis with 49.2 ± 26.0 units. The doses in the aboBoNT/A group were between 69.6 and 146.4 units, and the highest dose being injected into the splenius capitis (139.6 ± 80.7 units). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In clinical trials the doses per muscle are based on an arbitrary decision. In our study, the doses were lower than in other studies, which may be due to the number of muscles per session, the use of ultrasound guidance (and therefore more precise injections), as well as the use of the Col-Cap concept. Our results exemplify everyday practice, and may help as the basis for recommendations and further investigations.

Tremor in Idiopathic Cervical Dystonia - Possible Implications for Botulinum Toxin Treatment Considering the Col-Cap Classification.

Background: Tremor is an important phenotypic feature of dystonia. Using the new concept (Col-Cap) of classification we examined the frequency of tremor in cervical dystonia (CD) patients, their main subtypes and muscles injected. Methods: In this large study conducted at multiple movement disorder centres in Europe and India, between January and June 2019, we examined 293 patients with idiopathic CD who were all treated with botulinum toxin (BTX). Results: The dystonic head tremor (DHT+) was present in 57.6 % of CD patients and they had a significantly longer duration of symptoms than patients without head tremor (DHT-). In DHT+ patients torticaput was the most common subtype and the majority (63.3%) had one or two subtypes only. There was no significant difference between the number of unilateral injections for any of the muscles in the DHT+ and DHT- groups, while the number of patients receiving bilateral injections in splenius capitis (78 vs 25; p = 0.00001), sternocleidomastoid (31 vs 6; p = 0.0005), trapezius (28 vs 9; p = 0.01), and obliquus capitis inferior (15 vs 2; p = 0.008) were significantly more in the DHT+ group. The mean doses of all three types of BTX/A were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The frequency of head tremor was 57.6% in our CD patients and torticaput was the most common dystonic subtype associated with tremor. Simple forms of CD seemed more likely associated with head tremor, than complex forms of CD. Most of the DHT+ patients received bilateral injections. The use of 'Col-Cap' classification was helpful in the identification of muscles likely to be involved in tremor in CD patients.

Preferred muscles in cervical dystonia.

The classification of abnormal posture and the assessment of the affected muscles in cervical dystonia (CD) have changed in recent years. To determine the frequency of injected muscles, we studied 306 patients with CD. The mean age was 55.5 ± 13.1 years (range 21-90), 67% were female. Splenius capitis was the most commonly injected muscle (83%), followed by sternocleidomastoid (79.1%), and trapezius muscles (58.5%). The three next most common were the levator scapulae, semispinalis capitis, and obliquus capitis inferior muscles. The study shows that the most commonly injected muscles have remained unchanged over the past few decades, although the concept has changed. However, several new muscles have been added that were previously never, or hardly ever, considered.

Frequency of different subtypes of cervical dystonia: a prospective multicenter study according to Col-Cap concept.

Patients with cervical dystonia (CD) may present with head and/or neck movements in the coronal, sagittal or transverse plane. According to the Col-Cap concept, CD postures are classified in torti-, latero-, ante- and retrocollis/caput patterns. The frequency of these different subtypes has to be evaluated. Between January and June 2019, we examined 306 patients (55.5 ± 13.1 years, 67% female) with CD according to the Col-Cap concept. They were all treated with botulinum toxin. This prospective study took place in seven different movement disorder centers. The most common primary form was torticaput (49%), the second most common was laterocaput (16.7%). All other subtypes were less than 10% of the study population. Pure forms were observed in 16.3% of patients only. Torticaput was combined in 46% with laterocaput, and in 20.7% with retrocaput. Laterocaput was combined mainly with torticaput (45.1%), laterocollis (33.2%) or retrocaput (23.5%). Shift forms were found in 14.7%, but diagnosed only in 3.9%. On average, the patients had 2.51 (± SD 1.09) subtypes each. Tremor was observed in 55.6%. The mean number of injected muscles was 4.4 (SD 1.6). The most often injected muscles were splenius capitis (83%), sternocleidomatoideus (79.1%), and upper trapezius (58.5%). This is the first multicenter study to examine the frequency of different subtypes of CD according to the Col-Cap concept. The caput subforms are more common than the cervical types, with torticaput as the most common one. Shift forms were diagnosed less often than described. Pure forms are very rare, combinations of 2-6 subtypes are common (83.7%). Sternocleidomatoideus, splenius capitis and trapezius muscles were still injected most often, but the muscles rarely injected in the past such as levator scapulae (48.7%), obliquus capitis inferior (35.3%) and longissimus (16.7%) were considered quite often. Since optimal therapy results depend on the injection of the right muscles, the correct classification should optimize the treatment outcome.

Botulinum toxin treatment of spasticity targeted to muscle endplates: an international, randomised, evaluator-blinded study comparing two different botulinum toxin injection strategies for the treatment of upper limb spasticity.

OBJECTIVES: The therapeutic effects of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) are well documented in upper limb spasticity. However, several factors may influence treatment efficacy, including targeting of neuromuscular junctions (NMJs). We examined whether NMJ-targeted BoNT injections were non-inferior, in terms of efficacy, to current injection practices. DESIGN: Open-label prospective evaluator-blinded study. SETTING: Conducted across 20 medical centres in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden (24 September 2012 to 11 March 2015). PARTICIPANTS: Aged ˃18 years with upper limb spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS] score of 2 or 3) following stroke or traumatic brain injury, had received ≥2 consecutive BoNT-A treatment cycles (the latest of which was abobotulinumtoxinA [aboBoNT-A]) and needed BoNT-A retreatment (same modality as previous cycle). Patients requiring aboBoNT-A doses >800units were excluded. In total, 88 patients were randomised (intention-to-treat [ITT] population), most were male (n=58/88, 65.9%) and 54/88 (61.4%) completed the study (per protocol [PP] population). INTERVENTIONS: Randomisation (1:1) to receive a single dose of aboBoNT-A (≤800 U) according to either current clinical practice (300 U/mL) or as an NMJ-targeted injection (100 U/mL). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of patients with a ≥1 level reduction from baseline in MAS score at week 4 post-injection (responders). RESULTS: In the ITT population, the proportion of responders at elbow flexors was 72.7% in the current practice group and 56.8% in the NMJ-targeted group (adjusted difference -0.1673 [95% CIs: -0.3630 to 0.0284]; p=0.0986). Similar results were observed in the PP population (69.0% vs 68.0%, respectively, adjusted difference 0.0707 [-0.1948 to 0.3362]; p=0.6052). CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the limited number of participants, non-inferiority of NMJ-targeted injections could not be determined. However, there was no statistical difference between groups. Larger studies are needed confirm whether the two techniques offer comparable efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01682148.

Treatment diary for botulinum toxin spasticity treatment: a pilot study.

The aim of this study is to develop a treatment diary for patients receiving spasticity treatment including botulinum toxin injection and physiotherapy and/or occupational therapy. The diary focuses on problems triggered by skeletal muscle overactivity; agreed goals for treatment and the patient's self-evaluation of achievement on the Goal Attainment Scale; which skeletal muscles were injected; physiotherapists' and occupational therapists' evaluation of the patients' achievement of objectives on the Goal Attainment Scale; and proposals for optimization of treatment and changing goals. The evaluation included a satisfaction questionnaire and the WHO-QoL BREF and WHO-5 well-being score. Overall, 10 patients were enrolled in the pilot study. The patients were generally satisfied with the diary, found that it involved them more in their treatment and made it easier to set personal goals, and found it worth the time spent using it. However, no clear advantage in relation to their quality of life (WHO-QoL BREF and WHO-5 well-being score) was reported.

Muscle after spinal cord injury.

The morphological and contractile changes of muscles below the level of the lesion after spinal cord injury (SCI) are dramatic. In humans with SCI, a fiber-type transformation away from type I begins 4-7 months post-SCI and reaches a new steady state with predominantly fast glycolytic IIX fibers years after the injury. There is a progressive drop in the proportion of slow myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform fibers and a rise in the proportion of fibers that coexpress both the fast and slow MHC isoforms. The oxidative enzymatic activity starts to decline after the first few months post-SCI. Muscles from individuals with chronic SCI show less resistance to fatigue, and the speed-related contractile properties change, becoming faster. These findings are also present in animals. Future studies should longitudinally examine changes in muscles from early SCI until steady state is reached in order to determine optimal training protocols for maintaining skeletal muscle after paralysis.