Developing and applying synergistic multilevel implementation strategies to promote reach of an evidence-based parenting intervention in primary care.

Background: This practical implementation report describes a primary care-based group parenting intervention-Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement in Primary Care (PriCARE)-and the approach taken to understand and strengthen the referral process for PriCARE within a pediatric primary care clinic through the deployment of synergistic implementation strategies to promote physician referrals. PriCARE has evidence of effectiveness for reducing child behavior problems, harsh and permissive parenting, and parent stress from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The integration of evidence-based parenting interventions into pediatric primary care is a promising means for widespread dissemination. Yet, even when integrated into this setting, the true reach will depend on parents knowing about and attending the intervention. A key factor in this process is the endorsement of and referral to the intervention by the child's pediatrician. Therefore, identifying strategies to improve physician referrals to parenting interventions embedded in primary care is worthy of investigation. Method: Through lessons learned from the RCTs and key informant interviews with stakeholders, we identified barriers and facilitators to physician referrals of eligible parent-child dyads to PriCARE. Based on this data, we selected and implemented five strategies to increase the PriCARE referral rate. We outline the selection process, the postulated synergistic interactions, and the results of these efforts. Conclusions: The following five discrete strategies were implemented: physician reminders, direct advertising to patients, incentives/public recognition, interpersonal patient narratives, and audit and feedback. These discrete strategies were synergistically combined to create a multifaceted approach to improve physician referrals. Following implementation, referrals increased from 13% to 55%. Continued development, application, and evaluation of implementation strategies to promote the uptake of evidence-based parenting interventions into general use in the primary care setting are discussed. Plain Language Summary: There is strong evidence that parenting interventions are effective at improving child behavioral health outcomes when delivered in coordination with pediatric primary care. However, there is a lack of focus on the implementation, including the screening and referral process, of parenting interventions in the primary care setting. This is contributing to the delay in the scale-up of parenting interventions and to achieving public health impact. To address this gap, we identified barriers and facilitators to physician screening and referrals to a primary care-based parenting intervention, and selected and piloted five synergistic strategies to improve this critical process. This effort successfully increased physician referrals of eligible patients to the intervention from 13% to 55%. This demonstration project may help advance the implementation of evidence-based interventions by providing an example of how to develop and execute multilevel strategies to improve intervention referrals in a local context.

Patterns in opioid prescription in the United States by region and prescribers over a 4-year period.

BACKGROUND: As determinants of the opioid epidemic are several, describing patterns of opioid prescription over time is of importance. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the prescribing patterns of opioids per US region and physician specialty from 2012 to 2015. METHODS: Truven Health Analytics MarketScan® Databases were used to obtain data on opioid prescription rates per US region and physician specialty for the years 2012-2015. Opioids included in the study are tramadol, hydrocodone, codeine, oxycodone, oxymorphone, methadone, and fentanyl. RESULTS: Starting sample consisted of 5,860,096 individuals. An increase in prescriptions was seen for codeine (22.3 percent), oxycodone (22.4 percent), and tramadol (22.4 percent), while other opioids had decreases between 6.5 and 20.2 percent during this period. Family medicine physicians were the most frequent prescriber for all opioids except for oxycodone; nonphysician prescribers' share of prescriptions nearly doubled for all opioids. The share of oxycodone and of tramadol among all opioids increased in all regions, while the opposite was seen for hydrocodone. Codeine prescription share increased substantially in the South but not in other regions. When comparing the period of 2012-2015, differences were significant for all regions (p < 0.0001 for all regions). In 2015, the rate of prescription of oxycodone was nearly twofold higher in the Northeast vs North Central (38 percent vs 18.5 percent, p < 0.0001), while tramadol was substantially more frequently prescribed in the South, where it responded to nearly 20 percent of all opioid prescriptions (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Patterns of prescription per opioid vary considerably per physician specialty and per US region. Although an overall decrease in prescriptions was seen, certain opioids were more frequently prescribed in 2015 than in 2012.

Tramadol Prescription over a 4-Year Period in the USA.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Deaths associated to tramadol, a synthetic opioid, are rising globally. Herein, we characterize prescription patterns of tramadol relative to other opioids in the USA from 2012 to 2015, by geographic region and physician specialty. RECENT FINDINGS: Data on opioid was obtained using Truven Health Analytics MarketScan for the years 2012-2015. Inclusion criteria included subjects living in the USA with ages from 12 to 64 years. Patterns of prescription of tramadol were contrasted with other prescription opioids including hydrocodone, codeine, oxycodone, oxymorphone, methadone, and fentanyl. Between 2012 and 2015, prescriptions for tramadol increased by 22.8%. The absolute rate of prescription varies considerably per region, with tramadol representing nearly 20% of opioid prescriptions in the South, which, in turn, represents nearly 50% of all prescriptions in the USA. Significant differences were seen when comparing prescribers of tramadol with other opioids (p < 0.0001). Tramadol was more frequently prescribed by family practice (40% vs. 32%) and internal medicine physicians (19% vs. 16%). Family medicine, internal medicine, and non-physician prescribers responded by 67.2% of all tramadol prescriptions in 2015. The proportion of patients receiving tramadol from non-physician prescribers increased by 56% between 2012 and 2015 (p < 0.001) IOM. Tramadol prescriptions rates have continuously increased both nationally and throughout all US regions. Important differences exist among regions and physician specialties. These results may be helpful in the creation of regional policies to monitor reasons for this increase and to avoid excessive use of tramadol.