Acute headache in pregnant and post-partum patients: A clinical review.

BACKGROUND: Headaches during pregnancy and the post-partum period may be due to either an exacerbation of a pre-existing neurological presentation, a new pregnancy-related process, or a non-pregnancy related condition. Key physiologic changes during pregnancy and the post-partum period contribute to the vulnerability of this patient population and the increased risk of complications. OBJECTIVE OF THE REVIEW: Review causes of headaches in pregnant and post-partum patients as well as neuroimaging techniques performed. DISCUSSION: Headaches are a common complaint for pregnant and post-partum patients. For pregnant patients, a range of serious causes must be considered including cerebral venous thrombosis, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and stroke. Primary headaches are responsible for most post-partum headaches, however other causes also include pre-clampsia, cerebral venous thrombosis and post-dural headache. Determining the optimal imaging technique in this vulnerable population remains a challenge given the scarce guidelines. CONCLUSION: The greatest difficulty while evaluating pregnant and post-partum patients presenting with an acute headache in an emergency setting is to determine whether the headache is due to a primary disorder such as migraines or is secondary to an underlying, sometimes serious pathology. The following review explores evidenced-based diagnosis of headache in this particular setting.

Resident Attitudes Toward Performing Pelvic Examinations in the Emergency Department.

Mounting evidence suggests that emergency physicians tend to avoid patients with gynecologic chief complaints, and that avoidance may be higher for male physicians compared to females. One underlying reason could be discomfort with performing pelvic examinations. The goal of this study was to assess whether male residents report greater discomfort with pelvic examinations than females. We performed a cross-sectional, Institutional Review Board-approved survey of residents at 6 academic emergency medicine programs. Of 100 residents who completed the survey, 63 self-identified as male, 36 female, and one selected "prefer not to say" and was excluded. Responses were compared between male and females using chi-square tests. In secondary analysis, t-tests were used to compare preferences for various chief complaints. Self-reported comfort with pelvic examinations did not differ significantly between males and females (p = 0.4249). Barriers for male respondents in performing pelvic examinations included lack of training, general dislike, and concern the patient would prefer female providers. Male residents had a statistically significant higher aversion ranking towards patients with vaginal bleeding than female residents (mean difference = 0.48, confidence interval = 0.11-0.87). Aversion ranking was the same between males and females on other chief complaints. There is a gender disparity among male and female residents in attitudes towards patients with vaginal bleeding. However, the results from this study do not demonstrate a significant difference in self-reported comfort amongst male and female residents in performing pelvic examinations. This disparity may be driven by other barriers, including self-reported lack of training and concern about patients' physician gender preferences.

Impact of COVID-19 on emergency medicine resident procedure performance.

Background: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, patterns of patient presentations and medical education have changed, potentially resulting in fewer and different types of patient encounters. Procedural proficiency is a cornerstone of emergency medicine (EM) training, and residents must meet Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements to graduate. It is feared there may have been a pandemic-induced decrease in opportunities for residents to perform procedures. This study investigates the change in procedures performed by EM residents during the initial year of the pandemic. Methods: This study utilized a multicenter retrospective design. Across three EM residency programs, logs of 14 ACGME-required procedures performed by residents were reviewed. For each procedure, counts were compared prepandemic year (March 2019 to February 2020) to during pandemic year (March 2020 to February 2021). Procedures were further grouped into 4-month periods: March to June, July to October, and November to February. Results: A total of 113 EM resident physicians were included in this study. Procedures performed by EM residents tended to decrease during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were statistically significant decreases in number of annual cricothyrotomies (2.4 vs. 0.9, p < 0.001) and pediatric trauma resuscitations (5.7 vs. 3.9, p = 0.024). Comparing the first 4-month periods of each year, there were significant decreases in cardiac pacing (6.3 vs. 5.4, p = 0.038), chest tubes (2.2 vs. 1.0, p < 0.001), cricothyrotomies (0.6 vs. 0.1, p = 0.001), intubations (8.2 vs. 4.4, p = 0.002), and pericardiocenteses (1.7 vs. 0.2, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a decrease in the number of procedures performed per EM resident in many of the domains required by the ACGME. Although only some procedures had statically significant decreases, it remains to be seen if this will lead to decreased resident procedural competency. Further research may be required in this area to determine any such effect.

The Ethics of Procedural Education Under Pandemic Conditions.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted emergency medicine residents' education. Early in the pandemic, many facilities lacked adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), and intubation was considered particularly high risk for transmission to physicians, leading hospitals to limit the number of individuals present during the procedure. This posed difficulties for residents and academic faculty, as opportunities to perform endotracheal intubation during residency are limited, but patients with COVID-19 requiring intubation are unstable and have difficult airways. Case Scenario: When PPE is being rationed, who should be the one to perform an intubation on a patient with respiratory failure from severe COVID-19? DISCUSSION: We examined this case scenario using the ethical frameworks of bioethical principles and virtue ethics. Bioethical principles include justice, beneficence, nonmalfeasance, and autonomy, and virtue ethics emphasizes the provision of moral exemplars and opportunities to exercise practical wisdom. Arguments for an attending-only strategy include the role of the attending as a truly autonomous decision maker and the importance of providing residents with a moral exemplar. A resident-only strategy benefits a resident's future patients and provides opportunities for residents to exercise character. Strategies preserving the dyad of attending and resident maintain these advantages and mitigate some drawbacks, while intubation teams may provide the most parsimonious use of PPE, but may elide resident involvement. CONCLUSIONS: There exist compelling motivations for involving senior residents and attendings in high-risk intubations during the COVID-19 pandemic. A just strategy will preserve residents' role whenever possible, while maximizing supervision and providing alternative routes for intubation practice.

Pathway-Based Reduction of Repeat Head Computed Tomography for Patients With Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Implementation and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Routine follow-up head imaging in complicated mild traumatic brain injury (cmTBI) patients has not been shown to alter treatment, improve outcomes, or identify patients in need of neurosurgical intervention. We developed a follow-up head computed tomography (CT) triage algorithm for cmTBI patients to decrease the number of routine follow-up head CT scans obtained in this population. OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with protocol implications and patient outcome. METHODS: Data on all cmTBI patients presenting from July 1, 2018 to June 31, 2019, to our level 1, tertiary, academic medical center were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: Of the 178 patients enrolled, 52 (29%) received a follow-up head CT. A total of 27 patients (15%) were scanned because of initial presentation and triaged to the group to receive a routine follow-up head CT. A total of 151 patients (85%) were triaged to the group without routine follow-up head CT scan. Protocol adherence was 89% with 17 violations. CONCLUSION: Utilizing this protocol, we were able to safely decrease the use of routine follow-up head CT scans in cmTBI patients by 71% without any missed injuries or delayed surgery. Adoption of the protocol was high among all services managing TBI patients.

Retrospective Review of Pregnant Patients Presenting for Evaluation of Acute Neurologic Complaints.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Data suggest an increase in neurologic-related hospitalizations during pregnancy. It is crucial for health care providers to develop effective strategies to evaluate this young, generally healthy cohort of patients for whom missed neurologic diagnoses can have devastating results. We aim to describe the epidemiology of this high risk patient population by investigating exam findings, imaging studies, and clinical outcomes of pregnant women presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute neurologic complaints. METHODS: We conducted a 7-year retrospective chart review of pregnant patients presenting with neurologic chief complaints to the emergency department of an urban tertiary academic medical center in the northeastern United States. We investigated examination findings, imaging studies, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2010, and May 31, 2017, 205 pregnant patients presented to the ED with a neurologic chief complaint. The majority of patients had a normal neurologic examination result. Patients with an abnormal examination result were not more likely to have clinically significant imaging findings. Within our population, 28% underwent imaging, and noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging was the most common modality. Five patients had clinically significant imaging findings. Specifically, 3.3% of patients with abnormal examination result had significant findings and 2.3% of those with a normal examination result had significant findings. A minority of the patients with a visit resulting in discharge (9.8%) returned to the ED within a 7-day period. None required additional neuroimaging. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, our study is unique in that it incorporated all neurologic complaints. Headache was the most common complaint, followed by dizziness and seizures. Most of the headaches were related to first-trimester migraines. There was a high incidence of imaging used in clinical practice even when there was a normal neurologic examination result. A normal examination result does not adequately exclude serious intracranial pathology, and diagnostic vigilance is justified.

Outcomes of a novel ED observation pathway for mild traumatic brain injury and associated intracranial hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that the majority of non-anticoagulated patients with small subdural or subarachnoid intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in the setting of mild traumatic brain injury do not experience clinical deterioration or require neurosurgical intervention. We implemented a novel ED observation pathway to reduce unnecessary admissions among patients with ICH in the setting of mild TBI (complicated mild TBI, cmTBI). METHODS: Prospective, single-center study of ED patients presenting to a Level-1 Trauma Center, 4/2016-12/2018. INCLUSION CRITERIA: head injury with GCS ≥ 14, minor positive CT findings (i.e. subdural hematoma <1 cm). EXCLUSION CRITERIA: GCS < 14, multi-system trauma procedural intervention or admission, epidural hematoma, skull fracture, seizure, anticoagulant/antiplatelet use beyond aspirin, physician discretion. OUTCOMES: pathway completion rate, ED length-of-stay (LOS), neurosurgical intervention, hospital LOS, 7-day return visits. RESULTS: 138 patients met all pathway criteria and were included in analysis. 113/138 (81.9%) patients were discharged home after observation with mean ED LOS of 17.3 h (median 15.4 h, SD +/- 10.5) including 91/111 (81.9%) patients transferred from outside hospitals (median 18.1 h, SD +/- 11.0). Increased age and aspirin use were correlated with pathway non-completion requiring admission, but not due to hematoma expansion. Among admitted patients, none required neurosurgical intervention. Seven (5.1%) 7-day return visits occurred, 3 (2%) related to initial cmTBI; 1 (0.9%) was admitted for neurologic monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: ED observation for patients with cmTBI resulted in an 82% pathway completion rate, including outside hospital transfers. These results suggest that patients with cmTBI may be safely discharged from the ED after a brief period of observation. Our pathway protocol and implementation involved neurosurgical consultation and the ability to perform repeat neurologic exams in the ED. Future studies should examine the feasibility of non-transfer protocols for appropriately selected patients and access to neurosurgical expertise in the community setting.

Getting to the heart of the issue: senior emergency resident electrocardiogram interpretation and its impact on quality assurance events.

OBJECTIVE: Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation skills are of critical importance for diagnostic accuracy and patient safety. In our emergency department (ED), senior third-year emergency medicine residents (EM3s) are the initial interpreters of all ED ECGs. While this is an integral part of emergency medicine education, the accuracy of ECG interpretation is unknown. We aimed to review the adverse quality assurance (QA) events associated with ECG interpretation by EM3s. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all ED ECGs performed between October 2015 and October 2018, which were read primarily by EM3s, at an urban tertiary care medical center treating 56,000 patients per year. All cases referred to the ED QA committee during this time were reviewed. Cases involving a perceived error were referred to a 20-member committee of ED leadership staff, attendings, residents, and nurses for further consensus review. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: EM3s read 92,928 ECGs during the study period. Of the 3,983 total ED QA cases reviewed, errors were identified in 268 (6.7%; 95% CI, 6.0%-7.6%). Four of the 268 errors involved ECG misinterpretation or failure to act on an ECG abnormality by a resident (1.5%; 95% CI, 0.0%-2.9%). CONCLUSION: A small percentage of the cases referred to the QA committee were a result of EM3 misinterpretation of ECGs. The majority of emergency medicine residencies do not include the senior resident as a primary interpreter of ECGs. These findings support the use of EM3s as initial ED ECG interpreters to increase their clinical exposure.

A Case Report of Acute Transverse Myelitis Following Novel Coronavirus Infection.

INTRODUCTION: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, emergency providers are not only seeing an increasing number of patients with COVID-19 infections, but also associated complications and sequelae of this viral illness. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 28-year-old female patient who presented after a confirmed COVID-19 infection with lower back pain, bilateral symmetric upper and lower extremity numbness, and urinary retention. The patient was diagnosed with acute transverse myelitis. She required intravenous corticosteroids and plasma exchange with significant improvement in symptoms and minimal residual effects. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the importance of prompt recognition and treatment of sequelae of COVID-19 infections.

Turning The Tables On Tradition: Flipped High-Fidelity Simulation To Potentiate Learning.

Innovative teaching modalities are more popular than ever within medical education. Examples include the flipped classroom model, incorporation of digital media and use of high-fidelity simulation technology. Our novel flipped simulation curriculum proposes the use of the flipped teaching method within the simulation lab for undergraduate and graduate medical education. With a focus on case-based learning, procedural skill development, and clinical excellence, flipped simulation incorporates many of the most important facets of medical education.

Chest computed tomography imaging utility for radiographically occult rib fractures in elderly fall-injured patients.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrate an association between rib fractures and morbidity and mortality in trauma. This relationship in low-mechanism injuries, such as ground-level fall, is less clearly defined. Furthermore, computed tomography (CT) has increased sensitivity for rib fractures compared with chest x-ray (CXR); its utility in elderly fall patients is unknown. We sought to determine whether CT-diagnosed rib fractures in elderly fall patients with a normal CXR were associated with increased in-hospital resource utilization or mortality. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of emergency department patients presenting over a 3-year period. INCLUSION CRITERIA: age, 65 years or older; chief complaint, including mechanical fall; and both CXR and CT obtained. We quantified rib fractures on CXR and CT and reported operating characteristics for both. Outcomes of interest included hospital admission/length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) admission/LOS, endotracheal intubation, tube thoracostomy, locoregional anesthesia, pneumonia, in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: We identified 330 patients, mean age was 84 years (±SD, 9.4 years); 269 (82%) of 330 were admitted. There were 96 (29%) patients with CT-diagnosed rib fracture, 56 (17%) by CT only. Compared with CT, CXR had a sensitivity of 40% (95% confidence interval, 30-50%) and specificity of 99% (95% confidence interval, 97-100%) for rib fracture. A median of two additional radiographically occult rib fractures were identified on CT. Despite an increased hospital admission rate (91% vs. 78%) p = 0.02, there was no difference between patients with and without radiographically occult (CT+ CXR-) rib fracture(s) for: median LOS (4; interquartile range (IQR) 2-7 vs 4, IQR 2-8); p = 0.92), ICU admission (28% vs. 27%) p = 0.62, median ICU LOS (2, IQR 1-8 vs 3, IQR 1-5) p = 0.54, or in-hospital mortality (10.3% vs. 7.3%) p = 0.45. CONCLUSION: Among elderly fall patients, CT-identified rib fractures were associated with increased hospital admissions. However, there was no difference in procedural interventions, ICU admission, hospital/ICU LOS or mortality for patients with and without radiographically occult fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, level III.

Pre-matriculation clinical experience positively correlates with Step 1 and Step 2 scores.

BACKGROUND: This study investigates whether students with pre-matriculation, formalized, clinical experience performed better in Step 1 and Step 2 of the United States Medical Licensing Exams (USMLE) compared to students without formal pre-matriculation clinical experience. METHODS: This research investigation was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the University of Arizona College of Medicine in Tucson, Arizona, USA, and analyzed students in the Class of 2017 and Class of 2018. Formal clinical experience was defined as registered nurses, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, or licensed practical nurses for any amount of time prior to matriculation, as well as scribing for at least 6 months prior to matriculation. Students with any amount of shadowing experience were not considered to have clinical experience. The authors performed multiple regression analyses to investigate the effects of formal clinical experience on USMLE exam performance. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4. RESULTS: Our study had a total of 227 students from the two classes, with 40 (17.6%) having formal pre-matriculation clinical experience, as already defined. Nine (3.96%) students were not assessed in USMLE Step 1 calculations, and 61 (26.9%) students were not assessed in USMLE Step 2 calculations due to an absence of recorded USMLE scores. Formal pre-matriculation clinical experience was a statistically significant positive predictor of USMLE Step 1 score (P=0.03) and USMLE Step 2 score (P<0.010). CONCLUSION: Formal pre-matriculation clinical experience, as defined previously, positively correlates with an increase in USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 scores.

Fourth-year medical students do not perform a focused physical examination during a case-based simulation scenario.

BACKGROUND: The art of physical examination is one of the most valuable diagnostic tools bestowed upon new generations of medical students. Despite traditional educational techniques and significant attention on a national level, both trainees and educators have noticed a decrease in physical examination proficiency. Simulation has been identified as a potential way to improve physical examination techniques within undergraduate medical education. We sought to determine the utility of a cardiac case-based simulation scenario to assess physical examination performance of fourth-year medical students during an emergency medicine (EM) clerkship. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourth-year medical students enrolled in a 4-week EM clerkship were prospectively evaluated during a case-based scenario using a simulation mannequin (Laerdal SimMan®). The case involved a patient presenting with chest pain that evolved into cardiac arrest. All simulations were video recorded and two emergency physicians reviewed each video. The reviewers recorded whether or not each student completed the essential components of a focused physical examination. RESULTS: Twenty-seven students participated in the simulation. The percentage of students completing each of the four components of the physical examination was as follows: cardiac auscultation 33.3% (95% CI 18.5-52.3), lung auscultation 29.6% (95% CI 15.7-48.7), pulse and extremity examination 55.6% (95% CI 37.3-72.4), and abdominal examination 3.70% (95% CI 0-19.8). None of the students completed all four of these components. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that fourth-year medical students did not uniformly perform components of a focused physical examination during a high-acuity chest pain simulation scenario. Although our study showed limited physical examination performance, simulation allows evaluators to observe and provide constructive feedback and may lead to an improvement in these skills. These findings call for improved technology to increase authenticity of simulators and continued faculty development for more creative, meaningful integration of physical examination skills into high-acuity simulation cases.