Perception and Attitude of Turkish Gastroenterologists Toward Obesity: A Nationwide Survey Conducted by the Obesity Study Group of the Turkish Gastroenterology Association.

BACKGROUND/AIMS:  Gastroenterologists have an important role in the treatment and management of comorbidities related to obesity. Assessment of gastroenterologists' perception and attitude toward obesity was aimed in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  Survey questions were determined for the study. An online questionnaire was prepared afterward. Participants were invited via e-mail by providing them with information about the study. It was ensured that those who accepted the study could access the questionnaire form with the relevant link. Participants who answered all questions were included in the study. RESULTS:  Totally 117 gastroenterologists were included in the study. The proportion of gastroenterologists who thought that obesity complicates the management of gastroenterological diseases and those who thought obesity as a factor that negatively affects the prognosis of gastroenterological diseases was determined as 88.9% and 95.7%, respectively. Among the obese patients, the proportion of those who applied diet therapy, exercise, pharmacotherapy, and endoscopic methods was 94%, 91.5%, 35%, and 37.6%, respectively. The rates of intragastric balloon therapy and intragastric botulinum toxin A injection were 30% and 21.4%, respectively. The proportion of those who agreed that obese patients lost a significant amount of weight with the treatment methods applied was 47.2%. The proportion of participants who agreed that long-term maintenance of weight loss was impossible for most obese patients was 59.8%. CONCLUSION:  To our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluates the perception and attitude of gastroenterologists toward obesity. Our study results show that gastroenterologists think that obesity is a chronic disease and that gastroenterologists should be involved in management of obesity.

Combination of Precut Techniques in Difficult Biliary Cannulation.

Background: Selective biliary cannulation (SBC) is a prerequisite for successful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). SBC has the potential to fail in as many as 20% of cases, even with skilled endoscopists. Precut incision techniques like needle-knife sphincterotomy (NKS) and transpancreatic septotomy (TPS) can be used in cases where standard cannulation techniques fail. However, these precut techniques may also fail in some cases. We aimed to evaluate the procedural success of the combined TPS + NKS technique in difficult biliary cannulation. Patients and methods: The study included 289 patients who underwent ERCP with precut techniques from 2017 to 2022. Patients were classified into the following three groups and evaluated retrospectively in terms of cannulation success, and ERCP-related adverse effects: Transpancreatic septotomy, NKS, and TPS + NKS; statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS), version 29.0, software was used to analyze the data. Results: The success rate of SBC was 69% in the TPS group, 75.3% in the NCS group, and 87% in the TPS + NCS group. There was no significant difference between the NKS and TPS + NKS groups. Cannulation success in both NKS group and NKS + TPS groups was significantly higher than in the TPS group (p < 0.001). Complication rates were similar. Conclusion: In cases where standard sphincterotomy and precut techniques fail, a second precut technique can be used. A previous TPS does not prevent NKS. How to cite this article: Abiyev A, Tuzcu B, Bilican G, et al. Combination of Precut Techniques in Difficult Biliary Cannulation. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024;14(1):56-59.

Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis: Results from a Single Turkey Center Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Currently malignancies of the liver are the sixth most frequently diagnosed cancers worldwide. The admission of patients to hospitals decreased due to the restriction of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, especially patients suspected with cancer were delayed in their diagnosis and treatment. With this study, we aimed to investigate whether the Covid-19 pandemic caused a decrease in the number of hepatocellular cancers (HCC) or a delay in its diagnosis. METHODS: The study, which included newly diagnosed HCC patients, was conducted as a retrospective cross sectional study, in a single Turkey medical center. The patients were divided into pre-COVID-19 and post- COVID-19 two-year periods and compared in terms of tumor size, biochemical parameters, clinical and demographic features. RESULTS: A total of 63 HCC patients, 46 (73%) patients before the COVID-19 pandemic and 17 (27%) patients diagnosed during the COVID-19 pandemic were included. Maximum diameter of lesions and serum alpha- fetoprotein levels showed a statistically significant difference between the groups. Maximum tumor size in the pre-COVID-19 period was 4.58±3.77 mm, while in the COVID-19 period was 7.42±6.88 mm, the difference between two groups being statistically significant (p<0.05). HCC in the pre-COVID-19 period were detected mostly at Barcelona Clinic for Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A (45.7%, n=21), while in the COVID-19 period most of HCC were detected at stage B (35.3%, n=6). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic limited the access of patients to screening programs for HCC. The significant disruption in screening cirrhotic patients for HCC has led to a delay in diagnosis.