Diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is it cost-effective in the current era?

INTRODUCTION: For patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer, diagnostic laparoscopy may identify liver and peritoneal metastases that are difficult to detect with other staging modalities. The aim of this study was to utilize a population-based pancreatic cancer database to assess the cost effectiveness of preoperative laparoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from a state cancer registry were linked with primary medical record data for years 1996-2003. De-identified patient records were reviewed to determine the role and findings of laparoscopic exploration. Average hospital and physician charges for laparotomy, biliary bypass, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and laparoscopy were determined by review of billing data from our institution and Medicare data for fiscal years 2005-2006. Cost-effectiveness was determined by comparing three methods of utilization of laparoscopy: (1) routine (all patients), (2) case-specific, and (3) no utilization. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of 298 potentially resectable patients, 86 underwent laparoscopy. The prevalence of unresectable disease was 14.1% diagnosed at either laparotomy or laparoscopy. The mean charge per patient for routine, case-specific, and no utilization of laparoscopy was $91,805, $90,888, and $93,134, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cost analysis indicates that the case-specific or routine use of laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer does not add significantly to the overall expense of treatment and supports the use of laparoscopy in patients with known or suspected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

The use of trimodality therapy for the treatment of operable esophageal carcinoma in the veteran population: patient survival and outcome analysis.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to improve the cure rates associated with surgical therapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is being used with increasing frequency before resection (trimodality therapy). A variety of clinical trials have reviewed this approach, but only one study to the authors' knowledge has shown a survival benefit for trimodality therapy. The extent to which trimodality therapy has gained acceptance in general practice is not clear. The objective of the current study was to determine the extent to which both surgery and trimodality therapy are used for the management of esophageal carcinoma within a large, national health care system and to determine the outcome of patients treated with these treatment approaches. METHODS: The current study was a retrospective cohort study. The study population was comprised of all veterans who underwent either surgery alone or trimodality therapy for operable esophageal carcinoma between the fiscal years of 1993 and 1997. Data were obtained from the Veterans Administration Patient Treatment File, Outpatient Clinic File, and the Beneficiary Identification Record Locator System. The main outcome measures were perioperative mortality and patient survival. RESULTS: During the study period, 695 patients underwent either surgery alone or trimodality therapy for esophageal carcinoma. Five hundred thirty-four (77%) patients were treated with surgery only. One hundred sixty-one (23%) patients underwent surgery after induction chemoradiotherapy (trimodality therapy). Patients selected for trimodality therapy were younger (mean age, 60.8 years vs. 65.6 years), had fewer comorbidities, and were more likely to have a midesophageal tumor. The median survival for all patients was 15.2 months. The type of treatment had no apparent effect on survival. Favorable prognostic factors included younger age, a distal esophageal tumor, and the absence of metastases. The overall perioperative mortality was 13.7 %. The use of trimodality therapy did not increase perioperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Trimodality therapy is commonly used within the VA system. The nonrandomized nature of this study does not allow comparison of trimodality therapy to surgery alone, but the overall survival was limited for all patients. The predictors of survival are related to the biology of the disease, and they include patient age, tumor location, and stage at diagnosis.

Acute presentation of transverse colon injury following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement: case report and review of current management.

We describe a case of a patient who had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placed for enteral access. The patient's medical history was remarkable for chronic malnutrition, coronary artery disease, coronary bypass surgery, and severe esophageal dysmotility. We discuss the patient&'s course through treatment and we review the management options for patients that sustain colonic injury related to PEG placement. We conclude that colonic injury can be difficult to diagnose in the acute setting and that diagnosis may be facilitated by abdominal computerized tomographic (CT) scanning.

Pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma: analysis of patterns of diseases and postmetastasis survival.

OBJECTIVE: To report the patterns of disease and postmetastasis survival for patients with pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma in a large group of patients treated at a single institution. Clinical factors that influence postmetastasis survival are analyzed. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: For patients with soft tissue sarcoma, the lungs are the most common site of metastatic disease. Although pulmonary metastases most commonly arise from primary tumors in the extremities, they may arise from almost any primary site or histology. To date, resection of disease has been the only effective therapy for metastatic sarcoma. METHODS: From July 1982 to February 1997, 3149 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma were admitted and treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. During this interval, 719 patients either developed or presented with lung metastases. Patients were treated with resection of metastatic disease whenever possible. Disease-specific survival was the endpoint of the study. Time to death was modeled using the method of Kaplan and Meier. The association of factors to time-to-event endpoints was analyzed using the log-rank test for univariate analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The overall median survival from diagnosis of pulmonary metastasis for all patients was 15 months. The 3-year actuarial survival rate was 25%. The ability to resect all metastatic disease completely was the most important prognostic factor for survival. Patients treated with complete resection had a median survival of 33 months and a 3-year actuarial survival rate of 46%. For patients treated with nonoperative therapy, the median survival was 11 months. A disease-free interval of more than 12 months before the development of metastases was also a favorable prognostic factor. Unfavorable factors included the histologic variants of liposarcoma and malignant peripheral nerve tumors and patient age older than 50 years at the time of treatment of metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of metastatic disease is the single most important factor that determines outcome in these patients. Long-term survival is possible in selected patients, particularly when recurrent pulmonary disease is resected. Surgical excision should remain the treatment of choice for metastases of soft tissue sarcoma to the lung.

Multifactorial analysis of the survival of patients with distant metastasis arising from primary extremity sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Despite optimal multimodality limb-sparing therapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS), a significant number of patients develop distant metastasis. The objective of this study was to analyze patterns of metastatic disease and define prognostic factors for survival in a large group of patients followed prospectively at a single institution. METHODS: Between July 1, 1982, and June 30, 1996, all adult patients admitted to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center with primary extremity sarcoma were treated and prospectively followed. Patients who developed distant metastases constituted the study group. Prognostic factors were analyzed for postmetastasis survival. These included both factors related to the primary tumor and factors related to the pattern of metastasis. Postmetastasis survival was modeled using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical significance was evaluated using the log rank test for univariate analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, the authors admitted and treated 994 patients with primary extremity STS. The median follow-up was 33 months. Distant metastasis developed in 230 patients (23%). Median survival after distant metastasis was 11.6 months. The lungs were the first metastatic site in 169 patients (73%). Other first sites of metastasis included the skin and soft tissues of the head and neck, trunk, and extremities. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between patients with pulmonary and those with nonpulmonary metastatic disease. In multivariate analysis, resection of metastatic disease, the length of the disease free interval, the presence of a preceding local recurrence, and patient age > 50 years all were significant predictors of postmetastasis survival. Other factors that defined the primary tumor, including histologic grade, depth, and microscopic margins, were not associated with postmetastasis survival. CONCLUSIONS: Despite optimal multimodality therapy, 23% of the patients in this series with primary extremity sarcoma developed distant metastasis. Median survival after metastasis was approximately 1 year. After metastasis, the independent favorable factors that are associated with patient survival include resection of the metastases, a long disease free interval, the absence of preceding local recurrence, and patient age < 50 years. Although a definitive conclusion regarding the benefit of resection can be made only with a randomized clinical trial, these data suggest that resection of metastatic STS may contribute to patient survival, which in some cases may be long term.

Segment-oriented hepatic resection in the management of malignant neoplasms of the liver.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in the understanding of intrahepatic anatomy and radiographic technology have facilitated a segment-oriented approach to liver resection. This approach involves the resection of isolated anatomic segments or sectors of the liver as dictated by the extent of the intrahepatic pathology. Segment-oriented resection allows maximal conservation of normal liver parenchyma while clearing tumor. This report describes the technical features and the results of a prospective evaluation of segmental and sectoral resections in the treatment of malignant hepatic neoplasms. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with malignant hepatic neoplasms that were treated with a segment-oriented hepatic resection were identified from a prospective clinical data base. After undergoing segment-oriented liver resection, the patients were followed at regular intervals. Recurrent disease was the end point of the study. Followup is reported at a median of 12 months. This review outlines the technique of resection, intraoperative events, operating time, blood loss, and the ability to obtain negative resection margins. RESULTS: During the 5-year period between July 1992 and July 1997, 400 patients underwent liver resection for metastatic neoplasms and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). During this period, 79 patients (20%) were treated with a segment-oriented resection. These patients represent the study group for this report. The overall mortality rate was 2.5%; all postoperative deaths occurred in patients with HCC and cirrhosis. Overall morbidity was 26%. The median hospital stay was 8 days. Mean transfusion requirements were 1.0 +/- 0.3 U of packed red blood cells. Patients with HCC showed a greater transfusion requirement than did patients without HCC: 2.7 +/- 1.2 U versus 0.6 +/- 0.2 U (p < 0.05). Of the patients without HCC, 17% required transfusion. During the 12-month median followup period, the overall disease recurrence rate was 23%. Disease recurred at the hepatic-resection margin in 2.5% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Segmental resection is a safe technique that allows complete resection of liver tumors with preservation of normal liver parenchyma. Segmental resection is particularly useful for patients with HCC and patients undergoing repeat liver resections or bilobar resections.

Macrophage-derived tumor necrosis factor and tumor-derived of leukemia inhibitory factor and interleukin-6: possible cellular mechanisms of cancer cachexia.

BACKGROUND: The cellular basis for augmented cytokine production in the tumor-bearing host is not known. Recently leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and interleukin (IL)-6, produced by a variety of tumors, have been implicated as mediators of cachexia. METHODS: Five murine tumor cell lines were tested for the production of these cytokines. 4JK tumor was further tested to determine if IL-1, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), or cocultivation with RAW 264 cells augmented IL-6 or LIF production. RESULTS: 4JK from in vivo tumors produced significantly more IL-6 than did 4JK from culture, indicating that tumor production of IL-6 and LIF is potentially augmented by infiltrating macrophages. When 4JK was cocultured with RAW 264 cells, TNF, or IL-1 in vitro, a three- to 15-fold increase in tumor production of LIF and IL-6 was noted (p2 < or = 0.03). Conversely, in coculture experiments performed with a neutralizing TNF antibody, a 50% reduction in tumor production of LIF ad IL-6 was noted (p2 < 0.04). Resting RAW cells produced only minimal quantities of TNF; however, when RAW cells were exposed to tumor-conditioned supernatant from 4JK, their TNF production was markedly increased. CONCLUSIONS: In the tumor microenvironment, host macrophages may be activated and produce inflammatory cytokines such as TNF. Local TNF then appears to act on tumor cells to stimulate production of IL-6 and LIF. Enhanced tumor production of cytokine mediators may contribute to deleterious effects of neoplastic growth on the host.

Endogenous D-factor activity partially mediates the toxic but not the therapeutic effects of tumor necrosis factor.

We have earlier shown that passive immunization against differentiation-inducing factor/leukemia-inhibitory factor (D factor) activity improves the survival of endotoxemic mice, suggesting that D factor may contribute to the systemic toxicity associated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF). In the current experiments, TNF induced D-factor gene expression in various tissues of non-tumor-bearing female C57BI/6 mice. Passive immunization against D-factor significantly improved survival after a lethal TNF challenge in both non-tumor-bearing (p2 < 0.02) and tumor-bearing mice (p2 < 0.01). In mice bearing 10-day s.c. MCA 105 sarcomas, D-factor antibody alone had no effect on tumor growth as compared with control IgG. Tumor regression and regrowth in mice treated i.v. with TNF was not affected by pre-treatment with D-factor antibody, as compared with pre-treatment with IgG. However, TNF-treatment-related mortality was abrogated by pre-treatment with D-factor antibody (0% vs. 36% for IgG-pre-treated controls). These results indicate that endogenous D-factor activity contributes to the toxicity but not to the anti-tumor effects of TNF therapy. With renewed interest in the use of TNF for the treatment of patients with cancer, improved understanding of the role of D factor in mediating the effects of TNF may have important clinical benefits.

Localization and operative management of undescended parathyroid adenomas in patients with persistent primary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Between 5% and 10% of patients who undergo cervical exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism will have persistent or recurrent hyperparathyroidism. Many of these patients have parathyroid tumors in unusual locations. One such site of ectopic parathyroid tissue is an undescended parathyroid adenoma at or superior to the carotid bifurcation. We describe our experience with the preoperative localization and surgical management of undescended parathyroid adenomas. METHODS: From 1982 to 1993 a consecutive series of 255 patients have undergone localization studies and surgical exploration for persistent or recurrent hyperparathyroidism at the Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health. Operative strategy was determined by review of the patient's surgical history, disease reports, and data from localizing studies. Patients with an undescended parathyroid adenoma identified before the operation were examined with a direct approach high in the neck. Patients who did not have definitive preoperative localization were explored with the previous transverse cervical incision. RESULTS: Seventeen undescended parathyroid adenomas were identified in 255 patients. Thirteen (76%) of 17 patients had an undescended parathyroid adenoma precisely localized before the operation and were examined via a limited, oblique incision high in the neck anterior to the sternocleidomastoid muscle. In the 13 patients who had undergone accurate localization before the operation, the median operative time was 75 minutes compared with 235 minutes for four patients who did not have an undescended parathyroid adenoma identified before the operation and were examined via a previous transverse cervical incision. All patients were cured of their hyperparathyroidism. CONCLUSIONS: Undescended parathyroid adenomas were the cause of failed cervical exploration in 17 (7%) of 255 patients. Accurate preoperative localization of these lesions is possible in most cases with a combination of noninvasive and invasive modalities. Successful preoperative localization can convert a prolonged exploration of the neck and mediastinum into a brief, curative procedure with minimal morbidity.