Are ACE-inhibitors or ARB's still needed for cardiovascular prevention in high risk patients? Insights from profess and transcend.

The HOPE and EUROPA clinical studies have shown that treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, ramipril and perindopril, may reduce the occurrence of major cardiovascular events in patients with proven atherosclerotic disease. The recently published results of the PRoFESS and TRANSCEND trials completed the much needed information concerning the use of an angiotensin receptor blocker for patients at high risk of cardiovascular events. PROFESS compared a therapy of telmisartan 80 mg daily with placebo in patients with a recent ischemic stroke. The difference in the primary outcome of first recurrent stroke was not statistically significant between telmisartan and placebo. The secondary outcome of major cardiovascular events showed a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 7% in favour of telmisartan. This tended to be significant (p = 0.06) despite a rather short follow-up period of only 28 months. In TRANSCEND 5926 patients at high risk for cardiovascular events were randomized to a treatment with telmisartan 80 mg daily or placebo for a mean duration of follow-up of 56 months. The primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalization for heart failure showed a non-significant 8% RRR in favour of the telmisartan treated patients. The main secondary outcome of cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction or stroke as used in the HOPE trial showed a non-significant RRR of 13% in favour of telmisartan treated patients (p = 0.068 adjusted for multiplicity of comparisons). In comparing the Kaplan-Meier curves for the endpoint of major cardiovascular events used in HOPE, EUROPA, TRANSCEND and PRoFESS, the trends are similar. Results of most of the recently published trials have been neutral.This could partly be explained by major improvements in the optimal background therapy of the patients included. Nevertheless, the results of PRoFESS and TRANSCEND do not contradict the results from previous studies with theACE inhibitors ramipril and perindopril and the ARB telmisartan.

Lessons from ONTARGET.

The recently published results of the ONTARGET trial shed a new light on the cardiovascular protection of patients at high risk of a cardiovascular event. Despite a number of trials looking at the efficacy of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) in the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with specific high risk profiles, the question of the equivalence of ACEis and ARBs remained unanswered. The ONTARGET trial has shown that telmisartan 80 mg administered for a median duration of 4.5 years to patients at high risk of developing a major cardiovascular event, is equally effective to ramipril 10 mg. In addition, telmisartan was slightly better tolerated. The comparator ramipril has been chosen as it is currently the gold standard ACEi since the results of the HOPE study, in terms of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke. Moreover, ONTARGET is the first trial to test the hypothesis of superiority of adding an ARB (telmisartan 80 mg) to an ACEi (ramipril 10 mg) over the ACEi ramipril monotherapy in cardiovascular protection of the same broad range of high-risk patients. Surprisingly, despite a more pronounced blood pressure lowering, the combination of the two agents did not lead to an additional decrease in the number of events, but had significantly more side-effects compared to ramipril monotherapy. ONTARGET is a landmark study, performed according to the highest statistical and clinical standards, providing compelling evidence and clear answers to two important clinical questions.

Biochemical validation of a rat model for polycystic kidney disease: comparison of guanidino compound profile with the human condition.

Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) accounts for 7-10% of all dialyzed renal insufficient patients. Accumulation of specific guanidino compounds (GCs) has been related to neurological, cardiovascular, hematological, and immunological complications of renal failure. In this study, we investigate whether the PKD/Mhm rat model can be used as a biochemical model for human PKD. For the validation of the rat model, we performed the first detailed evaluation of the concentrations of GCs in serum and urine of patients with PKD in addition to the GC patterns in the plasma, urine, and tissues of the PKD/Mhm rat model. The GCs were determined after separation on a cation exchange resin and fluorescence detection. The GC levels and changes observed in blood and urine of patients with PKD are comparable with those found in patients with renal insufficiency due to different etiologies. The PKD/Mhm rat model can be used as a biochemical model for human PKD as the obvious increases of urea, guanidinosuccinic acid, creatinine, guanidine, methylguanidine, and N(G)N(G)-dimethylarginine (symmetrical dimethylarginine) seen in blood of oldest heterozygous and younger homozygous PKD rats were largely within the same range as those found in the studied human PKD population, especially in patients with a glomerular filtration rate below 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). The decreased levels of plasma guanidinoacetic acid seen at end-stage renal disease in homozygous and oldest heterozygous rats were also observed in serum of patients with a glomerular filtration rate below 20 ml/min/1.73 m(2). The PKD/Mhm rat model has, besides similar disease characteristics with human PKD, comparable GC alterations.

Lipid and apoprotein changes during atorvastatin up-titration in hemodialysis patients with hypercholesterolemia: a placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease commonly present with an atherogenic lipid profile characterized by the accumulation of triglyceride-rich, apoprotein B-containing "remnant" lipoproteins, small dense low-density lipoprotein, and low levels of high-density lipoprotein. They are at increased cardiovascular risk and may benefit from drastic lipid-lowering treatment with atorvastatin, a potent, broadacting lipid regulator. This study aims to assess the effects of atorvastatin on the lipid profile in hemodialysis patients, to determine wether atorvastatin is also effective at lowering lipid levels in this particular high-risk subgroup. METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in hemodialysis patients with hypercholesterolemia (n = 42, mean total cholesterol 243 +/- 33 mg/dl (6.3 +/- 0.8 mmol/l)), the efficacy of 4-weekly increasing doses of atorvastatin (10 - 40 mg daily) was investigated. Lipids and apoproteins were measured in plasma and isolated lipoprotein fractions. RESULTS: Mean total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol progressively decreased with increasing doses of atorvastatin (total cholesterol -33%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol -43% after 12 weeks), while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol remained unchanged. Plasma levels of apoprotein B and apoprotein E were also significantly reduced by atorvastatin 10 mg, while up-titration to 20 and 40 mg daily provided additional benefits by lowering triglycerides and apoprotein C-III. At week 12, the fraction of small dense low-density lipoprotein was significantly reduced from 23% - 18%, and apoprotein B-containing intermediate-density lipoproteins were no longer detectable. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, atorvastatin not only treated hypercholesterolemia but also favorably affected the uremic lipid profile in patients on hemodialysis. Atorvastatin 4-weekly dose escalation up to 40 mg daily was well-tolerated. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this improved lipid profile on morbidity and mortality.

Re-evaluation and modification of the Stuivenberg Hospital Acute Renal Failure (SHARF) scoring system for the prognosis of acute renal failure: an independent multicentre, prospective study.

BACKGROUND: A prognostic scoring system for hospital mortality in acute renal failure (Stuivenberg Hospital Acute Renal Failure, SHARF score) was developed in a single-centre study. The scoring system consists of two scores, for the time of diagnosis of acute renal failure (ARF) and for 48 h later, each originally based on four parameters (age, serum albumin, prothrombin time and heart failure). The scoring system was now tested and adapted in a prospective study. METHODS: The study involved eight intensive care units. We studied 293 consecutive patients with ARF in 6 months. Their mortality was 50.5%. The causes of ARF were medical in 184 (63%) patients and surgical in 108 (37%). In the latter group, 74 (69%) patients underwent cardiac and 19 (18%) vascular surgery. RESULTS: As the performance of the original SHARF scores was much lower in the multicentre study than in the original single-centre study, we re-analysed the multicentre data to customize the original model for the population studied. The independent variables were the score developed in the original study plus all additonal parameters that were significant on univariate analysis. The new multivariate analysis revealed an additional subset of three parameters for inclusion in the model (serum bilirubin, sepsis and hypotension). For the modified SHARF II score, r(2) was 0.27 at 0 and 0.33 at 48 h, respectively, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) values were 0.82 and 0.83, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit P values were 0.19 and 0.05. CONCLUSION: After customizing and by using two scoring moments, this prediction model for hospital mortality in ARF is useful in different settings for comparing groups of patients and centres, quality assessment and clinical trials. We do not recommend its use for individual patient prognosis.

The low nanomolar levels of N G-monomethylarginine in serum and urine of patients with chronic renal insufficiency are not significantly different from control levels.

There are no reliable mean values of N(G)-monomethylarginine (NMMA) in blood and urine of patients with renal insufficiency available in the literature. Therefore we investigate whether the NMMA levels are changed in blood and urinary excretion of nondialysed and dialysed patients with chronic renal insufficiency to evaluate whether NMMA may reach sufficiently increased concentrations in blood of the patients to exert toxic biological activity. In nondialysed as well as in dialysed patients we find no significant difference in serum concentration of NMMA between patients and controls. In nondialysed patients (all with a residual creatinine clearance lower than 15 ml/min), we find 94.5 +/- 26.1 nM (mean +/- SD) versus 94.6 +/- 19.5 nM in controls. Similar levels are found in serum of haemodialysed patients (each with serum creatinine levels >700 micro M): 83.0 +/- 20.2 nM. The urinary excretion of NMMA in nondialysed patients is also not significantly different from the excretion of controls: 123 +/- 110 in patients versus 157 +/- 117 nmol/24 hrs in controls. Furthermore, the clearance of NMMA is much lower compared to the clearance of the dimethylarginine derivatives. Based on the literature, the low nanomolar levels of NMMA found in blood of patients with renal insufficiency do not support the statement that NMMA proper may act as a uremic toxin.

Life-threatening hyperkalemia during combined therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and spironolactone: an analysis of 25 cases.

PURPOSE: The beneficial effects of spironolactone are additive to those of ACE inhibitors among patients with heart failure and/or hypertension; however, it is essential to identify patients prone to develop serious hyperkalemia during combined treatment and to evaluate the associated morbidity and mortality. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied 25 patients treated with ACE inhibitors and spironolactone who were admitted to the emergency room with a serum potassium level > 6 mmol/L. Patients were followed up for at least one month after admission. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients (11 males, 14 females) was 74 +/- 13 years. Five patients were diabetics. On admission, the serum potassium was 7.7 +/- 0.7 mmol/L and the serum creatinine was 3.8 +/- 1.8 mg/dL; these values were significantly higher than the most recent follow-up laboratory measurements (4.6 +/- 0.5 mmol/L and 1.9 +/- 1.2 mg/dL, respectively) obtained at 13 +/- 5 weeks before admission. The arterial pH on admission was 7.3 +/- 0.1 and the plasma bicarbonate was 18 +/- 5 mmol/L. The main causes for acute renal failure were dehydration (n = 12) and worsening heart failure (n = 9). The mean daily dose of spironolactone was 57 +/- 32 mg and 12 patients were concomitantly treated with other drugs that may cause hyperkalemia. Two patients died, and 2 patients were resuscitated but survived. Hemodialysis was necessary in 17 patients; 12 patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. The mean duration of hospitalization was 12 +/- 6 days. Two patients needed to be started on maintenance hemodialysis therapy. CONCLUSION: A combination of ACE inhibitors and spironolactone should be considered with caution and monitored closely in patients with renal insufficiency, diabetes, older age, worsening heart failure, a risk for dehydration, and in combination with other medications that may cause hyperkalemia. A daily spironolactone dose of 25 mg should not be exceeded.

On-line haemodiafiltration. Remarkable removal of beta2-microglobulin. Long-term clinical observations.

BACKGROUND: The accumulation of beta2-microglobulin (beta2-M) in long-term dialysis patients may lead to dialysis amyloidosis. In this respect, the removal with different modes of on-line haemodiafiltration (HDF) of beta2-M was studied. Long-term clinical observations in patients with more than 10 years of dialysis, treated mainly with biocompatible and highly permeable membranes and in the last years with on-line HDF are also reported. METHODS: In the first part of this report, the reduction ratios and clearances of beta2-M, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine and phosphorus (P) of on-line HDF with 40 to 120 ml/min replacement fluid are compared with bicarbonate haemodialysis (HD). In the second part, we investigated 16 patients with more than 10 years of dialysis treatment. The prevalence of dialysis amyloidosis and the mean values for serum albumin, serum total cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol and parathyroid hormone are reported, as well as the mean dose of erythropoietin. RESULTS: In the first part with on-line HDF, starting from HDF 60 ml/min a significantly higher beta2-M reduction ratio and clearance vs HD is noted. In HDF100 (i.e. with 241 replacement volume per 4-h treatment) vs HD, a beta2-M reduction ratio of 72.7% vs 49.7% (P= 0.0000) and a beta2-M clearance of 116.8 vs 63.8 ml/min (P=0.0000) was obtained. Comparing HDF120 with HDF100, there is a significantly higher beta2-M clearance with the former (P<0.005), although the beta2-M reduction ratio was not significantly better. In the HDF120 session the amount of beta2-M in the total dialysate was 292 mg per session. If one adds the known 17% adsorption on the polysulfone membrane, a total of 341.6 mg beta2-M per session is removed, which adds up to 1024.8 mg a week. Concerning the small molecules, our results with HDF100 also show a higher creatinine and especially P clearance vs HD. In the second part with 16 patients with more than 10 years of dialysis treatment (mean 14 years 1 month), the mean time on HDF amounted to 39.5% of the total treatment time. In four patients only biocompatible and highly permeable membranes were used, AN69 and mainly polysulfone, and in four other patients these membranes were used for more than 95% of the treatment time. Therefore, it is not surprising that the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome was only 12.5% in the patients after 10 years of dialysis. Twenty-five percent of these patients met the criteria for diagnosis of beta2-M bone-amyloidosis, proposed by van Ypersele de Strihou et al., but without a retrospective X-ray analysis. The mean predialysis beta2-M value was 29.6 mg/l. The mean values for serum albumin, serum total cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol were within normal limits. For the parathyroid hormone a mean of 287.5 pg/ml was found. Subtotal parathyroidectomy was performed in five patients. The mean dose of 43 U erythropoietin/kg per session is comparable with those reported in the literature. Conclusions. Like Canaud, in our renal unit, treatment with on-line HDF with a highly permeable and biocompatible membrane has proven to be an efficient, well-tolerated and safe technique. Furthermore it leads to a low prevalence of dialysis amyloidosis and a superior P clearance. However, continuous attention must be paid to an on-line sterile and apyrogenic dialysate. Although on-line HDF is undoubtedly a more optimal approach of chronic dialytic treatment, it also carries a higher cost, which is currently evaluated to be nearly US$11 per session.

Remarkable removal of beta-2-microglobulin by on-line hemodiafiltration.

UNLABELLED: Eight chronic, anuric hemodialysis patients were randomly treated with a high-flux polysulphone dialyzer (F80), using 6 different modes: conventional bicarbonate hemodialysis (HD), hemodiafiltration (HDF) with a replacement solution at 40, 60, 80 or 100 ml/min in postdilution and 80 ml/min in predilution. The differences in beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2M) reduction ratio and clearance were evaluated statistically by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Both studies revealed no significant difference between HD and HDF40 in postdilution, but an increasing significant difference from HDF60 to HDF100 in postdilution and with HDF80 in predilution. The mean reduction ratio ranged from 49.7 (HD) to 72.7% (HDF 100 ml/min), showing an overall statistically significant difference (p = 0.0000). For the clearance, the range was between 63.8 (HD) and 116.8 ml/min (HDF 100 ml/min) (p = 0.0000). beta 2M in the effluent dialysate with HDF 100 ml/min reached up to a mean of 258 mg/session. Concerning small molecules (BUN, creatinine and P), there was a statistically significant different clearance for creatinine and especially for P with HDF 100 ml/min. CONCLUSION: HDF with an on-line replacement solution at 100 ml/min and a high-flux and biocompatible polysulphone membrane represents a new tool for enhanced removal of beta 2M. Besides a significant increase in creatinine and especially in phosphorus clearance is noted.

Intermittent venovenous haemodiafiltration in critically ill patients with acute renal failure.

Various renal replacement therapies have been used for the treatment of acute renal failure in critically ill patients in the last decade. Due to the slower rate of solute and fluid removal, the continuous renal replacement therapies are generally better tolerated than conventional therapy. There is no consensus whether different treatment strategies effect the outcome of critically ill patients and no clear definition of adequacy of renal support in the severely ill patient. Despite their possible benefits, the continuous renal replacement therapies place major demands on the organisation and workload in the dialysis unit. Having taken this into consideration our unit has opted for a ten hours daytime intermittent venovenous haemodiafiltration technique as an alternative for patients in severe conditions of haemodynamic instability, the so-called "go slow" dialysis.

Guanidino compounds in serum and urine of nondialyzed patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

Levels of 15 guanidino compounds and urea were determined in serum and urine of nondialyzed patients with chronic renal insufficiency subdivided according to etiology and creatinine clearances. No significantly different guanidino compound levels in serum and urine were found for the interstitial nephritis, glomerulonephritis, nephrangiosclerosis, and diabetic nephropathy subgroups. Subdividing the patients according to creatinine clearance yields the following results: (1) Serum guanidinosuccinic acid (GSA) and methylguanidine levels of patients with end-stage renal failure (creatinine clearance < 10 mL/min) are up to 100 and 35 times higher than control levels, while guanidine, creatinine, and symmetrical dimethylarginine (SDMA) are increased about 10 times. Serum levels of asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA) are only doubled in end-stage renal failure. Serum levels of guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) and homoarginine are significantly decreased. (2) Urinary excretion levels of most guanidino compounds decrease with decreasing creatinine clearance except for GSA and methylguanidine. (3) Greater than 90% of patients with creatinine clearance ranging from subnormal to 40 mL/min have serum SDMA levels higher than the upper-normal limit; up to 80% have increased GSA levels. (4) The clearance rates of some of the guanidino compounds could be calculated: with the exception of arginine, they decrease with decreasing creatinine clearance. This study shows specific abnormal guanidino compound levels in serum and urine of nondialyzed patients with chronic renal insufficiency that can be used as complementary diagnostic parameters. The best correlation between serum guanidino compound levels and the degree of renal insufficiency is found for GSA, SDMA, methylguanidine, and guanidine. Urinary excretion levels of ADMA correlate best with decreasing creatinine clearance. Serum levels of GSA and especially SDMA are candidate indicators for the onset of renal failure.