Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci ; 31(10): 518-22, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26520690

RESUMO

Preeclampsia (PE) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are still among the most commonly researched titles in perinatology. To shed light on their etiology, new prevention and treatment strategies are the major targets of studies. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relation between gene polymorphism of one of the products of trophoblasts, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and PE/IUGR.A total of 147 women (IUGR, n = 61; PE, n = 47; IUGR + PE, n = 37; eclampsia, n = 2) were compared with 103 controls with respect to the sequencing of exon 14 of the PAPP-A gene to detect (rs7020782) polymorphism. Genotypes "AA" and "CC" were given in the event of A or C allele homozygosity and "AC" in A and C allele heterozygosity. Our findings revealed that the rate of AA, CC homozygotes, and AC heterozygotes did not differ between groups. Moreover, there was no difference in the distribution of PAPP-A genotypes among the patients with IUGR, PE, IUGR + PE, or eclampsia. Finally, birth weight, rate of the presence of proteinuria, and total protein excretion on 24-hour urine were similar in the subgroups of AA, AC, and CC genotypes in the study group. Our study demonstrated no association between PAPP-A gene rs7020782 polymorphism and PE/IUGR.


Assuntos
Retardo do Crescimento Fetal/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética , Pré-Eclâmpsia/genética , Proteína Plasmática A Associada à Gravidez/genética , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez
2.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 285(3): 635-9, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21837429

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of HbA1c levels and umbilical cord thickness upon birth weight, particularly in pregestational and gestational diabetic patients. METHOD: Pregnant women were included in the study and were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of patients who were diagnosed with pregestational or gestational diabetes mellitus. The control group consisted of pregnant women who were not diagnosed with pregestational or gestational diabetes mellitus. Ultrasound examination was performed twice. Examinations were performed at 27-28 weeks and 36-37 weeks of gestation, respectively. During ultrasound examinations, fetal anthropometric parameters, biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, femur length and estimated fetal weight (which was calculated automatically according to Hadlock's formula) were measured. Additionally, the sonographic cross-sectional areas of the umbilical cord, the umbilical arteries and the umbilical vein were measured in a free loop of the umbilical cord, using the software of the ultrasound machine. The cross-sectional area of Wharton's jelly was computed by subtracting the cross-sectional area of the vessels from that of the umbilical cord. HbA1c levels were measured for diabetic patients. RESULTS: At 27-28 gestational weeks, umbilical cord area and Wharton's jelly values were found to be statistically different in macrosomic fetuses compared with non-macrosomic fetuses for both groups (for cord area, P = 0.012; for Wharton's jelly, P = 0.001). Additionally, umbilical cord diameter vein and artery values were not statistically different between the two groups when macrosomic fetuses were compared with non-macrosomic fetuses. At 36-37 gestational weeks, when the relationship between umbilical cord components and birth weight was examined, there was a statistically significant difference when comparing macrosomic fetuses with non-macrosomic fetuses. There was a statistically significant correlation between umbilical cord area, umbilical cord diameter and fetal weight estimation at 36-37 gestational weeks. HbA1c values and fetal macrosomia did not show a statistically significant relationship (P = 0.701). CONCLUSION: A significant relationship between umbilical cord components and birth weight was not specific for the diabetic group. There was a significant relationship between birth weight and umbilical cord components for the control group as well. If the estimated fetal weight is combined with umbilical cord components, macrosomic fetuses can be predicted with more accuracy.


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico por imagem , Macrossomia Fetal/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Cordão Umbilical/patologia , Adulto , Peso ao Nascer , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Feminino , Macrossomia Fetal/epidemiologia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Incidência , Gravidez , Artérias Umbilicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Cordão Umbilical/diagnóstico por imagem , Veias Umbilicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Geleia de Wharton/anatomia & histologia , Geleia de Wharton/diagnóstico por imagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...