Intraoperative pathology consultation: error, cause and impact.

BACKGROUND: Correlation of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis with final diagnosis can be an important component of an institution's quality assurance process. METHODS: We performed a quality assurance review of 1207 frozen section diagnoses from 812 surgical cases performed in the Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Programme during a 6-month period in 2007. We reviewed the frozen section and permanent slides from all potentially discordant cases using a multiheaded microscope to arrive at a consensus pertaining to the type and reason for error. We reviewed the clinical record to determine whether there had been a potential adverse impact on immediate clinical management. RESULTS: Frozen sections were most commonly requested for head and neck, nervous system and female genital tract specimens. Twenty-eight frozen sections (3%) were deferred. We identified 24 discordant diagnoses involving 3% of cases and 2% of specimens. The organ systems showing the greatest frequency of discordance relative to the total number from that system were the nervous system, head and neck, and the lungs. Of the errors identified, most occurred owing to diagnostic misinterpretation, followed by problems related to tissue sampling. There was a potential adverse impact on immediate clinical management in 14 cases. CONCLUSION: Our results add to the Canadian data on the correlation between frozen sections and permanent sections; we note comparability to the concordance rates reported in the literature.

CONTEXTE: La corrélation entre le diagnostic fondé sur une analyse peropératoire des coupes congelées et le diagnostic final pourrait être un élément important du processus d'assurance qualité dans les établissements de santé. MÉTHODES: À des fins d'examen de l'assurance qualité, le Programme régional de médecine de laboratoire d'Hamilton a procédé à une revue de 1207 diagnostics fondés sur l'analyse de coupes congelées prélevées lors de 812 interventions chirurgicales au cours d'une période de 6 mois en 2007. Nous avons analysé les coupes congelées et les spécimens fixés pour tous les cas potentiellement discordants à l'aide d'un microscope multitête, dans la recherche d'un consensus quant au type d'erreur et à la raison de celle-ci. Nous avons passé en revue les dossiers cliniques pour mesurer, le cas échéant, un quelconque impact négatif sur la prise en charge clinique immédiate. RÉSULTANTS: Les coupes congelées ont le plus souvent été demandées pour des spécimens de tissu de la tête et du cou, du système nerveux et des voies génitales féminines. Vingt-huit coupes congelées (3 %) ont été écartées. Nous avons relevé 24 diagnostics discordants concernant 3 % des cas et 2 % des spécimens. Les systèmes et organes pour lesquels la fréquence de la discordance a été la plus élevée par rapport au nombre total de spécimens du même type, ont été le système nerveux, la tête et le cou et les poumons. Parmi les erreurs relevées, la plupart ont été attribuables à une mauvaise interprétation diagnostique, suivie de problèmes relatifs au prélèvement tissulaire. Dans 14 cas, l'erreur a pu exercer un impact négatif sur la prise en charge clinique immédiate. CONCLUSIONS: Nos résultats viennent étayer les données canadiennes sur la corrélation entre les coupes congelées et les lames adhérentes; nous notons que nos taux de concordance sont comparables à ceux qui sont cités dans la littérature.

The vaginal spindle cell epithelioma: a case report, review of the literature and discussion of potential histogenesis.

The so-called mixed tumors occur in a variety of sites throughout the body. While most cases are encountered in the salivary glands, several cases have been described in the female genital tract. A variety of monikers have been applied to this lesion including "spindle cell epithelioma." As in other locations, the vaginal spindle cell epithelioma (VSE) consists of a proliferation of both epithelial and mesenchymal components. Based on our extensive review of the literature, we present the 53rd reported case of VSE. More significantly, we present the most up-to-date review of this lesion, including its immunohistochemical and electron microscopic features. We also review the theories pertaining to its histogenesis incorporating current embryologic data, which together suggest a Müllerian derivation.

Primary anaplastic large cell lymphoma of the breast arising in reconstruction mammoplasty capsule of saline filled breast implant after radical mastectomy for breast cancer: an unusual case presentation.

BACKGROUND: Primary non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) of the breast represents 0.04-0.5% of malignant lesions of the breast and accounts for 1.7-2.2% of extra-nodal NHL. Most primary cases are of B-cell phenotype and only rare cases are of T-cell phenotype. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a rare T-cell lymphoma typically seen in children and young adults with the breast being one of the least common locations. There are a total of eleven cases of primary ALCL of the breast described in the literature. Eight of these cases occurred in proximity to breast implants, four in relation to silicone breast implant and three in relation to saline filled breast implant with three out of the eight implant related cases having previous history of breast cancer treated surgically. Adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy is given in only one case. Secondary hematological malignancies after breast cancer chemotherapy have been reported in literature. However in contrast to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the association between lymphoma and administration of chemotherapy has never been clearly demonstrated. CASE PRESENTATION: In this report we present a case of primary ALCL of the breast arising in reconstruction mammoplasty capsule of saline filled breast implant after radical mastectomy for infiltrating ductal carcinoma followed by postoperative chemotherapy twelve years ago. CONCLUSION: Primary ALK negative ALCL arising at the site of saline filled breast implant is rare. It is still unclear whether chemotherapy and breast implantation increases risk of secondary hematological malignancies significantly. However, it is important to be aware of these complications and need for careful pathologic examination of tissue removed for implant related complications to make the correct diagnosis for further patient management and treatment. It is important to be aware of this entity at this site as it can be easily misdiagnosed on histologic grounds and to exclude sarcomatoid carcinoma, malignant melanoma and pleomorphic sarcoma by an appropriate panel of immunostains to arrive at the correct diagnosis of ALCL.