Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 149: 105614, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574841

RESUMO

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) uses the lethal dose 50% (LD50) value from in vivo rat acute oral toxicity studies for pesticide product label precautionary statements and environmental risk assessment (RA). The Collaborative Acute Toxicity Modeling Suite (CATMoS) is a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR)-based in silico approach to predict rat acute oral toxicity that has the potential to reduce animal use when registering a new pesticide technical grade active ingredient (TGAI). This analysis compared LD50 values predicted by CATMoS to empirical values from in vivo studies for the TGAIs of 177 conventional pesticides. The accuracy and reliability of the model predictions were assessed relative to the empirical data in terms of USEPA acute oral toxicity categories and discrete LD50 values for each chemical. CATMoS was most reliable at placing pesticide TGAIs in acute toxicity categories III (>500-5000 mg/kg) and IV (>5000 mg/kg), with 88% categorical concordance for 165 chemicals with empirical in vivo LD50 values ≥ 500 mg/kg. When considering an LD50 for RA, CATMoS predictions of 2000 mg/kg and higher were found to agree with empirical values from limit tests (i.e., single, high-dose tests) or definitive results over 2000 mg/kg with few exceptions.


Assuntos
Simulação por Computador , Praguicidas , Relação Quantitativa Estrutura-Atividade , Testes de Toxicidade Aguda , United States Environmental Protection Agency , Animais , Medição de Risco , Praguicidas/toxicidade , Dose Letal Mediana , Ratos , Administração Oral , Testes de Toxicidade Aguda/métodos , Estados Unidos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 53(4): 207-228, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37401640

RESUMO

When registering a new pesticide, 90-day oral toxicity studies performed with both rodent and non-rodent species, typically rats and dogs, are part of a standard battery of animal tests required in most countries for human health risk assessment (RA). This analysis set out to determine the need for the 90-day dog study in RA by reviewing data from 195 pesticides evaluated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) from 1998 through 2021. The dog study was used in RA for only 42 pesticides, mostly to set the point of departure (POD) for shorter-term non-dietary pesticide exposures. Dog no-observed-adverse-effect-levels (NOAELs) were lower than rat NOAELs in 90-day studies for 36 of the above 42 pesticides, suggesting that the dog was the more sensitive species. However, lower NOAELs may not necessarily correspond to greater sensitivity as factors such as dose spacing and/or allometric scaling need to be considered. Normalizing doses between rats and dogs explained the lower NOAELs in 22/36 pesticides, indicating that in those cases the dog was not more sensitive, and the comparable rat study could have been used instead for RA. For five of the remaining pesticides, other studies of appropriate duration besides the 90-day rat study were available that would have offered a similar level of protection if used to set PODs. In only nine cases could no alternative be found in the pesticide's database to use in place of the 90-day dog study for setting safe exposure levels or to identify unique hazards. The present analysis demonstrates that for most pesticide risk determinations the 90-day dog study provided no benefit beyond the rat or other available data.


Assuntos
Praguicidas , Estados Unidos , Ratos , Cães , Humanos , Animais , Praguicidas/toxicidade , Testes de Toxicidade , Nível de Efeito Adverso não Observado , Medição de Risco , United States Environmental Protection Agency
3.
ALTEX ; 40(3): 534-540, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36888967

RESUMO

Progress in developing new tools, assays, and approaches to assess human hazard and health risk provides an opportunity to re-evaluate the necessity of dog studies for the safety evaluation of agrochemicals. A workshop was held where partic­ipants discussed the strengths and limitations of past use of dogs for pesticide evaluations and registrations. Opportunities were identified to support alternative approaches to answer human safety questions without performing the required 90-day dog study. Development of a decision tree for determining when the dog study might not be necessary to inform pesticide safety and risk assessment was proposed. Such a process will require global regulatory authority participation to lead to its acceptance. The identification of unique effects in dogs that are not identified in rodents will need further evaluation and determination of their relevance to humans. The establishment of in vitro and in silico approaches that can provide critical data on relative species sensitivity and human relevance will be an important tool to advance the decision process. Promising novel tools including in vitro comparative metabolism studies, in silico models, and high-throughput assays able to identify metabolites and mechanisms of action leading to development of adverse outcome pathways will need further development. To replace or eliminate the 90-day dog study, a collaborative, multidisciplinary, international effort that transcends organi­zations and regulatory agencies will be needed in order to develop guidance on when the study would not be necessary for human safety and risk assessment.


Assuntos
Rotas de Resultados Adversos , Praguicidas , Animais , Cães , Humanos , Agroquímicos/toxicidade , Praguicidas/toxicidade , Medição de Risco , Simulação por Computador
4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24151143

RESUMO

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) currently relies on an initial screening battery (Tier 1) consisting of five in vitro and six in vivo assays to evaluate a chemical's potential to interact with the endocrine system. Chemical companies may request test waivers based on Other Scientifically Relevant Information (OSRI) that is functionally equivalent to data gathered in the screening battery or that provides information on a potential endocrine effect. Respondents for 47 of the first 67 chemicals evaluated in the EDSP submitted OSRI in lieu of some or all Tier 1 tests, seeking 412 waivers, of which EPA granted only 93. For 20 of the 47 chemicals, EPA denied all OSRI and required the entire Tier 1 battery. Often, the OSRI accepted was either identical to data generated by the Tier 1 assay or indicated a positive result. Although identified as potential sources of OSRI in EPA guidance, Part 158 guideline studies for pesticide registration were seldom accepted by EPA. The 93 waivers reduced animal use by at least 3325 animals. We estimate 27,731 animals were used in the actual Tier 1 tests, with additional animals being used in preparation for testing. Even with EPA's shift toward applying 21st-century toxicology tools to screening of endocrine disruptors in the future, acceptance of OSRI will remain a primary means for avoiding duplicative testing and reducing use of animals in the EDSP. Therefore, it is essential that EPA develop a consistent and transparent basis for accepting OSRI.


Assuntos
Disruptores Endócrinos/análise , Disruptores Endócrinos/toxicidade , Testes de Toxicidade/métodos , United States Environmental Protection Agency , Animais , Bioensaio , Determinação de Ponto Final , Feminino , Masculino , Ratos , Estados Unidos
5.
Environ Health Perspect ; 120(12): 1631-9, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23033452

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Launched by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1998, the High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program was developed to address the perceived gap in basic hazard information for the 2,800 chemicals produced or imported into the United States in quantities of ≥ 1 million pounds per year. Health and environmental effects data obtained from either existing information or through new vertebrate animal testing were voluntarily submitted by chemical companies (sponsors) to the U.S. EPA. Despite the potential for extensive animal testing, animal welfare guidelines were not provided until after the start of the program. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated compliance with the animal welfare principles that arose from an agreement reached between the U.S. EPA and animal protection organizations and tracked the HPV program's use of animals for testing. DISCUSSION: Under a worst-case scenario, the HPV program had the potential to consume 3.5 million animals in new testing. After application of animal-saving measures, approximately 127,000 were actually used. Categorization of chemicals based on similar structure-activity and application of read-across, along with use of existing test data, were the most effective means of reducing animal testing. However, animal-saving measures were inconsistently used by both sponsors and the U.S. EPA. CONCLUSIONS: Lessons learned from the HPV program can be applied to future programs to minimize animal testing and promote more human-relevant chemical risk assessment.


Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Poluentes Ambientais/toxicidade , Testes de Toxicidade/normas , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais , Animais , Poluentes Ambientais/química , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency/legislação & jurisprudência
6.
Toxicol Sci ; 123(1): 15-25, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21642633

RESUMO

New approaches to generating and evaluating toxicity data for chemicals are needed to cope with the ever-increasing demands of new programs. One such approach involves the use of an integrated testing and evaluation strategy based on the specific properties and activities of a chemical. Such an integrated strategy, whether applied to existing or future programs, can promote efficient use of resources and save animals. We demonstrate the utility of such a strategy by applying it to the current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP). Launched in October 2009, the EDSP utilizes a two-tiered approach, whereby each tier requires a battery of animal-intensive and expensive tests. Tier 1 consists of five in vitro and six in vivo assays that are intended to determine a chemical's potential to interact with the estrogen (E), androgen (A), or thyroid (T) hormone pathways. Tier 2 is proposed to consist of multigenerational reproductive and developmental toxicity tests in several species and is intended to determine whether a chemical can cause adverse effects resulting from E, A, or T modulation. In contrast to the existing EDSP structure, we show, using the pesticide atrazine as an example, that a multilevel testing framework combined with an integrated evaluation process would significantly increase efficiency by minimizing testing.


Assuntos
Disruptores Endócrinos/toxicidade , Sistema Endócrino/efeitos dos fármacos , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Testes de Toxicidade/métodos , United States Environmental Protection Agency , Xenobióticos/toxicidade , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais , Animais , Monitoramento Ambiental/economia , Monitoramento Ambiental/normas , Feminino , Masculino , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Ratos , Testes de Toxicidade/economia , Testes de Toxicidade/normas , Estados Unidos
7.
J Environ Qual ; 34(3): 1087-101, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15888895

RESUMO

Quantification of the effects of management programs on water quality is critical to agencies responsible for water resource protection. This research documents reductions in stream water phosphorus (P) loads resulting from agricultural best management practices (BMPs) implemented as part of an effort to control eutrophication of Cannonsville Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City. Dairy farms in the upstate New York reservoir basin were the target of BMPs designed to reduce P losses. A paired watershed study was established on one of these farms in 1993 to evaluate changes in P loading attributable to implementation of BMPs that included manure management, rotational grazing, and improved infrastructure. Intensive stream water monitoring provided data to calculate P loads from the 160-ha farm watershed for all runoff events during a two-year pre-treatment period and a four-year post-treatment period. Statistical control for inter-annual climatic variability was provided by matched P loads from a nearby 86-ha forested watershed, and by several event flow variables measured at the farm. A sophisticated multivariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) provided estimates of both seasonal and overall load reductions. Statistical power and the minimum detectable treatment effect (MDTE) were also calculated. The results demonstrated overall event load reductions of 43% for total dissolved phosphorus (TDP) and 29% for particulate phosphorus (PP). Changes in farm management practices and physical infrastructure clearly produced decreases in event P losses measurable at the small watershed scale.


Assuntos
Eutrofização , Fósforo/análise , Eliminação de Resíduos Líquidos/métodos , Abastecimento de Água , Agricultura , Animais , Indústria de Laticínios , Análise Multivariada , Cidade de Nova Iorque
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...