Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 65
Filtrar
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 118(5): 689-698, 2017 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28475670

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest that mechanical cell washing to remove pro-inflammatory components that accumulate in the supernatant of stored donor red blood cells (RBCs) might reduce inflammation and organ injury in transfused patients. METHODS: Cardiac surgery patients at increased risk of large-volume RBC transfusion were eligible. Participants were randomized to receive either mechanically washed allogenic RBCs or standard care RBCs. The primary outcome was serum interleukin-8 measured at baseline and at four postsurgery time points. A mechanism substudy evaluated the effects of washing on stored RBCs in vitro and on markers of platelet, leucocyte, and endothelial activation in trial subjects. RESULTS: Sixty adult cardiac surgery patients at three UK cardiac centres were enrolled between September 2013 and March 2015. Subjects received a median of 3.5 (interquartile range 2-5.5) RBC units, stored for a mean of 21 ( sd 5.2) days, within 48 h of surgery. Mechanical washing reduced concentrations of RBC-derived microvesicles but increased cell-free haemoglobin concentrations in RBC supernatant relative to standard care RBC supernatant. There was no difference between groups with respect to perioperative serum interleukin-8 values [adjusted mean difference 0.239 (95% confidence intervals -0.231, 0.709), P =0.318] or concentrations of plasma RBC microvesicles, platelet and leucocyte activation, plasma cell-free haemoglobin, endothelial activation, or biomarkers of heart, lung, or kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support a hypothesis that allogenic red blood cell washing has clinical benefits in cardiac surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 27076315.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Preservação de Sangue , Endotélio Vascular , Eritrócitos , Feminino , Hemoglobinas/análise , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Interleucina-8/sangue , Leucócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ativação Plaquetária , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Open Heart ; 3(1): e000344, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26977309

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: It has been suggested that removal of proinflammatory substances that accumulate in stored donor red cells by mechanical cell washing may attenuate inflammation and organ injury in transfused cardiac surgery patients. This trial will test the hypotheses that the severity of the postoperative inflammatory response will be less and postoperative recovery faster if patients undergoing cardiac surgery receive washed red cells compared with standard care (unwashed red cells). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Adult (≥16 years) cardiac surgery patients identified at being at increased risk for receiving large volume red cell transfusions at 1 of 3 UK cardiac centres will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either red cell washing or standard care. The primary outcome is serum interleukin-8 measured at 5 postsurgery time points up to 96 h. Secondary outcomes will include measures of inflammation, organ injury and volumes of blood transfused and cost-effectiveness. Allocation concealment, internet-based randomisation stratified by operation type and recruiting centre, and blinding of outcome assessors will reduce the risk of bias. The trial will test the superiority of red cell washing versus standard care. A sample size of 170 patients was chosen in order to detect a small-to-moderate target difference, with 80% power and 5% significance (2-tailed). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial protocol was approved by a UK ethics committee (reference 12/EM/0475). The trial findings will be disseminated in scientific journals and meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 27076315.

3.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 91(3): 459-66, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22278333

RESUMO

Telcagepant is a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist being evaluated for acute migraine treatment. CGRP is a potent vasodilator that is elevated after myocardial infarction, and it delays ischemia during treadmill exercise. We tested the hypothesis that CGRP receptor antagonism does not reduce treadmill exercise time (TET). The effects of supratherapeutic doses of telcagepant on TET were assessed in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover study in patients with stable angina and reproducible exercise-induced angina. Patients received telcagepant (600 mg, n = 46; and 900 mg, n = 14) or placebo and performed treadmill exercise at T(max) (2.5 h after the dose). The hypothesis that telcagepant does not reduce TET was supported if the lower bound of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the mean treatment difference (telcagepant-placebo) in TET was more than -60 s. There were no significant between-treatment differences in TET (mean treatment difference: -6.90 (90% CI: -17.66, 3.86) seconds), maximum exercise heart rate, or time to 1-mm ST-segment depression using pooled data or with stratification for dose.


Assuntos
Angina Estável/tratamento farmacológico , Azepinas/uso terapêutico , Teste de Esforço/métodos , Imidazóis/uso terapêutico , Angina Estável/fisiopatologia , Antagonistas do Receptor do Peptídeo Relacionado ao Gene de Calcitonina , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Eletrocardiografia/métodos , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico
4.
Clin Cardiol ; 21(7): 483-90, 1998 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9669057

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mibefradil, a newly approved antihypertensive and antianginal drug, is the first member of a new class of calcium antagonists (CAs), the tetralol derivatives, that selectively blocks T-type Ca2+ channels in contrast to classical CAs which, at therapeutic concentrations, block only L-type Ca2+ channels. Since patients with chronic stable angina pectoris typically may be treated with the combination of a long-acting nitrate and a CA, the additive efficacy and safety of mibefradil in combination with nitrate therapy needs to be determined. HYPOTHESIS: This study was designed to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of mibefradil when added to long-acting nitrate therapy in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. METHODS: Following a 1-week placebo run-in period, patients were randomized to receive either mibefradil 50 mg (n = 96) or placebo (n = 93) once daily in addition to their nitrate therapy. After 2 weeks of active treatment, patients receiving the mibefradil were force titrated to 150 mg once daily for an additional 2 weeks. Exercise tolerance tests (ETTs) were performed at the end of Weeks 2 and 4; patients also maintained an anginal diary during the 4-week treatment period. RESULTS: After 2 weeks of treatment with 50 mg mibefradil (within the current recommended dose range), a statistically significant but modest increase in total exercise duration was observed (treatment effect 16.4 s, p = 0.04). Similarly, there was a significant increase in time to onset of ischemia (treatment effect 26 s, p = 0.008). The adverse event profile of the 50 mg dose was indistinguishable from placebo, indicating that this dose was extremely well tolerated. At Week 4, the mibefradil-treated patients were taking 150 mg, which is above the current recommended dose range. The increase in total exercise duration was larger for the mibefradil 150 mg group than for the placebo group. For the intent-to-treat population, this difference did not reach statistical significance, whereas in the standard population it did (treatment effect 21 s, p = 0.05). The other two ETT variables, time to onset of angina and time to onset of 1 mm ST-segment depression, demonstrated significantly greater effect with mibefradil 150 mg (treatment effects 40 s, p = 0.002, and 55 s, p < 0.001, respectively, for the intent-to-treat population). Mibefradil 150 mg was associated with more adverse events than placebo, specifically, dizziness, leg edema, and postural hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that mibefradil 50 mg once daily in the setting of the background long-acting nitrate therapy produces additive antianginal and anti-ischemic effects and is extremely well tolerated.


Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/tratamento farmacológico , Benzimidazóis/uso terapêutico , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Nitroglicerina/uso terapêutico , Tetra-Hidronaftalenos/uso terapêutico , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Angina Pectoris/fisiopatologia , Benzimidazóis/administração & dosagem , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/administração & dosagem , Doença Crônica , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Eletrocardiografia , Tolerância ao Exercício , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Mibefradil , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Segurança , Tetra-Hidronaftalenos/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Neurology ; 48(6): 1598-604, 1997 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9191773

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: The optimal evaluation and management of patients with atrial fibrillation who suffer an acute ischemic stroke remains controversial. METHODS: Medical records of 171 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation and acute stroke at six U.S. university hospitals were reviewed. Data collected included the use of antithrombotic therapy, brain and cardiac imaging, bleeding complications, stroke risk factors, and contraindications to anticoagulation. RESULTS: Mean age was 75.4 years. Cardiovascular risk factors associated with increased stroke risk were present in 87%; 35% had at least one contraindication to anticoagulation. Half of the patients with stroke risk factors and no contraindications to anticoagulation were not receiving any antithrombotic therapy at the time of admission. Of the 22 patients who were treated with warfarin, and had INR values on admission, 16 had levels of < 2.0; only six had INR values between 2.0 and 3.0. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 107 patients (63%); intracardiac thrombi were visualized in only 5%. Initial brain imaging revealed hemorrhagic transformation in nine. Heparin was used in 93 patients (54%), usually within 48 hours of stroke onset. Patients who received delayed heparin typically did not have repeat brain imaging prior to starting heparin. One patient had a delayed symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage. Of the survivors, 47% were discharged and treated with warfarin (or warfarin plus aspirin), 28% with ASA, 7% with other antithrombotic therapies, and 18% with no antithrombotic therapy. CONCLUSION: Antithrombotic therapy was underutilized and inadequately monitored in atrial fibrillation patients prior to stroke onset. After hospital admission, a wide range of diagnostic and management strategies, which often did not follow current recommendations, were employed.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/complicações , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Isquemia Encefálica/complicações , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamento farmacológico , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiologia , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/epidemiologia , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Heparina/administração & dosagem , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Tromboembolia/complicações , Tromboembolia/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia/etiologia , Estados Unidos , Varfarina/administração & dosagem , Varfarina/efeitos adversos
6.
Clin Ther ; 19(5): 954-62, 1997.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9385483

RESUMO

This multicenter, double-masked, randomized, forced-titration, parallel-group trial was designed to determine whether we could confirm the results of a previous trial that demonstrated a significantly greater antihypertensive effect for mibefradil compared with diltiazem CD. Two hundred thirty-nine patients with uncomplicated mild-to-moderate essential hypertension and a baseline sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) between 95 and 114 mm Hg were randomized to receive once-daily treatment with mibefradil 50 mg (n = 119) or diltiazem CD 180 mg (n = 120). After 4 weeks of treatment, all patients underwent forced titration to mibefradil 100 mg or diltiazem CD 360 mg for an additional 8 weeks. After 12 weeks of active treatment, the mean reduction from baseline in trough SDBP was significantly greater with mibefradil than with diltiazem CD (-14.3 +/- 6.6 mm Hg vs -11.7 +/- 7.4 mm Hg, respectively). In addition, significantly more patients receiving mibefradil had a decrease in SDBP > or = 10 mm Hg or a decrease to < or = 90 mm Hg by week 12 than did patients receiving diltiazem CD (82% vs 72%, respectively). The tolerability of mibefradil and diltiazem CD were comparable, with similar percentages of patients in both groups reporting at least one adverse event (21% vs 22%, respectively) that was considered to be at least remotely related to the study drug. The results of this study confirm those of the previous trial. Once-daily treatment with mibefradil 100 mg is significantly more effective than diltiazem CD 360 mg in lowering both diastolic and systolic blood pressure. Both drugs are well tolerated.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Benzimidazóis/uso terapêutico , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Diltiazem/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Tetra-Hidronaftalenos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/efeitos adversos , Benzimidazóis/efeitos adversos , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/efeitos adversos , Diltiazem/efeitos adversos , Tontura/induzido quimicamente , Método Duplo-Cego , Edema/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Mibefradil , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tetra-Hidronaftalenos/efeitos adversos
7.
Arch Intern Med ; 156(20): 2311-6, 1996 Nov 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8911237

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation can be significantly reduced with antithrombotic therapy. Despite this, many physicians remain hesitant to prescribe warfarin sodium or aspirin therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation at 6 academic hospitals in the United States. METHODS: Records were reviewed from consecutive hospital admissions of 309 patients with atrial fibrillation at 6 members of the University Health System Consortium, Oak Brook, III, which is a member driven alliance of 70 academic health centers in the United States. Risk factors for stroke, contraindications to anticoagulant therapy, and use of antithrombotic therapy at admission and discharge were recorded. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 71.6 years, 54% had chronic, 22% paroxysmal, and 24% new-onset atrial fibrillation. Eighty-two percent of the patients had cardiovascular risk factors that have been associated with increased risk of stroke. At least 1 relative contraindication to anticoagulant therapy was present in 44%. At the time of admission. 32% of the patients with previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation (n = 235) were receiving warfarin (or warfarin plus aspirin), 31% were receiving aspirin alone, and 36% were receiving no antithrombotic therapy. At discharge (n = 230), 41% of these patients were taking warfarin (or warfarin plus aspirin) and 36% were taking aspirin. Forty-four percent of the patients with risk factors for stroke and no contraindications to anticoagulation (n = 134) were discharged on a regimen of warfarin (or warfarin plus aspirin), 34% were discharged on a regimen of aspirin, and 22% received no antithrombotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: About half of the patients with atrial fibrillation admitted to these academic hospitals had clinical risk factors that are associated with increased risk of stroke and no contraindications to anticoagulation. Antithrombotic therapy was underused in these patients.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos , Varfarina/uso terapêutico
8.
Am Heart J ; 131(5): 872-8, 1996 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8615304

RESUMO

Optimal drug therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is well described in the medical literature. However, data on the actual pharmacologic management of patients surviving AMI at academic hospitals is unavailable. The purpose of this study was to document treatment profiles in 500 patients surviving AMI at 12 academic hospitals in the United States. These profiles were compared with established guidelines and were evaluated for trends. Overall, thrombolytics (streptokinase > or = tissue-type plasminogen activator) were administered in 29% of the patients, with a greater proportion of patients receiving beta-blockers than calcium channel antagonists in the initial 72 hours (61% vs 40%; p < 0.005) and at discharge (51% vs 35%; p < 0.005). Further, women were less likely than men to receive thrombolytic therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61; confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.69) or beta-blocker therapy within the first 72 hours (OR = 0.61; CI, 0.55 to 0.67) or at hospital discharge (OR = 0.53; CI, 0.48 to 0.58). Overall, improvements could still be made in the number of patients who receive thrombolytic and acute and chronic beta-blocker therapies after AMI, particularly in women. Changes in treatment profiles may be a reflection of the publication of large clinical trials.


Assuntos
Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Registros Hospitalares , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 35(8): 780-4, 1995 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8522634

RESUMO

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted to test the peak and trough antianginal and antiischemic monotherapy efficacy and safety of a new extended-release formulation of nisoldipine (nisoldipine Coat Core [Bayer Corporation], 20 mg, 40 mg, and 60 mg once daily compared to placebo). Study patients had a history of chronic, stable angina pectoris, exercise-induced angina in association with ST segment depression, and exercise test reproducibility. Of the 483 patients enrolled in the study, results were valid for safety analysis for 312 and for efficacy analysis for 284. There was a statistically significant improvement in total exercise time at both peak and trough for patients taking 20 mg and 60 mg of nisoldipine compared with patients taking placebo, but the group taking 60 mg was not better than the group taking 20 mg (33.9 and 33.7 seconds, respectively, at trough). The results were similar for the secondary endpoints (time to onset of angina and time to 1 mm ST segment depression). No correlation was evident between plasma nisoldipine levels and total exercise duration. Headache and peripheral edema were the most frequently reported adverse events and were dose related. There were no discontinuations due to adverse events in patients randomized to the 20-mg nisoldipine group. No deaths occurred while patients were receiving active nisoldipine therapy. Therapy with this extended-release formulation of nisoldipine is an effective once-daily treatment for chronic stable angina pectoris. It represents one of the few dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists that has shown efficacy when administered as monotherapy to patients with angina.


Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/tratamento farmacológico , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Isquemia Miocárdica/tratamento farmacológico , Nisoldipino/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angina Pectoris/diagnóstico , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/administração & dosagem , Doença Crônica , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Método Duplo-Cego , Teste de Esforço , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nisoldipino/administração & dosagem
11.
Clin Cardiol ; 18(6 Suppl 3): III 12-6, 1995 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7634558

RESUMO

Mild-to-moderate essential hypertension is a major risk factor for stroke and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Morbidity can be reduced significantly by lowering high blood pressure, and with the effective antihypertensive drugs now available, it is ever more important to identify and treat the estimated 50 to 60 million hypertensive persons in the United States. Yet a high percentage of persons being treated stop taking their medication and refuse to comply with their therapeutic regimen. Many problems relate to maintaining long-term therapy in the hypertensive population. They include the cost of medication, a lack of written instructions, unclear instructions, noninvolvement of the patient in designing the treatment plan, lack of patient education about the disease, side effects, and inconvenient dosing schedules. Numerous studies have found that compliance increases as drug-dosage frequency decreases, as with the use of once-daily or sustained-release drug preparations. Other contributors to compliance include prescription-refill reminders, appointment reminders, simple written instructions about drug use, and patient education about the need for treatment and the consequences of noncompliance. Many classes of antihypertensive drugs are available, and more are in development. With such an extensive armamentarium available, all patients, regardless of coexisting medical conditions, should be able to be given effective, individualized antihypertensive therapy.


Assuntos
Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Cooperação do Paciente , Humanos , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia
12.
Am J Cardiol ; 74(1): 9-17, 1994 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8017316

RESUMO

Diltiazem hydrochloride in a once-daily capsule formulation (DCD) has recently been approved in the United States for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and chronic stable angina pectoris. This trial evaluated the dose response of DCD in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-design trial, the effects and tolerability of once-daily therapy with placebo or DCD (60, 120, 240, 360, or 480 mg) were evaluated 24 hours after dosing, following 3 weeks of therapy in 227 patients with reproducible stable exertional angina pectoris. A significant linear dose trend (p = 0.004) was present across the 6 treatment groups for the primary end point--time to exercise termination at 24 hours after dosing--using a standard Bruce treadmill exercise test. A significant linear dose trend was also seen for time to 1 mm ST-segment depression at 24 hours after dosing. Similar effects on exercise parameters were also seen at 4 hours after dosing. A linear dose trend (p = 0.04) was noted relative to the overall anginal attacks during daily activities and for anginal attacks during exercise (p = 0.02). Overall frequency of treatment-related adverse effects was dose-related and occurred in 24.4% and 17.5% of patients treated with DCD and placebo, respectively. At a dose up to 240 mg/day, improvement in exercise tolerance was achieved without an associated increase in the rate of treatment-related adverse events compared with placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/tratamento farmacológico , Diltiazem/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Diltiazem/efeitos adversos , Diltiazem/farmacologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Eletrocardiografia/efeitos dos fármacos , Tolerância ao Exercício/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Am J Cardiol ; 73(16): 1165-8, 1994 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7911271

RESUMO

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study tested peak and trough efficacy of immediate-release nisoldipine (20 mg twice daily) added to existent beta-adrenergic blocking therapy. Patients were randomized with a history of chronic stable angina, while receiving a stable regimen of a beta-blocking agent, with exercise test-induced angina in association with 1 mm horizontal or downsloping ST-segment depression and exercise test reproducibility of +/- 15%. Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring (48-hour) was performed at 3 of 5 centers (44 patients). Efficacy was achieved in 53 patients (26 taking immediate-release nisoldipine/placebo in sequence and 27 taking placebo/immediate-release nisoldipine in sequence). Total exercise time increased compared with placebo at peak, but only a trend was seen at trough. Time to 1 mm ST-segment depression at peak and trough and ambulatory electrocardiographic parameters were also improved. Adverse effects were mild. This trial confirms that immediate-release nisoldipine when added to existent beta-blocker therapy is an active antianginal and anti-ischemic agent, but that the immediate-release formulation loses its antianginal effect at the end of its dosing interval (9 to 14 hours). This drug is therefore being examined in a new extended-release formulation (Coat-Core).


Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/prevenção & controle , Isquemia Miocárdica/prevenção & controle , Nisoldipino/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Doença Crônica , Método Duplo-Cego , Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial/efeitos dos fármacos , Teste de Esforço , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Nisoldipino/administração & dosagem , Nisoldipino/efeitos adversos , Placebos
14.
Cardiology ; 84(4-5): 316-21, 1994.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8187119

RESUMO

Betaxolol, a long-acting cardioselective beta-blocker, was tested alone and in combination with long-acting nitrates in a multicenter, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study of 3 weeks duration in patients with stable angina pectoris. All patients underwent exercise tolerance tests (ETTs) using Bruce's protocol. During the 3- to 4-week single-blind placebo baseline phase, all other drugs except sublingual nitroglycerin and long-acting nitrates were withdrawn. Those patients (n = 115) whose time to onset of moderate angina was between 2.5 and 7.5 min and was within +/- 15% in 2 consecutive ETTs were randomized to betaxolol 20 mg/day (n = 54) or placebo (n = 53). Betaxolol, compared to placebo, increased time to onset of angina, time to 1 mm S-T segment depression, and total exercise time and decreased the double product, weekly anginal attacks, and sublingual nitroglycerin consumption (p < 0.01). Our results indicate that betaxolol given in fixed 20-mg daily doses was efficacious in stable angina pectoris and its combination with long-acting nitrates potentiated its effect.


Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/tratamento farmacológico , Betaxolol/uso terapêutico , Betaxolol/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitroglicerina/uso terapêutico
15.
Am J Cardiol ; 72(17): 1249-56, 1993 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8256699

RESUMO

The efficacy and safety of extended-release isosorbide mononitrate tablets were evaluated in patients with stable effort angina. In a double-blind study, 313 patients with stable effort-induced angina were randomized to receive placebo or extended-release isosorbide mononitrate: 30, 60, 120 or 240 mg once daily in the morning. Serial exercise testing was performed using the standard Bruce treadmill protocol on days 1, 7, 14, 28 and 42 immediately before morning drug administration, and 4 and 12 hours after administration. After initial dosing, all groups that received extended-release isosorbide mononitrate had significant (p < 0.01) increases in mean total exercise time of approximately 30 to 50 seconds in relation to placebo 4 and 12 hours after administration. On day 42, mean changes from baseline in total exercise time of patients who received 120 or 240 mg of extended-release isosorbide mononitrate exceeded placebo by approximately 50 to 60 seconds 4 hours after dosing (p < 0.01), and by 30 to 35 seconds 12 hours after dosing (p < or = 0.05). No significant difference was detected between responses to extended-release isosorbide mononitrate and placebo 24 hours after administration (i.e., immediately before the next dose). Thus, there was neither significant activity nor demonstrable rebound of effort-induced angina (zero-hour effect) at the end of the dosing interval. Transient headache was the most prevalent adverse experience. Extended-release isosorbide mononitrate (120 and 240 mg administered orally once daily) significantly prolonged exercise time to development of moderate effort-induced angina 4 and 12 hours after dosing during long-term therapy, without development of nitrate tolerance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/tratamento farmacológico , Dinitrato de Isossorbida/análogos & derivados , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Angina Pectoris/sangue , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Dinitrato de Isossorbida/efeitos adversos , Dinitrato de Isossorbida/sangue , Dinitrato de Isossorbida/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método Simples-Cego , Vasodilatadores/efeitos adversos , Vasodilatadores/sangue
16.
Clin Ther ; 15(6): 1069-75, 1993.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8111804

RESUMO

The efficacy of a new sustained-release formulation of diltiazem was examined in a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in patients with stable angina. Doses of 60 mg BID, 90 mg BID, 180 mg BID and 240 mg BID were compared with placebo in 208 patients at 3 hours and 12 hours after dosing. Diltiazem, in doses of 90 mg BID and 180 mg BID, was statistically superior to placebo with respect to increasing total exercise time. Treadmill exercise time at 3 hours postdose increased with placebo from 356.1 +/- 118.7 sec to 375.7 +/- 119.8 sec (NS); with 90 mg BID, 382.7 +/- 111.8 sec to 445.4 +/- 117.5 sec (P < 0.005); and with 180 mg BID, 386.8 +/- 145.9 sec to 467.2 +/- 166.2 sec (P < 0.0001). At 12 hours postdose, treadmill exercise time with placebo increased from 357.6 +/- 128.3 sec to 383.8 +/- 128.7 sec (NS); with 90 mg BID, 395.2 +/- 119.4 sec to 449.7 +/- 123.1 sec (P = 0.053); with 180 mg BID, 395.3 +/- 141.4 sec to 476.6 +/- 165.6 sec (P < 0.0001). Time to onset of angina was also increased by the 180-mg-BID dose both at 3 hours postdose (257.3 +/- 126.8 sec to 354.3 +/- 158.7 sec; P < 0.0001) and at 12 hours postdose (274.7 +/- 131.2 sec to 377.4 +/- 186.2 sec; P < 0.0001). Sustained-release diltiazem is effective and safe in treating patients with chronic stable angina.


Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/tratamento farmacológico , Diltiazem/administração & dosagem , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Diltiazem/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Teste de Esforço , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
17.
Am J Cardiol ; 70(3): 286-92, 1992 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1632390

RESUMO

"Trough" plasma concentrations of isosorbide-5-mononitrate (IS-5-MN), an active metabolite of isosorbide dinitrate, of less than 95 ng/ml are considered necessary to prevent development of tolerance to isosorbide dinitrate and IS-5-MN. In a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study, the effects of IS-5-MN during twice daily eccentric therapy were evaluated in 18 patients with reproducible exercise-induced angina who were nitrate responders. In a random order, patients received either placebo or IS-5-MN (20 mg) at 8 a.m. and 2 p.m. for 1 week each. Average trough plasma IS-5-MN concentrations before the 8 a.m. and 2 p.m. doses were 67 and 226 ng/ml, respectively, and increased to 382 and 488 ng/ml 2 hours after the 8 a.m. and 2 p.m. doses, respectively. Despite a more than threefold higher trough plasma IS-5-MN concentration before the 2 p.m. dose than before the 8 a.m. dose, the increase in exercise duration 2 hours after the doses was similar (1.21 minutes [21%] after 8 a.m. dose, and 1.08 minutes [19%] after 2 p.m. dose). These increases in exercise duration after IS-5-MN were significantly (p less than 0.01) greater than those observed after placebo (0.17 minutes [3%] after 8 a.m. dose, and -0.05 minute [-0.5%] after 2 p.m. dose). Reduction in standing systolic blood pressure at 2 hours after the doses was also nearly identical after the 8 a.m. and 2 p.m. doses of IS-5-MN (21 [15%] and 19 [14%] mm Hg, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/tratamento farmacológico , Dinitrato de Isossorbida/análogos & derivados , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Angina Pectoris/fisiopatologia , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Eletrocardiografia , Teste de Esforço , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Dinitrato de Isossorbida/administração & dosagem , Dinitrato de Isossorbida/efeitos adversos , Dinitrato de Isossorbida/farmacocinética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Vasodilatadores/efeitos adversos , Vasodilatadores/farmacocinética
18.
Circulation ; 84(6): 2398-408, 1991 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1959195

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nisoldipine is a potent 1:4 dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist, and doses of 5 or 10 mg administered either once or twice daily have been claimed to exert antianginal effects. There is, however, little information regarding the dose-response relation and whether the drug exerts any consistent effects throughout the dosing interval. In this placebo-controlled, parallel-design study, the dose-response relation of monotherapy with nisoldipine administered twice daily was studied in patients with stable angina pectoris. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-one patients received single-blind placebo for 2 weeks; of these, 185 patients who reproducibly stopped treadmill exercise because of angina of moderate severity and had greater than or equal to 1 mm ST segment depression during exercise and experienced an average of three episodes of anginal attacks per week were randomized in a double-blind manner to one of the four treatment groups: placebo (n = 48), nisoldipine 2.5 mg (n = 47), nisoldipine 5 mg (n = 44), or nisoldipine 10 mg (n = 46). Nisoldipine or placebo was administered twice daily for 4 weeks and symptom-limited exercise tests were repeated at 2 and 10-14 hours after the double-blind medication. One hundred sixty-eight patients completed the study and 181 patients were valid for efficacy analysis. Compared with double-blind placebo, there were marginally significant trends toward increases for time to onset of angina for the 10-mg-b.i.d. group (83 versus 108 seconds, p = 0.08), time to 1 mm ST segment depression for the 5-mg-b.i.d. group (54 versus 83 seconds, p = 0.08), and total exercise time for the 5- (30 versus 50 seconds, p = 0.10) and 10-mg-b.i.d. (30 versus 58 seconds, p = 0.06) groups at 2 hours after the dose (peak effect) after 4 weeks of therapy. At 10-14 hours after the dose (trough effect), no differences between placebo and any of the nisoldipine doses on any of the exercise parameters were found after 4 weeks of therapy. A subset analysis of patients who stopped exercise within 10 minutes because of angina of moderate severity during single-blind placebo therapy (n = 123) revealed significant increase in total exercise duration and time to 1 mm ST segment depression at 2 hours after the dose in the 5- and 10-mg-b.i.d. dose groups compared with double-blind placebo (p less than 0.04). No significant trough effects, however, were observed even in this subgroup after any of the doses of nisoldipine. The frequency of anginal attacks decreased by 44%, 41%, 30%, and 41% after twice-daily therapy with 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg nisoldipine, and placebo groups, respectively (p = NS, nisoldipine versus placebo). The incidence of adverse events (minor and major) was 43.8% in the placebo group and 42.6%, 45.5%, and 56.5% in the nisoldipine 2.5-, 5-, and 10-mg-b.i.d. groups, respectively (p = NS compared with placebo). However, four patients developed unstable angina while on nisoldipine therapy (two in the 2.5-mg, one in the 5-mg, and one in the 10-mg-b.i.d. group) and two patients died suddenly in the nisoldipine 10-mg-b.i.d. group. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy with 2.5, 5, and 10 mg nisoldipine twice a day was not superior to placebo therapy in treating patients with angina pectoris, and the 10-mg-b.i.d. therapy resulted in a statistically insignificant but clinically important increase in the incidence of serious adverse events.


Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/tratamento farmacológico , Nisoldipino/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nisoldipino/administração & dosagem , Nisoldipino/efeitos adversos
19.
Mol Cell Biochem ; 96(2): 97-105, 1990 Aug 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2274050

RESUMO

The effects of infusing superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) into the coronary circulation were investigated in isolated, working rat hearts prior to and during a 15 minute episode of regional ischemia followed by 30 minutes reperfusion. Aortic output, left ventricular pressure and dP/dT were recorded. Compared to untreated hearts, SOD and CAT significantly improved function during reperfusion, but had no effect during the pre-ischemic or the ischemic period. To investigate possible transport of SOD and CAT into rat myocytes, cryotome sections of isolated, Langendorff perfused rat hearts were exposed to rabbit antibody prepared against the exogenous SOD and CAT. Bound antibody was detected by the indirect-fluorescent antibody test. The interior of myocytes from rat hearts exposed to SOD and CAT bound antibodies prepared against these enzymes, whereas myocytes from rat hearts not exposed to exogenous SOD and CAT only bound the CAT antibodies. This indicates the anti-SOD we prepared is specific for exogenous SOD, and also suggests exogenous SOD can gain access to the cytoplasm of myocytes from the coronary circulation.


Assuntos
Catalase/farmacologia , Doença das Coronárias/fisiopatologia , Superóxido Dismutase/farmacologia , Animais , Capilares/efeitos dos fármacos , Capilares/metabolismo , Capilares/ultraestrutura , Catalase/imunologia , Bovinos , Circulação Coronária/efeitos dos fármacos , Imunofluorescência , Fígado/enzimologia , Microcirculação , Ratos , Ratos Endogâmicos , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional , Superóxido Dismutase/imunologia
20.
Cytobios ; 63(252): 41-53, 1990.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2257758

RESUMO

Infusion of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) into the coronary circulation protects myocardial tissue from free radical injury and improves recovery of myocardial function after a short episode of ischaemia. To investigate the ultrastructure of myocardium treated with SOD and CAT, these enzymes were injected into the left atrium of dogs prior to and during 15 min of regional myocardial ischaemia, allowing 30 min of reperfusion, and then fixing the tissue for electron microscopy. The exogenous SOD + CAT was found to promote recovery of both function and structure in these hearts. In addition, electron dense material was unexpectedly found in vesicles of capillary endothelia, between capillaries and myocyte, and in vesicles within myocytes. This occurred only in hearts treated with SOD and/or CAT, suggesting SOD and CAT was concentrated and transported across the capillary endothelium and into myocytes. The rate of transcytosis, as measured by the number of intra-endothelial vesicles, was increased in tissue subjected to ischaemia and reperfusion in the presence of SOD and CAT. These observations suggest transcytosis of SOD and CAT is an important part of the process by which these enzymes provide protection to myocardium during reperfusion after ischaemia.


Assuntos
Catalase/farmacocinética , Endotélio Vascular/metabolismo , Traumatismo por Reperfusão Miocárdica/prevenção & controle , Miocárdio/metabolismo , Superóxido Dismutase/farmacocinética , Animais , Transporte Biológico , Capilares/metabolismo , Catalase/uso terapêutico , Cães , Feminino , Masculino , Miocárdio/ultraestrutura , Superóxido Dismutase/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA