Pathologic and clinical tumor size discordance in early-stage cervical cancer: Does it matter?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the rate of discordance between clinical and pathologic tumor size for women with stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009 criteria), assess risk factors for discordance, and determine the impact of discordance on oncologic outcomes. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a prior multi-institutional retrospective review of patients diagnosed with stage IB1 (FIGO 2009 staging) cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy between 2010 and 2017. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and oncologic data were collected. Pathologic upstaging was defined as having a preoperative diagnosis of stage IB1 cervical cancer with pathology demonstrating a tumor size >4 cm. Demographic and clinicopathologic data was compared using chi-square, fisher exact or 2-sided t-test. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of the 630 patients, 77 (12%) were upstaged. Patients who were upstaged had lower rates of preoperative conization (p < .001) or preoperative tumor sizes ≤2 cm (p < .001). Upstaged patients had increased odds of deep stromal invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, positive margins and positive lymph nodes. Almost 88% of upstaged patients received adjuvant therapy compared to 29% of patients with tumors ≤4 cm (odds 18.49, 95% CI 8.99-37.94). Finally, pathologic upstaging was associated with an increased hazard of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.95, 95% CI 1.03-3.67) and all-cause death (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.04-5.11). CONCLUSIONS: Pathologic upstaging in stage IB1 cervical cancer is relatively common. Upstaging is associated with an 18-fold increased risk of receipt of adjuvant therapy. Patients undergoing preoperative conization and those with tumors <2 cm had lower risks of upstaging. Improvement in preoperative assessment of tumor size may better inform primary treatment decisions.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal interval tumor reductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval tumor reductive surgery (TRS) for advanced ovarian cancer is feasible, however, the impact on disease outcomes remains unclear. We compare outcomes of patients treated with IP chemotherapy versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy following NACT and interval TRS. METHODS: In this retrospective review, patients with advanced ovarian cancer were included if they received NACT followed by optimal interval TRS between 1/2004 and 4/2017. Patients were excluded if they had an ECOG PS >1, received >6 cycles of NACT or postoperative chemotherapy, and/or received bevacizumab during primary therapy. Primary outcomes were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: There were 134 patients included in this study, 37 (28%) received IP and 97 (72%) received IV chemotherapy postoperatively. Patients in the IV group were older (median 66.3 vs 59.7 years, p = 0.0039) though there were no differences in BMI, race, BRCA status, stage, or histology. Median PFS was 3 months longer in the IP group (14.5 versus 11.5 months, p = 0.028) however there was no significant difference in OS. On univariate analysis, increasing number of NACT cycles (HR 1.914, 95% CI 1.024-3.497) and residual disease at completion of TRS (HR 1.541, 95% CI 1.042-2.248) were associated with decreased PFS; IP chemotherapy was associated with increased PFS (HR 0.633, 95% CI 0.414-0.944). These associations remained on multivariate analysis. Toxicity was comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: IP after NACT and optimal interval TRS was associated with in improved PFS compared to IV chemotherapy without significant differences in toxicity.

PARP inhibition and gynecologic malignancies: A review of current literature and on-going trials.

The poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) family of enzymes is important in several DNA repair pathways. Drugs that inhibit these enzymes have been investigated in many types of cancer, but their application in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies has rapidly evolved - as manifested by the 2014 FDA approval for olaparib in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer associated with a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCA). In efforts to broaden their efficacy, current clinical trials have demonstrated benefit of olaparib, and other PARP inhibitors (PARPi), as single agents and in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy and biologic agents, in wide ranging populations. Although the majority of data for PARPi in gynecologic malignancies has been specifically regarding ovarian cancer, their role in the treatment of uterine and cervical cancer is currently being investigated. This review will serve as a synopsis of seminal trials to date, summarize the breadth of clinical application in on-going studies, query how these results may change future practice, and reflect on questions yet to be answered.