Application and maintenance habits do make a difference in adhesion of Alora transdermal systems.

OBJECTIVES: To explore and evaluate Alora placebo patch application and maintenance habits of women in order to identify the factors that influence adhesion success. METHODS: This single-center, open-label, placebo, randomized, multiple-application, parallel-group study involved 99 healthy naïve users of transdermal patches. Participants applied and wore an Alora placebo patch for ten consecutive applications of approximately 3.5 days each and evaluated adhesion of the patches twice-daily. Three subgroups comprising participants achieving low, moderate or high adhesion success took part in focus groups to discuss their wear habits, practices and attitudes regarding transdermal patches. RESULTS: There was a significant behavioral component involved in patch adhesion. The habits, practices and attitudes of high achievers were clearly different from the other two subgroups. The three most important issues identified to improve adhesion were: mastering the removal of the patch liner, identifying the best site of application, and developing and implementing techniques to maintain patch adhesion. The Alora placebo patch was well tolerated throughout the study. CONCLUSION: The data showed that there is a learning curve involved in achieving maximal adhesion with a transdermal patch. During the study, a novel patch application method ('press, fold and slide') was demonstrated for the participants. This method was very well received by all participants and was more easily executed than the previous method. An adaptation of this method was incorporated into the Alora patient information leaflet, together with several other changes to help improve adhesion success.

Significant differences in estradiol bioavailability from two similarly labelled estradiol matrix transdermal systems.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bioavailabilities of estradiol delivered by two transdermal estradiol matrix systems; Alora and Evorel. STUDY DESIGN: A single-center, open-label, randomized, two-period cross-over study in 33 postmenopausal women. The subjects received two successive 84-h applications of either Alora or Evorel (each labelled to deliver 50 micrograms/day 17 beta-estradiol) in a randomized sequence. Serial serum samples, collected over the 84-h period following the application of the second patch, were analyzed for estradiol using a validated radioimmunoassay method. RESULTS: The fluctuation index produced by Evorel was significantly higher than that produced by Alora (Evorel, 135%; Alora, 76%; p < 0.0005). In addition, the estradiol baseline-corrected area under the curve for Evorel was significantly lower than that for Alora (Alora, 2871.8 pg h/ml; Evorel, 1870.6 pg h/ml; p < 0.0005). Both patches were found to be generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Alora delivered a higher, more consistent concentration of estradiol into the systemic circulation over the entire dosing interval than did Everol. Although the full clinical significance of these findings is currently unknown, this study demonstrates that there are significant differences in estradiol delivery from these two products, although they are labelled with the same nominal delivery rate.