Does the full-time presence of an intensivist lead to better outcomes in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit?

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to compare clinical outcomes in a dedicated adult cardiac surgery intensive care unit before and after the implementation of 24-hour intensivist coverage. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2016, 16,454 consecutive adult patients were admitted to the cardiac surgery intensive care unit after cardiac surgery. During this period, postoperative patients in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit were managed by intensivists during the day (group A); in July 2010, the nighttime coverage was transferred from the hands of residents and fellows to intensivists (group B). Postoperative outcomes before and after this change using 1-to-1 propensity score matching were examined. Patients were stratified a priori into low- and high-risk (<5% and ≥5% predicted mortality) based on the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II. RESULTS: Matched patients in group A had significantly higher cardiac surgery intensive care unit (2.1% vs 1.4%, P = .01) and in-hospital (2.7% vs 1.8%, P = .008) mortality. This higher mortality was only observed among high-risk group A patients who had significantly higher rates of cardiac surgery intensive care unit mortality (6.8% vs 4.1%, P = .01) and in-hospital mortality (8.5% vs 5.3%, P = .01) compared with the high-risk group B. The median duration of mechanical ventilation (5.8 vs 4.3 hours, P < .0001) and the risk of prolonged ventilation greater than 48 hours (5.3% vs 4%, P = .008) were significantly higher among group A patients; this higher rate of respiratory adverse events was observed in all strata of preoperative risk. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of patients admitted to a dedicated adult cardiac surgery intensive care unit, 24-hour intensivist coverage was associated with reduced mortality among patients with an expected operative mortality 5% or greater. These data suggest that preoperative risk stratification and adaptive cardiac surgery intensive care unit physician staffing may result in improved clinical outcomes and optimized hospital resource use.

Effect of thoracic epidural analgesia on clinical outcomes following transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) on acute and late outcomes following transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI). PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: A total of 135 consecutive patients who underwent TA-TAVI were included. All patients received catheter-based pain control, either via TEA (TEA group, n=74) or intercostal local analgesia with a catheter placed at the surgical incision site (non-TEA group, n=61), depending on the preference of the anaesthesiologist responsible for the case. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain level during early postoperative period (verbal rating scale from 1 to 10), 30-day/in-hospital complications and mortality, and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline or procedural characteristics between groups except for a lower left ventricular ejection fraction in the TEA group. The maximal pain score related to thoracotomy in the postoperative period was higher in the non-TEA group as compared with the TEA group (4 (IQR: 3-5)) vs 2 (IQR: 1-3), p<0.001). Non-TEA was associated with a higher rate of pulmonary complications (p<0.05 for nosocomial pneumonia, reintubation and tracheostomy). The 30-day/in-hospital mortality rate was higher in the non-TEA group (22.9% vs 2.7% in the TEA group, p<0.001). At 1-year follow-up, overall mortality remained higher in the non-TEA group (31.1%) compared with the TEA group (10.8%), p=0.005. Similar periprocedural and late results were obtained in a propensity score-matched analysis that included 100 matched patients. In the multivariable analysis, STS score (p=0.027) and absence of TEA (p=0.039) were independent predictors of increased cumulative late mortality. CONCLUSIONS: TEA provided superior analgesia following TA-TAVI, and was associated with a dramatic reduction in periprocedural respiratory complications, and both, short- and long-term mortality. These results highlight the importance of obtaining optimal analgesia following TA-TAVI to improve the results associated with this procedure.

A systematic review of lifestyle monitoring technologies.

The evidence base for lifestyle monitoring is relatively weak, even though there are significant numbers of commercial installations around the world. We conducted a literature review to summarize the current position with regard to lifestyle monitoring based on sensors in the home. In total, 74 papers met the inclusion criteria. Only four papers reported trials involving 20 or more subjects, with a further 21 papers reporting trials involving one or more subjects. Most papers (n = 49) were concerned with technology development. Motion detection was the most common of the technologies employed, followed by door and electrical appliance usage. The predominant monitoring strategy was that of detecting changes in activity. However, little attention has been given to determining when or how changes in the profile of activity should be used to raise a call for assistance from a health or care professional. Lifestyle monitoring remains a relatively immature research area in which there is little detailed understanding of how to provide comprehensive and effective systems.