The effect of gender on clinical outcomes following routine revascularizations with polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND: Gender-specific outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions were studied by a number of research groups with different endpoints and cohorts of different ethnic extractions. The purpose of this report is to use propensity score matching to determine gender-specific differences in clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions with polymer-free sirolimus-coated stents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The basis for this post hoc analysis was two large all-comers studies with prospectively enrolled patients from Europe and Asia. Data were pooled and analyzed in terms of clinical outcomes to assess the impact of gender in patients with stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome. The primary endpoint was the accumulated target-lesion revascularization rate whereas secondary endpoints consisted of the event rates for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), myocardial infarction, bleeding events and death from all causes. The purpose of these post hoc analyses was to detect potential differences in clinical outcomes between females and males in unselected and propensity-score-matched cohorts. RESULTS: Overall, in the unmatched cohorts, accumulated target-lesion revascularization rates did not differ between both genders (2.7% vs. 2.0%; P = 0.101), however, accumulated MACE rates were higher in females than in males (5.2% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.020). After propensity-score-matching, primarily adjusting for age, hypertension and diabetes, our data revealed similar accumulated MACE in women and men (5.5% vs. 5.2%; P = 0.749). In the unmatched STEMI subgroup, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in females driven by older age ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the propensity-score-matched real-world cohorts, female gender was not a predictor for increased rates of accumulated MACE. In the unmatched STEMI subgroup, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in females due to older age. Age seems to be the determining factor for increased clinical event rates and not gender.

Comparative characterization of cellular and molecular anti-restenotic profiles of paclitaxel and sirolimus. Implications for local drug delivery.

Pleiotropic anti-restenotic properties of drugs that are eluted from coated stents are critical for efficacy and safety. Little is known about comparative drug properties in appropriate human coronary target cell lines for the two compounds that are utilized on FDA-approved drug-eluting stent (DES) platforms, paclitaxel (PTX) and sirolimus (SRL). Target cell lines that play a pivotal role for the pathogenesis of restenosis and vascular healing include human coronary artery smooth muscle (CASMC) and endothelial cells (CAEC). PTX and SRL inhibited CASMC and CAEC proliferation and migration efficiently. However, there was a differential effect on proliferation and migration in CAEC with a more profound inhibition of both parameters by PTX, even at low dosages. Induction of cytotoxicity and apoptosis was pronounced in PTX- and very modest in SRL-treated CASMC and CAEC. PTX increased eNOS activity and nitric oxide (NO) release from CAEC. Neutrophilic leukocyte activation and transmigration, which should be avoided since it may precipitate adverse coronary events such as restenosis and stent thrombosis, was suppressed by SRL, whereas PTX tended to increase neutrophilic leucocyte activity. Therefore, although the primary drug target, inhibition of mitogen-mediated CASMC proliferation, is effectively accomplished by both drugs, auxiliary pharmacological properties that are crucial for the anti-restenotic drug effect and vascular healing are considerably different between PTX and SRL. In comparison with PTX, SRL shows minor interference with endothelial cell proliferation and migration, lower levels of cytotoxicity and apoptosis, a broader therapeutic range and distinctive immunosuppressive properties.

Does addition of estradiol improve the efficacy of a rapamycin-eluting stent? Results of the ISAR-PEACE randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a rapamycin plus 17-beta-estradiol-eluting stent versus a rapamycin-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND: Estradiol promotes rapid re-endothelialization of coronary stents in animal models, but it is not known whether combining this drug with rapamycin represents an improved drug-eluting stent technology in terms of reduced lumen renarrowing. METHODS: In this randomized study, we enrolled 502 patients with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries who were randomly assigned to receive either a polymer-free, estradiol plus rapamycin-eluting stent (ERES) (n = 252) or a polymer-free, rapamycin-eluting stent (RES) (n = 250). The primary end point was in-stent late lumen loss in the follow-up angiography. Secondary end points were binary angiographic restenosis, target lesion revascularization, combined incidence of death and myocardial infarction, and incidence of stent thrombosis during 1 year after randomization. The study was designed to test for the superiority of the ERES compared with the RES with respect to in-stent late lumen loss. RESULTS: Late lumen loss (0.52 +/- 0.58 mm vs. 0.51 +/- 0.58 mm, p = 0.83), the incidence of binary angiographic restenosis (17.6% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.85), the incidence of target lesion revascularization (14.3% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.72), the combined incidence of death and myocardial infarction (7.9% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.98), and the incidence of stent thrombosis (0.8% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.99) were not significantly different between the ERES group and the RES group. CONCLUSIONS: No apparent beneficial effect is obtained by adding estradiol to a polymer-free rapamycin-eluting stent during the first year after the procedure. (The ISAR-PEACE trial; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00402636?order=1; NCT00402636).