Coronal decompensation following thoracic vertebral body tethering in idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: Post-operative coronal decompensation (CD) continues to be a challenge in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). CD following selective spinal fusion has been studied. However, there is currently little information regarding CD following Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT). Thus, the goal of this study is to better understand the incidence and risk factors for CD after VBT. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database was used for analysis. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing thoracic VBT, a minimum 2-year follow-up, LIV was L1 or above, skeletally immature (Risser ≤ 1), and available preoperative and final follow-up AP and lateral upright radiographs. Radiographic parameters including major and minor Cobb angles, curve type, LIV tilt/translation, L4 tilt, and coronal balance were measured. CD was defined as the distance between C7PL and CSVL > 2 cm. Multiple logistic regression model was used to identify significant predictors of CD. RESULTS: Out of 136 patients undergoing VBT, 94 patients (86 female and 6 male) met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 12.1 (9-16) and mean follow-up period was 3.4 years (2-5 years). Major and minor curves, AVR, coronal balance, LIV translation, LIV tilt, L4 tilt were significantly improved after surgery. CD occurred in 11% at final follow-up. Lenke 1A-R (24%) and 1C (26%) had greater incidence of CD compared to 1A-L (4%), 2 (0%), and 3 (0%). LIV selection was not associated with CD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis yielded 1A-R and 1C curves as a predictor of CD with the odds ratio being 17.0. CONCLUSION: CD occurred in 11% of our thoracic VBT patients. Lenke 1A-R and 1C curve types were predictors for CD in patients treated with VBT. There were no other preoperative predictors associated with CD.

Incidence of Tether Breakage in Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering (TAVBT) is an emerging treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Tether breakage is a known complication of TAVBT with incompletely known incidence. We aim to define the incidence of tether breakage in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who undergo TAVBT. The incidence of tether breakage in TAVBT is hypothesized to be high and increase with time postoperatively. METHODS: All patients with right-sided, thoracic curves who underwent TAVBT with at least 2 and up to 3 years of radiographic follow-up were included. Tether breakage between 2 vertebrae was defined a priori as any increase in adjacent screw angle >5 degrees from the minimum over the follow-up period. The presence and timing of tether breakage were noted for each patient. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to calculate expected tether breakage up to 36 months. χ 2 analysis was performed to examine the relationship between tether breakage and reoperations. Independent t test was used to compare the average final Cobb angle between cohorts. RESULTS: In total, 208 patients from 10 centers were included in our review. Radiographically identified tether breakage occurred in 75 patients (36%). The initial break occurred at or beyond 24 months in 66 patients (88%). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated the cumulative rate of expected tether breakage to be 19% at 24 months, increasing to 50% at 36 months. Twenty-one patients (28%) with a radiographically identified tether breakage went on to require reoperation, with 9 patients (12%) requiring conversion to posterior spinal fusion. Patients with a radiographically identified tether breakage went on to require conversion to posterior spinal fusion more often than those patients without identified tether breakage (12% vs. 2%; P =0.004). The average major coronal curve angle at final follow-up was significantly larger for patients with radiographically identified tether breakage than for those without tether breakage (31 deg±12 deg vs. 26 deg±12 deg; P =0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of tether breakage in TAVBT is high, and it is expected to occur in 50% of patients by 36 months postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The Effect of Implant Density on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Fusion: Results of the Minimize Implants Maximize Outcomes Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be treated with instrumented fusion, but the number of anchors needed for optimal correction is controversial. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized study that included patients undergoing spinal fusion for single thoracic curves between 45° and 65°, the most common form of operatively treated AIS. Of the 211 patients randomized, 108 were assigned to a high-density screw pattern and 103, to a low-density screw pattern. Surgeons were instructed to use ≥1.8 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the high-implant-density group or ≤1.4 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the low-implant-density group. The primary outcome measure was the percent correction of the coronal curve at the 2-year follow-up. The power analysis for this trial required 174 patients to show equivalence, defined as a 95% confidence interval (CI) within a ±10% correction margin with a probability of 90%. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was equivalent between the high-density and low-density groups at the 2-year follow-up (67.6% versus 65.7%; difference, -1.9% [95% CI: -6.1%, 2.2%]). In the per-protocol cohorts, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was also equivalent between the 2 groups at the 2-year follow-up (65.0% versus 66.1%; difference, 1.1% [95% CI: -3.0%, 5.2%]). A total of 6 patients in the low-density group and 5 patients in the high-density group required reoperation (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of spinal fusion for primary thoracic AIS curves between 45° and 65°, the percent coronal curve correction obtained with use of a low-implant-density construct and that obtained with use of a high-implant-density construct were equivalent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Thoracolumbar curve behavior after selective thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering in Lenke 1A vs Lenke 1C curve patterns.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospective database. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate changes in the thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves and truncal balance in patients treated with selective thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) with Lenke 1A vs 1C curves at a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Lenke 1C curves treated with selective thoracic AVBT demonstrate equivalent thoracic curve correction and reduced thoracolumbar/lumbar curve correction compared to Lenke 1A curves. Additionally, at the most recent follow-up, both curve types demonstrate comparable coronal alignment at C7 and the lumbar curve apex, though 1C curves have better alignment at the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). Rates of revision surgery are equivalent between the two groups. METHODS: A matched cohort of 43 Risser 0-1, Sanders Maturity Scale (SMS) 2-5 AIS pts with Lenke 1A (1A group)and 19 pts with Lenke 1C curves (1C group) treated with selective thoracic AVBT and a minimum of 2-year follow-up were included. Digital radiographic software was used to assess Cobb angle and coronal alignment on preoperative, postoperative and subsequent follow-up radiographs. Coronal alignment was assessed by measuring the distance from the center sacral vertical line (CSVL) to the midpoint of the LIV, apical vertebra for thoracic and lumbar curves and C7. RESULTS: There was no difference in the thoracic curve measured preoperatively, at first erect, pre-rupture or at the most recent follow-up, nor was there a significant difference in C7 alignment (p = 0.057) or apical thoracic alignment (p = 0.272) between the 1A and 1C groups. Thoracolumbar/lumbar curves were smaller in the 1A group at all-time points. However, there was no significant difference between the percent correction between the two groups thoracic (p = 0.453) and thoracolumbar/lumbar (p = 0.105). The Lenke 1C curves had improved coronal translational alignment of the LIV at the most recent follow-up p = 0.0355. At the most recent follow-up the number of patients considered to have successful curve correction (Cobb angle correction of both the thoracic and thoracolumbar//lumbar curves to ≤ 35 degrees), was equivalent between Lenke 1A and Lenke 1C curves (p = 0.80). There was also no difference in the rate of revision surgery between the two groups (p = 0.546). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to compare the impact of lumbar curve modifier type on outcomes in thoracic AVBT. We found that Lenke 1C curves treated with selective thoracic AVBT demonstrate less absolute correction of the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve at all time points but have equivalent percent correction of the thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. The two groups have equivalent alignment at C7 and the thoracic curve apex, and Lenke 1C curves have better alignment at the LIV at the most recent follow-up. Furthermore, they have an equivalent rate of revision surgery compared to Lenke 1A curves. Selective thoracic AVBT is a viable option for selective Lenke 1C curves, but despite equivalent correction of the thoracic curve, there is less correction of the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve at all-time points.

Does Transitioning to a Brace Improve HRQoL After Casting for Early Onset Scoliosis?

BACKGROUND: Serial casting is favored for the initial treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS), but there is concern about significant morbidity and caregiver burden. Studies have examined the utility of bracing as an alternative to casting, but little is known about differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between treatments. We hypothesized that patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic EOS experience an improvement in HRQoL when transitioning from serial casting to bracing as measured by the 24-Item Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ). METHODS: Subjects with idiopathic EOS were retrospectively identified from a multicenter database. EOSQ scores were compared before treatment, after index casting, after transition out of cast to brace, and at the most recent follow-up. Available major curve magnitudes were also compared during these time points. Data were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Sixty-six subjects met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-seven (56%) subjects were male and the average age at the time of index treatment was 1.9 (0.37-6.4) years. The average follow-up was 3.2 (0.90-6.8) years. In 57 subjects, the major curve magnitude improved from a mean of 33 (CI 28-37) degrees before treatment initiation to 27 (CI 23-30) degrees after casting and to 24 (CI 20-29) degrees at the most recent follow-up. The HRQoL subdomain showed a significant decrease in HRQoL during casting treatment 75.7 (CI 72.9-78.5) from pre-index treatment 84.9 (CI 81.4-88.5), during brace treatment 84.8 (CI 81.8-88.0) and at most recent follow-up 87.0 (CI 83.6-90.3) ( P <0.001). The parental impact subdomain improved from the beginning to the end of treatment (77.7 to 87.7, P =0.001) (n=64). Satisfaction improved from casting to bracing (73.4 to 86.7, P <0.001) (n=63) and to the most recent follow-up (73.4 to 87.9, P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with casting for EOS experience reversible declines in HRQoL. After patients transition from casting to bracing, EOSQ scores recover to pretreatment baseline levels and are maintained at follow-up. This information must be balanced with the effectiveness of treatment for EOS with either method and customized for each patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Re-evaluating consensus and uncertainty among treatment options for early onset scoliosis: a 10-year update.

PURPOSE: Consensus and uncertainty in early onset scoliosis (EOS) treatment were evaluated in 2010. It is currently unknown how treatment preferences have evolved over the past decade. The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate consensus and uncertainty among treatment options for EOS patients to understand how they compare to 10 years ago. METHODS: 11 pediatric spinal surgeons (similar participants as in 2010) were invited to complete a survey of 315 idiopathic and neuromuscular EOS cases (same cases as in 2010). Treatment options included the following: conservative management, distraction-based methods, growth guidance/modulation, and arthrodesis. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement, and uncertainty was < 70%. Associations between case characteristics and consensus for treatments were assessed via chi-squared and multiple regression analyses. Case characteristics associated with uncertainty were described. RESULTS: Eleven surgeons [31.7 ± 7.8 years of experience] in the original 2010 cohort completed the survey. Consensus for conservative management was found in idiopathic patients aged ≤ 3, whereas in 2010, some of these cases were selected for surgery. There is currently consensus for casting idiopathic patients aged 1 or 2 with moderate curves, whereas in 2010, there was uncertainty between casting and bracing. Among neuromuscular cases with consensus for surgery, arthrodesis was chosen for patients aged 9 with larger curves. CONCLUSION: Presently, preferences for conservative management have increased in comparison to 2010, and casting appears to be preferred over bracing in select infantile cases. Future research efforts with higher levels-of-evidence should be devoted to elucidate the areas of uncertainty to improve care in the EOS population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Spontaneous Lumbar Curve Correction Following Vertebral Body Tethering of Main Thoracic Curves.

BACKGROUND: Growth modulation through anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) has emerged as a fusionless option for the treatment of progressive scoliosis. When tethering the main thoracic curve, the compensatory thoracolumbar/lumbar curve must correct indirectly as a result. The present study evaluated the response of these lumbar curves following AVBT of the main thoracic curves. METHODS: Patients who underwent thoracic AVBT and who had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Magnitudes of the thoracic and lumbar curves were recorded preoperatively and at the first-erect and 2-year postoperative visits. Lumbar curves were further stratified according to their lumbar modifier (A, B, or C). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and repeated-measures ANOVA were performed to compare correction rates, and the Pearson coefficient was utilized to determine the correlation between the tethered thoracic curve and uninstrumented lumbar curve magnitudes. RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were included. Thoracic curve correction was 40% at the first-erect visit and 43% at 2 years (p = 0.012). Lumbar correction was 30%, 26%, and 18% at the first-erect visit (p < 0.001 for all compared with preoperatively) and minimally changed at 31%, 26%, and 24% at 2 years for lumbar modifiers A, B, and C, respectively. A total of 118 patients (54%) showed thoracic curve improvement between the first-erect and 2-year visits. In a subgroup analysis, these patients had a correction in lumbar curve magnitude from preoperatively to the first-erect visit of 30%, 22%, and 16% for lumbar modifiers A, B, C, respectively, that increased to 42%, 34%, and 31% at 2 years, with strong correlation to thoracic correction at 2-year follow-up (r = 0.557, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was immediate lumbar correction following AVBT of a main thoracic curve, further improvement following initial correction was only observed among patients with growth modulation of the thoracic curve. Considering all patients, the uninstrumented lumbar curve corrected 30% at 2 years and the instrumented thoracic curve corrected 40%. As indications for AVBT are refined, these data will provide insight into the response of the uninstrumented lumbar curve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Semirigid Fiberglass Casting for the Early Management of Clubfoot: A Single-Center Experience.

Background Semirigid fiberglass (SRF) is an alternative material to plaster of Paris (POP) for idiopathic clubfoot casting in the Ponseti method. The purpose of this study was to evaluate early clinical outcomes in a series of idiopathic clubfoot patients treated with SRF at a single institution and to compare these findings to historical norms with POP casting present in the literature. Methods A series of idiopathic clubfoot patients managed exclusively with SRF in the Ponseti method was identified. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by number of casts, change in Pirani score, frequency of treatment-related complications, and frequency of surgery other than tenotomy. A comprehensive literature review was used for comparative historical norms. Results The study included 34 feet in 26 patients. Pirani score was 4.7±1.3 at presentation and 1.9±1.4 at the end of casting, representing a score change of 2.8±1.3 with SRF. Initial correction was obtained with 6.9±1.4 casts. Treatment-related complications occurred in six treated feet (17.6%) including 13 cast slippages in five feet and one cast-related thigh abrasion. A total of 25 (73.5%) feet underwent tenotomy. Two feet required an additional surgical procedure. Conclusion Clubfoot patients treated with SRF demonstrated acceptable deformity correction following Ponseti-style casting. The quantitative clinical outcomes evaluated appeared similar to norms using POP present in the literature. The findings of this study support SRF as a viable alternative to plaster casting for clubfoot correction utilizing the Ponseti method. As such, further investigation for rigorous comparative assessment is warranted.

Building Self-Confidence and Other Skills: What Surgeons Can Learn From Other Professions.

Self-confidence is one of the attributes often assigned to surgeons, but surgeons do not always feel self-confident in the operating room. A lack of confidence may lead to poor performance for both the surgeon and the surgical team. The ideal qualities of a self-confident surgeon, barriers to achieving confidence and strategies for becoming a more confident surgeon and leader in the operating room are outlined in this chapter.

To tether or fuse? Significant equipoise remains in treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) continues to grow in interest from both a patient and surgeon perspective for the treatment of scoliosis. However, the data are limited when it comes to surgeon selection of both procedure type and instrumented levels. This study sought to assess surgeon variability in treatment recommendation and level selection for VBT versus posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for the management of scoliosis. METHODS: Surgeon members of the Pediatric Spine Study Group and Harms Study Group were queried for treatment recommendations and proposed upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection for PSF and VBT based on 17 detailed clinical vignettes. Responses were subdivided in each clinical vignette according to surgeon experience and treatment recommendations with assessment of intra-rater reliability. Binomial distribution tests were used to establish equipoise, selecting p < 0.10 to indicate the presence of a treatment choice with consensus set > 70% agreement. For treatment choice, responses were assessed first for consensus on the decision to proceed with PSF or VBT. RESULTS: Thirty-five surgeons with varied experience completed the survey with 26 surgeons (74%) completing the second follow-up survey. Overall, VBT was the recommended treatment by 47% of surgeons, ranging by clinical vignette. Consensus in treatment recommendation was present for 6 clinical vignettes including 3 for VBT and 3 for PSF, with equipoise present for the remaining 11. Of the 17 vignettes, 12 demonstrated moderate intra-observer reliability including the 3 consensus vignettes for VBT. Sanders stage ≤ 3 and smaller curve magnitude were related with VBT recommendation but neither age nor curve flexibility significantly influenced the decision to recommend VBT. Surgeons with high VBT volume, ≥ 11 VBT cases/year, were more likely to recommend VBT than those with low volumes (0-10 cases per year (p < 0.0001)). High VBT volume surgeons demonstrated consensus in VBT recommendation for Lenke 5/6 curves (75% mean recommendation). High VBT volume surgeons had a significantly higher VBT recommendation rate for Lenke 1A, 2A curves (71.8% vs 48.0%, p = 0.012), and Lenke 3 curves (62% vs 26.9%, p = 0.023). Equipoise was present for all vignettes in low volume surgeons. In addition, high VBT volume surgeons trended toward including more instrumented levels than low VBT volume surgeons (7.17 vs 6.69 levels). CONCLUSION: Significant equipoise is present among pediatric spine surgeons for treatment recommendations regarding VBT and PSF. Surgeon-, patient-, and curve-specific variables were identified to influence treatment recommendations, including surgeon experience, curve subtype, deformity magnitude, and skeletal maturity. This study highlights the need for continued research in identifying the optimal indications for VBT and PSF in the treatment of pediatric spinal deformity.

Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering Compared with Posterior Spinal Fusion for Major Thoracic Curves: A Retrospective Comparison by the Harms Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is an alternative to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for the surgical treatment of scoliosis. The present study utilized a large, multicenter database and propensity matching to compare outcomes of AVBT to PSF in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: Patients with thoracic idiopathic scoliosis who underwent AVBT with a minimum 2-year follow-up retrospectively underwent 2 methods of propensity-guided matching to PSF patients from an idiopathic scoliosis registry. Radiographic, clinical, and Scoliosis Research Society 22-Item Questionnaire (SRS-22) data were compared preoperatively and at the ≥2-year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 237 AVBT patients were matched with 237 PSF patients. In the AVBT group, the mean age was 12.1 ± 1.6 years, the mean follow-up was 2.2 ± 0.5 years, 84% of patients were female, and 79% of patients had a Risser sign of 0 or 1, compared with 13.4 ± 1.4 years, 2.3 ± 0.5 years, 84% female, and 43% Risser 0 or 1 in the PSF group. The AVBT group was younger (p < 0.001), had a smaller mean thoracic curve preoperatively (48 ± 9°; range, 30° to 74°; compared with 53 ± 8°; range, 40° to 78° in the PSF group; p < 0.001), and had less initial correction (41% ± 16% correction to 28° ± 9° compared with 70% ± 11% correction to 16° ± 6° in the PSF group; p < 0.001). Thoracic deformity at the time of the latest follow-up was 27° ± 12° (range, 1° to 61°) for AVBT compared with 20° ± 7° (range, 3° to 42°) for PSF (p < 0.001). A total of 76% of AVBT patients had a thoracic curve of <35° at the latest follow-up compared with 97.4% of PSF patients (p < 0.001). A residual curve of >50° was present in 7 AVBT patients (3%), 3 of whom underwent subsequent PSF, and in 0 PSF patients (0%). Forty-six subsequent procedures were performed in 38 AVBT patients (16%), including 17 conversions to PSF and 16 revisions for excessive correction, compared with 4 revision procedures in 3 PSF patients (1.3%; p < 0.01). AVBT patients had lower median preoperative SRS-22 mental-health component scores (p < 0.01) and less improvement in the pain and self-image scores between preoperatively and the ≥2-year follow-up (p < 0.05). In the more strictly matched analysis (n = 108 each), 10% of patients in the AVBT group and 2% of patients in the PSF group required a subsequent surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: At a mean follow-up of 2.2 years, 76% of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent AVBT had a residual curve of <35° compared with 97.4% of patients who underwent PSF. A total of 16% of cases in the AVBT group required a subsequent surgical procedure compared with 1.3% in the PSF group. An additional 4 cases (1.3%) in the AVBT group had a residual curve of >50° that may require revision or conversion to PSF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Inter- and intra-rater reliability and accuracy of Sanders Skeletal Maturity Staging System when used by surgeons performing vertebral body tethering.

PURPOSE: Pediatric orthopedic surgeons must accurately assess the skeletal stage of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients for selection and timing of optimal treatment. Successful treatment using vertebral growth modulation is highly dependent on skeletal growth remaining. We sought to evaluate the current-state use of the Sanders Skeletal Maturity System (SSMS) in regard to precision and accuracy. We hypothesized that pediatric orthopedic surgeons currently use SSMS with moderate precision and accuracy. METHODS: Eight practicing pediatric orthopedic surgeons who perform vertebral body tethering surgery without specific training in SSMS were asked to assign the SSMS stage for 34 de-identified hand radiographs from AIS patients. Precision was evaluated as inter-rater reliability, using both Krippendorff's α and Weighted Cohen's kappa statistics, and as intra-rater reliability, using only Weighted Cohen's kappa statistics. Surgeon accuracy was evaluated using Weighted Cohen's kappa statistics with comparison of surveyed surgeons' responses to the gold standard rating. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability across the surveyed surgeons indicated moderate to substantial agreement using both statistical methods (α = 0.766, κ = 0.627) with the majority of discord occurring when assigning SSMS stages 2 through 4. The surveyed surgeons displayed substantial accuracy when compared to the gold standard (κ = 0.627) with the majority of inaccuracy involving the identification of stage 3B. When re-surveyed, the surgeons showed substantial intra-rater reliability (κ = 0.71) with increased inconsistencies when deciding between SSMS stage 3A and stage 3B. CONCLUSION: The current-state use of SSMS across pediatric orthopedic surgeons for evaluation of AIS patients displays adequate but imperfect precision and accuracy with difficulties delineating SSMS stages 2 through 4, which correlate with adolescent growth periods germane to scoliosis growth modulation surgery. Centralized assessment of hand-bone age may help ensure standardized reporting for non-fusion scoliosis research.

Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in a Patient With a Deep Brain Stimulator: A Case Report.

SUMMARY: A major complication of surgical scoliosis correction is permanent injury of the spinal cord. Intraoperative neuromonitoring continually evaluates spinal cord function through monitoring sensory and corticospinal motor tracts. There is no literature or manufacturer recommendation on whether transcranial motor evoked potential (tcMEP) monitoring can be performed safely in the presence of a deep brain stimulator (DBS) system. A 17-year-old adolescent boy with severe neuromuscular scoliosis presented for a posterior spinal fusion. The patient suffered from generalized dystonia treated with a DBS terminating in the left and right globus pallidus internus. The competing goals of monitoring motor function during the spinal fusion and preserving the integrity of the DBS system were discussed preoperatively. The DBS system was deactivated for the duration of surgery, and tcMEPs were used sparingly at the lowest suitable stimulation voltage. Intraoperative management focused on facilitating neurophysiologic monitoring through a total intravenous anesthetic of propofol, methadone, and remifentanil. The tcMEPS remained unchanged throughout the operation and the patient emerged able to move his lower extremities to command. Postoperatively, the DBS system was turned back on and showed retained settings, normal functioning, and unchanged impedance of the DBS leads. Neither the patient nor his parents reported any subjective changes in the symptoms of dystonia. The authors conclude that monitoring tcMEPs in the presence of a DBS implant may be done safely, when the clinical circumstances suggest that the added information gained from tcMEPs outweighs the theoretical risk to the DBS system and the course of the medical condition treated by the DBS.

Methadone and a Clinical Pathway in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: A Historically Controlled Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Historically controlled clinical trial. OBJECTIVES: Patients presenting for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) by posterior spinal fusion may benefit from structured clinical pathways. We studied the effects of implementing a published clinical pathway for the perioperative care of patients with AIS that required intraoperative use of methadone at our institution. METHODS: We performed a historically controlled clinical trial of patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS by comparing a retrospectively collected control group of 25 patients with a prospective experimental group of 14 patients receiving methadone, gabapentin, propofol, and remifentanil as part of a new clinical pathway. RESULTS: Use of the pathway decreased average pain scores evaluated by the Numeric Rating Scale in the 24 hours following surgery (4.8 [4-6] to 3.4 [2-4], P = .03 [-2.6 to -0.2; t = -2.3]) and postoperative opioid consumption by 76% (41 [29-51] mg to 10 [4-17] mg, P < .001 [-45 to -15; Welch's t = 4.9]) during the same period. Improved analgesia and reduced reliance on opioids facilitated other postoperative elements of the clinical pathway and shortened the average hospital length of stay by 1 day (4 [3-6] days to 3 [3-5] days, P = .001 [-2 to -1; U = 67, Z = -3.3]). CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal analgesia and a clinical pathway add value in the perioperative care of patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS by improving analgesia and shortening hospitalization. The prospective arm of the trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under NCT02481570.

What They Want - Caregiver and Patient Immobilization Preferences for Pediatric Buckle Fractures of the Wrist.

Background: Recent literature supports minimalist approaches such as splinting for pediatric buckle fractures of the wrist. Uptake of this practice, however, has lagged behind the evidence. Barriers to implementation of this strategy necessitate further investigation, and caregiver and patient preferences represent an obstacle that has not been previously evaluated. This study sought to examine caregiver and patient treatment preferences and factors influencing care decisions for buckle fractures of the wrist. We hypothesized that the majority of caregivers and patients prefer cast immobilization for buckle fractures of the wrist. Methods: A 22-item caregiver survey was created to assess demographics, treatment preferences and influential factors. The survey was completed by a convenience sample of caregivers presenting with patients of any diagnosis to our pediatric orthopaedic clinic. Results: 297 surveys were collected predominantly from mothers (81.2%) caring for 2.4 (SD 1.3) children. Forty-one percent had previously cared for a child with a fracture. Caregivers accompanied patients who were 9.0+/-5.0-years-old, 34% of whom were actively being treated for an orthopaedic injury. Caregiver immobilization preferences for buckle fractures of the wrist were: no preference (43.1%), cast (32.3%) and splint (24.6%). The doctor's recommendation was the most influential factor on this decision while the child's gender was the least of the factors assessed. Those who rated treatment durability and child's activity level higher were associated with a preference for casting, while those who rated comfort higher were associated with a preference for splinting. Discussion: This study is the first to characterize caregiver preferences regarding immobilization devices in the realm of buckle fractures of the wrist. Findings identified that preferences are mixed, with the interest in casting being less than anticipated. Factors influencing caregiver preference include the doctor's recommendation, durability, the patient's activity level, and comfort. Findings can help guide treatment discussions for providers seeking to implement splint-based immobilization strategies.Level of Evidence: III.

MRI utilization and rates of abnormal pretreatment MRI findings in early-onset scoliosis: review of a global cohort.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review OBJECTIVES: To report the frequency of pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilization and rates and types of intra-spinal abnormalities identified on MRI in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS). MRI can help identify spinal cord abnormalities in patients with EOS. METHODS: We reviewed data from patients enrolled from 1993-2018 in an international EOS registry. Patients with incomplete/unverifiable data and those with spinal deformities secondary to infection or tumor were excluded, leaving 1343 patients for analysis. Demographic characteristics, pretreatment major curve magnitude, treatment type, and MRI findings were analyzed. Patients were categorized by EOS type (congenital, idiopathic, neuromuscular, syndromic), pretreatment MRI utilization, and presence of intra-spinal abnormality on MRI. Univariate testing and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify demographic, radiographic, and clinical predictors of MRI utilization and abnormal MRI findings. RESULTS: MRI was used in 836 patients (62%). Pretreatment MRI utilization rates ranged from 42% in neuromuscular EOS to 74% in congenital EOS. Prevalence of abnormal MRI findings was 24% overall, ranging from 13% in patients with idiopathic EOS to 39% in neuromuscular EOS. Compared with white/Caucasian patients, Asian/Asian-American patients had higher odds of MRI utilization and abnormal MRI findings. Treatment type, pretreatment major curve magnitude, age at MRI, and age at treatment were not associated with abnormal MRI findings. Overall, 249 abnormalities were identified in 197 patients. The most common findings were syrinx and tethered cord. Syrinx with Chiari malformation was the most frequent combination of abnormal findings. CONCLUSION: In the two-thirds of patients who underwent MRI before EOS treatment, findings were abnormal in 24%. EOS type and race/ethnicity were associated with both MRI utilization and abnormal findings. The most frequent abnormalities were syrinx and tethered cord, and the type of abnormalities appeared to differ by EOS type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, Level III.

Buckling Down on Torus Fractures - Assessing Treatment Preferences and Perceived Management Barriers at a Single Institution.

Background: Pediatric buckle fractures of the wrist can be safely managed in 'minimalist' fashion with splinting and limited follow-up; however, traditional means of treatment remain prevalent. The purpose of this study was to 1) evaluate preferences for buckle fracture management among providers at a single institution and 2) identify factors influencing clinical decision-making and barriers to implementation of minimalist practices. Methods: A 13 question survey was developed split into three sections: 1) Demographics, 2) Preferred management, and 3) Influential factors. The survey was distributed to 32 providers within our hospital system involved in buckle fracture management via email over a 1 year period. Descriptive statistics of responses were performed to address study aims. Results: The survey participation rate was 72%. Respondents had 12.2+/-12.5 (Range: 1-41) years of experience. Casting of buckle fractures was preferred by 56.5% of providers. Most (77%) were aware of literature supporting minimalist strategies. Family preferences (59.1%) and compliance concerns (54.5%) were cited as the biggest barriers to implementing these practices. Colleague recommendations and patient and caregiver preferences had the strongest influence on providers' practice. Following completion, 88.2% of providers stated they would change or consider changing their practices. Discussion: Despite awareness of the evidence base, a casting preference still exists. While other aspects of the minimalist approach were popular, prior work suggests this does not necessarily translate into practice. Commonly cited barriers include family preferences and compliance concerns; however, awareness of these issues may enable change. Level of Evidence: III.

Surveying the POSNA Landscape: What Can We Learn From Society Survey Studies?

BACKGROUND: A growing trend of survey-based research has been seen in the field of pediatric orthopaedics. The purpose of this study was to describe patterns of surveys of Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) membership and evaluate for associations between study characteristics and response rates in order to inform future research efforts. We hypothesized that studies with fewer survey questions and study group or committee involvement would demonstrate higher response rates. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all peer-reviewed survey publications targeting POSNA members published up to December 2017. Included studies were reviewed to identify author and publication characteristics, survey development and methodology, survey distribution procedures, and response rates. Statistical analyses were performed to describe publication patterns and evaluate for associations between study characteristics and response rates. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies published from 1991 to 2017 were identified as meeting inclusion criteria, with a substantial increase noted over the last 3 years. Studies included 4.6 (SD 1.9) authors and 14.7% had affiliations with study groups or committees. Survey development methodology was detailed in only 1 study. Surveys included a median of 19.5 questions (3 to 108) and were primarily electronically distributed. The mean survey response rate was 42% with a downward trend noted over the studied time period. None of the studied author, publication, and design characteristics were associated with increased response rates. CONCLUSIONS: Survey-based studies of the POSNA membership have become increasingly popular study designs in recent years. Response rates are lower than reports in other physician cohorts, and appear to be declining, possibly representative of respondent fatigue. No associations were identified between response rates and the modifiable study characteristics evaluated (number of authors, committee or subgroup affiliation, number of questions, and mode of distribution). Efforts should be made to identify tactics to sustain participation as these studies become more widely utilized within our field. Optimizing study design and implementation features while valuing physician time and effort spent on survey completion is important to avoid member survey fatigue. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V-systematic review of Level V research.