Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins.

BACKGROUND: This randomized trial compared four treatments for varicose great saphenous veins (GSVs). METHODS: Five hundred consecutive patients (580 legs) with GSV reflux were randomized to endovenous laser ablation (980 and 1470 nm, bare fibre), radiofrequency ablation, ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy or surgical stripping using tumescent local anaesthesia with light sedation. Miniphlebectomies were also performed. The patients were examined with duplex imaging before surgery, and after 3 days, 1 month and 1 year. RESULTS: At 1 year, seven (5.8 per cent), six (4.8 per cent), 20 (16.3 per cent) and four (4.8 per cent) of the GSVs were patent and refluxing in the laser, radiofrequency, foam and stripping groups respectively (P < 0.001). One patient developed a pulmonary embolus after foam sclerotherapy and one a deep vein thrombosis after surgical stripping. No other major complications were recorded. The mean(s.d.) postintervention pain scores (scale 0-10) were 2.58(2.41), 1.21(1.72), 1.60(2.04) and 2.25(2.23) respectively (P < 0.001). The median (range) time to return to normal function was 2 (0-25), 1 (0-30), 1 (0-30) and 4 (0-30) days respectively (P < 0.001). The time off work, corrected for weekends, was 3.6 (0-46), 2.9 (0-14), 2.9 (0-33) and 4.3 (0-42) days respectively (P < 0.001). Disease-specific quality-of-life and Short Form 36 (SF-36(®)) scores had improved in all groups by 1-year follow-up. In the SF-36(®) domains bodily pain and physical functioning, the radiofrequency and foam groups performed better in the short term than the others. CONCLUSION: All treatments were efficacious. The technical failure rate was highest after foam sclerotherapy, but both radiofrequency ablation and foam were associated with a faster recovery and less postoperative pain than endovenous laser ablation and stripping.

Randomised clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: clinical outcome and recurrence after 2 years.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the outcome 2years after treatment of varicose veins by endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) or surgery by assessing recurrence, venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and quality of life. METHODS: A total of 121 patients (137 legs) were randomised to either EVLA or saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein (GSV). Follow-up included clinical and duplex ultrasound examinations, VCSS and quality of life questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 18 (26%) and 25 patients (37%) in the EVLA and surgery group, respectively, developed recurrent varicose veins (not significant (NS) between groups). The source of reflux was not significantly different between the groups. Technical failure occurred in three EVLA and two surgery patients, reflux in the anterior accessory GSV, the groin, thigh and calf perforators was found in six, two, four, and three EVLA patients, and in three, three, nine and six surgery patients. VCSS, Aberdeen Varicose Vein Severity Score and several domains of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF36) quality of life score improved significantly in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in clinical or ultrasound recurrences were found between EVLA and surgery groups. Our study also shows that similar improvements in clinical severity scores and quality of life were gained in both treatments.

Intra-patient variability of thromboelastographic parameters following in vivo and ex vivo administration of recombinant activated factor VII in haemophilia patients. A multi-centre, randomised trial.

Thromboelastography methods have been used to predict or monitor treatment of haemophilia patients with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). However, neither of the two thromboelastographic methods (ROTEM and TEG) has as yet been validated. This multi-centre, randomised trial compared both methods in terms of intra- and inter- patient variability following in vivo and ex vivo rFVIIa administration to haemophilia A and B patients with and without inhibitors. Patients ((3)16 years old) received the same intravenous rFVIIa dose (45, 90 or 180 microg/kg) twice, 1-12 weeks apart. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and 15, 60, 120 and 240 minutes post-dose for ROTEM and TEG analysis. Pre-dose samples were also spiked ex vivo with rFVIIa (0.6, 1.2 or 2.4 microg/ml), to correspond to the three in vivo doses. Twenty-six haemophilia A and four haemophilia B patients were enrolled. A significant treatment effect was observed with in vivo rFVIIa (p<0.05) with more pronounced effects in inhibitor (n=14) versus non-inhibitor (n=16) patients. There was a strong positive correlation between ROTEM and TEG parameters. Intra- and inter-patient variation was large for all thromboelastography parameters at all time points and rFVIIa doses. Intra-patient variation was generally lower for non-inhibitor than inhibitor patients, and lower following ex vivo spiking versus in vivo rFVIIa administration. In conclusion, there was a clear effect of rFVIIa on all thromboelastography parameters, but the large intra- and inter-patient variability following in vivo rFVIIa administration renders the use of our method unsuitable for dose-response prediction for haemophilia patients in the clinical setting.

Evaluation of rFVIIa (NovoSeven) in Glanzmann patients with thromboelastogram.

Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT) is a rare platelet function disorder characterized by a defect in fibrinogen binding to platelet membrane glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa. Recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa) is a haemostatic agent approved for the treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors, patients with acquired haemophilia and in EU also for treatment of factor VII (FVII)-deficient patients and GT patients with antibodies to GPIIb-IIIa. The present study was conducted to evaluate the use of the whole blood test system, rotational thrombelastometry (ROTEM), in measuring the overall haemostasis potential of rFVIIa in 28 GT patients treated with rFVIIa. The correlation of administered rFVIIa and time to start fibrin formation and clot dynamic/stability was assessed and correlation to the clinical response was elucidated. Assessments were performed on predose blood samples spiked with four different concentrations of rFVIIa and whole blood samples taken at 10 and 120 min following dosing. ROTEM parameters clotting time (CT), clot formation time (CFT) and maximum clot firmness (MCF) were measured. Both ex vivo and in vivo data showed beneficial effects on CT in the presence of rFVIIa, but no effect of added rFVIIa was seen on CFT and MCF. In conclusion, the use of thrombelastography at least in the modified form of ROTEM seems to be of limited use in predicting an adequate dose of rFVIIa in GT patients. A good clinical haemostatic response was recorded in spite of the limited changes in the ROTEM pattern supporting the conclusion that ROTEM should not be the method of choice for monitoring rFVIIa therapy in Glanzmann patients.