RESUMO
Objectives: Addressing extensive and deep burn wounds poses considerable challenges for both patients and surgeons. The NovoSorb® Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) emerged as a novel dermal substitute and has been subjected to evaluation in large burn wound cases, with a specific focus on identifying risk factors associated with suboptimal take rates. Methods: All patients with burn wounds greater than 10% body surface that underwent BTM treatment between March 2020 and November 2023 were eligible for inclusion. Univariate analyses and linear regression models were employed to discern risk factors and predictors influencing the take rates of both the BTM and split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs). Results: A total of 175 patients (mean age 56.2 ± 19.8 years, 70.3% male) were evaluated. The mean take rates of the BTM and STSGs were 82.0 ± 24.7% and 87.3 ± 19.0%, respectively. There were significant negative correlations between BTM take and the number of surgeries before BTM application (r = -0.19, p = 0.01), %TBSA and STSG take (r = -0.36, p = <0.001) and significant positive correlations between BTM and STSG take (r = 0.41, p ≤ 0.001) in addition to NPWT and STSG take (r = 0.21, p = 0.01). Multivariate regression analyses showed that a larger number of surgeries prior to BTM application (OR -3.41, 95% CI -6.82, -0.03, p = 0.04) was associated with poorer BTM take. Allograft treatment before BTM application (OR -14.7, 95% CI -23.0, -6.43,p = 0.01) and failed treatment with STSG before BTM application (OR -20.8, 95% CI -36.3, -5.23, p ≤ 0.01) were associated with poorer STSG take, whereas higher BTM take rates were associated with overall higher STSG take (OR -0.15, 95% 0.05, 0.26, p = 0.01). The Meek technique was used in 24 patients and showed similar take rates (BTM: 76.3 ± 28.0%, p = 0.22; STSG: 80.7 ± 21.1, p = 0.07). Conclusions: This study summarizes our findings on the application of a BTM in the context of large burn wounds. The results demonstrate that successful treatment can be achieved even in patients with extensive burns, resulting in satisfying take rates for both the BTM and STSG. The data underscore the importance of promptly applying a BTM to debrided wounds and indicate good results when using Meek.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Burns that involve the perineum, buttocks and genitals (PBG) have been associated with more challenging therapeutic needs and worse clinical outcomes. We aimed to investigate whether PBG burns are an independent predictor for mortality, morbidity and complications in a large, heterogenous patient collective and in comparison to patients without PBG burns. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted to a level one burn center between August 2014 and July 2022 were included and stratified based on the presence of PBG burns on admission (PBG & control group = CTR). Demographic baseline data, burn aetiology, inhalation trauma (IHT), full-thickness burns (FT), number of operations (NOR), mortality, length of ICU stay (LOS-ICU), length of in-hospital stay (LOHS) and bacteraemia were assessed to compare key clinical characteristics and outcomes between the groups. Multivariate regression analyses and a 1:1 propensity score matching were conducted for key clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1024 patients were included in the analysis (PBG: n = 227; CTR: n = 797). PBG burns were older (median (IQR) 54 (34-72) vs. 44, (30-61) years, p < 0.0001), more frequently female (35% vs. 23%, p = 0.002) presented with larger total body surface area (TBSA) burns overall (27 (32-39) vs. 10 (13-15) %, p < 0.0001) and sustained FT burns more frequently (69% vs. 26% p < 0.0001). Scald burns were more frequently the cause of PBG burns (45% vs. 15%, p < 0.0001), PBG patients needed twice as many surgical procedures (Mean (SD) 2 (2.84) vs. 1 (1.6), p < 0.0001) as CTR. In multivariate analyses, a significant correlation was identified between length of ICU stay and presence of PBG burns. Following strict cohort matching to account for sex, age, cause of burn, TBSA %, presence of FT burn, inhalation trauma and bacteraemia, PBG burns were an independent predictor for mortality (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: PBG burns are at risk for prolonged intensive care, hospitalization and complications during treatment. Furthermore, the presence of PBG burns appears to be a risk factor for mortality, irrespective of patient age, TBSA affected and other relevant covariates.
