Circulating free insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, total IGF-I, and IGF binding protein-3 levels do not predict the future risk to develop prostate cancer: results of a case-control study involving 201 patients within a population-based screening with a 4-year interval.

Recent studies have reported that serum IGF-I levels in the highest quartile of the normal range and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) in the lowest quartile of the normal range are associated with an increased risk of future prostate cancer and/or presence of prostate cancer. It has also been suggested that the measurement of circulating total IGF-I concentrations might be a useful tool for the early detection of prostate cancer in men with moderately increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. To determine whether circulating free IGF-I, total IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 levels can predict future prostate cancer risk, we prospectively studied prostate cancer characteristics in a cohort of men during two rounds (mean interval, 4 yr) of a population-based screening study for prostate cancer. Two hundred one prostate cancer cases were detected at the second-round screening (aged 55-70 yr), and all these subjects were enrolled in the case group for the present study. Prostate cancer had been confirmed by biopsy in all cases. These 201 subjects were matched with the 201 nonprostate cancer cases by age, serum PSA range at the first-round screening (PSA < 2 ng/ml, n = 67; PSA = 2-3 ng/ml, n = 67; and PSA = 3-4 ng/ml, n = 67), and residence area. At baseline, total IGF-I, free IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 levels and prostate volume of cases with prostate cancer were not different from those of healthy controls. PSA velocity was significantly different between cases and controls (P < 0.001).Stepwise forward logistic regression analysis showed that only PSA levels at baseline and PSA at round 2 after 4 yr are good predictors of prostate cancer, whereas total IGF-I, free IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 did not predict the development of prostate cancer. Only one of the 201 subjects with prostate cancer had metastases. Within the subjects with prostate cancer, there were no differences of IGF-I parameters with different tumor node metastasis categories and/or Gleason scores. Our study suggests that the measurement of serum IGF-I and/or IGFBP-3 concentrations in addition to PSA does not improve the identification of men at high risk to develop early stages of prostate cancer. In addition, our results indicate that the endocrine IGF-I system is not directly involved in the growth of the early stages of prostate cancer.

The value of (-7, -5)pro-prostate-specific antigen and human kallikrein-2 as serum markers for grading prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of the precursor form (-7,5pro) of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and human kallikrein-2 (hK2) for detecting and grading prostate cancer, as better serum markers with improved specificity are needed in men with lower ranges of total (t)PSA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: tPSA, free PSA (fPSA), the precursor (-7,5)proPSA and hK2 were measured in a subset of participants of the European Randomised Study of Screening of Prostate Cancer. In a pilot study, sera from 143 men biopsied but with no prostate cancer, 142 with BPH, and 146 with prostate cancer were analysed to determine the relative value of serum markers for differentiating between the groups. Then, in 141 men with prostate cancer who had a radical prostatectomy, these serum markers were related to the pathological grading to analyse their value as prognostic variables. RESULTS: Levels of (-7,5)proPSA, hK2 and fPSA could be used to distinguish between BPH and cancer, but proPSA and hK2, alone or combined, did not improve the specificity of fPSA for discriminating BPH and cancer. There was also no correlation between these serum markers and pathological tumour grade. CONCLUSION: The clinical effect of using (-7,5)proPSA or hK2 for detecting and grading prostate cancer remains limited.

Quality assessment for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in relation to ERSPC: report of the PSA committee.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the application of a quality control scheme for total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as used for participants of the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) during 1996-2002. METHODS: From 1996, the first complete year being 1997, an external scheme was organized by the Dutch Quality Assessment Foundation especially for the ERSPC. This scheme consists of one control round every 2 months with two different human serum samples and is only meant to compare the recovery of methods. From 1998 an internal scheme was also applied by adding two distinct samples to every round. RESULTS: Initially there was a wide variation (coefficient of variation of +/- 15% at threshold PSA of 4.0 ng/mL) among all ERSPC participants who were all using the Tandem assay (Hybritech Inc, USA). After introducing the internal scheme the performance of some intra-ERSPC group comparisons for PSA and the introduction of the completely automated Beckman-Access analyser in 2001 there was state-of-the-art precision for PSA of +/- 5% in the 2002 surveys. CONCLUSIONS: The ERSPC group measurements of PSA have considerably improved since 1996 because of the application of a quality-assessment scheme and with the introduction of complete automation of the PSA assay. Both findings are in line with earlier developments in clinical chemistry.

Different PSA assays lead to detection of prostate cancers with identical histological features.

OBJECTIVE: Because different PSA assays still show a wide inter-assay variation, we wondered what influence these discrepancies could have on the individual tumour characteristics of the cancers that each of these assays detect in a critical low PSA range. We analysed five different PSA assays in a biopsy simulation with PSA cut-offs of 3.0 and 4.0 ng/ml. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomly taken samples of 360 men with prostate cancer and 96 with benign prostatic disease from a screened population with PSA range of 1.0-6.0 ng/ml (Tandem-E) were investigated. In all cases the diagnosis was confirmed by sextant biopsies. One hundred and thirty-seven men (38%) underwent radical prostatectomy. Variability amongst assays was illustrated in terms of missed cancers and unnecessary biopsies, and in terms of pathologic features of detected cancers at both PSA cut-offs. RESULTS: Compared to Tandem-E, all assays, except Access, showed significant differences in PSA measurements. Furthermore, none of the assays discriminated significantly between benign and malignant prostatic disease (p>0.05). Tandem-E and Elecsys lead significantly more frequently to the detection of cancers at the cost of more unnecessary biopsies compared to the other assays. Yet, at both PSA cut-offs the proportion of cancers with a certain pathologic grade or stage that were detected by each assay were approximately the same. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the use of different PSA assays only have consequences for the number, and not for the tumour characteristics of the prostate cancers that are detected. Thus, different PSA assays detect prostate cancers with the same tumour features.

Discordant performance of assays for free and total prostate-specific antigen in relation to the early detection of prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of applying rigid threshold values in interpreting prostate specific antigen (PSA) results, by selecting and comparing five current methods for measuring free and total PSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples taken from an ongoing screening study for prostate cancer (total PSA by Tandem-E assay, 17 334 participants; biopsy criterion a PSA of 3.0 microg/L, 4 464 men) from men with a total PSA of 1.0-6.0 microg/L were measured for free and total PSA using the Access, Immulite, Elecsys and Prostatus analysis kits, in two patient groups, i.e. with prostate cancer or no evidence of disease. RESULTS: Both patient groups had equal means for total PSA but not for free PSA. In all, 360 samples from men with cancer and 96 from men with no evidence of disease were analysed. All methods applied to both groups deviated statistically significantly from the Tandem-E result for total PSA, except for the Access kit. There was a close correlation among all the methods (correlation coefficients of 0.89-0.97). There were very discordant results for the combination of the Tandem-E vs Prostatus (8% difference), representing 315 participants at a threshold of 3.0 microg/L. For free PSA (free/total PSA) the situation was worse, with extreme differences of 32% and 36% for both patient groups (Elecsys vs Access). CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the threshold value applied as an indication for biopsy, when using the total PSA alone or combined with the free/total PSA, care is needed in interpreting patient groups because of the discordance among PSA assays.

Multicentre evaluation of the Boehringer Mannheim/Hitachi 917 analysis system.

The new selective access analysis system BM/Hitachi 917 was evaluated in an international multicentre study, mainly according to the ECCLS protocol for the evaluation of analysers in clinical chemistry. Forty-three different analytes, covering 56 different methods--enzymes, substrates, electrolytes, specific proteins, drugs and urine applications--were tested in seven European clinical chemistry laboratories. Additionally, the practicability of the BM/ Hitachi 917 was tested according to a standardized questionnaire. Within-run CVs (median of 3 days) for enzymes, substrates and electrolytes were <2% except for creatine-kinase MB isoform and lipase at low concentration. For proteins, drugs and urine analytes the within-run CVs were < 4% except for digoxin and albumin in urine. Between-day median CVs were generally < 3% for enzymes, substrates and electrolytes, and < 6% for proteins, drugs and urine analytes, except for lipase, creatine kinase and MB isoform, D-dimer, glycosylated haemoglobin, rheumatoid factors, digoxin, digitoxin, theophylline and albumin in urine in some materials. Linearity was found according to the test specifications or better and there were no relevant effects seen in drift and carry-over testing. The interference results clearly show that also for the BM/Hitachi 917 interference exists sometimes, as could be expected because of the chemistries applied. It is a situation that can be found in equivalent analysers as well. The accuracy is acceptable regarding a 95-105% recovery in standard reference material, with the exception of the creatinine Jaffé method. Most of the 160 method comparisons showed acceptable agreement according to our criteria: enzymes, substrates, urine analytes deviation of slope +/- 5%, electrolytes +/- 3%, and proteins and drugs +/- 10%. The assessment of practicability for 14 groups of attributes resulted in a grading of one-three scores better for the BM/Hitachi 917 than the present laboratory situation. In conclusion, the results of the study showed good analytical performance and confirmed the usefulness of the system as a consolidated workstation in medium-sized to large clinical chemistry laboratories.

On the standardization of total prostate-specific antigen: an exercise with two reference preparations.

In this study, 112 serum samples were analyzed for total prostate-specific antigen with three well-established assays i.e. Tandem R and Tandem E (both from Hybritech Inc., San Diego, USA) and Prostatus Free/Total from Wallac Oy, Turku, Finland. Thirty-two samples were collected from prostate cancer patients, 32 from patients with benign prostate hyperplasia and 48 from men participating in a screening study for prostate cancer. The aim of the study was to compare the results before and after recalculation with the data obtained with two reference preparations for total prostate-specific antigen: Stanford 90:10 PSA Calibrator and Certified Reference Material 613 Prostate-Specific Antigen. Comparing the actual results revealed almost perfect correlations between Tandem R and Tandem E and between both Tandem assays and Prostatus. We observed statistically significant differences in accuracy between Tandem R and Tandem E: y(Tandem E)= 1.05 x(Tandem R)+0.07 and between Tandem E and Prostatus: y(Prostatus)= 0.94 x(Tandem E)+0.02 In both comparisons prostate-specific antigen values ranged from 0-40 microg/l. Recalculation with both reference preparations did not solve these discrepancies. One exception was the combination Tandem R and Tandem E. The application of either reference preparation solved the differences in accuracy here. In conclusion, even after recalibration, assays for total prostate-specific antigen are still not completely interchangeable.

New developments in the standardization of total prostate-specific antigen.

OBJECTIVE: Analytical evaluation of the calibration of three recently launched assays for the measurement of total prostate-specific antigen, i.e., IMx Total PSA (Abbott), Elecsys PSA (Roche), and IMMULITE 3rd Generation PSA (DPC). DESIGN AND METHODS: For accuracy assessment two reference materials were applied namely, Stanford 90:10 PSA Calibrator and Certified Reference Material 613 Prostate-Specific Antigen. Dilutions of these preparations were analyzed with all assays. In addition, clinical specimens from known prostate cancer or benign prostate hyperplasia patients and samples taken from an ongoing prostate cancer screening study were used for comparison. RESULTS: Application of the Stanford Calibrator revealed results well within 10% of the calculated values for all assays. Regarding the CRM Calibrator only the IMx Total PSA proved to approach the line of identity. The IMMULITE results differed about 40% and the Elecsys about 18% from the calculated values. The comparison with clinical specimens showed statistically different results for the combination IMMULITE-IMx and for IMMULITE-Elecsys. The regression lines for both collections were: y(IMx) = 0.86x(IMMULITE) +0.12 (n = 104, r = 0.970, Sy/x = 0.883 microg/L) and y(Elecsys) = 0.98x(IMMULITE) +0.38 (n = 97, r = 0.976, Sy/x = 0.733 microg/L). In the lower measuring range (PSA <5.0 microg/L) as measured with the screening samples (n = 43), these differences were less pronounced. CONCLUSION: In analytical sense a difference was found for both reference preparations in the assays studied. Clinically, despite improvements in methodology, results for total prostate-specific antigen are still not interchangeable. The possible consequences need to be elaborated.

Analytical issues on prostate-specific antigen in relation to prostate cancer screening.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the analytical performance of the Hybritech Tandem-E PSA assay as applied to the Rotterdam part of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) during 1994-1997. DESIGN AND METHODS: For assessment of test performance imprecision and accuracy contributing to clinical decision making was examined. Pre-analytical variables (specimen handling), long-term reagents stability and calibration check with the Stanford 90:10 PSA Calibrator were studied. RESULTS: Total prostate-specific antigen proved to be a stable marker. Provided correct storage at 4 degrees C, we were not able to find differences between samples analyzed directly after blood withdrawal and those analyzed the following day, with or without centrifugation. Day-to-day precision, we found during 1997 a coefficient of variation of 4.9% for concentration 1.8 micrograms/L and 4.2% for 4.8 micrograms/L (n = 182). The variation among the 21 Tandem-E reagent batches used during 1994-1997 proved to be small. Application of the Stanford 90:10 PSA Calibrator revealed 3% higher values for Tandem-E. CONCLUSION: The overall, long-term picture of Tandem-E PSA is reliable in our hands. Possible differences from the true PSA values, not specific for Tandem-E, need to be elaborated.

Validation of a natural urinary stone data based infrared library searching system with artificial survey samples.

In this study we evaluated a Fourier transform IR spectrometer (Bio-Rad, USA) equipped with a search system for the analysis of urinary stones. We constructed a database of the stone library with the help of results found with X-ray diffraction analysis. In total, we included 223 stone results (213 natural and 10 spurious stones) consisting of single and composite nature. Regarding the latter we used many comparable and many diverging combinations. Applying 60 artificial referee samples that were used in the urinary stone surveys as organized by the German Society for Clinical Chemistry, we found the instrument hit quality index alone, as a measure of best spectral match not entirely sufficient in relation to acceptable performance. This was also caused by the absence of some rare components. Of those 60 survey samples, 17 did not meet the guidelines of the survey organization. These guidelines are: qualitatively correct and quantitatively within tolerance limits +/-20%. Though a number of these samples seemed irrelevant in a clinical setting, they nevertheless represent a challenge for better performance. In the second round, therefore, we included new entries and human expertise as well, which resulted in an upgrading of the score. We only missed, finally, 4 combinations, mainly related to the purine molecule, i.e. uric acid, sodium urate and ammonium urate. In conclusion, based on extension of the library, we consider the search system as acceptable. Despite that, human interpretation proved to be necessary.

The free-to-total prostate specific antigen ratio improves the specificity of prostate specific antigen in screening for prostate cancer in the general population.

PURPOSE: The ratio between free and total prostate specific antigen (PSA) in serum improves the specificity of total serum PSA for the detection of prostate carcinoma in select populations. The value of the free-to-total PSA ratio for a PSA of 4.0 to 10.0 ng./ml. was analyzed in a screening population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 4,800 participants 55 to 76 years old 977 biopsies were obtained because of an abnormal digital rectal examination, suspicious transrectal ultrasonography and total serum PSA 4.0 ng./ml. or more. Of 191 patients with prostate carcinoma detected 101 had a serum PSA of 4.0 to 10.0 ng./ml. and 54 of them underwent radical prostatectomy. A free-to-total PSA ratio of 0.20, age specific PSA reference ranges and a PSA density of 0.12 ng./ml./cc were evaluated for the ability to increase the specificity of total serum PSA in predicting positive prostate biopsy results. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristics curves for the free-to-total PSA ratio showed a significant increase in specificity compared to PSA. Retrospective application of age specific PSA reference ranges, the free-to-total PSA ratio and the PSA density decreased the number of biopsies significantly by up to 40% in our study, with a decrease in cancer detection rate of 12%. When used in combination with digital rectal examination, the pathological stage of undetected carcinomas appeared favorable. CONCLUSIONS: The free-to-total PSA ratio may be used to decrease biopsies in patients with an intermediate PSA of 4.0 to 10.0 ng./ml.

Free and total prostate-specific antigen in a screened population.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the ratio of free to total (F/T) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can differentiate between men with prostate carcinoma or benign conditions in a screened population. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Total and free serum PSA (measured using Delfia PSA assays, Abbott IMx and Hybritech Tandem E methods) were determined retrospectively in 1726 men aged 55-77 years, in whom 67 prostate carcinomas were detected by screening with a digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and total serum PSA level. Predictors for a positive biopsy result were estimated as a function of total PSA, free PSA and the combination of both. RESULTS: There was an excellent correlation between the Delfia ProStatus, the Abbott IMx and the Hybritech Tandem E assays. Compared with the total serum PSA level, the F/T ratio improved the specificity significantly only in those men with a total PSA of > or = 7 ng/mL. Using the information given by the total and free PSA values, a maximum sensitivity of 75% at a specificity of 74% was obtained for the whole PSA range from 4 to 10 ng/mL; the maximum sensitivity was 79% with a specificity of 71%. CONCLUSION: The optimal mathematical combination of free and total serum PSA improves the specificity of total serum PSA level in detecting prostate carcinoma more than the does the F/T PSA ratio.

The free-to-total serum prostate specific antigen ratio for staging prostate carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We analyzed the relationship between the free-to-total PSA ratio and prostate cancer tumor stage and grade compared to total serum PSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 123 patients clinical and pathological grade and stage were related to total serum PSA and free-to-total PSA ratio. RESULTS: Total serum PSA paralleled clinical staging of prostate cancer. The distributions of total serum PSA and the free-to-total PSA ratio were significantly different between benign and malignant diseases (any stage), and between any T category and nodal disease. For serum PSA significant differences were noted between the distributions of men with locally confined (stages T1 and T2) and locally extended (stage T3) disease, and between all T categories and systemic metastatic disease. This finding was not noted for the free-to-total PSA ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The free-to-total PSA ratio has no additional value in clinical staging of prostate carcinoma compared to serum PSA. The free-to-total PSA ratio may be considered the result of cell differentiation and not an indicator of tumor load.

Analytical evaluation of the new Prostatus PSA Free/Total assay for prostate-specific antigen as part of a screening study for prostate cancer.

In this communication a limited analytical study is described on the new Prostatus PSA Free/Total assay. The study is considered as a side study of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. The between-day imprecision with 8 control samples for free prostate-specific antigen ranged from 10.3% at 0.17 microg/l to 3.7% at a concentration of 35.5 microg/l, while for total prostate-specific antigen we found 7.3% at 0.69 microg/l and 4.3% at 70.7 microg/l. For total prostate-specific antigen we found excellent agreement between the new assay and well-established assays like Abbott IMx and Hybritech Tandem-E, both for prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia specimens. The age-specific reference ranges proved to be well-comparable with the literature data both for free and total prostate-specific antigen.

The transferability of a candidate reference method for determination of creatinine in serum.

We developed a candidate reference method for the determination of creatinine in serum. For the acceptance of a reference method it is important that it be rigorously validated against a definitive method and that the method can be transferred from one laboratory to another. This study focussed on the transferability and consisted of two parts: introduction and familiarization with the method in four clinical chemistry laboratories in the Netherlands, followed by independent measurements of Standard Reference Material 909a2 and several commercial quality control materials provided with reference method values according to the protocol of the German Quality Assessment Organisation. The criterion for judging transferability was the mean total error (%) of the five sera used in the accuracy experiment. For creatinine we used a total error of < 2.2%. For Standard Reference Material 909a2 all four laboratories were able to comply with this demand, while only two laboratories met this requirement for the other four sera. The results for the Standard Reference Material 909a2 from the collaborating laboratories demonstrate that this candidate reference method can be successfully transferred without loss of precision and accuracy.

Some analytical considerations on the measurement of prostate-specific antigen.

In this study, various analytical aspects of the determination of serum prostate-specific antigen are described as applied to the Abbott IMx PSA and the Hybritech Tandem-E PSA assays. We used mainly specimens from a prostate cancer screening study in progress. A very good comparability between the assays proved to exist in our hands. The long-run variation (16 months) was also rated as acceptable, both for the IMx and the Tandem-E method. The method of choice, Tandem-E, showed good reagent stability over this period. We found, however, a difference in accuracy (Tandem-E +/- 8% higher values) that could not be explained by comparison with Tandem-R.

European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer--the Rotterdam pilot studies.

Five randomized pilot studies of screening for prostate cancer (PC) have been conducted in the area of Rotterdam from 1991 to 1994. The purpose of these studies was to establish the feasibility of a randomized screening protocol with PC mortality as the major end point in The Netherlands and at a European level. All procedures related to recruitment of participants, to application of the screening tests and to data collection were evaluated. Men (7,200) aged 55-74 years were invited through the Rotterdam Population Registry. The recruitment rate over the 5 pilot studies averaged 38.2% (2,747 men). Recruitment procedures proved to be relevant for establishing higher participation rates (invitation and consent by mail). The screening tests were well accepted and tolerated. The general population-based character of the sample was confirmed by studying symptoms of prostatic disease in participants and in men who refused participation. Data based on one PSA serum determination, rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography are presented; 204/1,403 men (14.5%) had a positive screening result by either test combination and underwent biopsy. Forty-nine cancers were found in 1,403 men (3.5%); 65% of prostate cancers (17/26) identified in men who eventually underwent radical prostatectomy proved to be locally confined. From the pilot studies, we conclude that a large contribution to a European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) can be made by recruiting about 40,000 men in the area of Rotterdam. The preliminary data suggest that after confirmation of the present data during the first years in the European study, DRE and TRUS can be withheld depending on the PSA result in a large proportion of the screening population.

Multicentre evaluation of a new fully automated enzyme immunoassay for total prostate-specific antigen.

UNLABELLED: The evaluation is reported of a newly developed automated assay for measuring total prostate-specific antigen: Enzymun-Test PSA. Starting with a small field study, the study was extended to 74 laboratories in different countries. The median values for the intra-assay imprecision ranged from 5.0% (0.0-2.0 micrograms/l) to 2.5% (> 10.0 micrograms/l). For the inter-assay imprecision the results for the same ranges were 23.2 and 3.8%, respectively. The lower limit of detection, biological and functional sensitivity were 0.03, 0.1 and 0.25 micrograms/l, respectively. The linearity and dilution experiments showed acceptable data. The determined reference ranges (95% confidence intervals) were: men < 40 years: 0.1-1.3 micrograms/l, men 40-50 years: 0.2-2.0 micrograms/l, men 50-60 years: 0.2-3.0 and men > 60 years: 0.2-4.5 micrograms/l. Comparison of Enzymun-Test PSA with most present-day commercially available assays generally revealed very good correlations. IN CONCLUSION: the new Boehringer Mannheim Enzymun-Test PSA is compatible with the state-of-the-art for the measurement of total prostate-specific antigen.

The value of screening tests in the detection of prostate cancer. Part I: Results of a retrospective evaluation of 1726 men.

OBJECTIVES: The ratio between free and total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in serum (F/T ratio) was shown to improve the differentiation between prostate carcinoma and benign conditions in selected series of patients. In this study the F/T ratio was analyzed for its ability to improve the specificity of total serum PSA, digital rectal examination (DRE), and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) for the detection of prostate cancer in an unselected screening population of men identified in the Rotterdam population. METHODS: In 1726 men between 55 and 76 years old, 67 prostate carcinomas were detected by DRE, TRUS, and total serum PSA (Abbott IMx, Hybritech Tandem E). The DELFIA ProStatus PSA EQM and ProStatus PSA Free/Total assays (Wallac) were applied in retrospect to determine total and free serum PSA. Age, total prostate and inner zone volumes were taken into consideration. RESULTS: Sixty-seven carcinomas were detected, two by TRUS and three by DRE alone. Total serum PSA was the most important single predictor of prostate cancer, followed by DRE. The F/T ratio increased the specificity of total serum PSA in the PSA range between 4.0 and 10.0 ng/mL. However, this improved specificity was not significant, nor for gland volumes restricted to 50 mL or less. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of total serum PSA and DRE remains the standard for detection of prostate carcinoma in a screening population. Their specificity may be improved minimally by the F/T ratio, but not significantly in a sample of 1726 screened men. The threshold of the F/T ratio, and the optimal PSA range for its application, remains to be assessed prospectively.