Preanalytics and Precision Pathology: Pathology Practices to Ensure Molecular Integrity of Cancer Patient Biospecimens for Precision Medicine.

Biospecimens acquired during routine medical practice are the primary sources of molecular information about patients and their diseases that underlies precision medicine and translational research. In cancer care, molecular analysis of biospecimens is especially common because it often determines treatment choices and may be used to monitor therapy in real time. However, patient specimens are collected, handled, and processed according to routine clinical procedures during which they are subjected to factors that may alter their molecular quality and composition. Such artefactual alteration may skew data from molecular analyses, render analysis data uninterpretable, or even preclude analysis altogether if the integrity of a specimen is severely compromised. As a result, patient care and safety may be affected, and medical research dependent on patient samples may be compromised. Despite these issues, there is currently no requirement to control or record preanalytical variables in clinical practice with the single exception of breast cancer tissue handled according to the guideline jointly developed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (CAP) and enforced through the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program. Recognizing the importance of molecular data derived from patient specimens, the CAP Personalized Healthcare Committee established the Preanalytics for Precision Medicine Project Team to develop a basic set of evidence-based recommendations for key preanalytics for tissue and blood specimens. If used for biospecimens from patients, these preanalytical recommendations would ensure the fitness of those specimens for molecular analysis and help to assure the quality and reliability of the analysis data.

Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry Testing: A Review of Analytical Assays and Clinical Implementation in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Purpose Three programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are currently approved for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Treatment with pembrolizumab in NSCLC requires PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing. Nivolumab and atezolizumab are approved without PD-L1 testing, though US Food and Drug Administration-cleared complementary PD-L1 tests are available for both. PD-L1 IHC assays used to assess PD-L1 expression in patients treated with programmed death-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in clinical trials include PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx (28-8), PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx (22C3), Ventana PD-L1 SP142 (SP142), and Ventana PD-L1 SP263 (SP263). Differences in antibodies and IHC platforms have raised questions about comparability among these assays and their diagnostic use. This review provides practical information to help physicians and pathologists understand analytical features and comparability of various PD-L1 IHC assays and their diagnostic use. Methods We reviewed and summarized published or otherwise reported studies (January 2016 to January 2017) on clinical trial and laboratory-developed PD-L1 IHC assays (LDAs). Studies assessing the effect of diagnostic methods on PD-L1 expression levels were analyzed to address practical issues related to tissue samples used for testing. Results High concordance and interobserver reproducibility were observed with the 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 clinical trial assays for PD-L1 expression on tumor cell membranes, whereas lower PD-L1 expression was detected with SP142. Immune-cell PD-L1 expression was variable and interobserver concordance was poor. Inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity had variable effects on PD-L1 expression. Concordance among LDAs was variable. Conclusion High concordance among 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 when assessing PD-L1 expression on tumor cell membranes suggests possible interchangeability of their clinical use for NSCLC but not for assessment of PD-L1 expression on immune cells. Development of LDAs requires stringent standardization before their recommendation for routine clinical use.

The Cancer Genomics Resource List 2014.

CONTEXT: Genomic sequencing for cancer is offered by commercial for-profit laboratories, independent laboratory networks, and laboratories in academic medical centers and integrated health networks. The variability among the tests has created a complex, confusing environment. OBJECTIVE: To address the complexity, the Personalized Health Care (PHC) Committee of the College of American Pathologists proposed the development of a cancer genomics resource list (CGRL). The goal of this resource was to assist the laboratory pathology and clinical oncology communities. DESIGN: The PHC Committee established a working group in 2012 to address this goal. The group consisted of site-specific experts in cancer genetic sequencing. The group identified current next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based cancer tests and compiled them into a usable resource. The genes were annotated by the working group. The annotation process drew on published knowledge, including public databases and the medical literature. RESULTS: The compiled list includes NGS panels offered by 19 laboratories or vendors, accompanied by annotations. The list has 611 different genes for which NGS-based mutation testing is offered. Surprisingly, of these 611 genes, 0 genes were listed in every panel, 43 genes were listed in 4 panels, and 54 genes were listed in 3 panels. In addition, tests for 393 genes were offered by only 1 or 2 institutions. Table 1 provides an example of gene mutations offered for breast cancer genomic testing with the annotation as it appears in the CGRL 2014. CONCLUSIONS: The final product, referred to as the Cancer Genomics Resource List 2014, is available as supplemental digital content.

Assessing the discordance rate between local and central HER2 testing in women with locally determined HER2-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The importance of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as a prognostic and predictive marker in invasive breast cancer is well established. Accurate assessment of HER2 status is essential to determine optimal treatment options. METHODS: Breast cancer tumor tissue samples from the VIRGO observational cohort tissue substudy that were locally HER2-negative were retested centrally with both US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays, using FDA-approved assay cutoffs; results were compared. RESULTS: Of the 552 unique patient samples centrally retested with local HER2-negative results recorded, tumor samples from 22 (4.0%) patients were determined to be HER2-positive (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.5%-5.7%). Of these, 18 had been tested locally by only one testing methodology; 15 of 18 were HER2-positive after the central retesting, based on the testing methodology not performed locally. Compared with the 530 patients with centrally confirmed HER2-negative tumors, the 22 patients with centrally determined HER2-positive tumors were younger (median age 56.5 versus 60.0 years) and more likely to have ER/PR-negative tumors (27.3% versus 22.3%). These patients also had shorter median progression-free survival (6.4 months [95% CI = 3.8-15.9 months] versus 9.1 months [95% CI = 8.3-10.3 months]) and overall survival (25.9 months [95% CI = 13.8-not estimable] versus 27.9 months [95% CI = 25.0-32.9 months]). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the limitations of employing just one HER2 testing methodology in current clinical practice. It identifies a cohort of patients who did not receive potentially efficacious therapy because their tumor HER2-positivity was not determined by the test initially used. Because of inherent limitations in testing methodologies, it is inadvisable to rely on a single test to rule out potential benefit from HER2-targeted therapy.

Mammostrat as an immunohistochemical multigene assay for prediction of early relapse risk in the tamoxifen versus exemestane adjuvant multicenter trial pathology study.

PURPOSE: Some postmenopausal patients with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer remain at high risk of relapse despite endocrine therapy and, in addition, might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. The challenge is to prospectively identify such patients. The Mammostrat test uses five immunohistochemical markers to stratify patients regarding recurrence risk and may inform treatment decisions. We tested the efficacy of this panel in the Tamoxifen versus Exemestane Adjuvant Multicenter (TEAM) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pathology blocks from 4,598 TEAM patients were collected, and tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed. The cohort was 47% node-positive, and 36% of patients in the cohort were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Triplicate 0.6-mm(2) TMA cores were stained, and positivity for p53, HTF9C, CEACAM5, NDRG1, and SLC7A5 was assessed. Cases were assigned a Mammostrat risk score, and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed. RESULTS: In multivariate regression analyses, which were corrected for conventional clinicopathologic markers, Mammostrat provided significant additional information on DRFS after endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor (ER) -positive node-negative patients (n = 1,226) who did not receive chemotherapy (P = .004). Additional analyses in all patients not exposed to chemotherapy, irrespective of nodal status (n = 2,559) and in the entire cohort (n = 3,837) showed Mammostrat scores provided additional information on DRFS in these groups (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively; multivariate analyses). No differences were seen between the two endocrine treatment regimens. CONCLUSION: The Mammostrat score predicts DRFS for patients treated with exemestane and patients treated with tamoxifen followed by exemestane irrespective of nodal status and chemotherapy. The ability of this test to provide additional outcome data after treatment provides additional evidence of its use in risk stratification of ER-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.

Multisite analytic performance studies of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of BRAF V600E mutations in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens of malignant melanoma.

CONTEXT: A polymerase chain reaction-based companion diagnostic (cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test) was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to select patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma for treatment with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. OBJECTIVES: (1) To compare the analytic performance of the cobas test to Sanger sequencing by using screening specimens from phase II and phase III trials of vemurafenib, and (2) to assess the reproducibility of the cobas test at different testing sites. DESIGN: Specimens from 477 patients were used to determine positive and negative percent agreements between the cobas test and Sanger sequencing for detecting V600E (1799T>A) mutations. Specimens were evaluated with a massively parallel pyrosequencing method (454) to resolve discordances between polymerase chain reaction and Sanger results. Reproducibility of the cobas test was assessed at 3 sites by using 3 reagent lots and an 8-member panel of melanoma samples. RESULTS: A valid cobas result was obtained for all eligible patients. Sanger sequencing had a failure rate of 9.2% (44 of 477). For the remaining 433 specimens, positive percent agreement was 96.4% (215 of 223) and negative percent agreement, 80% (168 of 210). Among 42 cobas mutation-positive/Sanger V600E-negative specimens, 17 were V600E positive and 24 were V600K positive by 454. The cobas test detected 70% of V600K mutations. In the reproducibility study, a correct interpretation was made for 100% of wild-type specimens and specimens with greater than 5% mutant alleles; V600E mutations were detected in 90% of specimens with less than 5% mutant alleles. CONCLUSIONS: The cobas test (1) had a lower assay failure rate than that of Sanger, (2) was more sensitive in detecting V600E mutations, (3) detected most V600K mutations, and (4) was highly reproducible.

The role of KRAS mutation testing in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

CONTEXT: KRAS mutations can be detected in approximately 30% to 40% of all patients with colorectal cancer. Several recent studies have shown that patients with KRAS mutations in codons 12 or 13 in metastatic tumors do not benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy with cetuximab or panitumumab. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the role of KRAS mutation testing for management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and to discuss testing strategies. DATA SOURCES: This review is based on published, peer-reviewed literature; available information from medical organizations (eg, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Society of Clinical Oncology, College of American Pathologists); and information from clinical laboratories conducting KRAS mutation analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple methods for detecting KRAS mutations in colorectal tumors are available, and all methods in current clinical use appear to have adequate clinical sensitivity for predicting a lack of response to cetuximab and panitumumab. Pathologist expertise is essential to quality KRAS testing and to determining effective treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Genetic heterogeneity in HER2 testing in breast cancer: panel summary and guidelines.

CONTEXT: Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 gene amplification has been well documented and represents subclonal diversity within the tumor. The reported incidence of intratumor HER2 amplification genetic heterogeneity ranges in the literature from approximately 5% to 30%. The presence of HER2 genetic heterogeneity may increase subjectivity in HER2 interpretation by the pathologist. OBJECTIVES: To define HER2 genetic heterogeneity and to provide practice guidelines for examining and reporting breast tumors with genetic heterogeneity for improvement of HER2 testing in breast cancer. DESIGN: We convened an expert panel to discuss HER2 gene amplification testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Components addressed included a definition of HER2 amplification heterogeneity, practice guidelines for examination of the tissue, and reporting criteria for this analysis. RESULTS: Genetic heterogeneity for amplification of HER2 gene status in invasive breast cancer is defined and guidelines established for assessing and reporting HER2 results in these cases. These guidelines are additive to and expand those published in 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists. CONCLUSION: Standardized methods for analysis will improve the accuracy and consistency of interpretation of HER2 gene amplification status in breast cancer.

Laser therapy of breast cancer with 3-year follow-up.

Breast cancer is the commonest female malignancy in the United States and is increasingly being detected at a non-palpable stage by annual mammography. Minimally invasive methods of its local treatment have been recently introduced as alternative to its surgical removal. The case reported in this article illustrates the advantages of in-situ ablation with minimal discomfort to the patient and deformity of the breast. More importantly, it demonstrates the absence of any adverse effect on health and survival of the patient during this intermediate period of follow-up.

HER-2/neu protein overexpression and gene amplification in human transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

OBJECTIVES: To assess HER-2/neu gene status by fluorescence in situ hybridization and protein expression by immunohistochemistry in human bladder transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). In breast carcinoma, HER-2/neu gene amplification and receptor protein overexpression are tightly correlated and have prognostic and therapeutic implications. METHODS: We used 54 randomly selected TCC specimens obtained from 1998 to 2000. Each specimen was fixated in 10% neutral-buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Of the 54 specimens, 7 were grade 1 (13%), 26 were grade 2 (48%), and 21 were grade 3 (39%); 36 (67%) were superficial (Stage Ta or T1) and 18 (33%) were invasive (Stage T2 or T3). The specimens were analyzed for HER-2/neu protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry and for gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: Of the 54 specimens, 14 (26%) were positive for protein overexpression. One (14%) of the 7 grade 1 tumors was positive for protein overexpression, 3 (12%) of 26 grade 2 tumors were positive, and 10 (48%) of 21 grade 3 tumors were positive (P = 0.0195). Six (17%) of 36 Stage Ta or T1 specimens and 8 (44%) of 18 Stage T2 or T3 specimens were positive for protein overexpression (P = 0.01). None of the 54 TCC specimens showed amplification of the HER-2/neu gene using fluorescence in situ hybridization. CONCLUSIONS: HER-2/neu protein overexpression is present in human bladder TCC, with a statistically significant increase in overexpression in grade 3, and invasive specimens. Gene amplification does not appear to be the mechanism of protein overexpression. The prognostic significance of these findings and the application of HER-2/neu in treatment needs additional investigation.

Targeted therapy in breast cancer: the HER-2/neu gene and protein.

The HER-2/neu oncogene, a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor or erb gene family, encodes a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor that has been linked to prognosis and response to therapy with the anti-HER-2-humanized monoclonal antibody, trastuzumab (Herceptin, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) in patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer. HER-2/neu status has also been tested for its ability to predict the response of breast cancer to other therapies including hormonal therapies, topoisomerase inhibitors, and anthracyclines. This review includes an analysis of 80 published studies encompassing more than 25,000 patients designed to consider the relative advantages and disadvantages of the various methods of measuring HER-2/neu in clinical breast cancer specimens. Southern blotting, PCR amplification detection, and fluorescence in situ hybridization assays designed to detect HER-2/neu gene amplification are compared with HER-2/neu protein overexpression assays performed by immunohistochemical techniques applied to frozen and paraffin-embedded tissues and enzyme immunoassays performed on tumor cytosols. The significance of HER-2/neu overexpression in ductal carcinoma in situ and the HER-2/neu status in uncommon female breast conditions and male breast cancer are also considered. The role of HER-2/neu testing for the prediction of response to trastuzumab therapy in breast cancer is reviewed along with the current studies designed to test whether HER-2/neu status can predict the response to standard and newer hormonal therapies, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and radiation. The review will also evaluate the status of serum-based testing for circulating HER-2/neu receptor protein and its ability to predict disease outcome and therapy response.

Radiofrequency ablation of invasive breast carcinoma followed by delayed surgical excision.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is gaining acceptance as a treatment modality for several tumor types. However, its use in patients with breast carcinoma remains investigational. The current study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of treating small breast malignancies with RFA and to evaluate the postablation magnetic resonance imaging scans (MRI) and histologic findings. METHODS: Patients with core-needle biopsy-proven invasive carcinoma (< 2 cm in greatest dimension) underwent ultrasound-guided RFA under local anesthesia. Surgical excision was undertaken 1-3 weeks later. All patients had breast MRI scans performed before ablation and repeated within 24 hours of surgery. RESULTS: Ten patients completed the treatment and experienced minimal or no discomfort. The mean tumor size was 1.2 cm (range, 0.8-1.6 cm). The mean time required for ablation was 13.8 minutes (range, 7-21 minutes). There were no treatment-related complications other than minimal breast ecchymosis. A pre-RFA MRI scan showed enhancing tumors in 9 of 10 (90%) patients. A post-RFA MRI scan revealed no residual lesion enhancement in 8 of these 9 patients (89%), and the zone of ablation was demonstrated in all patients. One patient had residual enhancement anteriorly consistent with residual tumor, which was confirmed histologically. Evaluation of the remaining ablated lesions revealed a spectrum of changes ranging from no residual tumor to coagulation necrosis with recognizable malignant cells. Immunostains for cytokeratin 8/18 were negative in these recognizable malignant cells. CONCLUSIONS: RFA of small breast malignancies can be performed under local anesthesia in an office-based setting. A postablation MRI scan appears to predict histologic findings, although tumor viability needs to be assessed in a long-term study.

The Her-2/neu gene and protein in breast cancer 2003: biomarker and target of therapy.

The HER-2/neu oncogene encodes a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor with extensive homology to the epidermal growth factor receptor. In this review, the association of HER-2/neu gene and protein abnormalities with prognosis and response to therapy with trastuzumab and to other therapies in breast cancer is presented. By considering a series of 80 published studies encompassing more than 25,000 patients, the relative advantages and disadvantages of Southern blotting, polymerase chain reaction amplification, and fluorescence in situ hybridization assays designed to detect HER-2/neu gene amplification are compared with HER-2/neu protein overexpression assays performed by immunohistochemical techniques applied to frozen and paraffin-embedded tissues and enzyme immunoassays performed on tumor cytosols. The significance of HER-2/neu overexpression in ductal carcinoma in situ and the HER-2/neu status in uncommon female breast conditions and male breast cancer are also considered. The role of HER-2/neu testing for the prediction of response to trastuzumab therapy in breast cancer is presented as well as its potential impact on responses to standard and newer hormonal therapies, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and radiation. The review also evaluates the status of serum-based testing for circulating HER-2/neu receptor protein and its ability to predict disease outcome and therapy response.

Assessment of Her-2/Neu status by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in mammary Paget disease and underlying carcinoma.

HER-2/Neu overexpression is seen in 20% to 30% of invasive breast carcinomas and has been reported in as many as 80% of high-grade infiltrating carcinomas. Earlier studies have suggested that 100% of the tumor cells in mammary Paget disease show overexpression of HER-2 protein. We undertook this study to assess HER-2 status of mammary Paget disease and of the underlying breast carcinoma, when present, by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from 20 cases of mammary Paget disease were analyzed for HER-2 status by IHC and FISH. IHC for estrogen receptor (ER) was also performed. The patients ranged in age from 34 to 88 years, with a mean age of 62 years. Eighty percent of the cases showed strong overexpression (3+) of HER-2 protein by IHC, and all of these cases showed more than 5-fold amplification of the HER-2 gene by FISH. The remaining 4 cases, which were negative for HER-2/Neu by IHC, showed no amplification by FISH. All of the latter cases expressed ER, whereas no case that overexpressed HER-2 expressed ER. Sixteen cases had an underlying tumor, which was in situ in 6 cases. The underlying tumors were identical to the Paget disease with respect to their HER-2/Neu overexpression by both IHC and FISH. HER-2 overexpression was identified in 80% of our cases of Paget disease. There was 100% concordance between HER-2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry and gene amplification in both the Paget and the underlying tumor. Moreover, all of the cases negative for HER-2 overexpression expressed ER, whereas those positive for HER-2 did not.

Glycoprotein A-80 in the human prostate: immunolocalization in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, carcinoma, radiation failure, and after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To review the expression of A-80 in prostate cancer and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and compare it with that of normal and hyperplastic prostatic tissue. The ability to recognize cancer after androgen deprivation therapy and residual and/or recurrent cancer after radiotherapy using A-80 staining was also examined. A-80 is a glycoprotein linked to exocrine differentiation that shows little or no expression in normal exocrine cells, but is selectively overexpressed in dysplasias and adenocarcinomas. METHODS: We studied 277 prostate samples with a monoclonal antibody (MAb) to A-80. We applied this MAb to paraffin sections of specimens of fetal (n = 12), benign prostatic hyperplasia (n = 26, from transurethral prostate resection specimens), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (n = 11), prostate cancer (n = 103, from radical prostatectomy specimens), and autopsy (n = 7) tissue. In addition, 54 prostatectomy specimens after androgen-deprivation therapy and 64 specimens after radiotherapy were similarly studied. RESULTS: MAb A-80 stained the epithelial component of all 12 prostate specimens from fetal tissue; no staining was seen in normal adult prostatic tissue (0 of 7). In benign prostatic hyperplasia, sporadic cells reacted in 13% of cases (4 of 30); the atypical adenomatous hyperplasia samples were all negative (0 of 11). In patients with prostate cancer, more than 99% (102 of 103) stained positive, regardless of the grade or stage of cancer. Low and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia reacted in 73% (38 of 52) and 92% (77 of 84) of cases, respectively. All 64 (100%) salvage prostatectomy samples after external beam radiotherapy stained positive for A-80. Carcinoma subsequent to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy stained positive in 98% (53 of 54) of cases. CONCLUSIONS: A-80 is useful in differentiating benign prostatic hyperplasia and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia from prostate cancer. Also, the strong A-80 reactions in most high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia provide strong molecular support to the precancerous nature of the lesion. In particular, A-80 staining of biopsies may be useful in detecting residual and/or recurrent prostate carcinoma after radiation or hormonal therapy.

HER-2/neu testing in breast cancer.

The testing of newly diagnosed breast cancer specimens for HER-2/neu status has achieved "standard of practice" status for the management of breast cancer in the United States. The discussion as to the best method to determine HER-2/neu status in these samples continues, with the fluorescence in situ hybridization method gaining popularity owing to the recent evidence that it, in comparison with immunohistochemical analysis, might more accurately predict clinical responses to trastuzumab-based therapies. With trastuzumab achieving excellent results in the treatment of HER-2/neu-positive advanced disease and under extensive evaluation in major clinical trials for its potential efficacy when used at earlier clinical stages, the potential role(s) for HER-2/neu testing as a predictor of response to other therapies being resolved by large prospective clinical outcome studies, and the more convenient gene-based chromogenic in situ hybridization technique "waiting in the wings," the saga of HER-2/neu testing in breast cancer will continue to unfold over the next several years.

Predictors of lymph node metastasis in T1 breast carcinoma, stratified by patient age.

It is important to identify T1-substage breast carcinomas (BCs) which are inherently aggressive, so that these can be managed more assertively. The purpose of this study was to distinguish those T1 BCs with the potential to metastasize to axillary lymph nodes from those lacking that ability by multiparametric analysis of several clinicopathologic features. The authors studied 197 patients with invasive BC who had undergone modified radical mastectomy; 161 tumors were ductal and 26 were lobular BCs. The study group was stratified by age into two groups:

Laser therapy for small breast cancers.

BACKGROUND: Widespread mammography has resulted in the increased detection of breast cancer <1.5 cm. It may be possible to treat these small tumors with in-situ laser ablation. Prior to ablation tumor size is determined by ultrasound and mammogram. Histologic diagnosis and determination of prognostic factors are obtained from image-guided needle core samples. Invasive and in-situ tumors may be percutaneously ablated by a stereotactically guided laser needle and subsequently evaluated by imaging methods and needle biopsy. METHODS: Fifty-four patients (50 invasive, 4 in-situ); 51 mass, 3 microcalcification; mean diameter 12 (5 to 23) mm were treated by a stereotactically guided 805 nm laser beam via a fiber in a 16G needle delivered to the cancer. One to 8 weeks later the coagulated lesions were surgically removed for pathologic evaluation. In 2 additional patients, the laser-treated tumors were not removed but were monitored by mammography, ultrasonography, and needle core biopsy. RESULTS: None of the patients sustained any adverse effect. The average treatment time was 30 minutes. Pathology analysis revealed a 2.5 to 3.5 hemorrhagic ring surrounding the necrotic tumor. Under steady conditions, in two groups of 14 patients, 93% and 100% of the tumors showed complete destruction, with no residual cancer report. In the 2 unresected cases kept under surveillance for 6 to 24 months, the laser-treated tumors first showed shrinkage, followed by a 2 to 3 cm oil cyst. Fibrosis was demonstrated on needle core biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Laser energy delivered through a stereotactically guided needle appears to ablate mammographically detected breast cancer. A multicenter clinical trail is planned.