[Acceptance of psychosocial bridging measures in dementia : Treatment observation during the COVID-19 pandemic]. / Akzeptanz psychosozialer Überbrückungsmaßnahmen im Rahmen demenzieller Erkrankungen : Behandlungsbeobachtung während der COVID-19-Pandemie.

BACKGROUND: In the event of a COVID-19-related absence from an outpatient treatment program, patients suffering from dementia and their caregivers were offered support from a distance. The aim was to examine the extent of the participants' burden as well as how the offer was accepted and evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All participants (n = 63) were offered supportive telephone contact over a period of 8 weeks at varying frequencies (weekly, fortnightly). In addition patients received cognitive and physical tasks by mail every 2 weeks. In order to examine the acceptance of the support, data collected from clinical routine were included in a treatment observation. Additionally, all participants were asked to evaluate the support retrospectively. RESULTS: Out of 63 contacted participants, 45 were included in the treatment observation. The telephone support was very well accepted and a tendency towards higher agreement could be ascertained by caregivers. The experience of burden remained stable at a moderate level for all participants; however, caregivers were significantly more burdened. CONCLUSION: The present treatment observation shows the acceptance of a location-independent psychosocial treatment program for dementia for future pandemics or treatment failure as well as for the routine care, e.g. for patients with restricted mobility or those living in rural areas without direct hospital connection. In particular, our data strengthen the importance of programs for caregivers in order to alleviate their burden.

Complications associated with distraction osteogenesis for infected nonunion of the femoral shaft in the presence of a bone defect: a retrospective series.

We undertook a retrospective study of 50 consecutive patients (41 male, 9 female) with an infected nonunion and bone defect of the femoral shaft who had been treated by radical debridement and distraction osteogenesis. Their mean age was 29.9 years (9 to 58) and they had a mean of 3.8 (2 to 19) previous operations. They were followed for a mean of 5.9 years (2.0 to 19.0). The mean duration of the distraction osteogenesis was 24.5 months (2 to 39). Pin-track infection was observed in all patients. The range of knee movement was reduced and there was a mean residual leg-length discrepancy of 1.9 cm (0 to 8) after treatment. One patient required hip disarticulation to manage intractable sepsis. In all, 13 patients had persistent pain. Bony union was achieved in 49 patients at a mean of 20.7 months (12 to 35). Although distraction osteogenesis is commonly used for the treatment of infected femoral nonunion with bone defects, it is associated with a high rate of complications.

Synthesis Pengo System plates for the treatment of long-bone diaphyseal fractures in dogs.

A Brazilian orthopaedic company designed a stainless steel plate called Synthesis Pengo System (S.P.S.), which has one fixed and one changeable extremity. According to the assembly of the changeable extremity, it is possible to obtain dynamization or neutralization of the fracture site. Since the S.P.S. plate was developed for use in human patients, the aim of this study was to evaluate this system in long-bone diaphyseal fractures in dogs. Eight dogs with closed diaphyseal fractures of the femur (n= 1), radius and ulna (n=5), and tibia (n=2) were used. Patients were aged seven months to three years and weighed 18 to 31.2 kg. The S.P.S. plate was assembled with one fixed extremity and one changeable extremity in dynamization mode. The trail bar was positioned for synthesis modules with holes for cortical screws. The modules were positioned close to one another in two fractures and far away from the fracture site in the others. The bone healing occurred by external callus. Since motion at the fracture site determines the amount of callus required, the secondary bone healing that was observed in all of the cases indicated less rigid fixation of this system. A potential benefit of this system was a lesser interface contact with the bone since it was only done by trail bar. The major disadvantage was the prominence of the implant. It was possible to conclude that the S.P.S. plate appears to be a suitable method for the treatment of diaphyseal fractures in dogs.

[Symptom- versus endoscopy-based diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)]. / Abklärung und Therapie von Refluxbeschwerden.

The current guidelines of the German Society for Digestive Diseases (DGVS) endoscopy recommends for patients representing with reflux symptoms. In daily routine as well as in Guidelines from other countries and international guidelines, however, a symptom-based strategy for the management of patients with reflux disease is favoured. Since either strategies is dependent on specific clinical findings, neither can be recommended. The preference for one or the other strategy depends on the prevalence of so-called alarm symptoms, risk factors for a reflux carcinoma or Barrett's metaplasia, demographic factors, e. g., age and gender, patient's wish and initial response to empirical therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPI). However, most patients with characteristic reflux symptoms without any alarm symptoms and/or other risk factors can be safely managed with a symptom-based strategy in acute and long-term care.

Is early endoscopy in the emergency room beneficial in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer? A "fortuitously controlled" study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: In previous randomized trials, early endoscopy improved the outcome in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer, though most of these studies defined "early" as endoscopy performed within 24 hours after admission. Using the length of hospital stay as the primary criterion for the clinical outcome, we compared the results of endoscopy done immediately after admission (early endoscopy in the emergency room, EEE) with endoscopy postponed to a time within the first 24 hours after hospitalization, but still during normal working hours ("delayed" endoscopy in the endoscopy unit, DEU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 81 consecutive patients with bleeding peptic ulcer admitted in 1997 and 1998 (age range 16 - 90 years). Of these 81 patients, 38 underwent DEU (the standard therapy at the hospital) and 43 underwent EEE. Patients in the two groups were comparable with regard to admission criteria, were equally distributed with respect to their risk of adverse outcome (assessed using the Baylor bleeding score and the Rockall score), and differed only in the treatment they received. Endoscopic hemostasis was performed whenever possible in all patients with Forrest types I, IIa, and IIb ulcer bleeding. RESULTS: We found similar rates in the two groups for recurrent bleeding (16 % in DEU patients vs. 14 % in EEE patients), persistent bleeding (8 % in DEU patients vs. none in EEE patients), medical complications (21 % in DEU patients vs. 26 % in EEE patients), the need for surgery (8 % in DEU patients vs. 9 % in EEE patients), and the length of hospital stay (5.1 days for DEU patients vs. 5.9 days for EEE patients). None of the differences between the two groups in these parameters were statistically significant. None of the patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Early endoscopy in an emergency room did not improve the clinical outcome in our 81 consecutive patients with bleeding peptic ulcer.

Meta-analysis: The treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.

To evaluate therapies available for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome, and provide consensus recommendations for their use, a total of 51 double-blind clinical trials using bulking agents, prokinetics, antispasmodics, alosetron, tegaserod and antidepressants were selected. The quality of studies was assessed using 5-point scale. Meta-analyses were performed on all studies, and on 'high-quality studies'. The efficacy of fibre in the global irritable bowel syndrome symptoms relief (OR: 1.9; 95% CI:1.5-2.4) was lost after exclusion of low-quality trials (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0-2.0, P = 0.06). When excluding the low-quality trials, an improvement of global irritable bowel syndrome symptoms with all antispasmodics (OR: 2.1; 95% CI:1.8-2.9) was maintained only for octylonium bromide, but on the basis of only two studies. Antidepressants were effective (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.9-3.5), even after exclusion of low-quality studies (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3-2.7). Alosetron (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.9-2.6) and tegaserod (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2-1.5) showed a significant effect in women. We recommend the use of tegaserod for women with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation and alosetron for women with severe irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea. Antidepressants can be beneficial for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea patients with severe symptoms. Loperamide can be recommended in painless diarrhoea. Evidence is weak to recommend the use of bulking agents in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.

Personal view: rationale and proposed algorithms for symptom-based proton pump inhibitor therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-erosive reflux disease are chronic, highly prevalent conditions requiring long-term treatment that is both effective and practical. On-demand therapy with a proton pump inhibitor may meet that need. It is becoming a mainstay of long-term treatment because it reduces the risk of over- and under-treatment, is cost-effective and user friendly. Epidemiological and clinical observations speak also in its favour. However, for the anticipated benefits of on-demand therapy to accrue in clinical practice, on-demand treatment algorithms are required. These algorithms must specify the initial evaluation and treatment of candidates, and follow-up protocols for an on-demand strategy. Our group has developed such algorithms, which are presented here.

Favourable effect of regular intake of fermented milk containing Lactobacillus johnsonii on Helicobacter pylori associated gastritis.

BACKGROUND: Lactobacillus johnsonii (Lj1) had an in vitro and in vivo inhibitory effect on Helicobacter pylori. Fermented milk containing Lj1 (LC1), coadministered with antibiotics had a favourable effect on H. pylori gastritis. AIM: Evaluate the effect of LC1 intake without antibiotics on H. pylori gastritis. METHODS: Fifty H. pylori positive healthy volunteers were randomised in a double-blind study to LC1 or placebo. Gastric biopsies from the antrum and corpus were obtained before, and after 3 and 16 weeks of treatment, for histology and quantitative cultures. RESULTS: Severity and activity of antral gastritis was reduced after 16-week LC1 intake (pretreatment and 16-week inflammatory cell score: 6.0 +/- 0.8 vs. 5.3 +/- 0.1; P=0.04). H. pylori density decreased in the antrum after LC1 intake (3-week: 4.4 +/- 0.6; 16-week: 4.3 +/- 0.5 log10 colony forming units (cfu) vs. pretreatment 4.5 +/- 0.4 log10 cfu; P=0.04, respectively). Mucus thickness increased after 16 weeks of LC1 consumption (change of mucus thickness with LC1 and placebo in the antrum: 0.6 +/- 1.3 vs. -0.2 +/- 1.0, P=0.01; in the corpus: 0.3 +/- 1.1 vs. -0.6 +/- 1.5, P=0.03). CONCLUSION: LC1 intake had a favourable, albeit weak, effect on H. pylori associated gastritis, particularly in the antrum. Regular ingestion of fermented milk containing L. johnsonii may reduce the risk of developing disorders associated with high degrees of gastric inflammation and mucus depletion.

13C urea breath test (UBT) in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: why does it work better with acid test meals?

BACKGROUND: Acid test meals may improve the accuracy of the (13)C urea breath test (UBT). This has been attributed to changes in gastric emptying rather than to the effects of gastric pH on Helicobacter pylori urease. AIMS: To determine whether enhancement of (13)CO(2) excretion in the UBT in H pylori infected volunteers by acidification of a test meal is due to a delay in gastric emptying. METHODS: Urease activity in vitro was measured in intact bacteria and in bacterial homogenates. Urease activity in vivo was assessed by means of the UBT. Eleven H pylori infected subjects underwent UBTs with neutral Ensure (pH 7.0), acidified Ensure (pH 3.0), and apple juice (pH 3.0). Gastric emptying was assessed by (13)C sodium acetate breath test. RESULTS: From pH 7 to pH 3, the in vitro urease activity of intact bacteria increased sixfold. In contrast, urease activity of bacterial homogenates was inactivated by low pH. In vivo, urease activity, as measured by the UBT 20 minutes after meal ingestion, was higher with apple juice (delta (13)CO(2)=21.1; p=0.03) and acidified Ensure (delta (13)CO(2)=25.5; p=0.01) than with neutral Ensure (delta (13)CO(2)=12.5). Gastric emptying was faster with apple juice (T(max)=36.7 (8) minutes) but not with acidified Ensure (T(max)=63.3 (5) minutes; p=0.06) than with neutral Ensure (T(max)=65.0 (3) minutes; p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The higher UBT found with acidified compared with neutral test meals was independent of the emptying rates of the test meals but may have been due to medium acidity dependent activation of intra-bacterial urease in intact H pylori.

Acid inhibition on the first day of dosing: comparison of four proton pump inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Rapid and consistent acid suppression on the first day of dosing may be important in treating acid-related disorders. AIM: To compare the antisecretory activity and onset of action of single doses of rabeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, omeprazole capsule, omeprazole multiple unit pellet system (MUPS) tablet and placebo in healthy Helicobacter pylori-negative subjects. METHODS: This cross-over, double-blind, randomized study was performed in 18 H. pylori-negative subjects. Twenty-four-hour intragastric pH monitoring was performed on the day of treatment (once-daily dose of rabeprazole 20 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg, omeprazole capsule 20 mg, omeprazole MUPS tablet 20 mg or placebo). RESULTS: The intragastric pH (3.4) and time at pH > 4 during the 24 h post-dose (8.0 h) were significantly greater with rabeprazole than with lansoprazole, pantoprazole, omeprazole capsule, omeprazole MUPS tablet or placebo (P

Clinical and pathological implications of IgG antibody responses to Helicobacter pylori and its virulence factors in non-ulcer dyspepsia.

AIM: To determine whether pre-treatment antibody response to Helicobacter pylori virulence factors predicts eradication success and symptom relief 12 months after triple therapy in non-ulcer dyspepsia. METHODS: H. pylori-positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia received 1-week omeprazole-based triple therapy, or omeprazole plus placebos. Symptoms were assessed using a validated Likert scale. Gastric biopsies taken before and 12 months after treatment were used for histological examination. Pre-treatment blood samples were used for the detection of anti-H. pylori immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, and specific IgG antibodies to 19.5-, 26.5-, 30-, 35-, 89- (VacA) and 116-kDa (CagA) antigens of H. pylori. RESULTS: IgG antibodies to the six antigens were detected in 62%, 96%, 88%, 47%, 54% and 78% of patients, respectively. The presence of antibody to 19.5-, 26.5- or 30-kDa antigen was associated with an increased anti-H. pylori IgG absorbance index. IgG absorbance indices were greater in those with H. pylori eradication (vs. persistent infection). The prevalence of antibodies to the six antigens was not significantly different between those with symptom relief vs. those without. The 19.5-kDa antigen (P = 0.018) and VacA (P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for body gastritis. CONCLUSIONS: An increased pre-treatment anti-H. pylori IgG absorbance index may be a useful predictor of the success of eradication therapy. Although the 19.5-kDa antigen and VacA were associated with body gastritis, none of the six antigens tested predicted symptom relief after triple therapy.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia resistant to conventional management: a double blind randomised trial with a six month follow up.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in functional dyspepsia have shown little, if any, effect on dyspeptic symptoms. However, whether such treatment might be of benefit in patients resistant to acid inhibitors has not been formally tested. AIM: The present study investigated the effect of H pylori treatment in patients with functional dyspepsia resistant to conventional treatment. PATIENTS: A total of 181 H pylori positive patients with chronic functional dyspepsia who had not responded to a one week antacid run-in and two week double blind antisecretory or placebo treatment were included. METHODS: Patients were randomised to two weeks of treatment with omeprazole 40 mg twice daily combined with amoxicillin 1 g twice daily or omeprazole 20 mg once daily alone. The primary outcome variable ("response") was defined as no need for further therapy or investigations for dyspeptic symptoms 4-6 months after treatment. RESULTS: H pylori infection was healed in 10% of patients after omeprazole and in 52% after omeprazole plus amoxicillin. The respective "response" rates were 66% and 62% (NS). H pylori treatment and cure of H pylori infection had no effect on complete resolution of all dyspeptic symptoms, individual symptoms, or various aspects of quality of life. CONCLUSION: In functional dyspepsia, H pylori treatment and cure of H pylori are no more effective for symptoms over six months than short term acid inhibition. These results do not support treatment of H pylori in functional dyspepsia.

Primary prevention of diclofenac associated ulcers and dyspepsia by omeprazole or triple therapy in Helicobacter pylori positive patients: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: There is much controversy as to whether or not treatment of Helicobacter pylori reduces the occurrence of peptic ulcers during therapy with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). AIM: To assess the efficacy of triple therapy or omeprazole on the occurrence of diclofenac associated ulcers in H pylori positive patients. METHODS: This was a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre trial in H pylori positive patients requiring NSAID therapy who had no past or current peptic ulcer. They received diclofenac 50 mg twice daily for five weeks in combination with one of the four randomly assigned treatments: anti-H pylori treatment for one week (omeprazole 20 mg+clarithromycin 500 mg+amoxicillin 1 g, all twice daily) followed by placebo for four weeks (OAC-P); anti-H pylori treatment for one week followed by antisecretory treatment with omeprazole 20 mg once daily for four weeks (OAC-O); omeprazole 20 mg once daily for five weeks (O-O); or placebo for five weeks (P-P). Patients were endoscoped before and after treatment. RESULTS: Data from 660 patients were included in an intention to treat analysis. The occurrence of peptic ulcers in the four treatment groups during the study period was: 1.2% for OAC-P, 1.2% for OAC-O, 0% for O-O, and 5.8% for P-P (p<0.05 between placebo and all active treatment groups). Patients who received active treatment developed therapy requiring dyspeptic symptoms less frequently than those who received placebo (p<0.05 between placebo and all active treatment groups). CONCLUSIONS: In H pylori infected patients, all three active therapies reduced the occurrence of NSAID associated peptic ulcer and dyspeptic symptoms requiring therapy.

Antibiotic prophylaxis of infective endocarditis during digestive endoscopy: over- and underuse in Switzerland despite professed adherence to guidelines.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis of infective endocarditis associated with gastrointestinal endoscopy are not uniform. Though based on weak scientific evidence, they do represent an attempt to unify the management of antibiotic prophylaxis. We investigated whether physicians who profess to adhere to these guidelines actually do apply them correctly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all 195 Swiss gastroenterologists asking whether they adhered to antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines and under what conditions did they apply antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal endoscopy. We analysed whether the Swiss gastroenterologists who claim to adhere to these guidelines actually do so in practice. RESULTS: The response rate to our questionnaire was 95%. Of the Swiss gastroenterologists, 60% correctly employ antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in gastroscopy, as do 47% in colonoscopy. In therapeutic endoscopy, the percentage of correct antibiotic prophylaxis use depends upon the type of intervention and varies between 21 and 58%. Overuse of antibiotic prophylaxis is at least twice as frequent in colonoscopy and therapeutic endoscopy than in gastroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis are not well applied and do not lead to uniform management despite a high degree of professed adherence to them. This phenomenon can be explained by "cognitive dissonance" and "reactance." We conclude that guidelines based on unconvincing data may even prove harmful.

Effect of omeprazole on regional and temporal variations in intragastric acidity.

BACKGROUND: Conventional techniques for measuring gastric acidity have demonstrated the decrease in gastric acidity produced by proton pump inhibitors (PPI); however, such techniques do not detect transient or localized pH changes which may modify the intragastric environment without affecting the therapeutic efficacy of PPIs. AIM: To investigate local and temporal variations in intragastric pH and to test the hypothesis that omeprazole produces prolonged, generalized gastric anacidity (pH >6). METHODS: A single-blind study was conducted with triple-point 24-hour gastric pH-metry on days 7, 14 and 21 in 14 healthy, Helicobacter pylori-negative volunteers (7 M; 20-46 years) who received placebo for 7 days, followed by omeprazole 20 mg daily for 14 days. RESULTS: Omeprazole increased the median 24-hour pH significantly in the distal corpus (placebo: 1.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.6); omeprazole week 1: 4.0 (2.6-5.0); omeprazole week 2: 4.0 (2.8-4.6)) and at all other gastric recording sites (p < 0.01). At both corpus sites, nocturnal pH was lower and mealtime pH was higher than the non-meal daytime pH during placebo and both omeprazole administration periods; in the antrum, however, the major difference noted was that meal-time pH was higher than non-meal daytime pH. Antral pH was lower during meals and higher at night than proximal corpus pH. During placebo, gastric pH >6.0 was observed at 1 site only for 1.7% (median; 95% CI 0.4-3.3%), at 2 sites simultaneously for 0.24% (0.0-1.0%) and at 3 sites for 0.0% (0.0-0.28%), respectively, of the recording periods; during the second week of omeprazole, the equivalent results were 7.7% (1.4-14.0%), 4.9% (0.21-15.7%) and 4.7% (0.0-9.9%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole, 20 mg daily, does not produce gastric anacidity despite significant increases in median 24-hour pH values. The time-, meal- and site-related variations in gastric pH observed under normal physiological conditions are seen to persist, with prolonged periods of low pH throughout the stomach and preservation of the normal, meal-related rise and nocturnal fall in gastric pH during omeprazole administration.

Combined analysis of the ORCHID and OCAY studies: does eradication of Helicobacter pylori lead to sustained improvement in functional dyspepsia symptoms?

Currently, one of the most important unresolved questions concerning Helicobacter pylori is whether eradication of the organism leads to a sustained improvement in symptoms in patients diagnosed with functional (non-ulcer) dyspepsia. Recently, two very similar studies, the ORCHID and OCAY studies, have been completed and the combined results of these two multicentre, multinational, randomised, double blind, controlled clinical trials are reviewed.

A randomized, double-blind, comparative study of standard-dose rabeprazole and high-dose omeprazole in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Rabeprazole has a faster onset of antisecretory action than omeprazole, and it is of interest to determine whether this translates into faster symptom relief in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. AIMS: To assess the relief from heartburn after 3 days of treatment with standard-dose rabeprazole or high-dose omeprazole (primary end-point). Secondary end-points included the decrease in score for other symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, healing rates and quantification of antacid use. METHODS: Patients with endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis were randomized to receive 4 weeks of double-blind treatment with rabeprazole (20 mg) or omeprazole (40 mg). Patients who were not healed after 4 weeks received a further 4 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-four patients were screened, 251 patients were randomized and 230 patients completed the trial. The numbers of patients with relief from heartburn on day 4 were similar in the two groups (84% for rabeprazole; 95% confidence interval, 76-90%; 83% for omeprazole; 95% confidence interval, 75-89%). There were no significant differences between the treatments in the relief from other gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms or in healing rates. The number of reports of severe heartburn during the first 3 days was higher in the omeprazole group (daytime heartburn: 4.7% for rabeprazole vs. 10.3% for omeprazole, P=0.005; night-time heartburn: 4.7% for rabeprazole vs. 9.8% for omeprazole, P=0.01; statistical comparisons defined post hoc). CONCLUSIONS: Standard-dose rabeprazole was as effective as high-dose omeprazole in relieving symptoms by day 4 of treatment and in healing oesophageal lesions, but had a faster onset of action in patients with severe heartburn. This suggests that the improved pharmacological properties of rabeprazole translate into a clinically relevant advantage.

Cholestatic hepatitis A complicated by acute renal insufficiency.

31 cases of non-fulminant hepatitis A complicated by acute renal insufficiency are reported in the literature. Two-thirds of those patients needed dialysis, usually when depending on the severity of their hyperbilirubinemia. This report concerns the first published case of non-fulminant cholestatic hepatitis A complicated by acute renal insufficiency in which a spontaneous remission of renal function occurred without need for dialysis despite a very severe hyperbilirubinemia.