Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acad Emerg Med ; 22(6): 670-5, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26010148

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) utilization has increased rapidly over the past 15 years. CT is the most common source for radiation exposure. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to measure the effective dose of radiation delivered during routine head and abdominal CT examinations at a children's hospital. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of emergency department (ED) patients < 20 years of age who underwent head or abdominal CT scans in 2012 at a single children's hospital. The authors abstracted the dose-length product from the CT scanners and calculated the effective radiation dose delivered. Patient demographics were abstracted from the medical record. The relationship between effective dose and age, patient weight, and reason for examination were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 478 subjects were included: 255 underwent head CT, and 223 underwent abdominal CT. The median age was 8.1 years (interquartile range = 2.71 to 14.40 years) and 56.9% were male. The median effective dose for head CT was 2.68 mSv (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.54 to 2.84 mSv) and decreased as age increased. For abdominal CT, the median effective dose was 5.06 mSv (95% CI = 4.58 to 6.03 mSv) and increased as age increased (3.67 to 11.12 mSv, p < 0.001). For abdominal CT, 8% of 5- to 10-year-olds, 28% of those 10 to 15 years, and 60% of patients over age 15 years received effective doses over 10 mSv. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of radiation delivered to pediatric patients during routine CT examinations of the head and abdomen was low. Regardless, a large proportion of older patients were exposed to elevated effective doses of radiation during abdominal CT.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Doses de Radiação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Peso Corporal , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Cabeça/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografia Abdominal , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 74(3): 907-11, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23425756

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Injured children undergo radiologic studies as part of trauma evaluations. Children are more sensitive than adult patients to the effects of ionizing radiation. Few studies have described the radiation exposure to pediatric patients during trauma evaluations. We sought to describe the rate of use of radiology studies and to estimate the effective dose of radiation delivered to pediatric trauma patients presenting to trauma centers within the United States. METHODS: We performed an analysis of pediatric patients younger than 19 years who presented to an American College of Surgery-verified trauma center in 2010 (National Trauma Data Bank). We excluded patients who were transferred from another facility, patients who died at the scene or those who presented to the emergency department dead on arrival. We examined the use of computed tomography (CT) and standard radiographs (x-ray). Radiologic studies were identified through common procedure codes (CPT). Using published criteria, we estimated the effective radiation dose per trauma patient. RESULTS: Among the 84,863 eligible pediatric trauma patients, 26,360 (31.1%) underwent imaging with x-ray or CT. Of these patients, 17,321 (65.7%) were male, median age was 13.0 years (interquartile range, 6.0-17.0), and 20,965 (79.5%) had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of less than 16. A total of 23,148 (27.4%) underwent CT. X-ray studies accounted for a small amount of exposure to radiation as compared with CT. Mean (SD) effective radiation exposure of patients imaged with CT was 12.0 (8.2) mSv. Younger children and those with increasing injury severity were exposed to higher doses of radiation (ß = -0.04, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The majority of radiation exposure to pediatric trauma patients is secondary to CT. Younger children and those with more severe injuries are exposed to higher doses of radiation. Pediatric trauma patients are exposed to levels of radiation, which could potentially lead to long-term harm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III.


Assuntos
Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Medição de Risco/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/efeitos adversos , Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Doses de Radiação , Lesões por Radiação/epidemiologia , Radiação Ionizante , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 13(2): e64-8, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21283043

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Intubation is a risk factor for nosocomial sinusitis in adult intensive care patients. Sinusitis in intubated adults can be an occult cause of fever. In children, nasal intubation may increase the risk of sinusitis. No pediatric study has determined the frequency of nosocomial sinusitis in the pediatric intensive care unit setting. We hypothesized that within a subset of patients who had head computed tomography imaging 1) the incidental frequency of sinusitis in pediatric intensive care unit patients exceeds the frequency in non-pediatric intensive care unit patients, 2) the frequency of sinusitis is greater in pediatric intensive care unit patients with a tube (nasotracheal, nasogastric, orotracheal, or orogastric) compared to those without a tube, and 3) nasal tubes confer an increased risk for sinusitis over oral tubes. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Independent not-for-profit pediatric healthcare system. PATIENTS: Pediatric intensive care unit and non-pediatric intensive care unit (inpatients hospitalized on medical-surgical wards) patients referred for head computed tomography. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Computed tomography images were scored using the Lund-MacKay staging system. Sinusitis was defined as a Lund-MacKay score ≥5. A total of 596 patients were studied, 395 (66.3%) in the pediatric intensive care unit. A total of 154 (44.3%) pediatric intensive care unit vs. 54 (26.9%) non-pediatric intensive care unit patients had sinusitis (p < .001). A total of 102 of 147 (69.4%) pediatric intensive care unit patients with a tube present had sinusitis vs. 73 of 248 (29.4%) patients without a tube present (p < .001). There was no difference in sinusitis based on tube location (p = .472). Of patients with sinusitis, 51.3% (81 of 158) compared to 39.4% (89 of 226) were febrile within 48 hrs of imaging (p = .021). A younger age or the presence of a tube increased the probability of sinusitis (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A total of 44.3% of our pediatric intensive care unit patients imaged for reasons other than evaluation for sinus disease had evidence of sinusitis, and 51.3% of these had fever. These findings raise the concern that sinusitis in pediatric intensive care unit patients is common and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of fever in pediatric intensive care unit patients.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Sinusite/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Intubação Gastrointestinal/efeitos adversos , Intubação Intratraqueal/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sinusite/diagnóstico por imagem , Sinusite/etiologia , Tomógrafos Computadorizados
5.
Pediatr Radiol ; 37(2): 225-7, 2007 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17186231

RESUMO

Motion of the aortic wall resulting in the appearance of aortic dissection on CT is a well-described artifact in the adult radiology literature. Aortic dissection is rare in the pediatric population, and literature on pediatric CT angiography has not included recognition of this pitfall in the diagnosis of children. The current case illustrates a patient at risk of aortic dissection and a false-positive CT diagnosis as a result of this artifact.


Assuntos
Aneurisma Aórtico/diagnóstico por imagem , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Artefatos , Adolescente , Angiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...