Study for Treatment Effects and Prognostic Factors of Bronchial Asthma : Follow Up Over 2 Years / 결핵

BACKGROUND: Asthma causes recurrent episodes of wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness, and cough. These symptoms are usually associated with widespread but variable airflow limitation that is partly reversible either spontaneously or with treatment. The inflammation also causes an associated increase in airway resposiveness to a variety of stimuli. METHOD: Of the 403 adult bronchial asthma patients enrolled from March 1992 to March 1994 in Allergy Clinics of Severance Hospital in Yonsei University, this study reviewed the 97 cases to evaluate the treatment effects and to analyse prognostic factors. The patients were classified to five groups according to treatment responses ; group 1 (non control group) : patients who were not controlled during following up, group 2 (high step treatment group) : patients who were controlled longer than 3 months by step 3 or 4 treatment of 'Global initiative for asthma, Global strategy for asthma management and prevention' (NHLBI/UNO) with PFR(%) larger than 8055, group 3 (short term control group) : patients who were controlled less than 1 year by step 1 or 2 treatment of NHLBI/WHO, group 4 (intermediate term control group) : patients who were controlled for more than 1 year but less than 2 years by step 1 or 2 treatment of NHLBI/HNO, group 5 (long term control group). patients who were controlled for more than 2 years by step 1 or 2 treatment of NHHI/WHO. Especially the patients who were controlled more than 1 year with negatively converted methacholine test and no eosinophil in sputum were classified to methacholine negative conversion group. We reviewed patients' history, atopy score, total IgE, specific IgE, methacholine PC2O and Peripheral blood eosinophil counts pulmonary function test steroid doses and aggrevation numbers after treatment. RESULTS: On analysis of 98 patients, 20 cases(20.6%) were classified to group 1, 26 cases(26.8%) to group 2, 23 cases(23.7%) to group 3, 15 cases(15.5%) to group 4, and 13 cases(13.4%) to groups 5. There were no differences of sex, asthma type, family history, smoking history, allergic rhinitis and aspirin allergy among the groups. In long term control group, asthma onset age was younger, symptom duration was shorter, and Initial pulmonary function was better. The long term control group required 1ower amounts of oral steroid, had less aggrevation during first 3months after starting treatment and shorter duration from enrollment to control. Atopy, allergic skin tests sputum and blood eosinophil, total IgE, nonspecific bronchial resposiveness was not significantly different among the groups. Seven out of 28 patients who were controlled more than 1 years showed negatively converted methachloine test and no eosinophils in the sputum. The mean control duration was 20.3α9.7 months and relapse did not occur. CONCLUSION: Patients who had asthma of onset age younger, shorter symptom duration better PFT, lower treatment initial steps, lower amounts of steroid needs and less aggravation numbers after starting treatment were classified in the long term control groups compared to the others.

Clinical Features of Pityitary Hyperplasia / 대한내분비학회지

BACKGROUNDS: Pituitary hyperplasia can mimic pituitary adenoma. In MRI, enlarged pituitary gland is enhanced homogenously with upward convexity of the superior margin of the gland .The best definition of hyperplasia in the pituitary hyperplasia seems to be a multiplication of one or more cell types. But definition, etiology and clinical courses of this disease are not clear, METHOD: We reviewed clinical symptoms, MRI, and pathologic findindings in 6 patients with pituitary hyperplasia. RESULT: 1. Major clinical symptoms were headache (100%), visual field defect (84%), polyuria/polydipsia (64%), and irregular mensturation (32%). Other symptoms were amenorrhea (16%) and galactorrhea (16%). 2. Three of five cases showed abnormal responses to combined pituitary function test, 3. MRI findings were pituitary hyperplasia (4), macroadenoma (l), and microadenoma (1). 4. In two operated cases, there was no adenoma. One case showed hyperplasia of lactotroph cells, the other was hyperplasia of gonadotroph cells confirmed by the examination of immunocytochemistry. CONCLUSION: Pituitary hyperplasia should be considered in patients with enlarged pituitary gland without focal mass lesion.

A Phase I/II Trial of DA3030 in Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia / 대한암학회지

PURPOSE: We planned to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of DA-3030 to determine the recommended dose for phase III clinical trial based on the biologically active doses from phase I/II clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Open non-randomized phase I/II study was carried out in 64 cancer patients with chemotheray-induced myelosuppression. After 1 cycle of control period (chemotherapy without DA-3030), DA-3030 was started 24 hours after the second cycle of chemotherapy to 4 groups of patients with the doses of 50 microgram/m2/day (step I), 100 microgram/m2/day (step II), 150 microgram/m2/day (step III), 200microgram/m2/day (step IV) by once-a-day subcutaneous administration for 10 days. RESULTS: Of the 64 enrolled patients, 46 patients were evaluable. Tmax reached after 2 hours of injection in step I and 4 hours in step II-IV. Terminal half life was 1.8 hours in step I and 3.2 hours in step II, 3.3 hours in step III, 3.0 hours in step IV. Area under the curve (AUC) and AUMC increased dose dependently from step I through step IV. Total clearance rate decreased in a dose dependent manner but the volume of distribution showed no differences between the steps.The mean nadir count of total WBC and neutrophil increased in all 4 steps of DA-3030 administration. Also the duration of leukopenia, equal to or less than 2,000/uL or neutropenia and the recovery time of WBC or neutrophil from nadir decreased with DA-3030 administration in all 4 steps. But no differece of DA-3030 effect was found among 4 steps. When we compared the clinical efficacy of DA-3030 with total WBC and neutrophil criteria, it was 58.3% and 58.3% in step I, 90.0% and 80.0% in step II, 91.7% and 91.7% in step III, 75.0% and 70.0% in step IV. Although the duration of antibiotics administration showed no difference between control and DA-3030 administration period in step I, it decreased with DA-3030 administration in step II-IV. Infection was found only in step I. Life-threatening side effect was not found in all steps. Only mild myalgia was found without any dose relationship. CONCLUSION: When we considered the efficacy, toxicity and pharmacokinetic parameters, we suggest that 100microgram/m2 is an appropriate dosage for the phase III clinical trial.