Giant Cell Tumors With HMGA2::NCOR2 Fusion : Clinicopathologic, Molecular, and Epigenetic Study of a Distinct Entity.

Giant cell tumors (GCTs) with high mobility group AT-Hook 2 ( HMGA2 )::nuclear receptor corepressor 2 ( NCOR2 ) fusion are rare mesenchymal tumors of controversial nosology, which have been anecdotally reported to respond to CSFR1 inhibitors. Here, we performed a comprehensive study of 6 GCTs with HMGA2::NCOR2 fusion and explored their relationship with other giant cell-rich neoplasms. Tumors occurred in 4 females and 2 males ranging in age from 17 to 32 years old (median 24). Three lesions originated in subcutaneous soft tissue and 3 in bone. Tumor size ranged from 20 to 33 mm (median 27 mm). The lesions had a nodular/multinodular architecture and were composed of sheets of mononuclear "histiocytoid" cells with uniform nuclei intermingled with multinucleated giant cells. Mitotic activity was low and nuclear atypia and metaplastic bone were absent. Variable findings included necrosis, cystic degeneration, lymphocytic infiltrate (sometimes forming nodules), and xanthogranulomatous inflammation. On immunohistochemistry, all cases focally expressed pan-keratin and were negative with SATB2 and H3.3G34W. Whole RNA-sequencing was performed in all cases of GCT with HMGA2::NCOR2 fusion and a subset of giant cell-rich tumors (tenosynovial-GCT, n = 19 and "wild-type" GCT of soft tissue, n = 9). Hierarchical clustering of RNA-sequencing data showed that GCT with HMGA2::NCOR2 fusion formed a single cluster, independent of the other 2 entities. Methylome profiling showed similar results, but the distinction from "wild-type" GCT of soft tissue was less flagrant. Gene expression analysis showed similar levels of expression of the CSF1/CSFR1 axis between GCT with HMGA2::NCOR2 fusion and tenosynovial-GCT, supporting their potential sensitivity to CSFR1 inhibitors. Clinical follow-up was available for 5 patients (range: 10 to 64 mo; median 32 mo). Three patients (60%) experienced local recurrences, whereas none had distant metastases or died of disease. Overall, our study confirms and expands previous knowledge on GCT with HMGA2::NCOR2 fusion and supports its inclusion as an independent entity.

NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms are ubiquitous tumours of myofibroblastic lineage with a distinct methylation class.

AIMS: NTRK gene fusions have been described in a wide variety of central nervous system (CNS) and soft tissue tumours, including the provisional tumour type 'spindle cell neoplasm, NTRK-rearranged' (SCN-NTRK), added to the 2020 World Health Organisation Classification of Soft Tissue Tumours. Because of histopathological and molecular overlaps with other soft tissue entities, controversy remains concerning the lineage and terminology of SCN-NTRK. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 16 mesenchymal tumours displaying kinase gene fusions (NTRK fusions and one MET fusion) initially diagnosed as infantile fibrosarcomas (IFS), SCN-NTRK and adult-type fibrosarcomas from the soft tissue, viscera and CNS. We used immunohistochemistry, DNA methylation profiling, whole RNA-sequencing and ultrastructural analysis to characterise them. Unsupervised t-distributed stochastic neighbour embedding analysis showed that 11 cases (two CNS tumours and nine extra-CNS) formed a unique and new methylation cluster, while all tumours but one, initially diagnosed as IFS, clustered in a distinct methylation class. All the tumours except one formed a single cluster within the hierarchical clustering of whole RNA-sequencing data. Tumours from the novel methylation class co-expressed CD34 and S100, had variable histopathological grades and frequently displayed a CDKN2A deletion. Ultrastructural analyses evidenced a myofibroblastic differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that SCN-NTRK share similar features in adults and children and in all locations combine an infiltrative pattern, distinct epigenetic and transcriptomic profiles, and ultrastructural evidence of a myofibroblastic lineage. Further studies may support the use of new terminology to better describe their myofibroblastic nature.

Intra- and extra-cranial BCOR-ITD tumours are separate entities within the BCOR-rearranged family.

BCOR-ITD tumours form an emerging family of aggressive entities with an internal tandem duplication (ITD) in the last exon of the BCOR gene. The family includes cerebral tumours, termed central nervous system BCOR-ITD (CNS BCOR-ITD), and sarcomatous types described in the kidney as clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (CCSK), in the endometrium as high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and in the bone and soft tissue as undifferentiated round cell sarcoma or primitive myxoid mesenchymal tumour of infancy. Based on a series of 33 retrospective cases, including 10 CNS BCOR-ITD and 23 BCOR-ITD sarcomas, we interrogated the homogeneity of the entity regarding clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings, and molecular signatures. Whole-transcriptomic sequencing and DNA methylation profiling were used for unsupervised clustering. BCOR-ITD tumours mostly affected young children with a median age at diagnosis of 2.1 years (range 0-62.4). Median overall survival was 3.9 years and progression-free survival was 1.4 years. This dismal prognosis is shared among tumours in all locations except CCSK. Histopathological review revealed marked differences between CNS BCOR-ITD and BCOR-ITD sarcomas. These two groups were consistently segregated by unsupervised clustering of expression (n = 22) and DNA methylation (n = 21) data. Proximity between the two groups may result from common somatic changes within key pathways directly related to the novel activity of the ITD itself. Conversely, comparison of gene signatures with single-cell RNA-Seq atlases suggests that the distinction between BCOR-ITD sarcomas and CNS BCOR-ITD may result from differences in cells of origin.

A potential diagnostic pitfall: Primary synovial sarcoma of the central nervous system.

(No abstract).