Molecular mistletoe therapy: friend or foe in established anti-tumor protocols? A multicenter, controlled, retrospective pharmaco-epidemiological study in pancreas cancer.

Mistletoe is often used as complementary therapy in oncology. The anti-tumor effects of mistletoe (Iscador) are well documented in-vitro in respect to inhibition of cell proliferation, induction of apoptosis, segmental activation of immune competent cells and trapping of chemotherapeutic drugs within cancer cells by modulating the inhibitory potential of P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-mediated transport of cell toxifying substances (cytotoxic drugs). However, the clinical activity of mistletoe treatment remains still controversial. Implementation of mistletoe therapy as supportive care into anti-cancer programs should be based on the best evidence and must continually be evaluated to ensure safety, efficacy, collection of new data, and cost-effectiveness. Useful domains that can be evaluated include symptom control, adherence to conventional treatment protocols, quality of life, individual outcome and potential advantages of a whole-system health approach. Here we report the results of a multicenter, controlled, retrospective and observational pharmaco-epidemiological study in patients suffering from a pancreatic carcinoma. After surgery the patients were treated by adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine supported by Iscador, or with gemcitabine alone, or any other best of care, but not including Iscador. Using a novel methodological pharmaco-epidemiological design and statistical approach it could be shown that Iscador offers benefits--symptom control, overall survival--as supportive care within gemcitabine protocols of patients with surgically resected pancreatic carcinoma.

Retrolective, comparative, epidemiological cohort study with parallel groups design for evaluation of efficacy and safety of drugs with "well-established use".

UNLABELLED: The randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) is accepted as the "golden standard" for the evaluation of efficacy and safety of new drugs. In contrast, to demonstrate efficacy and safety of drugs with "well-established use" that have been on the European Community market for long time, observational comparative epidemiological studies can be used according to the European drug regulation directive. However, because comparative epidemiological cohort studies can share some risk of bias with other nonrandomized observational study designs, there is a need for an approach that could effectively reduce the bias risk in this type of studies. STUDY OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of a long-term complementary therapy of primary, non-metastatic breast carcinoma patients treated with standardized European mistletoe extract Iscador("mistletoe") in addition to the conventional adjuvant oncologic therapy, and compared to the control group treated with the conventional therapy alone. METHODS: The multicenter, comparative, retrolective, pharmaco-epidemiological cohort study with parallel groups design and randomly selected centers that routinely used both treatments was carried out according to Good Epidemiological Practice rules under a standard operating procedure control. The test group patients received the mistletoe extract treatment subcutaneously for at least 3 months, while the control group patients of the same cohort was exclusively treated with the conventional therapy. The patients were followed up for at least 3 years or until death. The primary endpoint of efficacy was the incidence of adverse reactions to the conventional oncologic therapy. Secondary endpoints were change from baseline of the symptoms associated with the disease and treatment as well as overall survival. All endpoints were adjusted to baseline imbalance and confounders. Safety was assessed descriptively by the number of patients with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) attributed to the test treatment. RESULTS: 1442 patients (710 tests and 732 controls) were eligible for the "per protocol" analysis of efficacy and safety. At baseline, the test group had a more advanced disease and worse prognostic factors profile. After a median follow-up of 66 vs. 60 months, and a median mistletoe therapy duration of 52 months, significantly fewer test group patients (16.2%) than control patients (54.0%) developed ADRs attributed to the conventional therapy [adjusted odds ratio, OR (95% confidence interval, CI), OR = 0.47 (0.32-0.67), p < 0.001]. In the test group, the majority of the symptoms disappeared more frequently, and overall mortality hazard was significantly lower [adjusted hazard ratio, HR (95% CI), HR = 0.46 (0.22-0.96), p = 0.038] than in the control group. Systemic ADRs attributed to the test treatment developed in 0.8%, and local ADRs in 17.3% of the patients. ADR severity was mild to intermediate. Tumor enhancement was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Complementary therapy of patients with primary, non-metastatic breast carcinoma with the mistletoe extract Iscador was safe and in comparison to the control group within the same study cohort showed considerably fewer ADRs attributed to concurrent conventional therapy, reduced disease symptoms, and suggested a significant improvement of survival. Despite some methodical limitations that require careful study planning and conduction as well as critical interpretation, the applied study design seems suitable to evaluate the efficacy and safety of drugs with "well-established use", particularly in oncology.

Intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin versus mitomycin C in superficial bladder cancer: formal meta-analysis of comparative studies on tumor progression.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) with mitomycin C (MMC) on progression of Stage Ta and T1 bladder carcinoma. METHODS: Combined published and unpublished data from comparative studies on BCG versus MMC in superficial bladder carcinoma were analyzed, considering possible confounding factors. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the primary effect size estimate. Tumor progression was defined as progression to a higher tumor stage or the development of metastatic disease. RESULTS: In nine eligible clinical trials, 1277 patients were treated with BCG and 1133 with MMC. Within the overall median follow-up of 26 months, 7.67% of the patients in the BCG group and 9.44% of the patients in the MMC group developed tumor progression. In all nine individual studies and in the combined results, no statistically significant difference in the ORs for progression between the BCG and MMC-treated groups was found (combined OR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.03; P = 0.081). In the subgroup with BCG maintenance, the combined result of the five individual studies showed a statistically significant superiority of BCG over MMC (OR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.94; P = 0.02). In the four studies without BCG maintenance, the combined result indicated no statistically significant difference between the two treatments (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 0.65 to 2.07; P = 0.612). Potential confounders, such as tumor risk status, duration of follow-up, BCG strain, BCG and MMC treatment regimen, and year of publication did not significantly influence these results. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated statistically significant superiority for BCG compared with MMC for the prevention of tumor progression only if BCG maintenance therapy was provided.

Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin versus mitomycin C for superficial bladder cancer: a formal meta-analysis of comparative studies on recurrence and toxicity.

PURPOSE: We compare the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) with mitomycin C on recurrence of stages Ta and T1 bladder carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Combined published and unpublished data from comparative studies on BCG versus mitomycin C for superficial bladder carcinoma considering possible confounding factors were analyzed. Odds ratio (OR) and its 95% CI were used as primary effect size estimate. Toxicity data were evaluated descriptively. RESULTS: In 11 eligible clinical trials 1,421 patients were treated with BCG and 1,328 were treated with mitomycin C. Within the overall median followup time of 26 months 38.6% of the patients in the BCG group and 46.4% of those in the mitomycin C group had tumor recurrence. In 7 of 11 studies BCG was significantly superior to mitomycin C, in 3 studies no significant difference was found, while in 1 study mitomycin C was significantly superior to BCG. An overall statistically significant superiority of BCG versus mitomycin C efficacy in reducing tumor recurrence was detected (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.84, p = 0.005). In the subgroup treated with BCG maintenance all 6 individual studies showed a significant superiority of BCG over mitomycin C (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.53, p <0.001). In 4 of the 5 studies with reported data on toxicity BCG associated cystitis was significantly more frequent than in the mitomycin C group (53.8% versus 39.2%). The combined cystitis OR was 1.81 (95% CI 1.48 to 2.23, p <0.001). The OR for cystitis in the BCG maintenance group did not significantly differ from that in the nonmaintenance therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest superiority of BCG over mitomycin C for prevention of tumor recurrences in the combined data and particularly in the BCG maintenance treatment subgroup, irrespective of the actual (intermediate or high) tumor risk status. The toxicity with BCG is higher but does not differ between BCG maintenance and nonmaintenance groups.

Influence of postoperative complementary treatment with lectin-standardized mistletoe extract on breast cancer patients. A controlled epidemiological multicentric retrolective cohort study.

This epidemiological study was performed to evaluate the influence of postoperative complementary treatment with lectin-standardized mistletoe extract (sME) on breast cancer patients. The design (retrolective cohort analysis with parallel groups) and conduct of the study were in agreement with current standards for prospectively randomized clinical trials. A cohort of 1,248 breast cancer patients on postoperative chemo-, radio-, hormone-therapy were studied in 27 randomized centers. Patients with complementary medications other than sME were excluded from the evaluation and the final analysis was performed on data of 689 patients. From this cohort 219 patients received a complementary treatment exclusively with sME (therapy group), while 470 patients were without complementary treatment (control group). The median follow-up time was 284 days (therapy group) and 285 days (control group). The primary end-point of the study was to determine the impact of complementary sME treatment on disease- or therapy-induced adverse reactions in breast cancer patients. Imbalances for causal effects (covariates) were adjusted by propensity scores. Final evaluation was performed by estimating the linear regression between change in symptom score and propensity score with all data and using the regression line to calculate the change in symptom score expected for each patient. Tumor-associated events were evaluated by number and time until event. The safety of sME treatment was analysed in terms of number, severity, duration and outcome of adverse reactions. As compared to breast cancer patients without complementary treatment (control group), the administration of sME (therapy group) resulted in a significant reduction of adverse reactions induced by the tumor-destructive therapies (e.g. nausea, gastro-intestinal tract symptoms, depression, fatigue, mental symptoms) and prolonged relapse-free intervals, most pronounced for UICC stages IIa and IIb. The rate of sME-associated adverse reactions was 12.8%. All side-effects were mild to moderate, predominantly local skin reactions and self-limiting without therapeutic intervention. Complementary treatment of breast cancer patients with lectin-standardized mistletoe extract (sME) proved to be a well tolerated optimization of standard tumor-destructive therapies, mainly improving quality of life and relapse-free intervals in defined UICC stages.

Retrolective cohort study of an additive therapy with an oral enzyme preparation in patients with multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of an additive therapy with an oral enzyme (OE) preparation given for more than 6 months additionally to standard combination chemotherapy (vincristine/melphalan/cyclophosphamide/prednisone (VMCP)- or methylprednisolone/ vincristine/CCNU/cyclophosphamide/melphalan (MOCCA)-regimen) in the primary treatment of patients with multiple myeloma stages I-III. METHODS: A cohort of 265 patients with multiple myeloma stages I-III was consecutively treated at our institution in two parallel groups (control group (n = 99): chemotherapy +/-OE for less than 6 months; OE-group (n = 166): chemotherapy + OE for more than 6 months). The median follow-up time in the stages I, II, and III for the OE-group was 61, 37, and 46.5 months, respectively; for the control group the respective values were 33, 51.5, and 31.5 months. The primary endpoint of the study was disease-specific survival. Secondary endpoints were response to therapy, duration of first response and side effects. The chosen method for evaluation was the technique of a retrolective cohort analysis with a concurrent control group. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analysis was done with the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Significantly higher overall response rates and longer duration of remissions were observed in the OE-group. Primary responders showed a longer mean survival time than non-responders. Additive therapy with OE given for more than 6 months decreased the hazard of death for patients at all stages of disease by approximately 60%. Observation time was not long enough to estimate the median survival for patients at stages I and II; for stage III patients it was 47 months in the control group versus 83 months for the patients treated with OE (P = 0.0014) which means a 3-year gain of survival time. Significant prognostic factors for survival, in the Cox regression analysis, were stage of disease and therapy with OE. The OE-therapy was generally well tolerated (3.6% of patients with mild to moderate gastrointestinal symptoms). CONCLUSION: OEs represent a promising new additive therapy in multiple myeloma which will be further evaluated in a randomized phase III trial in the USA.

Impact of complementary oral enzyme application on the postoperative treatment results of breast cancer patients--results of an epidemiological multicentre retrolective cohort study.

PURPOSE: [corrected] To evaluate the impact of postoperative treatment with an oral enzyme (OE) preparation given complementary to an antineoplastic therapy in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: The design of this epidemiological study was a retrolective cohort analysis with parallel groups. Design and conduct of the study were performed to current standards for prospective, controlled clinical trials. A cohort of 2,339 breast cancer patients undergoing surgical intervention and radio-, chemo- or hormonal therapy were studied in 216 centres. Of the 2,339 patients, 1,283 received complementary treatment with OE and 1,056 did not receive OE. Patients with other complementary medications were excluded and the final analysis was performed with the data from 649 patients, of whom 239 (37%) were additionally treated with OE (test group) and 410 (63%) without OE (control group). The median follow-up time for the test group was 485 days and for the control group 213 days. The primary endpoint of the study was to determine whether complementary treatment with OE can reduce typical disease- or therapy-associated signs and symptoms (gastrointestinal symptoms, mental symptoms, dyspnoea, headache, tumour pain, cachexia, skin disorders, infections, and side effects associated with the antineoplastic therapy) in patients with breast cancer. Imbalances for causal effects (covariates) were adjusted for by means of the propensity score. Outcome analysis was performed by estimating the linear regression between change in symptom score and propensity score with all data and using this regression line to calculate the change in symptom score which would be expected for each patient. Tumour-associated events (recurrence, metastasis, and death) were evaluated in terms of the number of events observed and time to event. The safety of treatment with OE was analysed in terms of the number and severity of adverse events, their duration, treatment and outcome. RESULTS: For all symptoms except tumour pain, the adjusted mean improvement in symptom scores was larger in the test group than in the control group. The adjusted difference was statistically significant for all symptoms, except tumour pain and infections. The results show that the typical disease- and therapy-associated signs and symptoms in patients on complementary therapy with OE during postoperative treatment were significantly less. For 75% of the test group and 55% of the control group the physician recorded "no signs and symptoms". A clear reduction in the side effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy was documented in 74% of the test group and 55% of the control group. Analysis of survival, recurrence, and metastasis demonstrated a reduced number of events in the test group. There was evidence of a beneficial influence of OE on time to event, although the median observation time was too short in these breast cancer patients to draw definite conclusions. The safety component was judged in 98% of the test group and 76% of the control group as "very good" or "good". In the total sample of 2,339 patients, the rate of OE-associated adverse reactions was 3.2%. All side effects were mild to moderate gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Complementary treatment of breast cancer patients with OE improves the quality of life by reducing signs and symptoms of the disease and the side effects of adjuvant antineoplastic therapies. This epidemiological retrolective cohort analysis provides evidence that the patients may also gain benefit by a prolongation of the time to event for cancer recurrence, metastasis and survival. OE was generally well tolerated.

Influence of a complementary treatment with oral enzymes on patients with colorectal cancers--an epidemiological retrolective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of postoperative treatment with an oral enzyme (OE) preparation given complementary to an antineoplastic therapy in patients with all stages of colorectal cancer. METHODS: The design of this epidemiological study was a retrolective cohort analysis with parallel groups. Design and conduct of the study were performed to current standards for prospective, controlled clinical trials. Of a cohort of 1,242 patients with colorectal cancer (documented in 213 centres), 616 had received complementary treatment with OE (182 OE only, 405 other complementary drugs, 29 protocol violators) and 626 had not received OE (368 control only, 229 other complementary drugs, 29 protocol violators). Of 1,162 patients who had undergone primary surgery, 526 received adjuvant chemotherapy and 218 radiotherapy. The median follow-up time for the OE group was 9.2 months and for the control group 6.1 months. The primary test criterion of efficacy for OE treatment was the multivariate effect size of the changes from baseline of the disease- and therapy-associated signs and symptoms (nausea, vomiting, changes in appetite, stomach pain or stomach disorder, tiredness, depression, memory or concentration disorder, sleep disturbance, dizziness, irritability, dyspnoea at rest, dyspnoea during activity, headache, tumour pain, cachexia, skin disorders and infections). Tumour-related events, e.g. death, were evaluated by the number of events observed and time to event. Safety of treatment with OE was analysed in terms of number and severity of adverse events, their duration, treatment and outcome. RESULTS: A significant reduction in disease-associated signs and symptoms was observed in patients treated with OE alone, but not in those receiving OE in addition to other complementary treatments. Adverse reactions to chemo- and radiotherapy were diminished in all patients receiving OE. Analysis of survival did not demonstrate a reduced number of deaths in the OE group. However, a trend to prolongation of survival was demonstrated, particularly in the patients with disease stage Dukes' D, in the subgroup receiving OE in addition to other complementary treatments. Similar but less-pronounced trends were observed for disease stages Dukes' B and C. In the OE group, 21 of 616 patients (3.4%) experienced OE-associated adverse reactions, all of them mild to moderate gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Complementary treatment of colorectal cancer patients with OE improves their quality of life by reducing both the signs and symptoms of the disease and the adverse reactions associated with adjuvant antineoplastic therapies. This epidemiological retrolective cohort analysis provides evidence that patients may also benefit by a prolongation of survival time. OE were generally well tolerated.

[Comparative epidemiological study in patients with rheumatic diseases illustrated in a example of a treatment with non-steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs versus an oral enzyme combination preparation]. / Vergleichende epidemiologische Studie bei Erkrankungen des rheumatischen Formenkreises am Beispiel der Therapie mit nichtsteroidalen Antiphlogistika versus einem oralen Enzymkombinationspräparat.

To establish the safety and efficacy of an oral enzyme-combination product (OE; Phlogenzym, containing trypsin, bromelain and rutin) in the treatment of rheumatic diseases a retrolective cohort study with parallel groups was undertaken as an epidemiological study, in which the enzyme combination was compared with non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Data of 3326 patients treated for rheumatic diseases between January 1993 and the end of March 1995 were registered by 380 physicians. From the patient file age, gender, indication for treatment (diagnostic group), anamnestic data (especially pre-treatment), complaints at the beginning and end of treatment, treatment duration, prescribed drugs (OE, NSAID), additional treatment and adverse events were transferred into case report forms (CRFs). The quality of the data was monitored and additionally checked by internal and external quality audits. Included in the efficacy analysis were 2139 patients which were treated either only with OE or only with NSAID and could be classified unambiguously into one of the following diagnostic groups: joint diseases, spinal diseases, rheumatic soft tissue diseases. As clinically relevant and reliably evaluable criterion freedom from rheumatic complaints at the end of treatment was considered. For evaluation of safety the documented adverse events of all patients were considered. Two thirds of the OE patients received the recommended dose of 6 tablets/day, taken for 23 to 35 days. The respective mean values for NSAID patients were 16 to 25 days, and the patients were treated with the recommended symptomatically effective doses of NSAID. As the allocation of the compared treatment options (OE or NSAID) to the patients was not randomized, a mixing of treatment effects with other factors cannot be excluded. For adjustment of these confounding factors two methods were applied: a) logistic regression of the relative ratio of the main criterion and all confounding factors and b) stratification of data according to the propensity score i.e. the probability of a treatment with OE. Both methods yielded similar results: A 50% higher success rate can be expected in total for OE than for NSAID at comparable initial and treatment situations (95% confidence interval with logistic regression = 1.218-1.96, with stratification according to propensity score = 1.16-1.84). As significant negative indicators for response age over 50 years, pre-treatment with antirheumatic or analgetic drugs, treatment duration more than 30 days and joint diseases or fibromyalgias could be revealed. Since there was no interaction between these indicators and the type of treatment also in patients presenting with these indicators a treatment success (freedom from symptoms) with OE can be expected with a higher probability than with NSAID. OE were well tolerated showing much less adverse events when compared with conventional doses of NSAID.

Double-blind pilot-study on the efficacy of enzyme therapy in advanced colorectal cancer.

All tested variables showed a tendency in favor for Wobe-Mugos E therapy as addition to standard therapy. Enzymes improve the quality of life by reducing cancer disease typical symptoms, they reduce side effects of chemo-/radiotherapy and they have a potential of prolonging life (preliminary data only).

[Effect of hydroxyethyl starch HES 450/0.7 and 5% human albumin on the colloid osmotic pressure and hemodynamic parameters in hypovolemic patients after major abdominal procedures]. / Wirkung von Hydroxyäthylstärke HAS 450/0,7 und Humanalbumin 5% auf den kolloidosmotischen Druck und hämodynamische Parameter bei hypovolämischen Patienten nach grösseren abdominalen Eingriffen.

In a randomized study 20 patients with hypovolemia following abdominal surgery for malignoma were treated with 500 ml HES 450/0.7 or human albumin 5% during the first 24 h after operation. COP and various blood- and hemodynamic parameters were measured immediately before and after infusion as well as 2, 4 and 6 h after infusion. After HES-infusion COP increased from 20.2 to about 22 mmHg and remained at a significantly higher level (p less than 0.01) for 6 h. After albumin-infusion COP increased from 19.7 to 20.7 mmHg, but already returned to starting level within 2 h. CVP in the HES-group increased from 2.8 to 6.3 cmH2O after infusion, and then gradually dropped to 4 cmH2O during 6 h. In the albumin-group CVP increased from the same starting level only to 4.2 cmH2O, and then dropped back to 3.2 cmH2O after 6 h (no significant difference to the starting level). The other blood- and hemodynamic parameters measured showed no significant differences between the two groups. The results show that a quick and reliable improvement of hypovolemia can be obtained in both groups immediately after infusion, but that the COP- and volume-stabilizing effects of HES-infusion are more distinct and remained for a significantly longer period of time than the effects of albumin 5%-infusion.

[3H-Thymidine autoradiographic studies on proliferation of various smooth muscle cell populations pre- and postnatally (and its possible modification) (author's transl)]. / 3H-Thymidin-autoradiographische Untersuchungen zur Proliferation verschiedener Populationen glatter Muskelzellen prä- und postnatal (und ihrer möglichen Beeinflussung).

The pre- and postnatal proliferative kinetics of vascular and gastrointestinal smooth muscle cells (and possible influences on it) are reported by means of their 3-thymidine labelling indices. The 3H-autoradiographic investigations were carried out on Wistar inbred rats, strain Chbb:THOM (SPF), and on genetic osteoarthrosis mice, strain C 57 black St. Louis (in vivo investigations). The results show that the smooth muscle cells of the colon have significantly higher 3H-thymidine labelling indices than the smooth muscle cels of the other parts of the gastro-intestinal tract. Prenatally the label indices were 40 times higher than during postnatal maturation. The 3H-thymidine labelling indices (as a parameter of cell proliferation) of fetal cells of the vascular wall as well as the smooth muscle cells of the aorta during postnatal maturation are just about 10% the values of gastrointestinal smooth muscle cells at the same time. Moreover, the fetal cells of the vascular wall show 10 times higher values for the 3H-thymidine labelling index than do the smooth muscle cells of the aorta during postnatal maturation. The finding that smooth muscle cells of the vascular wall have low proliferation rates and reach a stable state later than many other populations of smooth muscle cells is discussed with regard to its theoretical and practical-therapeutical importance using kallikrein for a drug example.

A contribution to the pharmacokinetics of bencyclane (Fludilat) in man.

The quantitative determination of bencyclane from the biological material was carried out with the aid of a combined microchemical method (thin-layer chromatography and measurement of fluorescence) using NBD chloride. The original method [J. Reisch, Z. Analyt. Chemie, 247 (1969) 56; J. Monforte, Clinical Chemistry 18 (1972) 1329; R.S. Fager, Anal. Biochemistry, 53 (1973) 290, etc.] was so modified as to enable attainment of optimal results in respect of sensitivity and accuracy in the determination of bencyclane. The sensitivity of this modified method is 0.1 mug/ml plasma. Volunteer subjects and patients received under standard conditions 2 coated tablets Fludilat (i.e. 200 mg bencyclane hydrogen fumarate) orally as a single dose or repeated 3 times daily over 5 days, or 4 ampoules (= 200 mg) in a single intravenous injection. After a single oral administration, maximum plasma concentrations of approximately 2 mug/ml were attained in about 2 hours. The elimination half-life was about 360-480 min. The appearance of a second peak after about 6-7 hours indicates involvement of several compartments. On intravenous administration, maximum plasma concentrations of above 2 mug/ml were attained. A second peak in the late phase of the elimination was also detected here. The repeated oral administration led to maximum plasma concentrations of above 3 mug/ml without there being any indication of accumulation. Protein binding of about 30% was determined with the aid of the equilibrium dialysis method. A parallel "in vitro" study with 14C-bencyclane (U.R. Kleeberg, 1973, unpublished) showed an approx. 40% protein binding, an approx. 30% erythrocyte binding, and an approx. 10% thrombocyte binding. About 20% bencyclane remain free.

[A time-saving method for histo-enzymatic studies of brain tissues of animals with chronically implanted electrodes by means of a hard-section microtome (author's transl)]. / Eine zeitsparende Methode für histoenzymatische Untersuchungen des Hirngewebes bei Versuchstieren mit chronisch implantierten Elektroden mit Hilfe eines "Hartschnittmikrotoms"

A time-saving method is described for the localisation of chronically implanted electrodes in the brain of test animals by means of a "Kryostat" hard section microtome which allows both histo-topographic and histo-enzymatic investigations. This is made possible by the incorporation of a three-dimensional microtome holder.

[Qualitative and quantitative histoenzymatic study on isoproterenol induced myocardial necroses in rats (author's transl)]. / Qualitative und quantitative histoenzymatische Studie an den durch Isoproterenol induzierten Myokardnekrosen bei Ratten

By means of a 2-day s.c. application of 60 mg/kg isoproterenol in Wistar rats reproducible myocardium necroses with a characteristic topography were induced. The lesions were particularly found in the sub-endocardial area, penetrating intramurally into the wall of the left ventricle and spreading to the papillary muscle, the area of the apex of the heart, and they also appeared in the neighbourhood of the coronary arteries. The quantitative and qualitative histo-enzymatic determinations of the activity of oxydative mitochondrial enzymes, cytochromoxydase and succinatedehydrogenase do not only show a marked decrease of activity in the area of lesions proved by histopathological investigations, but also very sensitively demonstrate a beginning myocardial hypoxia in such areas which in histopathological tests only show light to medium infiltrations and above that also signify clearly that in the neighbourhood of the lesions a compensatory increase of the oxydative metabolism is found. The possibility of using myocardial necroses in rats, induced by the application of isopreterenol, as a model for the experimental study of new heart and coronary drugs, is discussed.