Angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs. endarterectomy compared to best medical treatment: One-year interim results of SPACE-2.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of individuals with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is still handled controversially. Recommendations for treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are based on trials having recruited patients more than 15 years ago. Registry data indicate that advances in best medical treatment (BMT) may lead to a markedly decreasing risk of stroke in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The aim of the SPACE-2 trial (ISRCTN78592017) was to compare the stroke preventive effects of BMT alone with that of BMT in combination with CEA or carotid artery stenting (CAS), respectively, in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis of ≥70% European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) criteria. METHODS: SPACE-2 is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, open study. A major secondary endpoint was the cumulative rate of any stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or death from any cause within 30 days plus an ipsilateral ischemic stroke within one year of follow-up. Safety was assessed as the rate of any stroke and death from any cause within 30 days after CEA or CAS. Protocol changes had to be implemented. The results on the one-year period after treatment are reported. FINDINGS: It was planned to enroll 3550 patients. Due to low recruitment, the enrollment of patients was stopped prematurely after randomization of 513 patients in 36 centers to CEA (n = 203), CAS (n = 197), or BMT (n = 113). The one-year rate of the major secondary endpoint did not significantly differ between groups (CEA 2.5%, CAS 3.0%, BMT 0.9%; p = 0.530) as well as rates of any stroke (CEA 3.9%, CAS 4.1%, BMT 0.9%; p = 0.256) and all-cause mortality (CEA 2.5%, CAS 1.0%, BMT 3.5%; p = 0.304). About half of all strokes occurred in the peri-interventional period. Higher albeit statistically non-significant rates of restenosis occurred in the stenting group (CEA 2.0% vs. CAS 5.6%; p = 0.068) without evidence of increased stroke rates. INTERPRETATION: The low sample size of this prematurely stopped trial of 513 patients implies that its power is not sufficient to show that CEA or CAS is superior to a modern medical therapy (BMT) in the primary prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with an asymptomatic carotid stenosis up to one year after treatment. Also, no evidence for differences in safety between CAS and CEA during the first year after treatment could be derived. Follow-up will be performed up to five years. Data may be used for pooled analysis with ongoing trials.

[Organized Post-Stroke Care through Case Management on the Basis of a Standardized Treatment Pathway : Results of a Single-Centre Pilot Study]. / Koordinierte Schlaganfallnachsorge durch Case Management auf der Basis eines standardisierten Behandlungspfades : Ergebnisse einer monozentrischen Pilotstudie.

BACKGROUND: Post-stroke care programs based on a standardized treatment pathway supported by case management may prevent secondary stroke and minimize risk factors. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the feasibility of a standardized treatment pathway and its impact on risk factor control, life-style changes and adherence to secondary prevention medication. METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot study in consecutive stroke patients. The 12-month post-stroke care program included regular perosnal and phone contact with a certified case manager. Target values for vascular risk factors following current recommendations of stroke guidelines were monitored and treated if necessary. In the case of deviations from the treatment pathway the case manager intervened. Patients were screened for recurrent stroke at the end of the program after 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled 101 patients: 57.4 % were male, the median age was 72 (IQR, 62-80) years, median baseline NIHSS score was 2(IQR, 1-5), 79.2 % had an ischemic stroke, 3 % a hemorrhagic stroke, and 17.8 % a transient ischemic attack (TIA). Eighty-six (85.1 %) patients completed the program, 12 (11.9 %) withdrew from the program and 3 died of malignant diseases. In total, 628 personal (6.2/patient) and 2,683 phone contacts (26.6/patient) were conducted by the case manager. Three hundred-seventy-nine specific interventions were necessary mostly because of missing medication, non-compliance, and social needs. After 12 months, target goals for blood pressure, body mass index, nicotine use, and cholesterol were more frequently (p < 0.05) achieved than at baseline. No recurrent stroke occurred during the program. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot data demonstrate that case management-based post-stroke care is feasible and may contribute to effective secondary prevention of stroke.

Multimodal Computed Tomography Based Definition of Cerebral Imaging Profiles for Acute Stroke Reperfusion Therapy (CT-DEFINE): Results of a Prospective Observational Study.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the prognostic impact of multimodal computed tomography-based imaging in ischemic stroke patients potentially eligible for reperfusion therapy. METHODS: Anterior circulation stroke patients underwent non-contrast CT (NCCT), CT-angiography, and CT-perfusion within 12 h from symptom-onset. Patients could be treated with intravenous-tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA), endovascular or combined reperfusion therapies. Cerebral imaging profiles (IP) were NCCT-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) > 7 (IP1); NCCT-ASPECTS > 5 and proximal occlusion on CT-angiography (IP2); CT-perfusion mismatch between cerebral blood volume (CBV)-ASPECTS, and cerebral blood flow (CBF)-ASPECTS ≥ 2 (IP3). Favorable outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2 at 3 months. RESULTS: Of 102 included patients, 62 (61%) received any reperfusion therapy. In IP2 and IP3, favorable outcome was more frequent in patients with reperfusion therapy than in those without; however, this did not reach statistical significance (IP2: 39% vs 15%, p = 0.26; IP3: 50% vs 17 %; p = 0.31). No difference was seen in IP1 (58% vs 58%, p = 1.0). In IP2, patients with IV-tPA alone achieved better functional outcome (50% vs 11%, p = 0.03) and lower mortality (0% vs 28%, p = 0.045) than those without. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a benefit with imaging profile selection based upon the combination of a small-to-moderate-sized infarction and a visible intracranial occlusion in patients receiving IV-tPA. Reperfusion therapy may be futile in patients without proven vessel occlusion.

[Statins and ASS for primary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease]. / Medikamentöse Primärprävention kardiovaskulärer und zerebrovaskulärer Erkrankungen.

Whereas statins and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) are considered gold standard for secondary prevention following myocardial infarction or atherotrombotic stroke, there are inconsistent data on the use of these drugs for primary prevention in patients with increased cardiovascular risk. Some meta-analyses indicated that the use of statins and ASA for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events such as ischemic stroke or myocardial infarction. However, the effects of primary prevention with statins and ASA on mortality varied in the data included in these meta-analyses. Therefore the guidelines of the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians recommend primary prevention with statins and ASA only in those patients who have a 10-year risk of cardiovascular events which exceeds 20 %. Divergently, primary prevention with ASA is not recommended by the European Society of Cardiology. Observational studies suggested that treatment success of primary prevention with statins and ASA depends on various factors such as adherence to medication and prescription behavior of physicians. This review summarizes the current literature on primary prevention of cardiovascular events with ASA and statins.