RESUMO
Background: The role of tear etiology in outcomes after rotator cuff repair is not well understood. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in outcomes after rotator cuff repair based on tear etiology. We hypothesized that traumatic rotator cuff tears will have greater improvements in functional outcome measures and range of motion (ROM) than atraumatic tears. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We conducted a chart review of 221 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; prospectively collected preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative data were evaluated. Shoulder ROM, strength, and standard shoulder physical examination findings were recorded pre- and postoperatively. Outcome measures included visual analog scale for pain, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), 10-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-10; physical and mental components), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) form. Results: Of the 221 patients, 73 had traumatic tears and 148 had atraumatic/degenerative tears. There were no differences in age, body mass index, or Charlson Comorbidity Index between groups. Patients in the atraumatic cohort had significantly longer duration of symptoms before presentation (18 vs 7 months; P < .01). Preoperatively, the traumatic cohort had less motion to forward flexion (mean ± SD; 138° ± 43.7° vs 152° ± 29.8°; P = .02). Postoperatively, both groups experienced significant improvements in visual analog scale and SSV scores (P < .001 each). However, only the traumatic cohort demonstrated improvements in ASES and PROMIS-10 physical component scores. Patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears had lower preoperative SSV and less motion than those with atraumatic tears, but they had greater improvements in SSV (40.6% ± 39.0% vs 29.2% ± 39.7%; P = .005) and forward flexion (21.6° ± 48.6° vs 2.3° ± 48.2°; P < .001), as well as strength in forward flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation (P < .001, P = .003, and P = .002, respectively). Conclusion: Patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears have worse preoperative symptoms and more functional deficits but experience greater improvements in ROM, strength, and perceived shoulder function than those with degenerative/atraumatic tears.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hammertoe deformities are the most common lesser toe deformity. To date, no studies have looked at outcomes of operative management in the geriatric population, which may be at greater risk for complications or functional compromise because of comorbidities. METHODS: Data on 58 patients undergoing operative correction of hammertoe deformities were prospectively collected. Clinical outcomes were assessed using preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores with a minimum of 6-month follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of age at the time of surgery: younger than 65 and 65 and older. Complication rates and mean VAS and SF-36 improvement were compared. Forty-seven patients met inclusion criteria (7 men, 40 women), with 26 patients (37 toes) in the younger cohort and 21 patients (39 toes) in the older cohort. RESULTS: Overall, patients demonstrated significant improvement from baseline to 6 and 12 months postoperatively in VAS ( P < .001 and P < .001) and SF-36 ( P < .001 and P < .001) scores. Mean improvement in VAS and SF-36 scores was not significantly different between the groups at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Complications occurred in 13.5% and 10.3% of patients in the younger and older cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of operative correction of hammertoe deformities in older patients were similar to outcomes in younger patients after greater than 6 months of follow-up. Overall improvement in VAS and SF-36 was statistically significant for both cohorts. There was no associated increase in complications for older patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level, III comparative series.
