Imaging in chronic spinal cord injury--indications and benefits.

As most patients who have suffered spinal cord injury can now expect a normal life span, the late complications of these injuries are seen increasingly frequently. Regular surveillance of both the renal tract and the central nervous system (CNS) is important as the treatment of impending, potentially fatal complications can be implemented before damage has progressed too far. Renal tract complications are particularly dangerous as they are often clinically silent but regular surveillance to detect early deterioration in renal function, particularly from reversible causes such as reflux or obstruction can pre-empt problems. Follow-up protocols depend on the bladder management regime but most centres advocate regular ultrasound with less frequent isotope function studies. With the increasing ability to diagnose and treat the neurological complications, surveillance of the state of the spinal cord with MRI is also important and many centres now advocate checks every few years with sagittal midline T2W sections are sufficient unless changes are noted, when axial T1W sections can be added without significant examination time penalty. Imaging is critical in acute problems. In addition to suffering from the usual normal conditions, patients with spinal cord injury suffer others peculiar to, or particularly related to, the injury, which may be missed as their symptomatology is greatly altered by their paraplegic or quadriplegic status and they may often present as generally unwell but with no obvious cause. This review discusses the role of radiology in routine surveillance of the CNS and the renal tract as well as in assessing specific conditions such as deteriorating neurology or renal function, pain, spinal instability, pressure sores, ectopic ossification, muscular spasm, spinal instability, airway problems and elective operations on the renal tract.

Brain activation sequences following electrical limb stimulation of normal and paraplegic subjects.

In current clinical practice the degree of paraplegia or quadriplegia is objectively determined with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP). We measured the MEG signal following electrical stimulation of upper and lower limbs in two normal and three clinically complete paraplegic subjects. From the MEG signal we computed distributed estimates of brain activity and identified foci just behind the central sulcus consistent in location with primary somatosensory (SI) for arm and foot and secondary somatosensory (SII) areas. Activation curves were computed from regions of interest defined around these areas. Activation of the SI foot area was observed in normal and paraplegic subjects when the upper limb was stimulated. Surprisingly, for each paraplegic subject, stimulation below the lesion was followed by cortical activations. These activations were weak, only loosely time-locked to the stimulus and were seen intermittently behind the central sulcus and nearby cortical areas. Statistical analysis of tomographic solutions and activation curves showed consistent responses following foot stimulation in one paraplegic (PS1) and intermittently in another paraplegic subject. We repeated the same experiment for PS1 in a different laboratory and the results from the analysis of foot stimulation from both laboratories revealed statistically significant focal cortical response only in the contralateral SI foot area.

Consultant assessment and appraisal: an outline in practice.

AIMS: To demonstrate a practical method to address new Department of Health requirements for assessment and appraisal. METHOD: This process was developed within the department to incorporate workload, clinical incidents and 360 degrees questionnaires to assess performance and working with departmental staff as preliminaries to an appraisal interview. CONCLUSION: Review of 2 years' process has resulted in minor amendments but there was general agreement that the parameters encompassed were practical and useful.