Inaccuracy of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein (IGFBP)-3 assessment in the diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency from childhood to young adulthood: association to low GH dependency of IGF-II and presence of circulating IGFBP-3 18-kilodalton fragment.

CONTEXT: Poor sensitivity of IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 assessment in the work-up of GH deficiency (GHD) has been ascribed to the equal affinity of IGFBP-3 for IGF-I and IGF-II and to IGFBP-3 proteolysis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the IGF-II GH dependency and IGFBP-3 proteolysis in patients with GHD from childhood to young adulthood. DESIGN: This study was cross-sectional. SETTING: This was a national multicenter study performed in university hospitals. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-one subjects (chronological age, 1.3-25 yr), 72 patients with GHD and 59 subjects with idiopathic short stature, were studied. INTERVENTIONS: IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3 serum concentrations were measured by immunoradiometric assay. IGFBP-3 circulating forms were assessed by Western immunoblot (WIB) analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity of IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3 measurements. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of IGFBP-3 measurement were 27 and 100%, respectively. IGFBP-3 sensitivity was 46% in young adulthood. Sensitivity and specificity of IGF-I were 69 and 81%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of IGF-II assessment were 23 and 97%, respectively. IGFBP-3 WIB revealed the presence of the intact form and the major 29-kDa fragment in both GHD and subjects with idiopathic short stature. In patients with GHD, WIB showed the presence of an additional smaller IGFBP-3 fragment migrating at approximately 18 kDa. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that in children and young adults with GHD, the low GH dependency of IGF-II together with IGFBP-3 proteolytic activity yielding the 18-kDa fragment concur to reduce the sensitivity of IGFBP-3 assessment, ultimately making it too inaccurate as a screening test in the work-up of GHD.

Adiponectin levels are reduced in children born small for gestational age and are inversely related to postnatal catch-up growth.

Adiponectin is an adipocytokine with insulin-sensitizing and antiatherogenic properties. Reduced concentrations of adiponectin precede the onset of type 2 diabetes and the development of atherosclerosis. Our aim was to quantify adiponectin concentrations in small for gestational age (SGA) children. Fifty-one SGA children, 24 obese, and 17 short-normal children with birth weight appropriate for gestational age (short-AGA) were studied. The statures of the SGA children were corrected for their midparental height and subdivided into two groups according to their corrected height: catch-up growth group, children with corrected height of 0 z-score or greater (n = 17); and noncatch-up growth group, subjects with corrected height less than 0 z-score (n = 34). SGA children showed adiponectin levels significantly lower than short- normal children (35.2 +/- 3.5 vs. 80.4 +/- 26.6 micro g/ml; P < 0.0001) and obese children (77.5 +/- 39.4 micro g/ml; P < 0.0001). Catch-up growth children showed adiponectin levels significantly lower than noncatch-up growth subjects (29.4 +/- 10.3 vs. 38.1 +/- 11.5 micro g/ml; P = 0.01). Adiponectin concentrations were inversely related to height z-score, corrected stature, weight, and body mass index and were positively related to birth weight. Our results suggest that adiponectin levels are reduced in SGA children and are even lower in those with postnatal catch-up growth. Whether this finding implies a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis remains to be established.

Height velocity and IGF-I assessment in the diagnosis of childhood onset GH insufficiency: do we still need a second GH stimulation test?

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of GH insufficiency (GHI) in childhood is not straightforward. Our aim was to test the sensitivity and specificity of height velocity (HV), IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and GH stimulation tests alone or in combination in the diagnosis of GHI. DESIGN: A retrospective review of patients with GHI and idiopathic short stature (ISS) diagnosed in our centre and followed up to the completion of linear growth. PATIENTS: Thirty-three GHI children and 56 children with ISS were evaluated. GHI diagnosis was based on fulfilment of anthropometric, endocrine and neuroradiological criteria: stature < or = -2 z-score, delayed bone age (at least 1 year), GH peak response to at least two different provocative tests < 10 micro g/l (20 mU/l), brain MRI positive for hypothalamus-pituitary abnormalities, catch-up growth during the first year of GH replacement therapy > or = 75th centile, peak GH response to a third provocative test after growth completion < 10 micro g/l (20 mU/l). Children with anthropometry resembling that of GHI but with peak GH responses > 10 micro g/l (20 mU/l) were diagnosed as ISS. MEASUREMENTS: All subjects underwent standard anthropometry. GH secretory status was assessed by clonidine, arginine and GHRH plus arginine stimulation tests. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 circulating levels were measured by immunoradiometric assay (IRMA). The following cut-off values were chosen to discriminate between GHI and nonGHI short children: HV < 25th centile over the 6-12 months prior to the initiation of GH therapy, peak GH responses < 10 or < 7 micro g/l (< 20 or < 14 mU/l) and IGF-I and IGFBP-3-values < -1.9 z-score. Sensitivity (true positive ratio) and specificity (true negative ratio) were evaluated. RESULTS: Taking 10 micro g/l (20 mU/l) as the cut-off value, sensitivity was 100% and specificity 57% for GH provocative tests, whereas taking 7 as the cut-off value, sensitivity was 66% and specificity rose to 78%. Sensitivity was 73% for IGF-I and 30% for IGFBP-3 measurement, whilst specificity was 95% for IGF-I and 98% for IGFBP-3 evaluation. HV assessment revealed a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 43%. When HV and IGF-I evaluations were used in combination, sensitivity reached 95% and specificity 96%. When both HV and IGF-I are normal (26% of our subjects) GHI may be ruled out, whereas when both the indices are subnormal (23%) GHI is so highly likely that the child may undergo only one GH provocative test and brain MRI and, thereafter, may begin GH therapy without any further test. In case of discrepancy, when IGF-I is normal and HV < 25th centile (44% of children), due to the relatively low sensitivity of IGF-I assessment and low specificity of HV, the patient should undergo GH tests and brain MRI. Finally, in the rare case of HV > 25th centile and subnormal IGF-I-values (7%), due to the high specificity of IGF-I measurement, the child should undergo one provocative test and brain MRI for the high suspicion of GHI. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a simple assessment of HV and basal IGF-I may exclude or, in association with only one stimulation test, confirm the diagnosis of GH insufficiency in more than half of patients with short stature.