A Pragmatic Randomized Trial Comparing Surgical Clipping and Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Surgical clipping and endovascular treatment are commonly used in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. We compared the safety and efficacy of the 2 treatments in a randomized trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clipping or endovascular treatments were randomly allocated to patients with one or more 3- to 25-mm unruptured intracranial aneurysms judged treatable both ways by participating physicians. The study hypothesized that clipping would decrease the incidence of treatment failure from 13% to 4%, a composite primary outcome defined as failure of aneurysm occlusion, intracranial hemorrhage during follow-up, or residual aneurysms at 1 year, as adjudicated by a core lab. Safety outcomes included new neurologic deficits following treatment, hospitalization of >5 days, and overall morbidity and mortality (mRS > 2) at 1 year. There was no blinding. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-one patients were enrolled from 2010 to 2020 in 7 centers. The 1-year primary outcome, ascertainable in 290/291 (99%) patients, was reached in 13/142 (9%; 95% CI, 5%-15%) patients allocated to surgery and in 28/148 (19%; 95% CI, 13%-26%) patients allocated to endovascular treatments (relative risk: 2.07; 95% CI, 1.12-3.83; P = .021). Morbidity and mortality (mRS >2) at 1 year occurred in 3/143 and 3/148 (2%; 95% CI, 1%-6%) patients allocated to surgery and endovascular treatments, respectively. Neurologic deficits (32/143, 22%; 95% CI, 16%-30% versus 19/148, 12%; 95% CI, 8%-19%; relative risk: 1.74; 95% CI, 1.04-2.92; P = .04) and hospitalizations beyond 5 days (69/143, 48%; 95% CI, 40%-56% versus 12/148, 8%; 95% CI, 5%-14%; relative risk: 0.18; 95% CI, 0.11-0.31; P < .001) were more frequent after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical clipping is more effective than endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in terms of the frequency of the primary outcome of treatment failure. Results were mainly driven by angiographic results at 1 year.

Flow Diversion in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Pragmatic Randomized Care Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow diversion is a recent endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms. We compared the safety and efficacy of flow diversion with the alternative standard management options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A parallel group, prerandomized, controlled, open-label pragmatic trial was conducted in 3 Canadian centers. The trial included all patients considered for flow diversion. A Web-based platform 1:1 randomly allocated patients to flow diversion or 1 of 4 alternative standard management options (coiling with/without stent placement, parent vessel occlusion, surgical clipping, or observation) as prespecified by clinical judgment. Patients ineligible for alternative standard management options were treated with flow diversion in a registry. The primary safety outcome was death or dependency (mRS > 2) at 3 months. The composite primary efficacy outcome included the core lab-determined angiographic presence of a residual aneurysm, aneurysm rupture, progressive mass effect during follow-up, or death or dependency (mRS > 2) at 3-12 months. RESULTS: Between May 2011 and November 2020, three hundred twenty-three patients were recruited: Two hundred seventy-eight patients (86%) had treatment randomly allocated (139 to flow diversion and 139 to alternative standard management options), and 45 (14%) received flow diversion in the registry. Patients in the randomized trial frequently had unruptured (83%), large (52% ≥10 mm) carotid (64%) aneurysms. Death or dependency at 3 months occurred in 16/138 patients who underwent flow diversion and 12/137 patients receiving alternative standard management options (relative risk, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.65-2.69; P = .439). A poor primary efficacy outcome was found in 30.9% (43/139) with flow diversion and 45.6% (62/136) of patients receiving alternative standard management options, with an absolute risk difference of 14.7% (95% CI, 3.3%-26.0%; relative risk, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.92; P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with mostly unruptured, large, anterior circulation (carotid) aneurysms, flow diversion was more effective than the alternative standard management option in terms of angiographic outcome.

Noninvasive Angiographic Results of Clipped or Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms: An Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Noninvasive angiography is commonly used to assess the outcome of surgical or endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms in clinical series or randomized trials. We sought to assess whether a standardized 3-grade classification system could be reliably used to compare the CTA and MRA results of both treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic portfolio composed of CTAs of 30 clipped and MRAs of 30 coiled aneurysms was independently evaluated by 24 raters of diverse experience and training backgrounds. Twenty raters performed a second evaluation 1 month later. Raters were asked which angiographic grade and management decision (retreatment; close or long-term follow-up) would be most appropriate for each case. Agreement was analyzed using the Krippendorff α (αK) statistic, and the relationship between angiographic grade and clinical management choice, using the Fisher exact and Cramer V tests. RESULTS: Interrater agreement was substantial (αK = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.55-0.70); results were slightly better for MRA results of coiling (αK = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.76) than for CTA results of clipping (αK = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.69). Intrarater agreement was substantial to almost perfect. Interrater agreement regarding clinical management was moderate for both clipped (αK = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32-0.61) and coiled subgroups (αK = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.54). The choice of clinical management was strongly associated with the size of the residuum (mean Cramer V = 0.77 [SD, 0.14]), but complete occlusions (grade 1) were followed more closely after coiling than after clipping (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: A standardized 3-grade scale was found to be a reliable and clinically meaningful tool to compare the results of clipping and coiling of aneurysms using CTA or MRA.

A randomized trial of endovascular versus surgical management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Interim results from ISAT2.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Appropriate management of ruptured intracranial aneurysm (RIA) in patients eligible for surgical clipping but under-represented in or excluded from previous randomized trials remains undetermined. METHODS: The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial-2 (ISAT-2) is a randomized care trial comparing surgical versus endovascular treatment (EVT) of RIA. All patients considered for surgical clipping but eligible for endovascular treatment can be included. The primary endpoint is death or dependency on modified Rankin score (mRS>2) at 1 year. Secondary endpoints are 1 year angiographic results and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: An interim analysis was performed after 103 patients were treated from November 2012 to July 2017 in 4 active centers. Fifty-two of the 55 patients allocated to surgery were treated by clipping, and 45 of the 48 allocated to EVT were treated by coiling, with 3 crossovers in each arm. The main endpoint (1 year mRS>2), available for 76 patients, was reached in 16/42 patients allocated to clipping (38%; 95%CI: 25%-53%), and 10/34 patients allocated to coiling (29%; 17%-46%). One year imaging results were available in 54 patients: complete aneurysm occlusion was found in 23/27 patients allocated to clipping (85%; 67%-94%), and 18/27 patients allocated to coiling (67%; 47%-81%). Hospital stay exceeding 20 days was more frequent in surgery (26/55 [47%; 34%-60%]) than EVT (9/48 [19%; 10%-31%]). CONCLUSION: Ruptured aneurysm patients for whom surgical clipping may still be best can be managed in a randomized care trial, which is feasible in some centers. More participating centers are needed.

Anatomic and Angiographic Analyses of Ophthalmic Artery Collaterals in Moyamoya Disease.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Moyamoya disease is a progressive neurovascular pathology defined by steno-occlusive disease of the distal internal carotid artery and associated with the development of compensatory vascular collaterals. The etiology and exact anatomy of vascular collaterals have not been extensively studied. The aim of this study was to describe the anatomy of collaterals developed between the ophthalmic artery and the anterior cerebral artery in a Moyamoya population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients treated for Moyamoya disease from 2004 to 2016 in 4 neurosurgical centers with available cerebral digital subtraction angiography were included. Sixty-three cases were evaluated, and only 38 met the inclusion criteria. Two patients had a unilateral cervical internal carotid occlusion that limited analysis of ophthalmic artery collaterals to one hemisphere. This study is consequently based on the analysis of 74 cerebral hemispheres. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The most frequently encountered anastomosis between the ophthalmic artery and cerebral artery was a branch of the anterior ethmoidal artery (31.1%, 23 hemispheres). In case of proximal stenosis of the anterior cerebral artery, a collateral from the posterior ethmoidal artery could be visualized (16 hemispheres, 21.6%). One case (1.4%) of anastomosis between the lacrimal artery and the middle meningeal artery that permitted the vascularization of a middle cerebral artery territory was also noted. CONCLUSIONS: Collaterals from the ophthalmic artery are frequent in Moyamoya disease. Their development depends on the perfusion needs of the anterior cerebral artery territories. Three other systems of compensation could be present (callosal circle, leptomeningeal anastomosis, and duro-pial anastomoses).

[Treatment of brain AVMS (TOBAS): A randomized controlled trial and registry]. / Le traitement des MAVS cérébrales (TOBAS) : une étude randomisée controlée avec registre.

OBJECTIVE: The management of unruptured and ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains controversial. The Treatment of Brain AVM Study (TOBAS) was designed to assess curative treatments in the management of AVMs. The purpose of our study is to provide a care trial context to brain AVM patients. METHODS: TOBAS is a pragmatic, prospective study including 2 randomized controlled trials and a registry. All AVM patients can be recruited. The preferred management modality will be predetermined prior to randomization by the team based on clinical judgment. Patients eligible for both conservative and interventional management will be randomly allocated conservative or curative treatment. Randomization will be stratified by a treatment modality (surgery, radiosurgery or embolization) and minimized according to a history of previous rupture and Spetzler-Martin grade. A second randomization will allocate eligible patients to embolization/no embolization prior to surgery or radiosurgery. The primary outcome of the study is death (any cause) or disabling stroke (mRS>2) at 10 years. All patients managed according to clinical judgment alone will be included in the registry. The study is registered under: wwwTrials.gov, ID: NCT02098252. EXPECTED RESULTS: A minimum recruitment of 540 patients is required to show that treatment can reduce the primary outcome by 10 % (from 25 to 15 %); 440 patients will be needed to show a 10 % increase in angiographic occlusion for a good clinical outcome with pre-embolization. CONCLUSION: The trial is designed to offer optimal and verifiable care to patients with brain AVMs in spite of the uncertainty. We are currently seeking the participation of multiple centers.

A case of dorsolateral pontine infarct: Description of a new vascular alternating syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Inferolateral pontine infarcts are well-described lesions of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery territory with a wide variety of clinical presentations. We report the case of isolated unilateral hearing loss and contralateral sensation of coldness due to a dorsolateral lower pontine infarct. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe the case of a 48-year-old female patient who developed isolated selective high-frequency hearing loss on the left side, and contralateral hemibody sensation of coldness. MRI showed a left-sided dorsolateral lower pontine ischemic lesion. A subsequent angiogram revealed the lesion to result from the spontaneous dissection of a long circumferential branch of the basilar artery. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a vascular alternating syndrome consisting of isolated ipsilateral hearing loss and contralateral thermal dysesthesia from a dorsolateral lower pontine infarct. Occlusion of a long perforating branch of the basilar artery and consequent posterolateral lower pontine infarct may result in an alternating syndrome with subtle clinical symptoms. Knowledge of this type of syndrome may direct physicians towards the diagnosis of a dorsolateral lower pontine infarct, despite vague clinical complaints.

[Variability in decision-making for treatment choice of intracranial aneurysms]. / Variabilité décisionnelle dans le choix thérapeutique des anévrismes intracrâniens.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the variability in choosing treatment options in different clinical situations involving intracranial aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire regarding 25 clinical cases was presented via visual projection, to attendees of the Congrès de la Société française de neurochirurgie et de la Société de langue française de neurochirurgie held in Toulouse from May 9th to May 12th, 2012. The audience (n=59) consisted of 58 neurosurgeons and one neuroradiologist. A minority of them (29.2%) stated that they specialized in vascular neurosurgery. The questionnaire dealt with 25 illustrative clinical cases, in which age, gender, and clinical context were provided along with the corresponding angiographic image of the aneurysm. The questionnaire asked whether the physician would have proposed treatment, and if so, which type of treatment (clip, coil or other). In addition, the physician had to indicate, on a scale of one to ten, the degree of confidence they had in their decision. RESULTS: For one-third of the cases, there was at least 10% of the respondents who opted for a decision opposite to the one of the majority. For 41.7% of the cases, the proportion of respondents who opted for the clip was not significantly different from the proportion of those who opted for the coil. CONCLUSION: Even in a relatively homogenous group of physicians, there were significantly diverging opinions regarding the management of cerebral aneurysms. This demonstrates the need for evidence-based data from controlled randomized studies.

Clipping vs. coiling in acute aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: Should the patient's medical condition influence treatment modality?

INTRODUCTION: Acute subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) resulting from aneurysmal rupture is a medical condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Medical complications resulting from the bleeding itself, along with the patient's underlying medical conditions are known to represent possible prognostic factors in acute SAH. However, their respective significance on the patient's overall clinical outcome following either endovascular coiling (EC) or surgical clipping (SC) remains to be ascertained as well as their potential role in choosing a definitive treatment option. We thus reviewed the evidence concerning the patient's medical condition as a factor in this decision making process. METHODOLOGY: Source data were obtained from a MEDLINE search of the medical literature and by manual review of published randomised trials comparing EC to SC. RESULTS: The last three decades allowed for detection of medical complications with increasing frequency in the context of SAH, as awareness for them has improved. Despite the fact that a patient's extra-neurological condition can be a significant prognostic factor after a SAH, our review demonstrates that medical conditions in general were not taken into consideration in randomized trials comparing EC to SC. Also, we found no analysis comparing the potential role of prior versus post-SAH medical conditions in choosing either therapeutic avenue. CONCLUSION: It is not determined whether it is appropriate for SAH patients to be offered treatment for a ruptured aneurysm based mostly on anatomical criteria or if, within certain subgroups of patients, EC and SC should also be recommended in light of what the patient can tolerate from a medical standpoint. Although we hypothesize that in practice, the patient's medical condition is considered in the decision making process, it remains to be documented. Patient, aneurysm and institution-related factors are all interrelated, as is patient care. Data on all of these factors are thus needed and their analysis by association rather than by dissociation may be the key in answering our question.

[Very small intracranial aneurysms: Clip or coil]. / Les anévrismes de très petite dimension : clip ou coil.

INTRODUCTION: It is not unusual for very small aneurysms (≤3mm) to be responsible for subarachnoid haemorrhage. In addition, modern imaging has increased diagnosis of those that are asymptomatic. Because of their spatial configuration and thin and fragile walls, very small aneurysms can be a sizeable challenge for both open surgical and endovascular treatment. Based on recent literature data, the present manuscript reviews treatment indications and the choice of treatment strategy to occlude these particular aneurysms. METHODS: Literature review concerning surgical and endovascular treatment of very small aneurysms (≤3mm). Arterial dissections and blister aneurysms were excluded. RESULTS: We found no study that systematically and specifically assessed surgical treatment of very small aneurysms. Investigations of endovascular treatment are almost exclusively retrospective, usually evaluating a small number of patients, and are limited by selection bias. Despite often contradictory results, it appears that very small aneurysms carry a higher risk of rupture during endovascular procedures and higher ensuing mortality, as compared to larger aneurysms. The use of more flexible coils and additional endovascular tools appears to reduce this risk. There is no study comparing surgical to endovascular treatment. CONCLUSION: Very small aneurysms carry higher treatment risks than larger aneurysms. A prospective randomised trial is justified for those very small aneurysms for which treatment is indicated.

Management of patients with aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage and associated symptomatic vasospasm on presentation.

Rebleeding and symptomatic vasospasm (VS) are the major causes of subsequent morbidity and mortality in patients surviving a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Although most patients present rapidly after the bleed, some may seek medical attention in a delayed fashion due to non-resolving or worsening headaches or new neurological deficits, requiring treatment during the period at risk for VS. Such patients may either present asymptomatic radiological VS on their diagnostic angiogram or present symptomatic VS confirmed on angiogram. A similar situation may occur in patients presenting within the first 48 hours after SAH with very early angiographic VS. Deciding on the optimal timing and modality of treatment in such patients with SAH and symptomatic VS on presentation is controversial. Only six observational studies that specifically assessed aneurysm treatment in the presence of symptomatic VS have been published to date. We reviewed the published literature on the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the presence of symptomatic VS and suggest avenues for future studies.

Blister-like aneurysms of the internal carotid artery - management considerations.

Blood blister-like aneurysms (BBA) originate at non-branching sites of the internal carotid artery (ICA). These aneurysms present a fragile wall and a poorly defined broad-based neck. Recognition of the BBA is essential for proper management of these vascular lesions. Various surgical and endovascular strategies have been attempted for these heterogeneous lesions. These have been associated with significant morbidity and mortality including rebleeding, regrowth, ischemic and thromboembolic complications. The authors review the key elements important for diagnosis and management of BBA and review current treatment options.

Endoscopic endonasal resection of the odontoid process as a standalone decompressive procedure for basilar invagination in Chiari type I malformation.

BACKGROUND: The expanded endonasal approach of the cranio-cervical junction provides comfortable working space while avoiding some of the disadvantages of the transoral route. We report a purely endonasal endoscopic resection of the odontoid process for basilar invagination in a patient with a Chiari type I malformation, without posterior decompression or fusion. CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old female patient presented with cranial nerve and brainstem deficits. CT and MRI showed a Chiari type I malformation and compression of the medulla by basilar invagination of the odontoid process. The tip of the latter was displaced up to the bulbo-pontine sulcus. The odontoid process was resected via the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach, without additional posterior decompression or fusion. The post-operative course was uneventful, including the absence of velopharyngeal insufficiency. Neurological deficits regressed rapidly. The preoperative cervical pain virtually disappeared. At 9 months follow-up, the patient had normal activity with minimal residual neurological deficits. Post-op dynamic radiography and CT showed stability of the cranio-cervical junction. CONCLUSION: Decompression of the bulbomedullary junction by purely endoscopic transnasal resection of the odontoid process is well tolerated and efficient. Immediate stabilization is not mandatory in all cases of congenital causes of basilar invagination.

Angiographic pitfall: duplicated tapered A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery mimicking an anterior communicating artery aneurysm.

We describe a misleading case of a partially occluded A1 segment duplication that mimicked an ACoA aneurysm on computed tomography angiography and conventional angiography and led to surgical intervention. The location of such an anomaly at the ACoA on the side of least hemodynamic stress may provide a clue to recognizing this variant.

[Secondary superficial siderosis of the central nervous system: report of three cases]. / Sidérose superficielle secondaire du système nerveux central : à propos de trois cas et revue de la littérature.

BACKGROUND: Superficial siderosis (SS) is an under-recognized entity. It is due to repeated microhemorrhages in the subarachnoid spaces resulting in a deposit of hemosiderin at the surface of the central nervous system and/or the cranial nerves. The origin of microhemorrhages remains unknown in almost one third of cases and therefore no treatment can be recommended. Through a literature review and new observations, our goal is to detail the outcome of patients with a recognized etiology of SS and treated surgically. METHODS: Series of three cases and review of the literature. RESULTS: We present three patients with symptomatic SS for whom the origin of microhemorrhages was found. The first two patients complained of longstanding ataxia and neurosensory deafness while the third patient presented with urinary retention, vertigo, diplopia and facial paresis. Neuroradiological explorations revealed a left temporoparietal cavernoma, a fronto-orbital arterio-venous malformation and a cauda equina myxopapillary ependymoma respectively. Surgical resection of the source of hemorrhage was performed in all cases. All outcomes were good with improvement of their SS-related symptoms. These cases are discussed and the current literature is reviewed. CONCLUSION: It is important to recognize SS since the treatment of the bleeding source may prevent further deterioration and may even in some cases improve the clinical condition.

[Evaluation of neuro-oncology information for French speaking patients on the Internet]. / Evaluation de l'information sur Internet destinée aux patients francophones en neuro-oncologie.

OBJECTIVE: Internet has become the first place where patients go to when seeking information about their disease. Little is known about the type and the quality of the medical information available on French-speaking websites, especially in the field of neuro-oncology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of these sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We entered six key words "glioblastome", "méningiome", "métastase cérébrale", "neurinome de l'acoustique", "adénome à prolactine" and "lymphome primitif cérébral" into 2 different search engines and, for each key word, the first fifty websites were reviewed using the tool "DISCERN", and with the help of two neuro-oncologists, we rated their content in terms of quality and comprehension. RESULTS: On 612 websites only 110 (18%) contained information that proved to be somewhat useful to patients. The average score for quality was 32, which is considered to be <>. According to our scoring system, 1.8% of websites were found to be "excellent", 11.8% "good", 24.5% "fairly good", 15.4% "average", 32.7% "poor" and 13.6% "very poor". Just over 50% of the websites were found to be clear. The study also showed that the order in which these websites were ranked in the search engine, their affiliation, their target or who financed them had little impact on quality. The websites were more likely to be of high quality if they were managed by doctors and had bibliographical references as well as a date indicating a recent website's update. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study shows that the search for medical information on the Internet is time consuming and often disappointing: very few websites provide information that is both clear and exhaustive. However, we also found that very few websites contained information that was seriously inaccurate. Given the growing popularity of the Internet, patients could certainly benefit from a high quality French speaking website that would specialize in cerebral tumors, as well as from a neuro-oncological portal that would take them to selected websites as it would save time and would be a guarantee for quality.

Early myocardial dysfunction following subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Like systolic dysfunction (SD), diastolic dysfunction (DD) has recently been proposed as a contributing factor in haemodynamic instability and in the genesis of pulmonary oedema, but its occurrence in subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) patients has not been described. Following aneurysmal SAH, three patients arrived at our institution with haemodynamic instability requiring vasoactive drugs and with pulmonary oedema. Transoesophageal echocardiographic study during aneurysm surgery documented mild to severe left ventricular SD and DD. Right ventricular SD and DD were also present. Documented biventricular systolic and diastolic myocardial dysfunctions may contribute to haemodynamic instability and pulmonary oedema following SAH due to intracranial aneurysmal rupture.

Ruptured aneurysm at the choroidal branch of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery: a case report, review of the literature and proposed pathogenesis.

Aneurysms rarely occur at the choroidal branch of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) and their pathogenesis is not well understood. We report such a case and review the literature. A 69-year-old female was admitted for a sudden onset of severe headache with nausea and vomiting. Soon after arrival, she became less responsive. CT of the head revealed an intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) predominantly in the fourth and third ventricles without subarachnoid hemorrhage and associated with hydrocephalus. Cerebral angiography demonstrated an aneurysm at the choroidal branch of the PICA. The aneurysm was resected through a bilateral suboccipital craniotomy. The patient made a remarkable recovery. The literature describes five other cases of aneurysms arising from a choroidal branch of the PICA. Hypertension was a common finding in this population. In summary, aneurysms arising from a choroidal branch of the PICA are rare. Hypertensive vessel damage might be a major factor in their pathogenesis. We propose that the rupture of a hypertensive aneurysm might account for some isolated spontaneous IVH.