Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Children (Basel) ; 9(8)2022 Jul 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35892603

RESUMO

(1) Background: A Monteggia fracture is an infrequent injury in children. It can be missed during an initial consultation in 20-50% of patients. Chronic radial head dislocation may lead to several complications. Thus, surgical reconstruction of chronic Monteggia injuries is justified. The aim of this study is to analyze the single tertiary center experience in the treatment of neglected Monteggia fractures. (2) Methods: A retrospective study of patients treated for missed Monteggia fractures was conducted. Hospital records, operative charts, follow-up records and a set of X-rays were analyzed for each patient. Radiographic results were graded as good, moderate or poor. The functional status of elbows was estimated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index. (3) Results: A total of 13 patients (8 boys and 5 girls) aged 4-12 years (mean 7.15) were treated during the study period. An angulation osteotomy of the ulna was performed in ten patients and a radial shortening osteotomy in three patients. A Bell-Tawse annular ligament reconstruction was performed in five patients, and a direct repair was performed in two patients. Eight patients had radiocapitellar trans-fixation. There were nine good radiographic results, three moderate and one poor. The functional result was excellent in nine patients, good in three and poor in one. (4) Conclusions: Our work has many limitations (only 13 patients and different types of operations), and conclusions should be drawn very carefully from such a small and diverse group. The surgical reconstruction of neglected Monteggia fractures in children should be attempted in all patients. Angulation and elongation osteotomies of the ulna are suitable for most patients. If there is a marked overgrowth of the radius, gradual ulnar lengthening and radial head reduction using the Ilizarov method may be a better option. Annular ligament reconstruction is not mandatory.

2.
Eur J Pediatr Surg ; 29(5): 475-480, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30372768

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Child migrants are the most vulnerable population, prone to various health conditions due to trauma and the bad living conditions that they experience during their migration. The objective of this study was to determine the pediatric surgical conditions of migrant children treated in our hospital on their way toward North-West Europe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all admitted migrants in one tertiary and one secondary level hospital from 2016 to 2018. Only migrant children with surgical issues who had been hospitalized or treated in outpatient clinics were included in the study. RESULTS: There were 47 migrants admitted to hospitals and outpatient clinics; 32 from Afghanistan, 11 from Iraq, 1 from Syria, 2 from Iran, and 1 from Algeria. There were 27 boys and 20 girls, average age 7.96 years (range: 3 months-17 years). The average length of hospitalization was 14.1 days (range: 1-48), and average stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) was 7.4 days (range: 1-15). There were 29 migrants treated in outpatient clinics, and 18 were hospitalized. The cause of seeking surgical treatment was trauma in 33 and non-traumatic surgical problems in 14. The most common types of trauma were isolated fractures which occurred in one, followed by isolated head injury in eight. Polytrauma occurred in five. A lethal outcome occurred in one 9-year-old boy from Afghanistan due to severe polytrauma. CONCLUSION: Trauma, predominantly fractures and head injuries, was the leading cause of morbidity in migrant children treated in these two hospitals.


Assuntos
Migrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia , Adolescente , Ásia/etnologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Cuidados de Saúde Secundários/estatística & dados numéricos , Sérvia/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/etiologia
3.
Injury ; 47(11): 2479-2483, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27622613

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning are the preferred treatment of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the non-standard Dorgan's method and compare its results with those of the standard percutaneous cross pinning method in treatment of unstable or irreducible Gartland type II and III supracondylar humeral fractures in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective evaluation of 138 consecutive patients with Gartland type II or III extension supracondylar humeral fractures referred to University Children's Hospital during a four-year period. The patients were randomized into two groups: the first group, comprised of 71 patients, was treated with standard pin configuration and the second group, comprised of 67 patients, underwent Dorgan's method. The study included 88 boys and 50 girls aged 1.5-11.4 years (mean 6.5±2). At initial presentation 8.7% (n-12) fractures were classified as Gartland type IIa, 25.4% (n-35) as Gartland type IIb and 65.9% (n-91) as Gartland type III. RESULTS: Flynn's criteria were used to evaluate the results. An excellent clinical outcome was reported in about 90% of patients (n-90) treated with standard pin configuration and 89.5% (n-60) of patients treated with Dorgan's method. There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes between the groups in terms of their gender, age, fracture types, function and cosmetics. Neurological lesions were observed in 9.9% of patients (n=7) who were treated using the standard configuration Kirschner pins, while in those treated by Dorgan's method neurological complications were not observed. However, the procedure time was longer (mean 36.54±5.65min) and radiation exposure significantly higher (mean 10.19±2.70 exposures) in the group that was treated using Dorgan's method, compared to the conventional method (mean 28.66±3.76min and 7.54±1.63 exposures). CONCLUSION: Two laterally inserted crossed pins provide adequate stability with good functional and cosmetic outcome for most unstable paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures with no risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas do Úmero/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Pinos Ortopédicos , Fios Ortopédicos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Fraturas do Úmero/diagnóstico por imagem , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA