Spinal and Paraspinal Plexiform Neurofibromas in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Novel Scoring System for Radiological-Clinical Correlation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a common tumor predisposition syndrome. The aim of this study was to characterize the radiologic presentation of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 with widespread spinal disease and to correlate it to clinical presentation and outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a historical cohort study of adult patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 with spinal involvement. Longitudinal clinical evaluation included pain and neurologic deficits. Radiologically, spinal involvement was classified according to a novel classification system, and a radiologic risk score was calculated. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-seven adult patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 are followed in our center. Thirty-four of these patients qualified for inclusion in this study. Three independent factors were found to be associated with increased risk for neurologic deficit: 1) bilateral tumors at the same level in the cervical region that approximated each other, 2) paraspinal tumors at the lumbar region, and 3) intradural lesions. On the basis of these factors, we calculated a combined risk score for neurologic deficits for each patient. We found a clear correlation between patient status and the calculated radiologic risk score. Patients with neurologic deficits were found to have a higher risk score (9 ± 8.3) than patients without neurologic deficits (2.5 ± 2.9, P < .05). Patients who progressed during the follow-up period had significantly higher scores at presentation than patients with stable conditions (9.9 ± 8.73 versus 3.9 ± 5.3, respectively; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, neurologic deficit is correlated with tumor burden and subtype. We found no direct correlation with tumor burden and pain. Our novel radiologic classification scoring system may be used to predict increased risk for neurologic morbidity.

Classification of High-Grade Glioma into Tumor and Nontumor Components Using Support Vector Machine.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Current imaging assessment of high-grade brain tumors relies on the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, which measure gross volume of enhancing and nonenhancing lesions from conventional MRI sequences. These assessments may fail to reliably distinguish tumor and nontumor. This study aimed to classify enhancing and nonenhancing lesion areas into tumor-versus-nontumor components. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 140 MRI scans obtained from 32 patients with high-grade gliomas and 6 patients with brain metastases were included. Classification of lesion areas was performed using a support vector machine classifier trained on 4 components: enhancing and nonenhancing, tumor and nontumor, based on T1-weighted, FLAIR, and dynamic-contrast-enhancing MRI parameters. Classification results were evaluated by 2-fold cross-validation analysis of the training set and MR spectroscopy. Longitudinal changes of the component volumes were compared with Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. RESULTS: Normalized T1-weighted values, FLAIR, plasma volume, volume transfer constant, and bolus-arrival-time parameters differentiated components. High sensitivity and specificity (100%) were obtained within the enhancing and nonenhancing areas. Longitudinal changes in component volumes correlated with the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria in 27 patients; 5 patients (16%) demonstrated an increase in tumor component volumes indicating tumor progression. These changes preceded Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology assessments by several months. Seven patients treated with bevacizumab showed a shift to an infiltrative pattern of progression. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes an automatic classification method: segmented Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria based on advanced imaging that reliably differentiates tumor and nontumor components in high-grade gliomas. The segmented Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria may improve therapy-response assessment and provide earlier indication of progression.

Mechanisms of post-radiation injury: cerebral microinfarction not a significant factor.

Post-radiation leukoencephalopathy is characterized by cognitive impairment and white matter alternations on imaging. Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) is one of several suggested etiologies. Cerebral microinfarction (CMI) is a recently described marker of SVD. We sought to examine the rate of CMI as a biomarker of ongoing ischemia among patients who underwent brain radiotherapy (RT). 110 patients treated with RT for primary or metastatic brain tumors were enrolled. A total of 685 brain MRI tests performed 1-108 months post-radiation were examined. The annual incidence of CMI was calculated. Only 2 definite CMI were found (2/685, 0.3 %). The calculated annual incidence of CMI was 0.11. This incidence is similar to the normal population, and lower than the reported incidence in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage or cognitive impairment. CMI incidence in patients treated with brain RT is similar to the general population. This finding suggests that post-radiation leukoencephalopathy and cognitive impairment are not due to active SVD solely but rather secondary to other causes such as inflammation, metabolic or direct cell damage.

Early Biomarkers from Conventional and Delayed-Contrast MRI to Predict the Response to Bevacizumab in Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The interpretation of the radiologic response of bevacizumab-treated patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas represents a unique challenge. Delayed-contrast MR imaging was recently introduced for calculating treatment-response-assessment maps in patients with brain tumors, providing clear separation between active tumor and treatment effects. We studied the application of standard and delayed-contrast MR imaging for assessing and predicting the response to bevacizumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas were scanned before and during bevacizumab treatment by standard and delayed-contrast MR imaging. The mean change in lesion volumes of responders (overall survival, ≥1 year) and nonresponders (overall survival, <1 year) was studied. The lesion volumes at baseline and the changes in lesion volumes 1 month after treatment initiation, calculated from standard and delayed-contrast MRIs, were studied as possible predictors of outcome. In scans acquired at progression, the average change in lesion volume from previous follow-up in standard and delayed-contrast MRIs was compared. RESULTS: Response and progression patterns were identified from the mean change in lesion volumes, depicted from conventional T1WI, delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and DSC MR imaging. Thresholds for early prediction of response were calculated by using these sequences. For each predictor, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were calculated, reaching 85.7%, 87.5%, 75%, and 93.3% for conventional T1WI; 100%, 87.5%, 77.8%, and 100% for delayed-contrast MR imaging; and 75%, 78.6%, 50%, and 91.7% for DSC MR imaging. The benefit of delayed-contrast MR imaging in separating responders and nonresponders was further confirmed by using log-rank tests (conventional T1WI, P = .0022; delayed-contrast MR imaging, P < .0001; DSC MR imaging, P = .0232) and receiver operating characteristic analyses. At progression, the increase in lesion volumes in delayed-contrast MR imaging was 37.5% higher than the increase in conventional T1WI (P < .01); these findings suggest that progression may be depicted more effectively in treatment-response-assessment maps. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of contrast-enhanced MR imaging for assessing and predicting the response to bevacizumab was demonstrated. The increased sensitivity of the treatment-response-assessment maps reflects their potential contribution to the management of bevacizumab-treated patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.

The optimal regimen of bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma: does dose matter?

The FDA-approved schedule and dose of bevacizumab (BVZ) for recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) (10 mg/kg q 2 weeks) were adopted from systemic cancer protocols. No dose-defining studies have been performed for glioblastoma. We began using BVZ for the treatment of rGB in 2005 at the dose of 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks combined with irinotecan, and later as single agent. Our previous report of 20 patients treated with BVZ 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks showed similar response rates and overall survival (OS) compared to other BVZ treatment protocols, with less adverse effects. In this study we retrospectively reviewed our 7 year experience with BVZ in 162 rGB patients. Treatment outcomes were analyzed from 87 patients who received BVZ at 5 mg/kg and 75 patients at 10 mg/kg. While median age was similar in both groups, the median KPS was significantly higher in the group treated with 10 mg/kg BVZ (85 versus 60). There was no significant difference in OS or progression free survival (PFS) between the groups treated with BVZ 5 versus 10 mg/kg. Overall survival was significantly improved in the subgroup treated with cytotoxic therapy in addition to BVZ 10 mg/kg. There were more adverse events seen with BVZ 10 mg/kg. There is no significant difference in OS for rGB treated with BVZ 5 mg/kg versus 10 mg/kg when given as monotherapy. The smaller dose was slightly less toxic. Addition of cytotoxic therapy resulted in prolongation of OS in a small subgroup of BVZ 10 mg/kg.

Temozolomide treatment for newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas: a clinical efficacy trial.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy with alkylating agents is of proven efficacy in recurrent anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO) with reported response rates ranging between 50% and 70%. The response of newly diagnosed AO to initial treatment with temozolomide (TMZ) has not yet been reported. This study evaluated the response and time to tumor progression of newly diagnosed AO initially treated with TMZ. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with a median age of 47 (range: 26-65) received a median of 14 (range: 3-24) cycles of TMZ as their first modality of therapy following diagnosis of AO. Treatment was given every 28 days for 5 days at a starting dose of 200 mg/m2/d and was continued for 24 cycles unless toxicity or tumor progression required withdrawal of TMZ. MRI evaluations were repeated every 8 weeks and scales of Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and of neurological function were used to assess clinical response. RESULTS: Clinical improvement was observed in 60% of the patients with statistically significant gain measured by KPS and the neurologic function scales. The objective response rate was 75%, and median time to tumor progression was 24 months. Maximal objective response was reached within a median of 6 months (range: 3-12). Tumors with 1p loss had longer progression free survival compared to tumors without deletions (PFS at 24 months: 1p LOH = 100%, 1p intact = 20%; P = 0.057). TMZ was well tolerated with only two events of grade 3/4 hematological toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Newly diagnosed AO demonstrates a high rate of response to initial therapy with TMZ, similar to the response reported for PCV combination therapy. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal duration of treatment and whether radiotherapy should immediately follow chemotherapy.

Pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in cerebrospinal fluid and serum after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption in patients with brain lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid and serum after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption and intra-arterial administration compared with intravenous or simple intra-arterial infusion in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma. METHODS: Serum and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid were sampled after methotrexate administration in 12 patients. Blood-brain barrier disruption was induced on 2 sequential days by mannitol (25%) infusion delivered to the vertebral or internal carotid artery territories followed by intra-arterial methotrexate (dose, 1.4 g/m2; 47 treatments). Sixteen treatments were given without barrier disruption by intravenous (3.5 g/m2; nine treatments) or intra-arterial (2.8 g/m2; seven treatments) infusion. RESULTS: Ventricular cerebrospinal fluid-methotrexate peak levels after blood-brain barrier disruption of the vertebral and the internal carotid arteries territories were 19.3 +/- 2.9 and 8.5 +/- 0.7 micromol/L (P < .001), and the area under the curve from time 0 to infinity was 178.0 +/- 21.3 and 110.0 +/- 12.4 [micromol/L x h, respectively (P < .01). No significant differences were observed in serum levels. After intra-arterial infusion was performed without disruption, the serum peak level was higher than that achieved by intravenous treatment (518.2 +/- 67.7 versus 180.6 +/- 31.8 micromol/L; P < .001). No differences were observed in cerebrospinal fluid concentrations, which dropped below 1 micromol/L at 6 hours. The cerebrospinal fluid/serum ratio [AUC(%)] of methotrexate after blood-brain barrier disruption was three to four times greater than that by systemic administration. CONCLUSION: Enhanced methotrexate delivery to the central nervous system can be attained by intra-arterial administration combined with osmotic disruption of the blood-brain barrier compared with simple intra-arterial or intravenous administration.

In vivo assessment of the window of barrier opening after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption in humans.

OBJECT: Osmotic blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption induced by intraarterial infusion of mannitol is used in conjunction with chemotherapy to treat human brain tumors. The time course to barrier closure, or the so-called therapeutic window, has been examined in animals but little information is available in humans. The authors, therefore assessed the time course to barrier closure after osmotic BBB disruption in humans. METHODS: Disruption of the BBB was demonstrated using 99mTc-glucoheptonate (TcGH) single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) scanning in 12 patients who were treated monthly with combination chemotherapy in conjunction with BBB disruption. The primary diagnosis was primary central nervous system lymphoma in seven patients and primitive neuroectodermal tumors in five. The TcGH (20 mCi) was injected at 1- to 480-minute intervals after osmotic BBB disruption, and patients underwent SPECT scanning after 4 hours. A total of 38 studies was performed. Good-to-excellent BBB disruption was obtained in 29 procedures and poor-to-moderate disruption was seen in the other nine studies. The TcGH indices correlated with the degree of BBB disruption as measured postprocedure on contrast-enhanced CT scans (r = 0.852). Mean baseline TcGH indices were 1.02+/-0.07. For the group of patients with good-to-excellent disruptions the mean indices at 1 minute postdisruption measured 2.19+/-0.18. After 40 minutes no significant change was noted (mean index 2.13+/-0.2). Then the indices declined more steeply and at 120 minutes after the disruption the index was 1.36+/-0.02. A very slow decline was noted between 120 and 240 minutes after mannitol infusion. At 240 minutes the barrier was still open for all good-to-excellent disruptions (index 1.33+/-0.08) but at 480 minutes the mean indices had returned to the baseline level. CONCLUSIONS: Results of these in vivo human studies indicate that the time course to closure of the disrupted BBB for low-molecular-weight complexes is longer than previously estimated. The barrier is widely open during the first 40 minutes after osmotic BBB disruption and returns to baseline levels only after 6 to 8 hours following the induction of good or excellent disruption. These findings have important clinical implications for the design of therapeutic protocols.

Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: a comparison of two prospective series treated with and without intra-cerebrospinal fluid chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that an aggressive treatment of patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) that groups radiotherapy and intra-cerebrospinal fluid (intra-CSF) chemotherapy has improved treatment outcomes. Based on their previous series of 137 patients treated with such an intensive standard protocol, the authors expected 20% of the patients to maintain their responses for at least 6 months after withdrawal of therapy. They also observed that, in patients with solid tumors, a partial response was compatable with sustained off-therapy response and that the maximal response was reached soon after completion of radiotherapy. The authors concluded that the role of intra-CSF chemotherapy, with its associated high rate of complications, is unclear. In this study, which was a further evaluation of this dilemma, they compared the outcomes of two prospective treatment protocols that were identical in their use of radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy and varied only in their inclusion or exclusion of intra-CSF chemotherapy. METHODS: Adult patients with LM from systemic solid tumors were prospectively included in the treatment protocol active at the time of their diagnosis. Group 1 comprised 54 patients treated by radiotherapy, intra-CSF chemotherapy, and systemic therapy, whereas Group 2 comprised 50 patients treated with radiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy but no intra-CSF chemotherapy. RESULTS: The analysis of treatment outcomes was performed retrospectively. The median patient age and distribution of primary neoplasms did not differ between the two groups. The proportion of early deaths that occurred during radiotherapy was similar for the two groups, as was the overall rate of response to treatment. The two groups also had the same median survival, which was 4 months for both groups, as well as the same proportion of long term survivors. Thirty-one percent of patients in Group 1 developed early complications related to intra-CSF chemotherapy, whereas patients in Group 2 were spared these complications. Delayed symptomatic leukoencephalopathy was observed in 20% of Group 1 patients compared with none in Group 2 (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The exclusion of intra-CSF chemotherapy from the treatment schedule of patients with LM does not change their overall response to treatment, their median survival, or the proportion of long term survivors. It does, however, significantly reduce the rate of early and delayed treatment-related complications.