Effectiveness of Nurse-Led Preoperative Assessment for Anesthesia: A Prospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate, in low-complexity surgical patients, the effectiveness of preoperative assessment carried out by nurses with formal postgraduate anesthetic training compared to that carried out by anesthesiologists in terms of cancellations and inadequate surgical preparation. DESIGN: This experimental research was conducted using a prospective cohort study. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-three patients were recruited who had undergone low-complexity surgery between May and September 2020. Sixty-nine patients were preoperatively assessed by a nurse with specific 1-year postgraduate university training in anesthesia and 114 by an anesthesiologist. Data collection included a questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction and knowledge acquired from the preoperative assessment. FINDINGS: Cancellations of surgery were the same in both cohorts (3.8%, 2.6%). The incidence of poor preparation attributable to the patient was also similar in both cohorts (17.0% vs 18.4%). Patients seen by nurses valued the satisfaction with the preoperative assessment more highly than patients seen by anesthesiologists (median 91.67 vs 84.62). In terms of Knowledge obtained from the preoperative assessment, both professionals did not show statistically significant differences in knowledge levels. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative patient assessment performed by a nurse, with formal anesthesia training, in low-complexity surgical patients can be as effective as that performed by an anesthesiologist, without having an impact on surgical cancellations or patient preparation. On the day of surgery, patients who had been assessed by a nurse were more satisfied with their care during the visit and acquired similar knowledge about preoperative preparation as patients assessed by anesthesiologists.

Appropriateness of the dialysis modality selection process: A cross-sectional study.

Studies that specifically quantify the appropriateness of the process of dialysis modality selection are lacking. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) offers clinical and social advantages over hemodialysis (HD), but may be underused. We aimed to determine the appropriateness of the process of dialysis modality selection and quantify the percentage of patients who could potentially have been PD candidates. We performed a cross-sectional study that included adult patients from a hospital Nephrology Department in Barcelona who started dialysis between 2014 and 2015. We assessed the appropriateness of dialysis modalities selection by defining 3 sequential domains based on 3 critical steps in choosing a dialysis modality: eligibility for either treatment, information about modalities, and shared decision-making. We obtained data using medical records and a patient questionnaire. The dialysis modality selection process was considered appropriate when patients had no contraindications for the selected option, received complete information about both modalities, and voluntarily chose the selected option. A total of 141 patients were included in this study. The median age was 72 years (interquartile range 63-82 years), and 65% of the patients were men. The dialysis modality selection process was potentially inappropriate in 22% of the participants because of problems related to information about dialysis modalities (15%) or shared decision-making (7%). Appropriate PD use can potentially increase from 17% to 38%. Patient age and lack of information regarding dialysis options were independently associated with the potential degree of inappropriate dialysis modality selection. Our findings indicate areas for improvement in the selection of dialysis modalities. With better education and shared decision-making, the number of patients with PD could potentially double. The analysis of appropriateness is a helpful approach for studying renal replacement treatment patterns and identifying strategies to optimize their use.

Timing of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Readmitted Patients with Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Early pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), started during hospitalization or within the first month after discharge, has been shown to reduce exacerbations and improve health-related-quality of life (HRQoL) and exercise capacity. However, no randomized clinical trials (RCT) have compared the efficacy of PR started during hospitalization (DHPR) to PR initiated one month post-hospitalization (PHPR). We conducted an RCT to compare DHPR to PHPR in severe patients with COPD readmitted for exacerbations in a tertiary hospital setting. Patients were randomized to receive three months of DHPR or PHPR. Outcomes were assessed at completion of the PR programme and at months 3 and 9. A total of 53 patients (26 DHPR and 27 PHPR) were included. There were no between-group differences in the number of exacerbations (mean, 3.62 vs. 3.04 in the DHPR and PHPR groups, respectively; p = 0.403). Dyspnea in activities of daily living, exercise capacity, and all HRQoL parameters improved in the PHPR group. In the DHPR group, improvement was observed only for some HRQoL parameters. All gains in both groups were lost during follow-up. More adverse events were observed in the DHPR group (20 vs 5, p = 0.023), although none of these were clinically significant. In this sample of patients with severe COPD readmitted to the hospital for exacerbations, both approaches to PR were safe, but PHPR yielded better outcomes overall. These findings suggest that, PR should be initiated in patients with severe COPD only after hospital discharge when the patients' clinical condition has stabilized.

Syphilis and other sexually transmitted infections among waste pickers in Brasilia, Brazil.

There are millions of waste pickers worldwide that are predominantly located in low- and middle-income countries. They survive on sorting and selling reusable orrecyclable materials discarded by society.While sorting, they are exposed to occupational risks and hazards, including cuts from sharp objects and medical wastes, that could be contaminated by infectious diseases. Because of these exposures, a study was conducted to determine the prevalence of syphilis and other sexually transmitted infections (STI's) among waste pickers. A cross-sectional study using a semi-structured questionnaire and blood samples for serological tests were collected. A total of 1,025 waste pickers were interviewed. Most participants were women (67.54%), without a partner (70.11%), were an average of 40 years old, and had between 3 and 4 children. There were 755 samples collected for syphilis, 791 for HIV, 866 for hepatitis B, and 859 for hepatitis C. Of these samples, 28 (3.70%) waste pickers had reagent serology for syphilis, 6 (0.75%) for HIV; 6 (0.69%) for acute hepatitis B and 1 (0.11%) for hepatitis C. Overall, this study identified the serological status of waste pickers; this information can be used to encourage waste pickers to seek health treatment for STIs and receive education to understand the risks associated with being exposed to medical waste or syringes.