[Cecal tuberculosis: the importance of a high diagnostic suspicion]. / Tuberculosis cecal: la importancia de una alta sospecha diagnóstica.

Intestinal tuberculosis is less common than pulmonary tuberculosis. Its clinical and endoscopic features are nonspe-cific, so diagnostic suspicion must be high in order to make an early diagnosis and prevent iatrogenia. Pharmacotherapy is often effective, with an excellent clinical and endoscopic evolution. Surgical treatment is reserved for complications. We present the case of cecal tuberculosis diagnosed endoscopically; this is the second case diagnosed in a few months in our center. In this case there were no risk factors, such as recent travel, risk of contacts or inmunosupression.

Tuberculosis cecal: la importancia de una alta sospecha diagnóstica / Cecal tuberculosis: the importance of a high diagnostic suspicion

La tuberculosis intestinal es mucho menos frecuente que la pulmonar. Además, tanto su presentación como el aspecto endoscópico son muy variados, de modo que la sospecha diagnóstica debe ser elevada para un diagnóstico precoz y para evitar la posible yatrogenia. Con el tratamiento antituberculoso convencional la evolución, tanto clínica como endoscópica, suele ser excelente, quedando la cirugía relegada como tratamiento para las complicaciones. Presentamos un caso de tuberculosis cecal diagnosticada endoscópicamente, la segunda diagnosticada en unos meses en nuestro centro. En este caso no había factores de riesgo como viajes recientes, contactos con infectados ni toma de fármacos inmunosupresores (AU)

Intestinal tuberculosis is less common than pulmonary tuberculosis. Its clinical and endoscopic features are nonspecific, so diagnostic suspicion must be high in order to make an early diagnosis and prevent iatrogenia. Pharmacotherapy is often effective, with an excellent clinical and endoscopic evolution. Surgical treatment is reserved for complications. We present the case of cecal tuberculosis diagnosed endoscopically; this is the second case diagnosed in a few months in our center. In this case there were no risk factors, such as recent travel, risk of contacts or inmunosupression (AU)

SEMICYUC 2012. Recommendations for intensive care management of acute pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVE: Significant changes in the management of acute pancreatitis have taken place since the 2004 Pamplona Consensus Conference. The objective of this conference has been the revision and updating of the Conference recommendations, in order to unify the integral management of potentially severe acute pancreatitis in an ICU. PARTICIPANTS: Spanish and international intensive medicine physicians, radiologists, surgeons, gastroenterologists, emergency care physicians and other physicians involved in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE AND GRADES OF RECOMMENDATION: The GRADE method has been used for drawing them up. DRAWING UP THE RECOMMENDATIONS: The selection of the committee members was performed by means of a public announcement. The bibliography has been revised from 2004 to the present day and 16 blocks of questions on acute pancreatitis in a ICU have been drawn up. Firstly, all the questions according to groups have been drawn up in order to prepare one document. This document has been debated and agreed upon by computer at the SEMICYUC Congress and lastly at the Consensus Conference which was held with the sole objective of drawing up these recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Eighty two recommendations for acute pancreatitis management in an ICU have been presented. Of these 84 recommendations, we would emphasize the new determinants-based classification of acute pancreatitis severity, new surgical techniques and nutritional recommendations. Note. This summary only lists the 84 recommendations of the 16 questions blocks except blocks greater relevance and impact of its novelty or because they modify the current management.

Metástasis ósea como primera manifestación de un hepatocarcinoma / Bone metastases as the first manifestation of hepatocarcinoma

No disponible