[Breast cancer radiation therapy: Current questions in 2023]. / Radiothérapie des cancers du sein : questions d'actualité en 2023.

Radiation therapy is a corner stone of breast cancer treatment as it has been shown postoperatively that it improves local control and overall survival. In recent years, multidisciplinary therapeutic strategies have evolved considerably for early-stage breast cancer, both surgically and in terms of systemic treatments or radiation therapy. Each of these developments affects other treatment components and open up new questions allowing even more personalized treatments. Essentially normofractionated a few years ago, breast radiation therapy is today very largely moderately or even ultra hypofractionated. De-escalation of the surgery of the axilla has changed the indications for lymph node radiation therapy keeping similar efficacy with reduced toxicity. Indications for radiation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remain based on pre-chemotherapy staging pending the results of ongoing randomized studies. The addition of a boost to the tumor bed significantly reduces the risk of local recurrence, but the magnitude of this benefit decreases with increasing age. The main risk factors for local recurrence are young age, the associated extended ductal in situ component, hormone receptor negative and high-grade status. The results of the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) seem similar with normo- or moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy regimen.

Extensive pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: identification of predictors of associated infiltrating carcinoma and lymph node metastasis before immediate reconstructive surgery.

AIM: To identify predictors for infiltrating carcinoma and lymph node involvement, before immediate breast reconstructive surgery, in patients with an initial diagnosis of extensive pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2009, 241 patients with pure extensive DCIS in preoperative biopsy had underwent mastectomy. Axillary staging (sentinel node and/or axillary dissection) was performed in 92% (n = 221) of patients. Patients with micro-invasive lesions at initial diagnosis, recurrence or contralateral breast cancer were excluded. RESULTS: Respectively 14% and 21% of patients had a final diagnosis of micro-invasive carcinoma (MIC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Univariate analysis showed that the following variables at diagnosis were significantly correlated with the presence of either MIC or IDC in the mastectomy specimen: palpable tumor (p = 0.002), high grade DCIS (p = 0.002) and detection of an opacity by mammography (p = 0.019). Axillary lymph node (ALN) involvement was reported in 9% of patients. Univariate analysis suggested that a body mass index higher than 25 (p = 0.007), a palpable tumor (p = 0.012) and the detection of an opacity by mammography (p = 0.044) were associated with an increased rate of ALN involvement. CONCLUSION: Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (IBRS) has become increasingly popular, especially for patients with extended DCIS of the breast. This study confirmed that extended DCIS is associated with a substantial risk of finding MIC or IDC on the surgical specimen but also ALN involvement. Adjuvant systemic treatment and/or radiotherapy could be indicated for some of these patients after the surgery. Patients should be informed of the rate of 1) complications associated to IBRS that will potentially delay the introduction of systemic or local therapy 2) complications associated to radiotherapy after IBRS.

[Prospective monocentric study of the toxicity and the efficacy of concurrent trastuzumab and radiotherapy]. / Étude prospective monocentrique de la toxicité et de l'efficacité du trastuzumab concomitant à la radiothérapie.

PURPOSE: Prospective monocentric study of the toxicities related to concurrent administration of trastuzumab to breast radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy-three patients were treated between June 2003 and March 2009 by concurrent trastuzumab with normofractionated radiotherapy. Trastuzumab was delivered every 3 weeks (8mg/kg in the first infusion then 6mg/kg) during a median time of 12 months (2-62). Left ventricular ejection fraction was assessed by echocardiography or cardiac scintigraphy at baseline, before and after radiotherapy, every 3 months for 1 year and annually. A left ventricular ejection fraction strictly lower than 55% was considered as altered. All toxicities were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects version 3.0. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 52 months (17-88). Median age was 52 years (25-83). One hundred and thirty-four patients (77.5%) received radiotherapy to the internal mammary chain. Acute grade 1, 2 and 3 epithelitis was described in 132 (76.3%), 32 (18.5%) and six patients (3.4%), respectively. At 23 months, grade 1 and 2 fibrosis was observed in 31 and eight patients, respectively (18.8 and 4.6%). Left ventricular ejection fraction remained normal for 159 patients (91.9%) before radiotherapy. Among them, 18 (11.3%) experienced a left ventricular ejection fraction alteration, eight (5.0%) at the completion of radiotherapy. Congestive heart failure occurred in one patient (0.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Toxicities related to the association of trastuzumab to breast radiotherapy were mild. Further follow-up is warranted.

Adjuvant radiotherapy in the management of axillary node negative invasive breast cancer: a qualitative systematic review.

PURPOSE: To actualize and to detail guidelines used in technical radiotherapy and indications for innovative radiation technologies in early axillary node negative breast cancer (BC). METHODS: Dosimetric and treatment planning studies, phase II and III trials, systematic reviews and retrospective studies were all searched (Medline(®) database). Their quality and clinical relevance were also checked against validated checklists. A level of evidence was associated for each result. RESULTS: A total of 75 references were included. Adjuvant BC radiotherapy (50Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks followed by a tumor boost of 16Gy/8 fractions) is still the standard of care. Overall treatment time could be shortened for patients who present with low local relapse risk BC by using either hypofractionated whole breast irradiation; or accelerated partial breast irradiation. BC IMRT is not used in current practice. CONCLUSION: Our group aimed to provide guidelines for technical and clinical applications of innovative BC radiation technologies.

[A case of cutaneous mammary re-irradiation]. / Un cas de ré-irradiation cutanée mammaire.

In early-stage breast cancer, radiotherapy delivered after conservative surgery leads to a reduction in the risk of local recurrences by approximately two thirds. However, some local recurrences can occur in a previously irradiated region and be relevant for a second radiotherapy, exposing to an increased risk of adverse effects. We describe here the observation of a 66-year-old woman treated for a triple negative ductal infiltrative carcinoma of the left breast, who presented an early locoregional recurrence, notably as skin nodules, developed within the irradiated volume and progressing on chemotherapy. The patient was treated by re-irradiation performed concomitantly to oral chemotherapy by capecitabine.

New strategy in hepatic metastatic colorectal cancer: tomotherapy and capecitabine followed by hepatic surgical resection.

The majority of patients who develop liver metastases in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has often unresectable disease. Several new methods of nonsurgical ablation have been tested with variable success. Helical tomotherapy (HT), such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy therapy, is a recent radiation therapy technique which can provide simultaneous and precise targeting of multiple lesions, while sparing normal tissues. We retrospectively assess the feasibility and the tolerance of IMRT with capecitabine followed by hepatic surgery in mCRC patients. This original observation suggests that HT could be safely integrated in the multidisciplinary management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer as an alternative to surgery or other local ablation therapies.

[Breast conserving surgery in locoregional treatment of breast carcinoma after Hodgkin lymphoma]. / Traitement conservateur dans la prise en charge locorégionale du cancer du sein après lymphome de Hodgkin.

PURPOSE: To report characteristics and outcome of breast cancer after irradiation for Hodgkin lymphoma with special focus on breast conservation surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of 72 women who developed either ductal carcinoma in situ or stage I-III invasive carcinoma of the breast after Hodgkin lymphoma between 1978 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Median age at Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosis was 23 years old. Median total dose received by the mediastinum was 40 Gy, mostly by a mantle field technique. Breast cancer occurred after a median time interval of 21 years. Ductal invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ represented respectively 71% and 19% of the cases. Locoregional treatment for breast cancer consisted of mastectomy with or without radiotherapy in 39 patients and of lumpectomy with or without adjuvant radiotherapy in 32 patients. The isocentric lateral decubitus radiation technique was used in 17 patients after breast conserving surgery (57%). With a median follow-up of 7 years, 5-year overall survival rate and locoregional control rate were respectively 74.5% and 82% for invasive carcinoma and 100% and 92% for in situ carcinoma. Thirteen patients died of progressive breast cancer and contralateral breast cancer was diagnosed in ten patients (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Breast conserving treatment can be an option for breast cancers that occur after Hodgkin lymphoma despite prior thoracic irradiation. It should consist of lumpectomy and adjuvant breast radiotherapy with use of adequate techniques, such as the lateral decubitus isocentric position.

[Role of locoregional radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes after preoperative chemotherapy and mastectomy. The Institut Curie-Hôpital René-Huguenin experience]. / Rôle de l'irradiation locorégionale adjuvante en l'absence d'envahissement ganglionnaire après chimiothérapie néoadjuvante, mastectomie totale et lymphadénectomie axillaire pour un cancer du sein. Expérience de l'hôpital René-Huguenin-institut Curie.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy generally induces significant changes in the pathological extent of disease and challenges the standard indications of adjuvant postmastectomy radiation therapy. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes (pN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: Among 1054 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in our institution between 1990 and 2004, 134 patients had pN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, metastatic sites, and treatments were prospectively recorded. The impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy on locoregional recurrence-free survival and overall survival was evaluated by multivariate analysis including known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 134 eligible patients, 78 patients (58.2%) received postmastectomy radiation therapy, and 56 patients (41.8%) did not. With a median follow-up time of 91.4 months, the 10-year locoregional recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were 96.2% and 77.2% with postmastectomy radiation therapy and 86.8% and 87.7% without radiation therapy, respectively (no significant difference). In multivariate analysis, there was a trend towards poorer overall survival among patients who did not have a pathologically complete primary tumour response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 6.65; 95% CI, 0.82-54.12; P=0.076). Postmastectomy radiation therapy had no effect on either locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.09-1.61; P=0.18) or overall survival (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 0.71-6; P=0.18). There was a trend towards poorer overall survival among patients who did not have pathologically complete in-breast tumour response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 6.65; 95% CI, 0.82-54.12; P=0.076). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study showed no increase in the risk of distant metastasis, locoregional recurrence or death when postmastectomy radiation therapy was omitted in breast cancer patients with pN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy. Whether the omission of postmastectomy radiation therapy is acceptable for these patients should be addressed prospectively.

[Management of inflammatory breast cancer after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy]. / Traitement locorégional du cancer du sein inflammatoire après chimiothérapie néoadjuvante.

PURPOSE: To assess the benefit of breast surgery for inflammatory breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective series was based on 232 patients treated for inflammatory breast cancer. All patients received primary chemotherapy followed by either exclusive radiotherapy (118 patients, 51%) or surgery with or without radiotherapy (114 patients, 49%). The median follow-up was 11 years. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable apart from fewer tumors smaller than 70 mm (43% vs 33%, P=0.003), a higher rate of clinical stage N2 (15% vs 5%, P=0.04) and fewer histopathological grade 3 tumors (46% vs 61%, P<0.05) in the no-surgery group. The addition of surgery was associated with a significant improvement in locoregional disease control (P=0.04) but with no significant difference in overall survival rates or disease-free intervals. Late toxicities were not significantly different between the two treatment groups except for a higher rate of fibrosis in the no-surgery group (P<0.0001), and more lymphedema in the surgery group (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest an improvement in locoregional control in patients treated by surgery, in conjunction with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, for inflammatory breast cancer.

[Radiotherapy for breast cancer and pacemaker]. / Radiothérapie pour un cancer du sein et stimulateur cardiaque.

PURPOSE: Patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers occasionally require radiotherapy. Therapeutic irradiation may cause pacemakers to malfunction due to the effects of ionizing radiation or electromagnetic interference. We studied the breast cancer patients who needed breast and/or chest wall and lymph node irradiation to assess the feasibility and tolerance in this population of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 2008 to December 2009, more than 900 patients received radiotherapy for their breast cancer in our department using megavoltage linear accelerator (X 4-6 MV and electrons). Among them, seven patients were with permanent pacemaker. All patients have been treated to the breast and chest wall and/or lymph nodes. Total dose to breast and/or chest wall was 50 Gy/25 fractions and 46 Gy/23 fractions to lymph nodes. Patients who underwent conserving surgery followed by breast irradiation were boosted when indicated to tumour bed with 16 Gy/8 fractions. All patients were monitored everyday in presence of radiation oncologist to follow the function of their pacemaker. All pacemakers were controlled before and after radiotherapy by the patients' cardiologist. RESULTS: Seven patients were referred in our department for postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy. Among them, only one patient was declined for radiotherapy and underwent mastectomy without radiotherapy. In four cases the pacemaker was repositioned before the beginning of radiotherapy. Six patients, aged between 48 and 84 years underwent irradiation for their breast cancer. Four patients were treated with conserving surgery followed by breast radiotherapy and two with mastectomy followed by chest wall and internal mammary chain, supra- and infra-clavicular lymph node irradiation. The dose to the pacemaker generator was kept below 2 Gy. There was no pacemaker dysfunction observed during the radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: The multidisciplinary work with position change of the pacemaker before radiotherapy and everyday monitoring permitted the safe treatment of our patients. Updated guidelines are definitely needed with more details about acceptable doses at the different parts of the pacemaker.

[Early stage breast cancer: is exclusive radiotherapy an option for early breast cancers with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?]. / Cancers du sein de stade II-IIIA: la radiothérapie exclusive est-elle une option en cas de réponse clinique complète à la chimiothérapie néoadjuvante?

PURPOSE: To determine whether exclusive radiotherapy could be a therapeutic option after complete clinical response (cCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for early breast cancers (EBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1985 and 1999, 1477 patients received néoadjuvante chemotherapy for early breast cancer considered to be too large for primary conservative surgery. Of 165 patients with complete clinical response, 65 were treated by breast surgery (with radiotherapy) and 100 by exclusive radiotherapy. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics, except for larger initial tumor sizes in the exclusive radiotherapy group. There were no significant differences in overall, disease-free and metastasis-free survivals. Five-year and 10-year overall survivals were 91 and 77% in the no surgery group and 82 and 79% in the surgery group, respectively (P = 0.9). However, a non-significant trend towards higher locoregional recurrence rates (LRR) was observed in the no surgery group (31 vs. 17% at 10 years; P = 0.06). In patients with complete responses on mammography and/or ultrasound, LRR were not significantly different (P=0.45, 10-year LRR: 21 in surgery vs. 26% in exclusive radiotherapy). No significant differences were observed in terms of the rate of cutaneous, cardiac or pulmonary toxicities. CONCLUSION: Surgery is a key component of locoregional treatment for breast cancers that achieved complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Simplified rules for everyday delineation of lymph node areas for breast cancer radiotherapy.

The aim of this study was to present the simplified rules of delineation of lymph node (LN) volumes in breast irradiation. Practical rules of delineation of LN areas were developed in the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Institut Curie. These practical guidelines of delineation were based on different specific publications in the field of breast and LN anatomy. The principal characteristic of these rules is their clearly established relationship with anatomical structure, which is easy to find on CT slices. The simplified rules of delineation have been published in pocket format as the illustrated atlas "Help of delineation for breast cancer treatment". In this small pocket guide, delineation using the practical rules is illustrated, with examples from anatomical CT slices. It is shown that there is an improvement in delineation after the use of these simplified rules and the guide. In conclusion, this small guide is useful for improving everyday practice and decreasing the differences in target delineation for breast irradiation between institutions and observers.

[Definition of nodal volumes in breast cancer treatment and segmentation guidelines]. / Définition des volumes ganglionnaires dans le cadre du traitement d'un cancer du sein et règles de contourage.

PURPOSE: To assist in the determination of breast and nodal volumes in the setting of radiotherapy for breast cancer and establish segmentation guidelines. Materials and methods. Contrast metarial enhanced CT examinations were obtained in the treatment position in 25 patients to clearly define the target volumes. The clinical target volume (CTV) including the breast, internal mammary nodes, supraclavicular and subclavicular regions and axxilary region were segmented along with the brachial plexus and interpectoral nodes. The following critical organs were also segmented: heart, lungs, contralateral breast, thyroid, esophagus and humeral head. RESULTS: A correlation between clinical and imaging findings and meeting between radiation oncologists and breast specialists resulted in a better definition of irradiation volumes for breast and nodes with establishement of segmentation guidelines and creation of an anatomical atlas. CONCLUSION: A practical approach, based on anatomical criteria, is proposed to assist in the segmentation of breast and node volumes in the setting of breast cancer treatment along with a definition of irradiation volumes.

[Management of malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: the experience of the Institut Curie]. / Prise en charge des tumeurs phyllodes malignes du sein: l'expérience de l'institut Curie.

PURPOSE: Given the scarcity of malignant phyllode tumours of the breast and the absence of consensus regarding their management justify the need for institutional retrospective evaluations of clinical practices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study with central pathology review of the 25 consecutive patients treated at the Institut Curie (Paris, France) between 1969 and 2006 for non metastatic malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast. The median follow-up was 65 months (7-257 months). RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 52 years (20-64 years). Breast surgery was conservative in five patients (20%). Surgical margins were wide (> 10mm), narrow, involved or unknown in respectively 17 (68%), three (12%), three (12%) and two (8%) patients. Median tumour size was 65 mm (12-250 mm). Adjuvant radiotherapy was delivered in seven (28%) patients (two patients, post-tumorectomy; five patients, post-mastectomy) and 13 patients (52%) received anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Five-year overall survival rate was 91% (95% CI, 80-100%). Five patients (20%) developed distant metastases (one after chemotherapy) and three (12%) locoregional relapse (one after tumorectomy and unknown margin without radiotherapy, two after mastectomy and involved margins with radiotherapy). CONCLUSION: Wide breast surgery (that can be conservative in selected patients) is the mainstay of the treatment of non metastatic malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast. To better determine the respective roles of adjuvant systemic treatment and radiotherapy, further clinical studies and the search for new prognostic and predictive factors remain necessary.

[Monocentric evaluation of the skin and cardiac toxicities of the concomitant administration of trastuzumab and radiotherapy]. / Evaluation monocentrique de la tolérance de l'association concomitante de trastuzumab et de radiothérapie.

PURPOSE: Prospective monocentric study of the skin and heart tolerance of a concurrent administration of trastuzumab (T) and radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer (BC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 2004 to January 2007, 57 patients (pts), were treated by a concomitant administration of T and normo-fractionated RT of either whole breast (+/-boost) or chest. The perfusion of T started either with or after chemotherapy (CT). Left ventricular ejection fractions (LEVF), assessed at baseline, before start of RT, after completion of RT and then every four to six months with either echocardiography or multiple gated acquisition scanning, were considered normal if greater or equal to 50% or stated so by the cardiologist. Inclusion criteria included a normal LVEF at baseline. Skin toxicity was evaluated using CTCAEV3. Median age was 49 years (25-80). CT with anthracycline was administered in 84% (total dose 300 mg/m(2)). All but one patient (treated weekly) received T every three weeks (8 mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg) for a median duration of 12 months (6-33). The internal mammary chain was irradiated in 88% of cases. Median follow-up for LVEF assessment was 13 months (2-33). RESULTS: LVEF at pre-RT were normal in 54 pts (100%, three Missing Data [MD]), at post-RT in 56 pts (98%, no MD) and at last follow-up in 53 pts (95%, one MD). There were two grade 0, 44 grade I and 11 grade II skin reactions. For the 27 patients with a skin toxicity assessment after six months, late skin toxicity was grade 0 in 22 pts, grade 1 in four, grade 2 in one. CONCLUSION: Provided that the technique is adapted, the acute skin and heart toxicities of the concomitant administration of T-RT appeared satisfactory. More patients and longer follow-up are still mandatory.

Anatomical, clinical and radiological delineation of target volumes in breast cancer radiotherapy planning: individual variability, questions and answers.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the individual variability of anatomical and radiological delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy (RT) in preparation for new techniques and to propose practical solutions to improve delineation in everyday practice. In the first phase, a patient with stage T3N3M0 breast cancer and complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed by CT scan in the treatment position before RT. 11 radiation oncologists (5 breast cancer specialists and 6 residents) independently delineated the breast and lymph node (LN) regions before definition of target volumes. Organs at risk (heart, lung, thyroid and brachial plexus) were also delineated. All regions (breast, axilla, supraclavicular LN, infraclavicular LN and internal mammary chain) were delineated and compared in terms of volume. Comparative analysis was performed with Aquilab software. Differences in the clinical and radiological assessment were observed between the various radiation oncologists. Simplified rules of delineation were developed in the department. Using these rules, the second patient's CT was delineated by the same physicians and better results were observed. Simplified rules of delineation were developed. In conclusion, major differences in anatomical and radiological delineation for breast cancer RT were observed among the physicians. This study led to the development of written delineation protocols. The study is ongoing with evaluation of the dosimetric impact and definition of different target volumes.

[Hypofractionated breast radiotherapy in 13 fractions, perfect tolerance or delayed early reaction? Prospective study of Curie Institute]. / La radiothérapie mammaire hypofractionnée en 13 séances, parfaite tolérance ou réaction cutanée décalée ? Etude prospective de l'institut Curie.

PURPOSE: To assess the skin toxicity of this scheme and the time to its appearance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-one prospectively recorded patients (pts), treated in Radiotherapy Department for Breast Cancer (BC) with radiotherapy (RT) to the whole breast at the dose of 42.9Gy per 13 fractions (F) per 5 weeks have been studied. Skin reactions were monitored weekly using the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria scoring system, version 3. All risk factors as tobacco smoking, diabetes, obesity were also recorded. RESULTS: All 81 pts, aged from 40 to 83 years (median: 70 years) received whole breast RT 42.9Gy per 13 F without lymph node irradiation after breast conserving surgery. There were no pts with concurrent chemo- and/or hormonal therapy. Seventeen patients (21%) have been treated using decubitus dorsal (DD) technique and 64 (79%) using the previously described isocentric decubitus lateral (IDL) technique. During the RT, only 34 pts (42%) experienced grade I skin reactions and 47 pts (58%) were without. At the last day of the breast irradiation, there were 66 (81%) grade I (N=59) and II (N=7) skin reactions and 15 pts (19%) without. The early skin tolerance of this scheme was considered to be excellent. But in the 2 weeks after the RT, 20 pts (25%) asked for new clinics with their radiation oncologist as a matter of urgency due to worsening of their skin condition. All of them have been seen by their physician and/or the nurse. Of them, nine presented grade I and 11 presented grade II skin reactions, with necessity of special skin care. The analysis of these results was realized and delayed clinics were organized for all pts treated with this scheme 10-14 days after the end of the radiation treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The breast RT 42.9Gy/13 F have been previously described as an efficacious and well tolerated scheme. This prospective homogeneous group of patients showed that delayed early skin reactions could appear in some cases. Therefore complementary clinics are needed to detect and treat these reactions.

Technique alternatives for breast radiation oncology: Conventional radiation therapy to tomotherapy.

Breast conserving radiotherapy uses tangential fields and compensating wedges. This conventional approach can be improved by a field-in-field technique using the linac multi-leaf collimator (MLC). A simplified field-in-field technique that planners can easily achieve and which improves dose uniformity in the breast volume is presented here. Field junction problems are more easily solved by the use of a virtual simulation. A unique isocenter can be set at the junction between the supra-clavicular field and the breast tangential fields. However, careful quality assurance of the treatment planning system must be performed. Tomotherapy has promising clinical advantages: the ability of a tomographic image to correct for random set-up errors, a continuous cranio-caudal delivery which suppresses junction problems, the conformality of the dose distribution throughout the complex volumes formed by the lymph nodes and the breasts. Tomotherapy is a valuable recourse for complex irradiations like bilateral breast or mammary plus axillary irradiation while a field-in-field associated with a unique isocenter technique can be used for majority of the patients.

[Meta-analyses of the effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer: the ultimate evidence?]. / Méta-analyses des effets de la radiothérapie dans le cancer du sein: la preuve absolue?

Several meta-analyses of the effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer were published. Methodological quality varied largely in these studies, from simply gathering data from published studies or even published abstracts, to more rigorous studies gathering individual data from each patient having participated in the trials analysed. A model of the latter is represented by the successive meta-analyses from the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Cooperative Group (EBCTCG). These studies have had a strong impact on the clinical practice of radiotherapy in breast cancer, by demonstrating its long-term potential toxic effects, but also its ability to decrease the long-term breast-cancer mortality, regardless of the effects of other breast-cancer treatments. Therefore, it has contributed to the continuous improvement in the techniques of radiotherapy, as well as to its use in the multidisciplinary management of breast-cancer patients.