RESUMO
This study aimed to verify the impact of milking permission (MP) and concentrate supplementation (CS) on milking frequency (milkings per cow/day) and milk yield (kg per cow/day) in a farm using a pasture-based automatic milking system (AMS). Sixty-eight cows milked using this AMS unit were randomly assigned to one of 4 groups homogeneous for parity, days in milk and milk yield. Treatments used were: Frequent (F) or Restricted (R) MP, that granted cows permission to milk after 6 to 8 h or 9.6 to 14 h of the previous milking, respectively; and low (LC) or high (HC) CS of 0.5 kg or 3.5 kg per cow/day, respectively. The combination of the 2 levels of MP and the 2 levels of CS resulted in the 4 treatment combinations (FHC, RHC, FLC, RLC). This study was designed as a 2 X 2 factorial arrangement with treatment crossover: each of the 4 cow-groups was randomly assigned to one of the 4 treatment combinations for a 5-week experimental period (one pre-treatment week and 4 treatment weeks), and after each 5-week period groups crossed over to another treatment combination until they experienced all. Statistical analysis assessed the impact of MP, CS and their interaction on milk yield, milking frequency, box time, milking time and average milk flow rate. This was done using a mixed model analysis with repeated measures to account for repeated observations on the experimental unit (cow). Milk yield per cow/day and milkings per cow/day were significantly higher with the Frequent compared with the Restricted MP (1.5 kg and 0.65 respectively). Milk yield per cow/day and milkings per cow/day were significantly higher with the HC compared with the LC CS (3.1 kg and 0.25 respectively). Additionally, milk yield per cow/day was affected by the interaction of MP and CS and it was highest with the FHC (20.1 kg) treatment combination, followed by RHC (18.2 kg) treatment combination. The number of milkings per cow/day were also affected by the interaction of MP and CS. The highest estimated number of milkings per cow/day was recorded for the FHC (2.12) and the FLC (1.77) treatment combinations, followed by the RHC (1.38) and RLC (1.23) treatment combinations. Similarly, milking interval was 2.5 h longer for the RLC treatment combination compared with RHC. The shortest milking interval/milking was observed for the FHC (11 h) and FLC (12.8 h) treatment combinations. In conclusion, the study showed that allowing access to the robot between 6 to 8 h after the previous milking was sufficient (even with a minimal level of CS) to achieve acceptable milk production and milking performance in a pasture-based AMS.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study describes a survey designed to fill knowledge gaps regarding farm management practices, parlour management practices and implemented technologies, milking management practices, somatic cell count (SCC) control strategies, farmer demographics and attitudes around SCC management on a sample of Irish dairy farms. RESULTS: We categorized 376 complete responses by herd size quartile and calving pattern. The average respondent herd was 131 cows with most (82.2%) operating a seasonal calving system. The median monthly bulk tank somatic cell count for seasonal calving systems was 137,000 cells/ml (range 20,000 - 1,269,000 cells/ml), 170,000 cells/ml for split-calving systems (range 46,000 - 644,000 cells/ml) and 186,000 cells/ml for 'other' herds (range 20,000 - 664,000 cells/ml). The most common parlour types were swing-over herringbones (59.1%) and herringbones with recording jars (22.2%). The average number of units across herringbone parlours was 15, 49 in rotary parlours and two boxes on automatic milking system (AMS) farms. The most common parlour technologies were in-parlour feeding systems (84.5%), automatic washers on the bulk tank (72.8%), automatic cluster removers (57.9%), and entrance or exit gates controlled from the parlour pit (52.2%). Veterinary professionals, farming colleagues and processor milk quality advisors were the most commonly utilised sources of advice for SCC management (by 76.9%, 50.0% and 39.2% of respondents respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we successfully utilised a national survey to quantify farm management practices, parlour management practices and technology adoption levels, milking management practices, SCC control strategies and farmer demographics on 376 dairy farms in the Republic of Ireland. Rotary and AMS parlours had the most parlour technologies of any parlour type. Technology add-ons were generally less prevalent on farms with smaller herds. Despite finding areas for improvement with regard to frequency of liner changes, glove-wearing practices and engagement with bacteriology of milk samples, we also found evidence of high levels of documentation of mastitis treatments and high use of post-milking teat disinfection. We discovered that Irish dairy farmers are relatively content in their careers but face pressures regarding changes to the legislation around prudent antimicrobial use in their herds.
