Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 78: 104895, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37515913

RESUMO

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive, demyelinating neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. MS is immune-mediated and leads to disability especially in young adults. Even though 18 MS therapy drugs were approved, they slightly inhibit disease progression and do not induce regeneration and repair in the nervous system. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have emerged as a new therapeutic modality in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering due to their immunomodulation and bio regenerative properties. We have designed a randomized, controlled clinical trial to assess safety and possible efficacy of MSC application in MS patients. Twenty-one MS patients were enrolled. Patients were allocated in two distinct groups: treatment group, which received systemic transplantation of autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs, and control group, which received placebo at the first injections. Patients in control group received MSCs at the second injection while the treatment group received placebo. All the patients were followed for 18 months. Follow-ups included regular visits, laboratory evaluation, and imaging analysis. Control patients received MSCs six month after treatment group. No severe immediate or late adverse events were observed in both groups after interventions. We did not find any significant differences in the rate of relapses, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, cognitive condition, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings, or any biomarkers of cerebrospinal fluid between the two groups and in each group before and after cell infusion. Transplantation of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells is safe and feasible. The efficacy of transplantation of these cells should be evaluated through designing randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes, different administration routes, other cell types (allogeneic adipose derived MSCs, allogeneic Wharton's jelly derived MSCs …), repeated injections, and longer follow-up periods.

2.
Cell J ; 25(6): 363-371, 2023 Jun 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37434453

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) play immunomodulatory role in various autoimmune diseases. Previous pre-clinical and clinical studies have shown that MSCs could be a therapeutic modality for psoriasis. However, the mechanisms of treatment and its possible side effects are under investigation. In this study, the safety and probable efficacy of injecting allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ADSCs) in psoriatic patients were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this phase I clinical study with six months of follow-up, total number of 1×106 or 3×106 cells/cm2 of ADSCs were injected into the subcutaneous tissue of each plaque as a single dose in three males and two females (3M/2F) with a mean age of 32.8 ± 8.18. The primary outcome was safety. Changes in clinical and histological indexes, the number of B and T lymphocytes in local and peripheral blood, and serum levels of inflammatory cytokines were assessed. Paired t test was used to compare variables at two time points (baseline and six months after injection) and repeated measures ANOVA test was utilized for variables at three time points in follow-up visits. RESULTS: No major adverse effects such as burning, pain, itching, or any systemic side effects were observed following ADSCs injection, and the lesions showed slight to considerable improvement after injection. The mRNA expression levels of pro-inflammatory factors were reduced in the dermis of the patients after injection. The increased expression level of Foxp3 transcription factor in the patient blood samples suggested modulation of inflammation after ADMSCs administration. Six months after the intervention, no major side effects were reported, but skin thickness, erythema, and scaling of the plaques, as well as the PASI score, were decreased in majority of patients. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that ADSC injection could be considered as a safe and effective therapeutic approach for psoriatic plaques (registration number: IRCT20080728001031N24).

3.
Urol J ; 16(5): 482-487, 2019 10 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31004339

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This clinical study evaluated the effect of autologous muscle-derived cell (MDC) injection for the treat-ment of female patients with pure stress urinary incontinence (SUI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 women with SUI received transurethral injections of autologous MDCs. Baseline and follow-up evaluations consisted of physical examinations (cough stress tests), one-hour pad test, In-continence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7), and Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) scoring. The patients were followed one week as well as 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 month(s) after the procedure. Multichannel urodynamic study were performed before and 24 months after the intervention. The incidence and severity of adverse events (AE) were also recorded at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: A total of 20 eligible female patients with the chief complaint of SUI that was unresponsive to conserva-tive management, was enrolled in the trial, 17 of whom completed all follow-up visits. At 12th months, 10 (59%) patients had complete response, whereas 2 (12%) and 5 (29%) patients had partial and no response, respectively. At 24th months, relapse of SUI in 5 out of 10 complete responders (29%) and 2 out of 2 partial responders to the treatment, respectively. The intervention produced no serious AE during the trial. CONCLUSION: According to our results, though obtained from a limited number of patients, MDC therapy was a minimally invasive and safe procedure for treatment of female patients with pure SUI. However, currently, the efficacy of this type of treatment for SUI is not sufficiently high and multi-center randomized clinical trials are required to be conducted before reaching a concrete conclusion.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Autoenxertos , Transplante de Células/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Injeções , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculo Esquelético/citologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
4.
Cell J ; 20(4): 483-495, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30123994

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is regarded as a new therapeutic approach for improving fibrotic diseases. the aim of this study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of systemic infusion of autologous adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with expected peritoneal fibrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a prospective, open-label, non-randomized, placebo-free, phase I clinical trial. Case group consisted of nine eligible renal failure patients with more than two years of history of being on PD. Autologous AD-MSCs were obtained through lipoaspiration and expanded under good manufacturing practice conditions. Patients received 1.2 ± 0.1×106 cell/kg of AD-MSCs via cubital vein and then were followed for six months at time points of baseline, and then 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks and 24 weeks after infusion. Clinical, biochemical and peritoneal equilibration test (PET) were performed to assess the safety and probable change in peritoneal solute transport parameters. RESULTS: No serious adverse events and no catheter-related complications were found in the participants. 14 minor reported adverse events were self-limited or subsided after supportive treatment. One patient developed an episode of peritonitis and another patient experienced exit site infection, which did not appear to be related to the procedure. A significant decrease in the rate of solute transport across peritoneal membrane was detected by PET (D/P cr=0.77 vs. 0.73, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: This study, for the first time, showed the feasibility and safety of AD-MSCs in PD patients and the potentials for positive changes in solute transport. Further studies with larger samples, longer follow-up, and randomized blind control groups to elucidate the most effective route, frequency and dose of MSCs administration, are necessary (Registration Number: IRCT2015052415841N2).

5.
Cell J ; 20(4): 592-598, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30124008

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most severe disorder within the spectrum of motor neuron diseases (MND) that has no effective treatment and a progressively fatal outcome. We have conducted two clinical trials to assess the safety and feasibility of intravenous (IV) and intrathecal (IT) injections of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) in patients with ALS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an interventional/experimental study. We enrolled 14 patients that met the following inclusion criteria: definitive diagnosis of sporadic ALS, ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALS-FRS) ≥24, and ≥40% predicted forced vital capacity (FVC). All patients underwent bone marrow (BM) aspiration to obtain an adequate sample for cell isolation and culture. Patients in group 1 (n=6) received an IV and patients in group 2 (n=8) received an IT injection of the cell suspension. All patients in both groups were followed at 24 hours and 2, 4, 6, and 12 months after the injection with ALS-FRS, FVC, laboratory tests, check list of side effects and brain/spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In each group, one patient was lost to follow up one month after cell injection and one patient from IV group died due to severe respiratory insufficiency and infection. RESULTS: During the follow up there were no reports of adverse events in terms of clinical and laboratory assessments. In MRI, there was not any new abnormal finding. The ALS-FRS score and FVC percentage significantly reduced in all patients from both groups. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that IV and IT transplantation of BM-derived stromal cells is safe and feasible (Registration numbers: NCT01759797 and NCT01771640).

6.
Cytotherapy ; 20(10): 1238-1246, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30318332

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The intra-articular implantation of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA) is an emerging new therapy. In this study, patients with knee OA received intra-articular implantations of autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of this implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a phase 1/2 single-center, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a placebo control. The subjects consisted of patients with knee OA randomly assigned to either an intra-articular implantation of MSCs (40 × 106 cells) or 5 mL normal saline (placebo). Patients were followed up for 6 months after the implantations. The pain level and function improvements for patient-reported outcomes were assessed based on a visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and its subscales, walking distance, painless walking distance, standing time and knee flexion compared with the placebo group at 3 and 6 months following the implantations. RESULTS: Overall, 43 patients (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 2, 3 and 4) were assigned to either the MSCs (n = 19) or placebo (n = 24) group. Patients who received MSCs experienced significantly greater improvements in WOMAC total score, WOMAC pain and physical function subscales and painless walking distance compared with patients who received placebo. There were no major adverse events attributed to the MSC therapy. CONCLUSION: This randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled RCT demonstrated the safety and efficacy of a single intra-articular implantation of 40 × 106 autologous MSCs in patients with knee OA. Intra-articular implantation of MSCs provided significant and clinically relevant pain relief over 6 months versus placebo and could be considered a promising novel treatment for knee OA. We propose that further investigations should be conducted over an extended assessment period and with a larger cohort.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/métodos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/terapia , Adulto , Medula Óssea , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Masculino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Escala Visual Analógica , Caminhada
7.
Cytotherapy ; 20(4): 499-506, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29428486

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In this study, we intend to assess the safety and tolerability of intra-articular knee implantation of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to determine the preliminary clinical efficacy data in this population. The trial registration numbers are as follows: Royan Institute Ethics Committee: AC/91/1133; NCT01873625. METHODS: This single-center, randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 clinical trial randomized RA patients with knee involvement to receive either an intra-articular knee implantation of 40 million autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs per joint or normal saline (placebo). Patients were followed up for 12 months to assess therapy outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients, 15 in the MSC group and 15 in the placebo group, enrolled in this study. There were no adverse effects reported after MSC administration or during follow-up. Patients who received MSCs had superior findings according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue scale (VAS), time to jelling and pain-free walking distance. However, this improvement could not be significantly sustained beyond 12 months. The MSC group exhibited improved standing time (P = 0.01). In addition, the MSCs appeared to contribute to reductions in methotrexate and prednisolone use. CONCLUSION: Intra-articular knee implantation of MSCs appeared to be safe and well tolerated. In addition, we observed a trend toward clinical efficacy. These results, in our opinion, have justified the need for further investigations over an extended assessment period with larger numbers of RA patients who have knee involvement.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/terapia , Células da Medula Óssea/citologia , Transplante de Medula Óssea/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/métodos , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/citologia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Articulação do Joelho , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite do Joelho/complicações , Placebos , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Stem Cell Res Ther ; 8(1): 116, 2017 05 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28535817

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a genetic ciliopathy disease characterized by progressive formation and enlargement of cysts in multiple organs. The kidneys are particularly affected and patients may eventually develop end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We hypothesize that bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BMMSCs) are renotropic and may improve kidney function via anti-apoptotic, anti-fibrotic, and anti-inflammatory effects. In this study, we aim to assess the safety and tolerability of a BMMSC infusion in ADPKD patients. METHODS: We performed a single-arm phase I clinical trial with a 12-month follow-up. This study enrolled six eligible ADPKD patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25-60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Patients received autologous cultured BMMSCs (2 × 106 cells/kg) through the cubital vein according to our infusion protocol. We investigated safety issues and kidney function during the follow-up visits, and compared the findings to baseline and 1 year prior to the intervention. RESULTS: There were no patients lost to follow-up. We observed no cell-related adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) after 12 months of follow-up. The mean eGFR value of 33.8 ± 5.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 1 year before cell infusion declined to 26.7 ± 3.1 ml/min/1.73 m2 at baseline (P = 0.03) and 25.8 ± 6.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 at the 12-month follow-up visit (P = 0.62). The mean serum creatinine (SCr) level of 2 ± 0.3 mg/dl 1 year before the infusion increased to 2.5 ± 0.4 mg/dl at baseline (P = 0.04) and 2.5 ± 0.6 mg/dl at the 12-month follow-up (P = 0.96). This indicated significant changes between the differences of these two periods (12 months before infusion to baseline, and 12 months after infusion to baseline) in SCr (P = 0.05), but not eGFR (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrated the safety and tolerability of an intravenous transplantation of autologous BMMSCs. BMMSC efficacy in ADPKD patients should be investigated in a randomized placebo-controlled trial with a larger population, which we intend to perform. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02166489 . Registered on June 14, 2014.


Assuntos
Células da Medula Óssea/citologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/efeitos adversos , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/citologia , Rim Policístico Autossômico Dominante/terapia , Adulto , Pressão Sanguínea , Creatinina/sangue , Demografia , Determinação de Ponto Final , Feminino , Seguimentos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Rim/patologia , Rim/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rim Policístico Autossômico Dominante/sangue , Rim Policístico Autossômico Dominante/fisiopatologia , Transplante Autólogo/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...