Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation during less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants: An open-label randomized controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately half of very preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) fail treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and need mechanical ventilation (MV). OBJECTIVES: Our aim with this study was to evaluate if nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) during less invasive surfactant treatment (LISA) can improve respiratory outcome compared with NCPAP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out an open-label randomized controlled trial at tertiary neonatal intensive care units in which infants with RDS born at 25+0-31+6 weeks of gestation between December 1, 2020 and October 31, 2022 were supported with NCPAP before and after surfactant administration and received NIPPV or NCPAP during LISA. The primary endpoint was the need for a second dose of surfactant or MV in the first 72 h of life. Other endpoints were need and duration of invasive and noninvasive respiratory supports, changes in SpO2/FiO2 ratio after LISA, and adverse effect rate. RESULTS: We enrolled 101 infants in the NIPPV group and 99 in the NCPAP group. The unadjusted odds ratio for the composite primary outcome was 0.873 (95% confidence interval: 0.456-1.671; p = .681). We found that the SpO2/FiO2 ratio was transiently higher in the LISA plus NIPPV than in the LISA plus NCPAP group, while adverse effects of LISA had similar occurrence in the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: The application of NIPPV or NCPAP during LISA in very preterm infants supported with NCPAP before and after surfactant administration had similar effects on the short-term respiratory outcome and are both safe. Our study does not support the use of NIPPV during LISA.

Decreased incidence of late-onset sepsis during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Italy: a multicentric study on a cohort of infants requiring major surgery.

Changes in the organization of the clinical care wards, requested by the SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) pandemic, have influenced the environmental circulation of other pathogens. The implementation of prevention procedures may have led to a decrease in the incidence of healthcare-associated infections. We aimed to investigate the impact of prevention and control measures for preventing the COVID-19 spread on the incidence of bacterial sepsis and invasive fungal infections in neonates and infants requiring major surgery. We compared the incidence of bacterial and fungal sepsis and their risk factors observed before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (from 01/10/2018 to 29/02/2020) with those observed during the pandemic (from 01/03/2020 to 07/05/2021) in 13 level III Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Italy, through a secondary analysis of data, collected during a prospective multicenter study (REF). The patients enrolled were infants within three months of life, hospitalized in the two periods in the participating centers to undergo major surgery. Among 541 enrolled patients, 324 (59.9%) were born in the pre-pandemic period and 217 (40.1%) during the pandemic. The incidence density (ID) of any infection in the pre-pandemic period was 16.0/1000 patient days versus 13.6/1000 patient days in the pandemic period (p < 0.001). One hundred and forty-five (145/324; 44.8%) patients developed at least one episode of bacterial sepsis in the pre-pandemic period, versus 103/217 (31.8%) patients, during the pandemic (p = 0.539). Concerning fungal sepsis, 12 (3.7%) patients had one episode in the pre-pandemic period versus 11 (5.1%) patients during the pandemic (p = 0.516). The most significant differences observed in the use of healthcare procedures were the reduction of CVC days, the reduced use of antibiotics pre-surgery, and that of proton pump inhibitors during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic compared with the previous period. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of patients with major surgical needs, the reduction of CVC days, pre-surgery antibiotics administration, and current use of proton pump inhibitors, during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, led to a decrease in the incidence of late-onset sepsis. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Most cases of late-onset sepsis in neonates are referred to as central line-associated bloodstream infections. • In adults, the COVID-19 outbreak negatively influenced healthcare-associated infection rates and infection clusters within hospitals. WHAT IS NEW: • In neonates and infants undergoing major surgery the incidence density of infections was lower in the pandemic period than before. • The most significant differences observed in the use of healthcare procedures were the reduction of CVC days, the reduced use of antibiotics before surgery, and that of proton pump inhibitors during the pandemic compared with previously.

Invasive Candida Infections in Neonates after Major Surgery: Current Evidence and New Directions.

Infections represent a serious health problem in neonates. Invasive Candida infections (ICIs) are still a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Infants hospitalized in NICUs are at high risk of ICIs, because of several risk factors: broad spectrum antibiotic treatments, central catheters and other invasive devices, fungal colonization, and impaired immune responses. In this review we summarize 19 published studies which provide the prevalence of previous surgery in neonates with invasive Candida infections. We also provide an overview of risk factors for ICIs after major surgery, fungal colonization, and innate defense mechanisms against fungi, as well as the roles of different Candida spp., the epidemiology and costs of ICIs, diagnosis of ICIs, and antifungal prophylaxis and treatment.

The care of constipated children in primary care in different countries.

AIM: To investigate and compare the approach to childhood constipation by primary care physicians (PCP) in three Western countries to give insight into adherence to current guidelines and in actual care. METHODS: Prospective study utilizing a two-page survey regarding the approach to children suspected to have functional constipation (FC). A total of 413 of 1016 (41%) distributed surveys were returned out of which 383 were suitable for analysis. Surveys were answered anonymously. Survey responses were analysed and are reported in a descriptive way. RESULTS: In Italy, the Netherlands, and the USA, respectively, 75, 187 and 121 surveys were returned by PCP. The majority of PCP (62%) considered stool withholding as a result of painful defecation to be the most common cause of childhood constipation. Rectal examination was used as a standard diagnostic tool for the evaluation of FC by only 31% of PCP with significant differences among the countries (p < 0.05) and a minimum in the Netherlands (11%). Abdominal X-ray is used by 49% to diagnose FC. 63% of PCP were convinced that hard stool can be softened by drinking more water. Polyethylene glycol was the most common prescribed drug (85%). Significant differences were found among countries in the use of senna and bisacodyl suppositories (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Significant differences in practice exist among PCP from different countries regarding the performance of a digital rectal examination, need for additional diagnostic tests and use of laxatives in childhood constipation.