Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 74(12): 3281-3288, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34247960

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Safety of reconstructive microsurgery in elderly patients is still a topic of debate, because no conclusive evidence exists that provides indications and risk evaluation in elderly patients. The purpose of this study, which the Italian Society for Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery (SICPRE) has promoted, is to evaluate the safety and the complication risk of elective reconstructive microsurgery in elderly patients as well as to identify patient- or procedure-related risk factors. The secondary aim is to evaluate the predictive role for complications of the Geriatric 8 score (G8). METHODS: A total of 194 consecutive patients from 18 centers, aged 65 or older, who received an elective microsurgical flap between April 2018 and April 2019 were prospectively evaluated. Patient-related, treatment-related, and outcomes data were recorded and statistically analyzed through multiple-adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS: Our study showed an increased risk of complications and a longer hospitalization in patients aged ≥75 years with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3 (or G8 score ≤11) as compared to patients >65 years of age and <75 years of age who undergo reconstruction with a microsurgical flap. Instead, flap survival did not significantly vary with age, but was associated only with ASA score ≥3 (or G8 score ≤11) and surgeries that last longer than 480 min; however, flap survival (92.3%) was slightly lower than that commonly reported for in the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstructive microsurgery in the elderly is generally safe. The ASA score is easier and quicker than the G8 score and equally useful for risk stratification.


Assuntos
Microcirurgia/métodos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/transplante , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Segurança do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Indian J Plast Surg ; 54(1): 90-93, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33814749

RESUMO

Despite being especially used in its solid form, silicone is still injected as a liquid filler for breast contouring in many countries. Here, we present a rare case of a woman with silicone pneumonitis and extended breast scarring after breast silicone injection. Because of evidence of a restrictive syndrome due to the thoracic extensive scarring tissue and the high demand of oxygen therapy, as jointly agreed with the pulmonologists, we decided to perform a surgical asportation of the scarring tissue and covering with microsurgical flap. We chose the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap mainly because of the large amount of skin that is possible to use, the good skin texture matching, and the possibility of double team working without changing patient's position.

3.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 6(12): e1949, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30656095

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The risk of infection continues to be a subject of discussion within the field of implant-based breast reconstruction. Studies have shown the feasibility of immediate single-stage procedures with acellular dermal matrix (ADM), yet 2-stage tissue expander techniques continue to be the procedure most often performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative infections and to identify associated predictors. METHODS: A retrospective study at Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital was conducted between 2013 and 2017. Patients' demographic data were compared between single-stage and 2-stage procedures. Rate of infection and predictors were examined. Minor infections could be treated by oral antibiotics only, major infections required inpatient treatment. Healing was considered a successful treatment with antibiotics only, whereas any supplementary surgical intervention resulting in the preservation of an implant device was considered salvage. Breast reconstruction was defined a failure in case of implant loss or need for autologous reconstruction. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-three patients underwent 336 monolateral and 57 bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction. Ninety-two patients had a submuscular direct-to-implant reconstruction with ADM with an infection rate of 11.4% compared with an infection rate of 7.8% among the 268 patients with a 2-stage tissue expander procedure. Beta-binomial regression showed obesity and preoperative radiotherapy as significant predictors for infection (OR, 4.65, P = 0.038, and OR, 7.13, P = 0.015, respectively). Average time of onset of infection among the submuscular direct-to-implant with ADM group was 67.1 days compared with 80.1 days among tissue-expander group with postoperative chemotherapy and preoperative radiotherapy having a significant effect on time of infection onset (P = 0.014, P = 0.034, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with ADM is a procedure with acceptable risks of infection in comparison to tissue expander procedures. A profound patient selection pre- and intraoperatively is the basis of successful breast reconstruction.

4.
Ann Plast Surg ; 64(2): 202-9, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20098107

RESUMO

Relatively small soft-tissue defects of the lower leg following tumor excision are usually treated, especially in older patients, by split-thickness skin grafting. On specific sites where periosteum or paratenon is exposed, as well as when a skin graft is best avoided for cosmetic reasons, an excellent alternative option is the use of posterior tibial artery perforator flaps.Such flaps are designed and elevated "on demand," ie, according to the defect location and on whichever perforator is best found suited to supply the flap and allow adequate transposition.However, operative time is longer, and the surgeon needs to be judicious in dissection, as well as versatile in choosing the best flap design after identifying a suitable perforator.Between 2003 and 2008, 24 patients underwent this procedure, with uniformly successful result except for 2 partial flap necrosis.The advantages of posterior tibial artery perforator flaps are a quick and usually safe procedure, which provides good contour with excellent color, texture, and thickness match, with long-term stability of the reconstruction at the expense of minimal donor-site morbidity.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Basocelular/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Perna (Membro)/cirurgia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/irrigação sanguínea
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA