Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors: a randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. The specific diagnosis of GIST has to be based on immunocytochemistry. This study aimed to prospectively compare in a crossover manner the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and EUS-guided trucut biopsy (EUS-TCB) in the specific diagnosis of gastric GISTs. We hypothesized that EUS-TCB is superior to EUS-FNA in this respect. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with gastric subepithelial tumors suspected on the basis of EUS of being a GIST underwent both EUS-FNA and EUS-TCB. The sequence in which the techniques were employed was randomly assigned to avoid bias. RESULTS: Forty tumors were sampled (mean number of passes: 2.1 +/- 0.9 with EUS-TNB and 1.9 +/- 0.8 with EUS-FNA; P = not significant, NS). Final diagnoses were: GIST (n = 27), carcinoma (n = 2), leiomyoma (n = 1), schwannoma (n = 1), and no diagnosis possible (n = 9). Device failure occurred in 6 patients with EUS-TCB. A cytohistological diagnosis of mesenchymal tumor (n = 29) and carcinoma (n = 2) was made in 70 % of cases by EUS-FNA and in 60 % of cases by EUS-TCB ( P = NS). Among the samples that were adequate, immunohistochemistry could be performed in 74 % of EUS-FNA samples and in 91 % of EUS-TCB samples ( P = 0.025). When inadequate samples were included, the overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA was 52 % and that of EUS-TCB was 55 % ( P = NS). There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-TCB is not superior to EUS-FNA in GISTs because of the high rate of technical failure of trucut. However, when an adequate sample is obtained with EUS-TCB, immunohistochemical phenotyping is almost always possible. EUS-TCB can be safely performed in this set of patients.

Severe complications limit long-term clinical success of self-expanding metal stents in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are increasingly being used to treat malignant colorectal obstruction. However, complications have been reported in up to 50% of patients. There is limited information on long-term outcomes of these patients. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the long-term clinical success of SEMS in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction in a single tertiary center and to identify possible predictive factors of developing complications. METHODS: A total of 47 attempts to insert colorectal SEMS were made in 47 patients during a 5-year period. Stents of 9-cm length were placed under endoscopic and radiologic monitoring. After 24 h, all patients underwent abdominal X-ray to verify correct positioning of the stent. Patients were followed at the outpatient clinic. RESULTS: Insertion success was achieved in 44 (94%) patients. Acceptable initial colonic decompression was observed in 44 out of 47 (94%) attempts and in all (100%) successfully inserted stents. The stents were placed in the rectum (n=7, 15%), sigmoid (n=33, 70%), left colon (n=4, 9%), or anastomosis (n=3, 6%). The majority of patients had stage IV disease (n=40, 85%). SEMS served as a bridge to scheduled surgery in 9 (20%) patients and as a palliative definitive treatment in 38 (80%) cases. Three patients were lost to follow-up, so the outcome was evaluated in 41 patients. Long-term clinical failure occurred in 21 (51%) patients and was due to complications such as: migration (n=9, 22%), obstruction (n=7, 17%), perforation (n=3, 7%), and tenesmus (n=2, 5%). Perforations occurred 3, 4, and 34 days after insertion, and all patients died. In the bridge-to-surgery group, primary anastomosis was possible in only four of nine patients (44%). Clinical failure was not associated with any tumor-related factor. However, eight of nine patients with stent migration and two of three patients with perforation had been previously treated with chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of SEMS does not seem to be as effective as suggested because of late complications. For patients with potentially curable lesions, the use of colonic stents for malignant obstruction should only be considered when surgery is scheduled shortly after the stent insertion. Moreover, in patients with incurable obstructing colorectal cancer eligible for chemotherapy and a long life expectancy, palliative treatments other than SEMS should be considered.

Wireless capsule endoscopy.

Wireless capsule endoscopy is a new technique that allows complete exploration of the small bowel without external wires. Its role has been analyzed in many small bowel diseases such as obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, Crohn's disease and gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes with promising results. Studies on other pathologies (i.e. small bowel tumour, celiac disease) are under evaluation to define the role of this technique.

Incidence and clinical significance of hyperamylasemia after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions: a prospective and controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Acute pancreatitis as a complication of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions is rarely observed. However, there is little information on the incidence of hyperamylasemia after EUS-FNA of the pancreas and its clinical significance. This study aimed to supply this lack of information. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent EUS-FNA of a pancreatic lesion between October 2004 and October 2005 were studied prospectively. Exclusion criteria were: (i) platelet count under 50,000/mm (3) and/or prothrombin time < 50 %; (ii) performance of surgery, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), a percutaneous biopsy attempt, or another invasive procedure within 7 days before EUS-FNA; (iii) lack of informed consent. Serum amylase levels were determined before and 8 and 24 h after the procedure. Hyperamylasemia was defined by amylase levels above 104 UI/L (and higher than baseline levels) 8 h after the procedure. Acute pancreatitis was defined by upper abdominal pain (with or without nausea and/or vomiting) accompanied by elevation of serum amylase or lipase to at least twice baseline levels. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients underwent EUS-FNA of a pancreatic lesion (58 men, 42 women; mean age 60 +/- 13 years). Eleven patients (11 %) showed hyperamylasemia 8 h after the puncture (298 +/- 293 UI/L, range 105 - 1044 UI/L), but only two of them developed acute mild pancreatitis after EUS-FNA. Hyperamylasemia was not related either to the type of lesion (cystic or solid) or to its location, the duration of the procedure, or the number of passes performed. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatitis after pancreatic EUS-FNA occurs in 2 % of patients, with some more cases of silent hyperamylasemia. This complication may have to be included in the information given to patients for their informed consent.

EUS FNA in intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is little information concerning the potential role of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasonography in the pathologic diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. METHODOLOGY: Patients with an intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the pancreas suggested by endoscopic ultrasonography underwent fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasonography in order to investigate the presence of mucin and/or cytologic changes consistent with this diagnosis. A group of 111 patients with other pancreatic lesions explored during the same period of time was used as a control group. RESULTS: Fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasonography was safely performed in 19 patients and supported the diagnosis in 17 of them. Nine out of the 17 patients with suspicion of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas went to surgery and this diagnosis was confirmed in the resected specimen in all of them. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of EUS FNA in the diagnosis of IPMT were 82%, 100%, 100%, 92% and 94% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasonography is a good technique to support the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas and should be considered in this group of patients if pathologic confirmation is judged to be necessary.

Prospective assessment of the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in ERCP.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite the existence of published recommendations, various studies of antibiotic prophylaxis have reached conflicting conclusions, and controversy exists regarding the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in ERCP. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of the intramuscular administration of clindamicine and gentamicine before ERCP. METHODOLOGY: Sixty-one consecutive patients referred for ERCP were prospectively randomized to receive either clindamicine 600mg and gentamicine 80mg, both intramuscularly one hour before the ERCP (group I; 31 patients) or not (group II; 30 patients). Two blood samples were obtained from every patient (just before endoscopy and within 5 minutes of withdrawal of the endoscope) and were incubated for 7 days and examined daily for growth of bacteria. Patients were closely monitored for 7 days after endoscopy to detect the development of infectious complications. RESULTS: Only 7 cultures from 7 patients were positive. Four were obtained post-ERCP (two patients in group I and two in group II) and the remaining three before endoscopy. The post-ERCP isolated bacteria were: Streptococcus mitis, Peptoestreptococcus anaerobious, Moraxella spp and Escherichia coli. Two patients, one from each group, developed post-ERCP cholangitis that were solved with medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that ERCP induce bacteremia in a small group of patients and suggest that prophylactic administration of clindamicine plus gentamicine does not reduce the incidence of bacteremia and cholangitis, and do not support the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to ERCP.

Documento de consenso de la Asociación Española de Gastroenteología sobre sedoanalgesia en la endoscopia digestiva / Consensus document of the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology on sedoanalgesia in digestive endoscopy

No disponible

Endoscopia digestiva en la ingesta de cáusticos / Digestive tract endoscopy in caustic ingestion

La ingesta de productos cáusticos, ácidos o bases, puede producir lesiones digestivas altas, que pueden ir desde el edema y la hiperemia hasta úlceras profundas y extensas áreas de necrosis, con riesgo vital para el paciente. La endoscopia digestiva permite confirmar o descartar la presencia de estas lesiones, clasificarlas en caso de que estén presentes, establecer un pronóstico y contribuir a definir las medidas terapéuticas a aplicar, y sólo está contraindicada cuando se sospecha que hay una perforación digestiva o que ésta podría producirse al practicar esta exploración

The ingestion of caustics, both acids and alkalis, can cause upper gastrointestinal tract lesions ranging from oedema and hyperaemia to life-threatening deep ulcerations and extensive areas of necrosis. Digestive tract endoscopy may confirm or rule out the presence of such lesions, classify them when present, establish a prognosis and contribute to defining the therapeutic intervention. Endoscopy is only contraindicated when viscus perforation is suspected, or when a viscus perforation may occur when carrying out procedure

Embolia pulmonar masiva después de esclerosis endoscópica con N-butil-2-cianoacrilato / Massive pulmonary embolism after endoscopic sclerosis with N-butyl-2- cyanoacrylate

No disponible

Embolia pulmonar masiva después de esclerosis endoscópica con N-butil-2-cianoacrilato / Massive pulmonary embolism after endoscopic sclerosis with N-butyl-2- cyanoacrylate

No disponible

[Emerging endoscopic techniques. The arrival of virtual histology]. / Técnicas endoscópicas emergentes. La llegada de la histología virtual.

Endoscopic technology has evolved in such a way that gastroenterologists can now visualize and store high-resolution images of the gastrointestinal tract. This has improved the approach to precancerous and cancerous lesions of the gastrointestinal tract and biliary tree. However, certain difficulties remain, especially in relation to diagnosis. In the last few years, multiple techniques have been developed that, using the properties of light, enable an instantaneous histologic diagnosis to be made while endoscopy is being performed. What has been called the "optical biopsy" allows highly exact information to be obtained, both from the morphological and functional point of view. Some of these techniques, such as chromoendoscopy and magnification, are already being performed in clinical practice while others are still under investigation. The aim of the present article is to review the underlying principles and applications of these emerging techniques.

Técnicas endoscópicas emergentes. La llegada de la histología virtual / Emerging endoscopic techniques. The arrival of virtual histology

La tecnología endoscópica ha evolucionado de forma que los gastroenterólogos son capaces de visualizar y almacenar imágenes de alta resolución del tracto gastrointestinal. Esto ha permitido mejorar la actitud ante las lesiones precancerosas y cancerosas en el tubo digestivo y el árbol biliar. Sin embargo, quedan todavía ciertas dificultades, sobre todo en relación con la capacidad diagnóstica. En los últimos años se han desarrollado múltiples técnicas que, utilizando las propiedades de la luz, logran obtener un diagnóstico histológico instantáneo en el mismo momento de la endoscopia. La denominada «biopsia óptica» permite obtener una información muy precisa tanto desde el punto de vista morfológico como funcional. Algunas de estas técnicas, como la cromoendoscopia y la magnificación, son ya una realidad en la práctica clínica y otras se encuentran todavía en un plano meramente de investigación. El objetivo de este trabajo es revisar estas técnicas emergentes, sus bases y sus aplicaciones

Endoscopic technology has evolved in such a way that gastroenterologists can now visualize and store high-resolution images of the gastrointestinal tract. This has improved the approach to precancerous and cancerous lesions of the gastrointestinal tract and biliary tree. However, certain difficulties remain, especially in relation to diagnosis. In the last few years, multiple techniques have been developed that, using the properties of light, enable an instantaneous histologic diagnosis to be made while endoscopy is being performed. What has been called the «optical biopsy» allows highly exact information to be obtained, both from the morphological and functional point of view. Some of these techniques, such as chromoendoscopy and magnification, are already being performed in clinical practice while others are still under investigation. The aim of the present article is to review the underlying principles and applications of these emerging techniques

The European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy guidelines colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The demand for gastrointestinal endoscopy is increasing in most developed countries, resulting in an important rise in overall costs and waiting lists for endoscopic procedures. Therefore, adherence to appropriate indications for these procedures is essential for the rational use of finite resources in an open-access system. AIM: To assess indications and appropriateness of colonoscopy according to the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE) criteria. METHODS: From May to June 2004, all consecutive patients referred to our Unit for open-access colonoscopy were considered for inclusion in this prospective study. Appropriateness of each colonoscopy was established according to the EPAGE criteria. In order to evaluate whether appropriateness of use correlated with the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy, relevant endoscopic findings were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 350 consecutive patients were included in the study. In 38 of them, the colonoscopy indication was not listed in the EPAGE guidelines and, consequently, they were not evaluated. In the remaining 312 patients, the indication for the procedure was considered inappropriate in 73 (23%) patients. Both referring doctor characteristics (specialty and health care setting) and patient data (age) correlated with appropriateness of endoscopy. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher for appropriate colonoscopies (42%) than in those judged inappropriate (21%) (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A noteworthy proportion of patients referred for colonoscopy to an open-access endoscopy unit are considered inappropriate because of their indication, with significant differences among specialties. These results suggest that implementation of validated guidelines for its appropriate use could improve this situation and, considering the correlation between appropriateness and diagnostic yield, even contribute to improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal diseases.