Resultados del proyecto de mejora de la calidad de la asistencia en hemodiálisis: estudio multicéntrico de indicadores de calidad de la Sociedad Española de Nefrología (SEN) / No disponible

Introducción: En el año 2002 se creó el grupo de trabajo sobre Calidad en Nefrología de la SEN (CNSEN). Los objetivos de este grupo han sido la identificación, difusión, implantación y consolidación de una herramienta de Gestión de la Calidad en Hemodiálisis, sistemática, objetiva y global, basada en la recopilación de Indicadores de Calidad, las estrategias de retroalimentación (Feedback) y Benchmarking,y el diseño de Planes de Mejora y Evaluación Global. El objetivo de este estudio es presentar los primeros resultados de los indicadores de calidad obtenidos en un grupo de centros españoles, así como evaluar la repercusión de la aplicación de las mencionadas técnicas en los resultados obtenidos. Métodos: Durante 2007 se ha ido incorporando al estudio un total de 28 unidades de hemodiálisis de todo el ámbito nacional. El número total de pacientes evaluados a lo largo del estudio ha sido 2516. Los indicadores han sido recogidos mediante un software informático específico de calidad, que permite calcularlos con facilidad. Los indicadores de cumplimiento se refieren a las siguientes áreas: adecuación de diálisis, anemia, metabolismo mineral y óseo, nutrición, enfermedades víricas, accesos vasculares, mortalidad, morbilidad (ingresos hospitalarios) y trasplante. Cada tres meses los centros reciben sus datos comparados con los del resto del grupo. Resultados: Se detectó una mejora de los resultados a nivel global, excepto en los niveles de hemoglobina. El porcentaje de centros que alcanzaron los estándares definidos por el CNSEN pasó del 65% al 90,9% en el caso del estándar de Kt/V Daugirdas II (> 1,3 en > del 80% de sus pacientes); del 71,4 % al 77,2 % en el caso del estándar de PTH (> 30% de sus pacientes con PTH entre 150 y 300 pg/ml); y del 42,8% al 63,5% en el caso del estándar de fósforo (> 75% de sus pacientes con fósforo < 5,5 mg/dl). Más del 50% de los centros mejoraron sus resultados con respecto al inicio del estudio en todas las áreas analizadas. Los centros que no obtuvieron una mejora en sus resultados partían de porcentajes de cumplimiento de los indicadores significativamente más altos que aquellos que si lograron mejorarlos (80,6 ± 15,4 versus 71,8 ± 16,6 respectivamente; p < 0,001). Conclusiones: Estamos avanzando en lo referente al conocimiento de los resultados de la hemodiálisis, aunque el trabajo pendiente todavía es extenso. La monitorización de indicadores de calidad respecto a un estándar, y su puesta en común con otros centros puede contribuir a la mejora de resultados y a la disminución en la variabilidad entre centros (AU)

Introduction: The Spanish Society of Nephrology «Quality in Nephrology Working Group» (QNWG) was created in 2002. The aims of this group are the identification, diffusion, implementation and consolidation of a systematic, objective and comprehensive set of quality performance measures (QPMs) to help along the improvement of patient care and outcomes on hemodialysis, by means of strategies of feedback and benchmarking, and the design of quality improvement projects. The objective of this study is to present the preliminary results of a set of quality performance measures obtained in a group of Spanish hemodialysis centers, as well as to evaluate the repercussion of the application of the aforementioned thecniques on the observed results. Methods: During 2007 a total of 28 hemodialysis units participated in the study; 2,516 patients were evaluated. A specific software was designed and used to facilitate the calculation of CPMs in each unit. The clinical indicators used refered to dialysis adequacy; anemia; mineral metabolisme; nutrition; viral infections; vascular access; mortality, morbidity (number and days of hospital admissions); and renal transplant. Every three months each center received its own data and its comparison with the rest of the group. Results: Except for hemoglobin levels we observed a global improvement. The percentage of centers reaching the stablished standards defined by the QNWG passed from 65% to 90.9% for Kt/V Daugirdas II (> 1.3 in > that 80% of the patients); from 71.4% to 77.2% for PTH (> 30% of patients with serum PTH between 150 and 300 pg/ml); and from 42.8% to 63.5% for phosphate (> 75% of patients with a serum phsphate < 5.5 mg/dl). More than 50% of centers showed an improvement in their final results as compared with their own initial results in all analyzed CPMs. Those centers that did not obtained an improvement in their results started the study with better percentages of acomplishment than those that showed a significant improvement in QPMs. (80.6 ± 15.4 versus 71.8 ± 16.6 respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusions: We are starting to make progresses in our knowledge of clinical results in our hemodialysis units, although there is still a long way to go over. To monitor and share CPMs results within hemodialysis centers might help to improve their results as well as to reduce intecenters variability (AU)

[Preliminary results of the Spanish Society of Nephrology multicenter study of quality performance measures: hemodialysis outcomes can be improved]. / Resultados del proyecto de mejora de la calidad de la asistencia en hemodiálisis: estudio multicéntrico de indicadores de calidad de la Sociedad Española de Nefrología (SEN).

INTRODUCTION: The Spanish Society of Nephrology "Quality in Nephrology Working Group" (QNWG) was created in 2002. The aims of this group are the identification, diffusion, implementation and consolidation of a systematic, objective and comprehensive set of quality performance measures (QPMs) to help along the improvement of patient care and outcomes on hemodialysis, by means of strategies of feedback and benchmarking, and the design of quality improvement projects. The objective of this study is to present the preliminary results of a set of quality performance measures obtained in a group of Spanish hemodialysis centers, as well as to evaluate the repercussion of the application of the aforementioned thecniques on the observed results. METHODS: During 2007 a total of 28 hemodialysis units participated in the study; 2516 patients were evaluated. A specific software was designed and used to facilitate the calculation of CPMs in each unit. The clinical indicators used refered to dialysis adequacy; anemia; mineral metabolisme; nutrition; viral infections; vascular access; mortality, morbidity (number and days of hospital admissions); and renal transplant. Every three months each center received its own data and its comparison with the rest of the group. RESULTS: Except for hemoglobin levels we observed a global improvement. The percentage of centers reaching the stablished standards defined by the QNWG passed from 65% to 90,9% for Kt/V Daugirdas II (> 1,3 in > that 80% of the patients); from 71,4 % to 77,2 % for PTH (> 30 % of patients with serum PTH between 150 and 300 pg/ml); and from 42,8 % to 63,5 % for phosphate (> 75 % of patients with a serum phsphate < 5,5 mg/dl). More than 50% of centers showed an improvement in their final results as compared with their own initial results in all analyzed CPMs. Those centers that did not obtained an improvement in their results started the study with better percentages of acomplishment than those that showed a significant improvement in QPMs. (80,6+/-15,4 versus 71,8+/-16,6 respectively; p<0,001) CONCLUSIONS: We are starting to make progresses in our knowledge of clinical results in our hemodialysis units, although there is still a long way to go over. To monitor and share CPMs results within hemodialysis centers might help to improve their results as well as to reduce intecenters variability.

[Cytomegalovirus viral load and antigenemia in the monitorization of prophylactic treatment with valganciclovir in renal transplant recipients]. / Carga viral y antigenemia de citomegalovirus en la monitorización de la profilaxis con valganciclovir en pacientes con trasplante renal.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is one of the most relevant infectious complications in solid organ transplant, and we must perform an appropriate prophylactic intervention. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic treatment with valganciclovir in renal transplant recipients in the first three months post transplantation by shell vial urine culture assay, and by measuring antigenemia (pp65) and CMV viral load, the latter by PCR. The population of the study included 100 renal transplant recipients. We analyzed the results of 36 patients recruited between November 2003 and July 2004 who were receiving a prophylactic oral treatment with valganciclovir, and who had finished the follow-up period of 90 days. The three tests mentioned above were performed on days 7, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90. No positive antigenemia was detected, the virus was cultured in a urine specimen and, in one patient, three measurements of viral load in serum were positive. Preliminary results of the study suggest that universal chemoprophylaxis with valganciclovir is effective for the prevention of CMV infection in renal transplant recipients and that, although all three tests used were useful, the measurement of CMV viral load seems to be the most appropriate method for monitoring these patients.

Carga viral y antigenemia de citomegalovirus en la monitorización de la profilaxis con valganciclovir en pacientes con trasplante renal / Cytomegalovirus viral load and antigenemia in the monitorization of prophylactic treatment with valganciclovir in renal transplant recipients

La enfermedad por citomegalovirus (CMV) es una de las complicaciones infecciosas más importantes en el trasplante de órgano sólido, porlo que es necesario realizar una correcta profilaxis de ella. El objetivo del estudio es ver la eficacia de la profilaxis con valganciclovir en pacientesreceptores de riñón durante el primer trimestre postrasplante, mediante la determinación de antigenemia (pp65), cultivo en Shellvialde orina y carga viral cuantitativa por PCR del CMV. En el estudio se incluyen cien pacientes con trasplante renal. Se analizan los resultadosde 36 de ellos reclutados entre noviembre de 2003 y julio de 2004, que estaban recibiendo profilaxis con valganciclovir oral y habíancumplido los 90 días de seguimiento. Las tres pruebas mencionadas se hicieron los días 7, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 y 90. No se detectó ningunaantigenemia positiva, en una muestra de orina se cultivó el virus y tres determinaciones de carga viral en suero fueron positivas, todas ellasdel mismo paciente. Con los resultados preliminares del estudio se puede apuntar que la quimioprofilaxis universal con valganciclovir resultaútil para la prevención de la infección por CMV en pacientes con trasplante renal y, aunque las tres técnicas descritas son válidas, la determinaciónde la carga viral del CMV parece ser la más adecuada para la monitorización de estos pacientes

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is one of the most relevant infectious complications in solid organ transplant, and we must perform an appropriateprophylactic intervention. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic treatment with valganciclovir inrenal transplant recipients in the first three months post transplantation by shell vial urine culture assay, and by measuring antigenemia(pp65) and CMV viral load, the latter by PCR. The population of the study included 100 renal transplant recipients. We analyzed the resultsof 36 patients recruited between November 2003 and July 2004 who were receiving a prophylactic oral treatment with valganciclovir, andwho had finished the follow-up period of 90 days. The three tests mentioned above were performed on days 7, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90.No positive antigenemia was detected, the virus was cultured in a urine specimen and, in one patient, three measurements of viral load inserum were positive. Preliminary results of the study suggest that universal chemoprophylaxis with valganciclovir is effective for the preventionof CMV infection in renal transplant recipients and that, although all three tests used were useful, the measurement of CMV viral loadseems to be the most appropriate method for monitoring these patients

Comparison of quantitative PCR and antigenemia in cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients.

UNLABELLED: Cytomegalovirus infection is a common complication of renal transplantation. Antigen pp65 levels serve as indicators of viral load, although the technique is difficult to perform and interpret. We sought to determine whether quantitative PCR had a higher sensitivity and predictive value in CMV infection. METHODS: The study included 100 renal transplant recipients who were screened for IgM and IgG at the time of admission. On days 7, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120, 180, and 360, antigenemia tests were performed on blood (pp65) and urine, and a quantitative PCR on blood. Among 59 patients recruited between November 2003 and August 2004 the mean age was 54.5 +/- 12.9 years. Two patients did not reach 90 days follow-up (3%); four patients have not surpassed 90 days (7%); 22, 120 days (37%); and 31, 180 days (53%). Ninety-three percent of patients showed anti-IgG CMV-positive titers with all being IgM CMV-negative at baseline. The patients at risk for infection were given valgancyclovir as prophylaxis throughout the study. RESULTS: At 474 visits, 8 samples (2.4%) were positive with urine; 5 (1.4%) with pp65, and 15 (4.7%) with PCR. Among the 15 positive samples, two (>100,000 and 3250 copies) revealed agreement of positive IgM and shellvial test on urine; two (15,100 and 5670 copies), antigen pp65 1+; one (17,400 copies) with pp65 2+ and shellvial urine; two (99,400 and 28,300 copies) with pp65 1+ and shellvial urine; and eight remaining determinations, 749, 2250, 686, 928, 2250, 26600, 777, and 2790 copies. The rest of the tests were negative. CONCLUSION: The preliminary results of this study demonstrated that quantitative PCR was a useful rapid tool for diagnosing and monitoring CMV infections.