Immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of Nuwiq® (human-cl rhFVIII) in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A-Interim results from the NuProtect Study.

INTRODUCTION: Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) is a fourth generation recombinant FVIII, produced in a human cell line, without chemical modification or protein fusion. No inhibitors developed in studies with Nuwiq® in 201 previously treated patients with haemophilia A (HA). The immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of Nuwiq® in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe HA are being assessed in the ongoing NuProtect study. METHODS: The study, conducted across 38 centres worldwide, is evaluating 110 true PUPs of all ages and ethnicities enrolled for study up to 100 exposure days (EDs) or 5 years maximum. The primary objective is to assess the immunogenicity of Nuwiq® (inhibitor activity ≥0.6 BU) using the Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay at a central laboratory. RESULTS: Data for 66 PUPs with ≥20 EDs from a preplanned interim analysis were analysed. High-titre (HT) inhibitors developed in 8 of 66 patients after a median of 11.5 EDs (range 6-24). Five patients developed low-titre inhibitors (4 transient). The cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval) was 12.8% (4.5%, 21.2%) for HT inhibitors and 20.8% (10.7%, 31.0%) for all inhibitors. During inhibitor-free periods, median annualized bleeding rates during prophylaxis were 0 for spontaneous bleeds and 2.40 for all bleeds. Efficacy was rated as "excellent" or "good" in treating 91.8% of bleeds. Efficacy of surgical prophylaxis was "excellent" or "good" for 8 (89%) procedures and "moderate" for 1 (11%). No tolerability concerns were evident. CONCLUSION: These interim data show a cumulative incidence of 12.8% for HT inhibitors and convincing efficacy and tolerability in PUPs treated with Nuwiq® .

Postauthorization safety study of Clottafact® , a triply secured fibrinogen concentrate in acquired fibrinogen deficiency: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A postauthorization safety study was performed between 2009 and 2012 to describe the use of Clottafact® in acquired fibrinogen deficiency in real-life medical practice in France. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients were planned for 28 days of prospective follow-up after infusion. The analysis of this observational study was descriptive and performed according to the type of treatment (curative or preventive) and the origin of the bleed. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-six patients (16-87 years) were included in 13 centres and treated in five different medical bleeding situations: postpartum (59), other gynaecological/obstetrical (6), trauma (34), liver (13), cardiovascular (23) and other various bleeding situations (21). The mean follow-up time was 18·9 ± 12·3 days. Two patients presented adverse drug reactions: one a pulmonary embolism and the other a four-site venous thromboembolic episode. All were serious with a dubious causal relationship with the study treatment. Efficacy data were collected as a secondary objective. In 150 patients receiving curative treatment, 117 of 159 infusions (73·6%) were considered as successful by the investigators, 35 as moderate (22%) and seven as no response (4·4%). CONCLUSION: The Clottafact® safety profile observed during the study matched the known profile of fibrinogen during use.

F376A/M388A-solulin, a new promising antifibrinolytic for severe haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia is a major bleeding disorder due to a deficiency of procoagulant factor VIII (type A) or IX (type B). The treatment is substitutive and based on infusion of factor concentrates. Main limitations of this therapy are cost, short factor half-life and the development of inhibitors (up to 30% of severe HA patients). An important aggravating factor of haemophilia is due to a premature fibrinolysis, directing attention to the therapeutic potential of suitable antifibrinolytics. Thrombomodulin (TM) is a key player of the coagulation cascade by activating protein C (an inhibitor of thrombin generation, thus antagonizing coagulation) and of the fibrinolytic cascade by activating thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor TAFI (thus reducing fibrinolysis). Solulin is a soluble form of TM that shows both capabilities. AIM: Here, we developed a new generation of solulin variants (F376A-, M388A- and F376A/M388A-solulin) with a decreased ability to activate protein C and a conserved capacity to activate TAFI. METHODS: We produced and characterized solulin variants in vitro. In addition, F376A/M388A-solulin was tested ex vivo, using blood samples of haemophilic A patients, with thromboelastography. RESULTS: The solulin variants (F376A, M388A and the double-mutant F376A/M388A) lost their abilities to activate protein C but are still capable to activate TAFI. Thrombelastography showed increased clot firmness and stability, that, as opposed to wild-type solulin, was maintained even at high concentrations of F376A/M388A-solulin (100 nm). CONCLUSION: In sum, these results open new opportunities for the development of specific medication for haemophilic patients.

Achievements, challenges and unmet needs for haemophilia patients with inhibitors: Report from a symposium in Paris, France on 20 November 2014.

Over the past 20 years, there have been many advances in haemophilia treatment that have allowed patients to take greater control of their disease. However, the development of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors is the greatest complication of the disease and a challenge in the treatment of haemophilia making management of bleeding episodes difficult and surgical procedures very challenging. A meeting to discuss the unmet needs of haemophilia patients with inhibitors was held in Paris on 20 November 2014. Topics discussed were genetic and non-genetic risk factors for the development of inhibitors, immunological aspects of inhibitor development, FVIII products and inhibitor development, generation and functional properties of engineered antigen-specific T regulatory cells, suppression of immune responses to FVIII, prophylaxis in haemophilia patients with inhibitors, epitope mapping of FVIII inhibitors, current controversies in immune tolerance induction therapy, surgery in haemophilia patients with inhibitors and future perspectives for the treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors. A summary of the key points discussed is presented in this paper.

Use of Haemate(®) P as immune tolerance induction in patients with severe haemophilia A who failed previous induction attempts: a multicentre observational study.

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) can eliminate factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitory antibodies that appear during FVIII replacement therapy. If first-line ITI fails, switching to a different FVIII concentrate, especially one containing von Willebrand factor (VWF), has been advocated. The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of Haemate(®) P, a plasma-derived FVIII concentrate containing high levels of VWF, as ITI in severe haemophilia A patients who had failed at least one prior ITI attempt with a different FVIII concentrate. In this multicentre, observational study, Haemate(®) P was administered at a starting dose of 83-308 IU kg(-1) day(-1) (1500-6000 IU day(-1)). Efficacy was assessed by standard criteria (e.g. Bethesda titre, FVIII recovery and half-life), and bleeding characteristics. Nine patients from six haemophilia centres were treated with Haemate(®) P after failing one (n = 2), two (n = 5) or three (n = 2) prior ITI courses. The median time from inhibitor detection to Haemate(®) P treatment was 5.4 years. The median Haemate(®) P dose was 134 IU kg(-1), and the median treatment duration 32 months. During median of 47 months of follow-up, complete response, partial response and treatment failure were observed in one, three and five patients respectively. Five patients experienced seven adverse events (AEs), including two serious AEs (sepsis). Haemate(®) P was discontinued due to an AE in one patient with a partial response. Haemate(®) P salvage ITI resulted in complete or partial tolerization in four of nine patients (44%) who had failed previous ITI attempts using different FVIII concentrates.

Hydrolysis of factor VIII mediated by catalytic antibodies occurs in haemophilia A patients with or without factor VIII inhibitors.

The major complication of the substitutive treatment of haemophilia A (HA) is the development of antifactor VIII (FVIII) antibodies. Most of these antibodies neutralize FVIII procoagulant activity, and are identified as FVIII inhibitor. A subgroup of these antibodies, 'catalytic antibodies', catalyses the FVIII hydrolysis. We investigated the frequency and the activity of catalytic antibodies, according to the phenotype of HA and the presence or absence of FVIII inhibitor. IgG from 16 patients with inhibitor and 17 patients without inhibitor were purified. Rates of FVIII hydrolysis and inhibitor titres were evaluated. Anti-FVIII catalytic antibodies were detected in 63.6% of patients with HA, irrespective of the HA phenotype and the presence of FVIII inhibitor. The frequency was significantly higher for severe HA patients (73.3%) and patients with inhibitor (87.5%), but their FVIII-proteolytic activity was not significantly different from patients with mild or moderate HA and patients without inhibitor. The evolution of both catalytic and inhibitory activities was studied for 11 patients with FVIII inhibitor. We observed two profiles. In the profile 1, 18.2% of patients, the catalytic activity and the inhibitor titre coevolved. In contrast, a dissociated evolution of these two parameters was observed in 72.8% patients in profile 2. These data confirm the importance of anti-FVIII catalytic activity in patients with severe, moderate and mild HA. Interestingly, most of the patients presented a dissociated profile, suggesting that anti-FVIII antibodies might not systematically act as FVIII inhibitors.

Patient resources in the therapeutic education of haemophiliacs in France: their skills and roles as defined by consensus of a working group.

The activities of 'expert patients' or 'patient tutors', who help educate their peers, are gaining recognition in the health care system. This study investigates the role played by such patients in therapeutic education programmes organized by caregivers to validate the role of patients in implementing the therapeutic education of haemophilic patients and to define the skills required for such activities. This study employs the consensus methodology recommended by France's National Authority for Health. The working group includes seven caregivers from Hemophiliac Treatment Centers (HTCs) and three patients from the French Association of Hemophiliacs (FAH). The role of patients in haemophilia education is recognized. Patients participating in the education of their peers are referred to as 'patient resources'. A patient resource should be an adult, a volunteer and live in the same region as his peers. Candidates are chosen by the FAH and the HTCs to serve based on their motivation to facilitate the education of other patients as well as on their psychological and pedagogical aptitudes. A patient resource participates in the conception and administration of therapeutic education programmes. He also mediates between the caregivers and the patients. He ensures that the patients understand the material and are able to apply their knowledge in daily life. His activities are governed by professional ethics. Seven categories of skills were defined, permitting the group to determine precisely which skills are required to function as a patient resource. Supervision of the patients is planned to reinforce reflexive practices in the patients. Evolution of the health care system has led patients to become involved in therapeutic education. This phenomenon calls for a framework to be developed and an evaluation of its eventual effects.

[French guidelines. Long-term prophylaxis for severe haemophilia A and B children to prevent haemophiliac arthropathy]. / Prophylaxie de longue durée chez les enfants hémophiles A et B sévères en pévention de l'arthropathie hémophilique.

During the last decades, long-term prophylaxis has become the gold standard for the treatment of children with severe haemophilia A or B. Prophylactic replacement regimens modify the natural history of the disease by aiming at the prevention of haemarthrosis, target joints and arthropathy. This treatment represents a constraint and an enhanced exposure to anti-haemophilic concentrates, which means potential increase of related risks and significant additional cost. The context of crisis of confidence due to the blood borne infections in the 1980s, may have delayed prophylaxis as an universal gold standard.In the early 2000s, the French group CoMETH proposed recommendations based on the review of the international experience. At first, specific guidelines of long-term prophylaxis were dedicated to children with severe haemophilia A or B, aged 3 years or less, with no history of target joint or arthropathy. The main concerns of this regimen consist in the early start and the escalating intensification of the treatment. In the French haemophilia care centres, the diffusion of these guidelines has apparently induced a significant turning point in therapeutic practices for haemophilia children. In 2006, more comprehensive recommendations were diffused to take into account all the children with severe haemophilia, whatever the bleeding history and joint status. The analysis of their impact, jointly with the National cohort "France Coag Network", will first assess the widespread implementation of the recommendations and the observance of the prophylactic regimen and identify factors associated to the compliance.

[Acquired von Willebrand syndrome: from diagnosis to treatment]. / Le syndrome de Willebrand acquis: du diagnostic au traitement.

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome is a rare bleeding disorder, which has been related in various diseases including lymphoproliferative disorders or autoimmune diseases. Its diagnosis is an important step before treatment of patients and particularly in case of bleeding. We report four cases from Caen Hemophilia Treatment Center, diagnosed and treated from 1999 to 2008. Mucocutaneous bleeds in every case were the same as in hereditary von Willebrand disease. All patients had no personal or family history of bleeding. Phenotype was identified as type 2 von Willebrand disease with a loss of high molecular weight multimers. Anti-von Willebrand factor inhibitor screening was positive for three patients. The etiological diagnosis was one chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, two monoclonal gammapathies of undetermined significance (MGUS) and one undetermined case. The management of patients need two stages: first infusions of factor von Willebrand/factor VIII concentrates to stop bleeds, then treatment of the underlying disease such as chemotherapy, corticotherapy and treatment with high doses of polyvalents immunoglobulins. In every case, treatment was effective and improved patient's quality of life.

Prophylactic treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors: clinical experience with recombinant factor VIIa in European Haemophilia Centres.

Many patients with haemophilia develop inhibitors to factor VIII and require bypassing agents to provide haemostatic cover for limb- or life-threatening bleeding episodes. Due to the reduced risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission with recombinant products, on-demand recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa; NovoSeven is the treatment of choice for children with inhibitors. In haemophiliac patients without inhibitors, primary prophylaxis has been clinical practice for several years. This paper summarises 13 case histories of rFVIIa secondary prophylaxis for haemophilia patients with inhibitors. This was a retrospective survey of adult and paediatric severe haemophilia patients with inhibitors treated with rFVIIa from ten European Haemophilia Centres. There was a wide variation in administered rFVIIa dose, from 200-250 microg kg(-1) per week to 220 microg kg(-1) daily. In many cases, this was lower than the recommended on-demand dose of rFVIIa. In 12/13 cases, prophylaxis with rFVIIa considerably reduced the number of bleeding episodes compared with previous treatment. Eight/nine patients were satisfied or very satisfied with rFVIIa treatment, and in cases reporting subjective quality of life (QoL), all were improved, much improved, or significantly improved. In haemophilia patients with inhibitors, prophylaxis with rFVIIa is highly effective in reducing the number of bleeding episodes and results in good patient compliance and improved QoL. Randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings. Results of a recently completed clinical trial on secondary prophylaxis with rFVIIa in frequently bleeding haemophilia patients with inhibitors are expected in late 2006.

Factor VIII (FVIII) gene mutations in 120 patients with hemophilia A: detection of 26 novel mutations and correlation with FVIII inhibitor development.

BACKGROUND: As the publication of the sequence of the factor VIII gene (FVIII) in 1984, a large number of mutations that cause hemophilia A (HA) have been identified. Thanks to the advances in the detection of mutations, it is now possible to identify a putative FVIII sequence alteration in the vast majority of patients with HA. OBJECTIVES: Our main objective was to report on the spectrum of FVIII mutations and their distribution throughout the gene in 120 patients with HA. METHODS: Screening of FVIII mutations was performed using direct sequencing. Newly described missense mutations were further studied by molecular modeling. RESULTS: A total of 47 different HA causative FVIII mutations have been identified, 26 of which are described for the first time. These novel mutations include 14 missense and six nonsense mutations, two small deletions, one large deletion and three splice-site mutations. We further investigated the development of FVIII-specific inhibitors in all patients with HA. We found that four novel mutations (Ser882X, Tyr1786Ser, Ala2218Thr and a splice-site defect in intron 22) were associated with inhibitor development. CONCLUSION: These data extend our insight into the mechanisms by which novel amino acid substitutions may lead to HA, and how HA patient genotypes influence the risk of FVIII inhibitor development.

Treatment of severe von Willebrand disease with a high-purity von Willebrand factor concentrate (Wilfactin): a prospective study of 50 patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A plasma-derived von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrate with low factor VIII (FVIII) content was specifically developed to treat von Willebrand disease (VWD). Efficacy and safety were investigated by merging the results of two comparable protocols conducted prospectively in 5 European and 12 French centers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty patients with clinically severe VWD (72% had VWF ristocetin cofactor activity less than 10 IU dL(-1) and 46% had FVIII < 20 IU dL(-1)) were treated with the concentrate as the only therapy, except for clinical situations requiring a priming dose of FVIII to rapidly correct an intrinsic coagulation defect. A total of 139 spontaneous bleeding episodes were treated; only 53 (38%) needed a concomitant FVIII dose. Outcome was excellent or good in 89% of the episodes. Forty-four patients underwent 108 surgical or invasive procedures. Outcome was excellent or good in 95 scheduled procedures (only VWF was infused) and 13 emergency procedures (a priming FVIII dose was co-administered with the first VWF infusion). There were no thrombotic complications and none of the 18 patients with type 3 VWD developed anti-VWF or anti-FVIII antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: This concentrate safely and effectively provides hemostasis in patients with clinically severe VWD.

Impact of choice of treatment for bleeding episodes on inhibitor outcome in patients with mild/moderate hemophilia a and inhibitors.

Patients with mild/moderate hemophilia A (MHA) may develop inhibitors to factor VIII (FVIII). In this condition, FVIII clotting activity (FVIII:C) baseline levels may remain stable for some patients, but may be reduced to less than 0.01 U/mL for others. Several risk factors for the development of inhibitors in MHA have been proposed. Genetic factors, such as mutations in the FVIII gene, may play a central role; however, other influences, such as intensive treatment with FVIII products, may also be important. Optimal treatment regimens have yet to be determined, not only for the eradication of inhibitors, but also for the management or surgical prophylaxis of hemorrhages associated with this condition. Several treatment options for the control of bleeding in patients with MHA and inhibitors (MHAI) are currently available, and the choice of therapeutic strategy should be given careful consideration; some treatments may produce an anamnestic response, thus delaying the return to FVIII:C baseline levels and adversely affecting the duration of the severe bleeding phenotype. To increase our knowledge of MHAI, a retrospective collection of data is currently being performed among hemophilia centers in France and Belgium. Based on five examples of patients with MHAI collated from preliminary study data, we illustrate the impact on inhibitor outcome of the therapeutic choices used to treat bleeding episodes in these patients.

Pharmacokinetic studies on Wilfactin, a von Willebrand factor concentrate with a low factor VIII content treated with three virus-inactivation/removal methods.

OBJECTIVE: In order to correct the primary von Willebrand factor (VWF) defect and avoid supra-physiologic plasma levels of factor VIII, a pure VWF concentrate almost devoid of FVIII was developed and used in France since 1989. METHODS: The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of the most recent version of this concentrate (Wilfactin; LFB, Les Ulis, France), treated with three virus-inactivation/removal methods (solvent/detergent, 35 nm filtration, dry heat treatment), was investigated in 25 patients. Seventeen patients with various types of clinically severe von Willebrand disease (VWD) were included in a crossover, randomized trial carried out in five European centers and comparing Wilfactin with concentrates containing both FVIII and VWF (FVIII/VWF). Eight type 3 VWD patients were included in another trial carried out in six French centers comparing Wilfactin with its previous version (Facteur Willebrand-LFB; LFB) that adopted one virus-inactivation method only. RESULTS: For both the measurements evaluated in this study (VWF antigen, VWF:Ag; and VWF ristocetin co-factor activity, VWF:RCo), Wilfactin had a PK profile similar to that of the FVIII/VWF concentrates and of Facteur Willebrand-LFB. VWF:RCo and VWF:Ag recoveries were 2.1 +/- 0.3 and 1.8 +/- 0.3 per IU kg(-1), respectively, and the half-lives were 12.4 +/- 1.8 and 15.9 +/- 1.5 h. The FVIII synthesis rate was 5.8 +/- 1.0 IU dL(-1) h(-1), with a half-life of 15.8 +/- 2.4 h. CONCLUSION: The PK of VWF and FVIII have not been altered by the three virus-inactivation/removal steps during the manufacturing of Wilfactin.

Experience with use of recombinant activated factor VII.

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has recently been introduced for improving haemostasis in haemophiliac patients developing alloantibodies (inhibitors) to factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX). We describe the successful management of haemorrhagia with rFVIIa in five different situations: an episode of surgical bleeding in a patient with haemophilia A and non-surgical haemorrhages in four patients with haemophilia A, acquired haemophilia, congenital severe FV defect and pseudo-acquired haemophilia, respectively. In each case, rFVIIa was effective and safe. There is no doubt that rFVIIa is useful in the therapeutic management of patients with antibodies to FVIII or FIX. However, the treatment is expensive and a cost-effectiveness analysis would be useful.

Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy: a retrospective study of enoxaparin safety in 624 pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the maternal, fetal and neonatal safety of enoxaparin in pregnant women who require antithrombotic therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of case notes of women who received enoxaparin during pregnancy, irrespective of dose, duration and reason for treatment. SETTING: Fifty-five French perinatal centres. SAMPLE: Data from 624 pregnancies in 604 women between 1988 and 1997. The incidence of previous thromboembolism was 29.8%, known thrombophilia 15.2%. METHODS: Indication, regimen of enoxaparin and outcome measures were reported for each pregnancy. Information was obtained from case records, validated by research staff and analysed by an independent scientific committee. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, seriousness and causality of maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse events, pregnancy outcome, and incidence of venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: Enoxaparin was administered for treatment of an acute episode in 49 cases and for thromboprophylaxis in 574 cases. Serious maternal haemorrhage occurred in 11 cases during pregnancy (1.8%), one being reasonably related to enoxaparin, and in nine cases at delivery (1.4%), all unrelated to enoxaparin. Maternal thrombocytopenia was reported in 10 cases (1.6%). two being serious but unrelated to enoxaparin. Eight pregnancies ended in stillbirth (1.1%). Among the 693 live births, 17 major congenital abnormalities (2.5%) and 10 serious neonatal haemorrhages (1.4%) were reported. None of the fetal or neonatal adverse events was related to enoxaparin. Eight venous thromboembolic events (1.3%) were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of adverse events reported could be explained by the high risk profile of the study population. Overall, this retrospective study suggests enoxaparin is well tolerated during pregnancy.

Platelet ultrastructural abnormalities in three patients with type 2B von Willebrand disease.

Several reports have described the presence of giant platelets in patients with type 2B von Willebrand disease (VWD). We have now characterized the ultrastructural changes in platelets from three unrelated patients with type 2B VWD and different mutations within exon 28 of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene. Electron microscopy showed that each of these subjects had an increased proportion of large platelets when compared with those of a patient with type 2A VWD or control subjects. Immunogold labelling for VWF was performed. Large masses detected by anti-VWF antibody were seen not only on the platelet surface, but also inside the platelet surface-connected canalicular system (SCCS) when ultrathin sections were labelled. This suggested translocation of the abnormally bound VWF from the platelet surface. Labelling of the alpha-granules was eccentric as for normal platelets. Labelling for glycoprotein (GP) Ib was seen on the surface and within the SCCS, suggesting co-localization with the bound VWF. However, there was no evidence for VWF in endosomes or other endocytic vesicles. The presence of platelet-bound VWF was not accompanied by high levels of platelet activation, as detected by electron microscopy, or by using monoclonal antibodies against P-selectin or activation-dependent determinants on GP IIb-IIIa in flow cytometry. Intriguingly, platelet ultrastructure often resembled that seen in patients with congenital thrombocytopathies characteristic of giant platelet syndromes.

Three cases of acquired von Willebrand disease associated with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Acquired von Willebrand disease associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been detected in three middle-aged women. In each case the first clinical manifestation was a bleeding syndrome. Plasma levels of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination were as found in type 1 von Willebrand disease for the first patient, type 3 for the second patient, and type 2 for the third patient. Intraplatelet levels of VWF were normal for all three patients. In all cases a mixture of patient's plasma with normal plasma resulted in inhibition of ristocetin-induced binding of VWF to normal platelets. Intravenous immunoglobulin given to patients 2 and 3 corrected the plasma VWF level of the second patient but not that of the third. Therapy with corticosteroids was partially beneficial for patient 3 and patient 2. For patient 2, the severity of the cutaneous lesions also led to the use of cyclophosphamide, and this therapy resulted in total correction of VWF levels. Our observations confirm previous reports of acquired von Willebrand syndrome associated with SLE and show heterogeneity both in the phenotypic form and in the response to treatment.

French previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A after exposure to recombinant factor VIII : incidence of inhibitor and evaluation of immune tolerance.

Fifty French previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII < 1%), treated with only one brand of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII), were evaluated for inhibitor development, assessment of risk factors and outcome of immune tolerance regimen. The median period on study was 32 months (range 9-74) since the first injection of rFVIII. Fourteen patients (28%) developed an inhibitor, four of whom (8%) with a high titer (> or = 10 BU). All inhibitor patients but one continued to receive rFVIII either for on-demand treatment or for immune tolerance regimen (ITR). Among these patients, inhibitor was transient in 2 (4%), became undetectable in 6 and was still present in 6. The prevalence of inhibitor was 12%. Presence of intron 22 inversion was found to be a risk factor for inhibitor development. Immune tolerance was difficult to achieve in our series despite a follow-up period of 16 to 30 months: immune tolerance was complete in only one out of the 3 patients undergoing low dose ITR and in one out of the 5 patients with high dose ITR.