Perceptions of Military Experience Among Veterans Reporting Lifetime Warzone Moral Injury.

ABSTRACT: Exposures to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) and possible moral injury are risk factors for a range of difficulties impacting individual functioning. Although exposure to PMIEs is a somewhat common product of war, qualitative methods to understand Veterans' experiences of moral injury and Veterans Affairs treatment are limited. To better characterize Veterans' experiences, 14 male warzone Veterans who reported moral injury post-warzone deployment and completed posttraumatic stress disorder treatment in the past year were asked to describe their military service as part of a qualitative study. Through thematic analysis, we found two moral injury-consistent themes and four subthemes. The first theme was "military experiences were associated with morally questioning one's self" with subthemes of "moral shift" and "depersonalization." The second theme was "military experiences were associated with morally questioning others" with subthemes of "disillusionment" and "resignation." Based on these findings, we conclude with a discussion of treatment implications for moral injury.

Trauma-Informed Training for Veterans Treatment Court Professionals: Program Development and Initial Feedback.

Background: Justice-involved veterans demonstrate greater mental health and psychosocial needs relative to justice-involved nonveterans and veterans without a criminal history. Veterans treatment courts (VTCs) serve as an alternative to incarceration for veterans whose criminogenic risk is believed to be related to mental health symptoms. Despite observed improvements in functioning and recidivism risk following successful VTC completion, little is known about factors that impede engagement with VTCs. This paper describes a trauma-informed training program that included psychoeducation, skills training, and consultation and was developed for court professionals to facilitate veteran engagement in VTCs. Observations: Needs assessments and court observations informed program development. Based on identified needs, the training incorporated skills from dialectical behavior therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and motivational interviewing. Two VTCs in the Rocky Mountain region participated in the pilot trauma-informed training, each lasting about 90 to 120 minutes. Feedback from attendees indicated that the focus on skills training-specifically, managing intense emotions, addressing ambivalence, and approaching sanctions and rewards-was uniquely helpful. The function of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and structure of evidence-based treatments were identified as useful educational components. Conclusions: Veterans Health Administration mental health professionals can serve an important role in facilitating effective practices for professionals working within VTCs. This pilot program provided preliminary support for skills-based training to bolster communication, motivation, distress tolerance, and engagement among veterans court participants. Future directions of this program may include expanding the training into a full-day workshop, conducting comprehensive needs assessments, and examining program outcomes.

Personality Disorder Diagnosis Among Justice-Involved Veterans: An Investigation of VA Using Veterans.

ABSTRACT: Justice-involved veterans are more likely to experience myriad mental health sequelae. Nonetheless, examination of personality psychopathology among justice-involved veterans remains limited, with studies focused on males within correctional settings. We examined Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic medical records for 1,534,108 (12.28% justice-involved) male and 127,230 (8.79% justice-involved) female veterans. Male and female veterans accessing VA justice-related services were both approximately three times more likely to have a personality disorder diagnosis relative to those with no history of using justice-related services. This effect persisted after accounting for VA use (both overall and mental health), age, race, and ethnicity. Augmenting and tailoring VA justice-related services to facilitate access to evidence-based psychotherapy for personality psychopathology may promote optimal recovery and rehabilitation among these veterans.

Racial, ethnic, and sex differences in psychiatric diagnosis, mental health sequelae, and VHA service utilization among justice-involved veterans.

OBJECTIVE: Intervening in the cycle of symptom exacerbation and recidivism among justice-involved veterans is critical given elevated rates of psychiatric diagnoses and mental health sequelae. To responsively and effectively address justice-involved veterans' needs, it is essential to examine distinct groups who are at heightened risk (e.g., marginalized communities). Although racial and ethnic disparities within the justice system are well established, veteran-focused research remains limited. HYPOTHESES: We hypothesized that significant differences exist in service utilization, psychiatric diagnoses, and mental health sequelae among Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) and White/non-Hispanic justice-involved veterans, for both male and female cohorts. METHOD: We examined a national data set of veterans accessing U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) justice-related services (i.e., justice-involved veterans) between 2005 and 2018 (N = 183,880; nBIPOC = 73,863, nWhite = 110,017) to elucidate racial and ethnic differences across clinical characteristics documented in the VA electronic medical record. Using linear and logistic analyses, we analyzed male (n = 173,487) and female (n = 10,393) justice-involved veterans separately to capture intersectionality. RESULTS: In general, BIPOC justice-involved veterans were more likely than White/non-Hispanic justice-involved veterans to be diagnosed with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders and to use homeless services, p < .001. They were less likely to be diagnosed with mood, anxiety, personality, and opioid use disorders, p < .01. Separate examinations of Black and Hispanic justice-involved veterans, compared with their White/non-Hispanic counterparts, demonstrated some divergent trends (e.g., frequency of use of Veterans Health Administration [VHA] services). Our findings also revealed nuanced sex-related differences in terms of service use and diagnoses. Descriptive characteristics for each racial and ethnic category are reported. CONCLUSION: These findings provide support for race and ethnicity as a key social factor of health associated with distinct psychiatric diagnoses and mental health sequelae among justice-involved veterans. We discuss practice and policy implications, including how to adapt existing VHA programming and practices to meet the needs of BIPOC justice-involved veterans. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Policy Changes as a Context for Moral Injury Development in the Wake of Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization.

The U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 ruling in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization held that the U.S. Constitution does not confer the right to an abortion, which set into motion an overhaul of reproductive health care services in certain states. Health care professionals are now operating within a rapidly changing landscape of clinical practice in which they may experience conflict between personal and professional morals (eg, bodily autonomy, patient advocacy), uncertainty regarding allowable practices, and fear of prosecution (eg, loss of medical license) related to reproductive health care services. The ethical dilemmas stemming from Dobbs create a context for exposure to potentially morally injurious events, moral distress, and moral injury (ie, functional impairment stemming from exposure to moral violations) among health care professionals. Considerations related to clinical intervention and approaches to policy are reviewed. Early identification of health care professionals' potentially morally injurious event exposure related to restricted reproductive services is critical for preventing and intervening on moral injury, with implications for improving functioning and retention within the medical field.

Case Conceptualizing in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Moral Injury: An Active and Ongoing Approach to Understanding and Intervening on Moral Injury.

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Moral Injury (ACT-MI; 10-11), is an application of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy principles designed to help individuals live their values, even in the presence of moral pain. ACT-MI differs from other emerging treatments for moral injury in that ACT-MI is not based on a traditional syndromal approach to conceptualizing moral injury, which treats moral injury as a collection of signs and symptoms to be reduced. Rather than assuming moral injury causes suffering through a constellation of symptoms that a person has, in ACT-MI, moral injury is defined by what a person does in response to moral pain. Consistent with this framework, we present a unique approach to moral injury case conceptualization that emphasizes function over form, providing clients the opportunity to break free from the patterns of behavior that cause moral injury-related suffering to persist. Rooted in approaches to conceptualizing that have demonstrated utility in extant interventions (e.g., ACT), ACT-MI clinicians conduct ongoing functional analyses to inform case conceptualization and intervention. Functional analysis is used to disrupt the processes maintaining moral injury, as the client and therapist work to identify and intervene on the behaviors reinforcing avoidance and control of painful internal experiences causing moral injury. In the current article, we guide the reader through a framework for applying functional analysis to the conceptualization of moral injury where the reinforcers driving moral injury are explored. We also provide examples of questions that can be used to help uncover the functions of moral injury consistent behavior. Case examples based on our experiences treating moral injury are presented to demonstrate how various types of morally injurious events can evoke different features of moral pain which in turn motivate different repertoires of avoidance and control. These inflexible patterns of avoidance and control create suffering by engaging in behavior designed to escape moral pain, such as social isolation, spiritual disconnection, reduced self-care, suicidal ideation, and substance use. We discuss how to target this suffering using functional analysis to guide treatment decisions, matching interventional processes within ACT-MI to the specific functions that moral injury-related behavior is serving for an individual. We suggest that the use of functional analytic case formulation procedures described herein can assist clients in disrupting behavioral patterns maintaining moral injury and thereby free them to pursue lives of greater meaning and purpose.

The Role of Social Determinants of Health in Moral Injury: Implications and Future Directions.

Purpose of Review: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) and the development of moral injury have yet to be conceptualized as they relate to social determinants of health (SDoH).Recent Findings.In this paper, the extant literature on moral injury and SDoH is reviewed. Specific individual-level SDoH, including gender, sex, sexual orientation, race, and ethnicity, are explored relative to PMIEs and moral injury. The relationship among environmental SDoH, including childhood environment, justice involvement, and homelessness, is described. Summary: Assessment and treatment implications are discussed, and future research directions highlighting the need for additional work addressing health inequities in moral injury are presented.

Cultivating psychological flexibility to address religious and spiritual suffering in moral injury.

In the current paper, we aim to expand the dialogue about applying psychological flexibility processes to moral injury-related spiritual suffering using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). Psychological flexibility is the process of practicing present moment awareness and openness to experiences of emotions and thoughts, while also choosing to engage in actions that are consistent with one's values. This open, aware, and engaged approach to life fits well with spiritual endeavors. We provide a framework and a case example illustrating how spiritual care providers and Chaplains can use psychological flexibility processes to target spiritual suffering in the context of moral injury.

A longitudinal analysis of the role of potentially morally injurious events on COVID-19-related psychosocial functioning among healthcare providers.

Medical leaders have warned of the potential public health burden of a "parallel pandemic" faced by healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. These individuals may have experienced scenarios in which their moral code was violated resulting in potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs). In the present study, hierarchical linear modeling was utilized to examine the role of PMIEs on COVID-19 pandemic-related difficulties in psychosocial functioning among 211 healthcare providers (83% female, 89% White, and an average of 11.30 years in their healthcare profession [9.31]) over a 10-month span (May 2020 -March 2021). Reported exposure to PMIEs was associated with statistically significant poorer self-reported psychosocial functioning at baseline and over the course of 10-months of data collection. Within exploratory examinations of PMIE type, perceptions of transgressions by self or others (e.g., "I acted in ways that violated my own moral code or values"), but not perceived betrayal (e.g., "I feel betrayed by leaders who I once trusted"), was associated with poorer COVID-19 related psychosocial functioning (e.g., feeling connected to others, relationship with spouse or partner). Findings from this study speak to the importance of investing in intervention and prevention efforts to mitigate the consequences of exposure to PMIEs among healthcare providers. Interventions for healthcare providers targeting psychosocial functioning in the context of moral injury is an important area for future research.

Therapeutic Risk Management for Violence: Safety Planning for Other-directed Violence.

Therapeutic management of risk for other-directed violence (ODV) involves screening, assessment, and clinically appropriate intervention. In this 5-part series, effective screening and assessment for ODV have been described as a combination of clinical interviewing and the use of structured tools to inform clinical impressions of both acute and chronic risk for violence. Once risk of violence is identified, therapeutic management of the risk throughout the course of treatment is best achieved by determining the function of the violent ideation and behavior. This can be achieved through the use of functional chain analysis. Chain analysis not only serves the purpose of providing insight into the contingencies of violent behavior but also helps to identify target areas of intervention where other skills, strategies, and means to access resources for support can be applied. In this fifth and final column of the series, we describe an intervention with all of these outcomes as its goals. A safety plan for ODV assists both clients and mental health professionals in disrupting patterns of violent ideation or behavior that would otherwise continue causing not only harm to others but prolonged negative consequences for those engaging in such behaviors.

Therapeutic Risk Management for Violence: Chain Analysis of Other-directed Violent Ideation and Behavior.

Violence risk assessment is a requisite component of mental health treatment. Adhering to standards of care and ethical and legal requirements necessitates a cogent process for conducting, and then documenting, other-directed violence (ODV) risk screening, assessment, and management. In this 5-part series, we describe a model for achieving therapeutic risk management of the potentially violent patient, with essential elements involving: clinical interview augmented by structured screening or assessment tools; risk stratification in terms of temporality and severity; chain analysis to intervene on the functions of ODV ideation and behavior; and a personalized safety plan to mitigate/manage risk. In this fourth column of the series, we describe chain analysis as a critical tool for assessing and intervening on ODV ideation and behavior. We identify the pathways of reinforcement that can cause ODV to persist, and how to navigate potential barriers to completing ODV chains. Using a case example, we demonstrate how to apply chain analysis to ODV ideation and behavior and offer interventional strategies that can be used to disrupt the chain and ultimately reduce the risk for violence.

Facilitating Successful Reentry Among Justice-involved Veterans: The Role of Veteran and Offender Identity.

Reentry courts facilitate successful offender reintegration into the community following release from incarceration, and many justice-involved veterans may benefit from such services given their elevated risk for deleterious outcomes postrelease. However, effectively engaging court participants is a crucial foundation to achieve the goals of recidivism reduction and global psychosocial improvement. This conceptual article presents an overview of factors that may interfere with a veteran's engagement in reentry court through the lens of both veteran and offender identity. Recommendations for reentry court personnel based on justice-involved veterans' experiences, identity, and unique needs are presented. Careful consideration of these factors and associated practice adaptations may facilitate rapport between reentry court personnel and veteran participants, foster engagement, and ultimately improve outcomes among this unique, at-risk population.

Therapeutic Risk Management for Violence: Stratifying Risk and Characterizing Violence.

Violence risk assessment is a requisite component of mental health treatment. Adhering to standards of care and ethical and legal requirements necessitates a cogent process for conducting, and then documenting, other-directed violence risk screening, assessment, and management. In this 5-part series, we describe a model for achieving therapeutic risk management of the potentially violent patient, with essential elements involving: clinical interview augmented by structured screening or assessment tools; risk stratification in terms of temporality and severity; chain analysis to intervene on the functions of violent ideation and behavior; and personalized safety plans to mitigate/manage risk. This third column in the series describes other-directed violence risk stratification in terms of both severity and temporality, as well an approach for characterizing (ie, predatory/planned or impulsive/reactive) the violence risk posed by an individual.

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Suicidal Ideation, and Suicidal Self-Directed Violence Among U.S. Military Personnel and Veterans: A Systematic Review of the Literature From 2010 to 2018.

Rates of suicide and posttraumatic stress disorder remain high among United States military personnel and veterans. Building upon prior work, we conducted a systematic review of research published from 2010 to 2018 regarding: (1) the prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and suicide among United States military personnel and veterans diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder; (2) whether posttraumatic stress disorder was associated with suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and suicide among United States military personnel and veterans. 2,106 titles and abstracts were screened, with 48 articles included. Overall risk of bias was generally high for studies on suicidal ideation or suicide attempt and low for studies on suicide. Across studies, rates of suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and suicide widely varied based on study methodology and assessment approaches. Findings regarding the association between posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis with suicidal ideation and suicide were generally mixed, and some studies reported that posttraumatic stress disorder was associated with lower risk for suicide. In contrast, most studies reported significant associations between posttraumatic stress disorder and suicide attempt. These findings suggest complex associations between posttraumatic stress disorder and suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and suicide, which are likely influenced by other factors (e.g., psychiatric comorbidity). In addition, most samples were comprised of veterans, rather than military personnel. Further research is warranted to elucidate associations between posttraumatic stress disorder and suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and suicide, including identification of moderators and mediators of this relationship. Addressing this among United States military personnel, by gender, and in relation to different trauma types is also necessary.

Therapeutic Risk Management for Violence: Augmenting Clinical Risk Assessment With Structured Instruments.

Violence risk assessment is a requisite component of mental health treatment. Adhering to standards of care and ethical and legal requirements necessitates a cogent process for conducting, and then documenting, other-directed violence risk screening, assessment, and management. In this 5-part series, we describe a model for achieving therapeutic risk management of the potentially violent patient, with essential elements involving: clinical interview augmented by structured screening or assessment tools; risk stratification in terms of temporality and severity; chain analysis to intervene on the functions of violent ideation and behavior; and a personalized safety plan to mitigate/manage risk. This second column in the series describes the advantages of, and offers suggestions for, incorporating structured tools into violence risk assessment.

A contextual behavioral approach for responding to moral dilemmas in the age of COVID-19.

Prior pandemics and current news stories suggest that a "second pandemic" of potentially devastating mental health consequences will follow the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the changing contextual demands associated with the pandemic for many people, the mental health consequences of COVID-19 are likely to include exposure to a range of moral dilemmas. Such dilemmas may set the stage for the development of moral distress and moral injury in a broad range of contexts from the ER to the grocery store. In the current paper we offer an approach to responding to moral dilemmas presented by COVID-19. We propose a contextual behavioral model of moral injury that is relevant to those experiencing moral pain associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on this model, we offer two different approaches to intervening on COVID-19-related moral dilemmas. First, we propose the use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Moral Injury (ACT-MI) among individuals suffering from moral injury. Second, to intervene on moral dilemmas at the level of the group, we propose the use of the Prosocial intervention. We offer case examples describing ACT-MI and Prosocial to highlight how these interventions might be applied to moral-dilemma-related concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic and discuss implications for future research.

Therapeutic Risk Management for Violence: Clinical Risk Assessment.

Violence risk assessment is a requisite component of mental health treatment. Adhering to standards of care and ethical and legal requirements necessitates a cogent process for conducting (and documenting) screening, assessment, and management of other-directed violence risk. In this 5-part series, we describe a model for achieving therapeutic risk management of the potentially violent patient, with essential elements involving a clinical interview augmented by structured screening or assessment tools; risk stratification in terms of temporality and severity; chain analysis to intervene on the functions of violent ideation and behavior; and development of a personalized safety plan. This first column of the series focuses on essential aspects of the clinical interview.

A commentary on moral injury among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Although little is known about moral injury in nonmilitary populations, the COVID-19 pandemic has made it clear that moral injury's relevance extends beyond the battlefield. Health care providers are experiencing potentially morally injurious events that may violate their moral code or values, yet almost no research has been conducted on moral injury among health care providers to date. The purpose of this commentary is to describe the relevance of moral injury to health care providers and to spark a dialogue that motivates future research, prevention, and intervention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Veterans' perspectives on discussing moral injury in the context of evidence-based psychotherapies for PTSD and other VA treatment.

OBJECTIVE: We examined Veterans' perspectives on discussing moral injury in veterans affairs (VA) evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other VA treatment. METHODS: Fourteen male warzone veterans (ages 25-74) who completed an EBP for PTSD within the past year participated in semistructured interviews related to discussing moral injury in VA treatment (e.g., EBPs for PTSD, chaplaincy). Qualitative interviews were evaluated using a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four themes were identified; moral injury is often not identified or discussed during therapy, therapeutic relationships can promote or inhibit discussion of moral injury, treatment has limited impact on moral injury, and it is difficult to cope with moral injury even after treatment. CONCLUSION: The majority of Veterans interviewed identified moral injury persisting within a year of completing a PTSD EBP. These findings highlight the value of asking about, assessing, and treating moral injury in Veterans. Our results suggest the importance of developing specific moral injury interventions for warzone Veterans.

What Ought We to Do With "Thick Terms"? A Response to Frankfurt & Coady's "Bringing Philosophy to Bear on Moral Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Construct Validation".

We respond to the commentary by Frankfurt and Coady (this issue) regarding the descriptive-prescriptive framework for partially distinguishing between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and moral injury (Farnsworth, 2019). In their commentary, Frankfurt & Coady raise concerns about the application of R. M. Hare's (2014) philosophical approach of prescriptivism to military-related moral injury (MI) and the potential philosophical and ethical implications that may follow. In this response, we clarify that Farnsworth's descriptive-prescriptive framework is not tied to or aligned with Hare's prescriptivism and, as a result, many of Frankfurt and Coady's critiques become tangential to Farnsworth's original argument. We go on to clarify that Farnsworth's descriptive-prescriptive framework does not deny the utility of all cognitive therapies for moral injury, nor does it attempt to fully separate descriptive and prescriptive cognitions from one another, as was asserted by Frankfurt and Coady. We also provide a counterargument to Frankfurt and Coady's ethical concerns regarding the potential of Farnsworth's framework to enable militarism and instead assert its value for increasing peace and understanding. Finally, we address the relevance of "thick terms" for MI, highlighting their potential strengths and clinical weaknesses. We conclude by joining with Frankfurt and Coady in expressing our hopes for future research on the association between PTSD and MI. We argue that future research must go beyond defining content-level boundaries between the two constructs and instead grapple with the processes that give rise to them and the philosophical, empirical, and professional questions that they imply.

Spanish Abstracts by Asociación Chilena de Estrés Traumático (ACET) ¿Qué debemos hacer con "términos contundentes"? Respuesta a la (s) autor (es) 'Aportando a la filosofía sobre el daño moral y TEPT' QUÉ PODEMOS HACER Respondemos al comentario de Frankfurt y Cody (de este número) sobre el marco descriptivo y prescriptivo para distinguir, parcialmente, entre el trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT) y el daño moral (Farnsworth, 2019). En su comentario, Frankfurt y Cody plantean inquietudes sobre la aplicación del enfoque filosófico del prescriptivismo de R. M. Hare (2014) al daño moral (DM) relacionado con el ejército y las posibles implicaciones filosóficas y éticas que pueden surgir. En esta respuesta, aclaramos que el marco descriptivo-prescriptivo de Farnsworth no está ligado ni alineado con el prescriptivismo de Hare y, como resultado, muchas de las críticas de Frankfurt y Cody se vuelven tangenciales al artículo original de Farnsworth. Continuamos para aclarar que el marco descriptivo-prescriptivo de Farnsworth no niega la utilidad de todas las terapias cognitivas para el daño moral, ni intenta separar las cogniciones descriptivas y prescriptivas por completo, como afirmaron Frankfurt y Cody. También proporcionamos un argumento en contra de las preocupaciones éticas de Frankfurt y Cody sobre el potencial del marco de Farnsworth para permitir el militarismo y, en cambio, afirmar su valor para aumentar la paz y la comprensión. Finalmente, abordamos la relevancia de los "términos contundentes" para el DM, destacando sus potenciales fortalezas y debilidades clínicas. Concluimos uniéndonos a Frankfurt y Cody para expresar nuestras esperanzas de futuras investigaciones sobre la asociación entre TEPT y DM. Argumentamos que la investigación futura debe ir más allá de definir límites a nivel de contenido entre las dos construcciones y, en su lugar, lidiar con los procesos que las originan y las preguntas filosóficas, empíricas y profesionales que implican.