Prognostic and predictive value of PD-L1 expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TiLs) in locally advanced NSCLC treated with simultaneous radiochemotherapy in the randomized, multicenter, phase III German Intergroup lung Trial (GILT).

OBJECTIVES: Immune checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy (RTCT) has become a new standard of care for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. However, little is known about the prognostic role of immune response markers in this setting. We analysed PD-L1 expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TiLs) in tumour biopsies from the multicenter German Intergroup Lung Trial (GILT), which previously randomised patients with stage III NSCLC to RTCT with or without consolidation chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed tumour biopsies from patients treated in the GILT trial. PD-L1 expression was analysed using the Ventana SP263 assay and TiL score (low, intermediate, high) and pattern (excluded, inflamed, desert) were assessed. The primary endpoint of the biomarker analysis was PFS in patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% vs. PD-L1 < 1% NSCLC. Secondary endpoints explored the prognostic relevance of additional PD-L1 expression levels and TiL score and pattern. RESULTS: Biopsies were available from 92 patients treated with RTCT. Patients with available tumor tissue did not differ significantly from the whole study population. PD-L1 scores from 78 samples were available for analysis. There was no difference in PFS in the PD-L1 < 1% vs. PD-L1 ≥ 1% subgroups. TiL score was available in 66 patients. Patients with high TiL score showed favourable overall survival compared to the low TiL subgroup. This trend was most pronounced in those patients treated with consolidative chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: In this analysis, PD-L1 expression did not correlate with PFS following RTCT. However, patients with TiLs > 10% were found to have longer overall survival, especially for those patients treated with consolidation chemotherapy after the end of RTCT. Further analyses to explore the prognostic and predictive relevance of TiLs in the context of consolidative checkpoint inhibition with durvalumab are required.

Metronomic treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with daily oral vinorelbine - a Phase I trial.

MICRO-ABSTRACT: In a Phase I dose-finding study of metronomic daily oral vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, a recommended dose was established for this therapeutic approach. In addition, this trial revealed promising efficacy data and an acceptable tolerability profile. The observed vinorelbine blood concentrations suggest continuous anti-angiogenic coverage. INTRODUCTION: We present a Phase I dose-finding study investigating metronomic daily oral vinorelbine (Navelbine® Oral, NVBo) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage III/IV NSCLC received daily NVBo at fixed dose levels of 20-50 mg/d for 21 days of each 4-week cycle. Primary end point was the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary end points included tumor response, time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and tolerability. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled. Most of them were extensively pretreated. Daily NVBo was well tolerated up to 30 mg/d. At 40 mg/d, two of five patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Three of six patients had DLTs at the 50 mg/d level. The recommended dose was established at 30 mg/d in cycle 1, with escalation to 40 mg/d in cycle 2, if tolerated. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed continuous blood exposure over 21 days and only marginal accumulation. The tolerability profile was acceptable (all dose levels - all grades: decreased appetite 33%, diarrhea 33%, leukopenia 33%, nausea 30%, vomiting 26%; ≥grade 3: leukopenia 30%, lymphopenia 19%, neutropenia 19%, febrile neutropenia 15%). Disease control rate, OS and TTP signaled a treatment effect. CONCLUSION: Daily metronomic NVBo therapy in extensively pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC is feasible and safe at the recommended dose of 30 mg/d. Escalation to 40 mg/d in the second cycle is possible. The blood concentrations of vinorelbine after daily metronomic dosing reached lower peaks than intravenous or oral conventional dosing. Blood concentrations were consistent with anti-angiogenic or immune modulating pharmacologic properties of vinorelbine. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this novel approach in specific patient populations.

Preselection based on clinical characteristics in German non-small-cell lung cancer patients screened for EML4-ALK translocation.

BACKGROUND: The advent of multiple molecular targets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has brought new treatments, but also new logistic and technical considerations, to the clinician. The small size of endoscopic biopsies and the increasing number of relevant but uncommon markers has increased the need for rational approaches to molecular testing. We present the results of clinical preselection before EML4-ALK testing in a German NSCLC cohort. METHODS: Patients with stage IV NSCLC were included. Clinicians were encouraged to consider screening epidermal growth factor receptor wild-type adenocarcinoma patients with a limited smoking history, relatively young age, or who had benefited from chemotherapy for a relatively long period. Break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization using archived paraffin tissue was performed in a central facility. RESULTS: From April 2010 to September 2011 we included 61 patients: mean age 56.6 years, 41% women, 90% adenocarcinoma, 5% large-cell, and 5% squamous cell cancers. Only three patients had activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutations; 16.4% of patients were positive for EML4-ALK fusion. The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive patients included 60% women, tended to be younger, had smoked less, and had received significantly more systemic therapy, on average 3.7 lines of treatment over 3 years, before ALK-testing compared with the ALK-negative patients. Long periods of progression-free survival were experienced by ALK-positive patients treated with pemetrexed, vinorelbine, or cetuximab. CONCLUSIONS: EML4-ALK fusion is uncommon, reported in about 5% of NSCLC patients; however, clinical preselection increased the yield of testing to 16.4%. EML4-ALK positive patients seem to have distinct clinical features and show long responses to a number of systemic therapies.

Concurrent chemoradiation therapy with docetaxel/cisplatin followed by docetaxel consolidation therapy in inoperable stage IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a phase I study.

INTRODUCTION: Docetaxel consolidation therapy (DCT) after concurrent cisplatin/docetaxel chemoradiation therapy (CRT) produces high tumor control in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); toxicity is, however, considerable. We aimed to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) for DCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with inoperable stage IIIB NSCLC received docetaxel 20 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36, with concurrent radiation therapy 5 days per week for a total dose of 66 Gy. Patients achieving stable disease, partial response, or complete response were given DCT on days 71, 92, and 113. DCT was started with 75 mg/m2 and titrated depending on tolerability. The MTD of docetaxel was defined as the dose preceding that at which 3 or more patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). RESULTS: Of 23 patients enrolled (median age, 58.8 years +/- 7.3 years), 19 received complete CRT (4 withdrew because of toxicity). Of the patients receiving complete CRT, 1 patient died and 1 became operable, leaving 17 patients eligible for DCT starting at 75 mg/m2. After the third patient with DLT, dose was reduced to 60 mg/m2. Median survival was 27.6 months +/- 23.1 months. Median TTP was 12.4 months +/- 10.7 months. CONCLUSION: The MTD of DCT after concurrent cisplatin/docetaxel CRT was determined to be 60 mg/m2, but toxicity was considerable. The benefit-risk ratio of DCT has, however, been questioned by a placebo-controlled phase III trial. Further phase III trials need to consider further stratification factors (pretreatment forced expiratory volume [FEV]1, hemoglobin, performance, and stage) to define a role for DCT in patients with NSCLC.