Differential response to cytotoxic therapy explains treatment dynamics of acute myeloid leukaemia patients: insights from a mathematical modelling approach.

Disease response and durability of remission are very heterogeneous in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). There is increasing evidence that the individual risk of early relapse can be predicted based on the initial treatment response. However, it is unclear how such a correlation is linked to functional aspects of AML progression and treatment. We suggest a mathematical model in which leukaemia-initiating cells and normal/healthy haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells reversibly change between an active state characterized by proliferation and chemosensitivity and a quiescent state, in which the cells do not divide, but are also insensitive to chemotherapy. Applying this model to 275 molecular time courses of nucleophosmin 1-mutated patients, we conclude that the differential chemosensitivity of the leukaemia-initiating cells together with the cells' intrinsic proliferative capacity is sufficient to reproduce both, early relapse as well as long-lasting remission. We can, furthermore, show that the model parameters associated with individual chemosensitivity and proliferative advantage of the leukaemic cells are closely linked to the patients' time to relapse, while a reliable prediction based on early response only is not possible based on the currently available data. Although we demonstrate with our approach, that the complete response data is sufficient to quantify the aggressiveness of the disease, further investigations are necessary to study how an intensive early sampling strategy may prospectively improve risk assessment and help to optimize individual treatments.

Effects of spleen status on early outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation.

To assess the impact of spleen status on engraftment, and early morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), we analyzed 9,683 myeloablative allograft recipients from 1990 to 2006; 472 had prior splenectomy (SP), 300 splenic irradiation (SI), 1,471 with splenomegaly (SM), and 7,440 with normal spleen (NS). Median times to neutrophil engraftment (NE) and platelet engraftment (PE) were 15 vs 18 days and 22 vs 24 days for the SP and NS groups, respectively (P<0.001). Hematopoietic recovery at day +100 was not different across all groups, however the odds ratio of days +14 and +21 NE and day +28 PE were 3.26, 2.25 and 1.28 for SP, and 0.56, 0.55, and 0.82 for SM groups compared to NS (P<0.001), respectively. Among patients with SM, use of peripheral blood grafts improved NE at day +21, and CD34+ cell dose >5.7 × 10(6)/kg improved PE at day+28. After adjusting variables by Cox regression, the incidence of GVHD and OS were not different among groups. SM is associated with delayed engraftment, whereas SP prior to HCT facilitates early engraftment without having an impact on survival.

Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT in patients with AML following treosulfan/fludarabine conditioning.

An alternative reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen for allogeneic transplantation, based on treosulfan and fludarabine, has recently been identified. The safety and efficacy of this new conditioning regimen has been investigated prospectively in patients with AML. A total number of 75 patients with AML in CR were treated with 3 × 14 g/m(2) treosulfan and 5 × 30 mg/m(2) fludarabine, followed by matched sibling or unrelated SCT. Patients were evaluated for engraftment, adverse events, GVHD, and for non-relapse mortality, relapse incidence, overall and disease-free survival (DFS). All patients showed primary engraftment of neutrophils after a median of 20 days. Non-hematological adverse events grade III-IV in severity included mainly infections (59%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (7%). Acute GVHD grade II-IV occurred in 21% and extensive chronic GVHD occurred in 16% of the patients. After a median follow-up of 715 days, the 2-year overall and DFS estimates were 61% and 55%, respectively. The 2-year incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality reached 34% and 11%, respectively. In summary, our data confirm promising safety and efficacy of the treosulfan-based conditioning therapy in AML patients, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01063660.

HPC enumeration with the Sysmex XE-2100 can guide further flow cytometric CD34(+) measurements and timing of leukaphereses.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether HPC counts measured with the hematology analyzer can predict CD34+ levels in peripheral blood and in the apheresis product, as detected by standard flow cytometry. The main focus was the evaluation of HPC counts in poor mobilizers. METHODS: Progenitor cell quantification was performed measuring HPC counts provided by the Sysmex XE-2100 hematology analyzer and CD34+ counts obtained in parallel by flow cytometry. Peripheral blood of patients who had received chemotherapy and G-CSF (142 measurements) and healthy donors mobilized with G-CSF alone (106 measurements) was investigated HPC counts in peripheral blood were also correlated with apheresis yield. RESULTS: HPC counts were significantly higher than CD34+ counts (3.5 fold inpatients and 1.7 fold in healthy donors, p= 0.0015). Our data indicate that HPC counts < or = 10/microL in pretreated patients predict a low probability of adequate CD34+ counts in peripheral blood and yields < 2 x 10(6)/kg in subsequent aphereses. Furthermore, repetitive low HPC enumerations in an individual were followed by insufficientCD34+ counts in peripheral blood or aphereses in 81% of investigations. In healthy donors low HPC counts (< or = 10/microL; 12/106 measurements) did not exclusively predict low CD34+ counts (median 23/microL). DISCUSSION: HPC counts can be used to schedule the start of CD34+ measurements(threshold > 10 HPC/microL) in patients mobilized after chemotherapy for autologous donation. Thus, expensive and time-consuming CD34+ enumerations can perhaps be minimized HPC measurements cannot completely replace flow cytometric CD34+ enumeration. In particular healthy stem-cell donors should be monitored with both methods to exclude false negative HPC measurements.