Distinct spatiotemporal roles of hedgehog signalling during chick and mouse cranial base and axial skeleton development.

The cranial base exerts a supportive role for the brain and includes the occipital, sphenoid and ethmoid bones that arise from cartilaginous precursors in the early embryo. As the occipital bone and the posterior part of the sphenoid are mesoderm derivatives that arise in close proximity to the notochord and floor plate, it has been assumed that their development, like the axial skeleton, is dependent on Sonic hedgehog (Shh) and modulation of bone morphogenetic protein (Bmp) signalling. Here we examined the development of the cranial base in chick and mouse embryos to compare the molecular signals that are required for chondrogenic induction in the trunk and head. We found that Shh signalling is required but the molecular network controlling cranial base development is distinct from that in the trunk. In the absence of Shh, the presumptive cranial base did not undergo chondrogenic commitment as determined by the loss of Sox9 expression and there was a decrease in cell survival. In contrast, induction of the otic capsule occurred normally demonstrating that induction of the cranial base is uncoupled from formation of the sensory capsules. Lastly, we found that the early cranial mesoderm is refractory to Shh signalling, likely accounting for why development of the cranial base occurs after the axial skeleton. Our data reveal that cranial and axial skeletal induction is controlled by conserved, yet spatiotemporally distinct mechanisms that co-ordinate development of the cranial base with that of the cranial musculature and the pharyngeal arches.

Differentiation of avian craniofacial muscles: I. Patterns of early regulatory gene expression and myosin heavy chain synthesis.

Myogenic populations of the avian head arise within both epithelial (somitic) and mesenchymal (unsegmented) mesodermal populations. The former, which gives rise to neck, tongue, laryngeal, and diaphragmatic muscles, show many similarities to trunk axial, body wall, and appendicular muscles. However, muscle progenitors originating within unsegmented head mesoderm exhibit several distinct features, including multiple ancestries, the absence of several somite lineage-determining regulatory gene products, diverse locations relative to neuraxial and pharyngeal tissues, and a prolonged and necessary interaction with neural crest cells. The object of this study has been to characterize the spatial and temporal patterns of early muscle regulatory gene expression and subsequent myosin heavy chain isoform appearance in avian mesenchyme-derived extraocular and branchial muscles, and compare these with expression patterns in myotome-derived neck and tongue muscles. Myf5 and myoD transcripts are detected in the dorsomedial (epaxial) region of the occipital somites before stage 12, but are not evident in the ventrolateral domain until stage 14. Within unsegmented head mesoderm, myf5 expression begins at stage 13.5 in the second branchial arch, followed within a few hours in the lateral rectus and first branchial arch myoblasts, then other eye and branchial arch muscles. Expression of myoD is detected initially in the first branchial arch beginning at stage 14.5, followed quickly by its appearance in other arches and eye muscles. Multiple foci of myoblasts expressing these transcripts are evident during the early stages of myogenesis in the first and third branchial arches and the lateral rectus-pyramidalis/quadratus complex, suggesting an early patterned segregation of muscle precursors within head mesoderm. Myf5-positive myoblasts forming the hypoglossal cord emerge from the lateral borders of somites 4 and 5 by stage 15 and move ventrally as a cohort. Myosin heavy chain (MyHC) is first immunologically detectable in several eye and branchial arch myofibers between stages 21 and 22, although many tongue and laryngeal muscles do not initiate myosin production until stage 24 or later. Detectable synthesis of the MyHC-S3 isoform, which characterizes myofibers as having "slow" contraction properties, occurs within 1-2 stages of the onset of MyHC synthesis in most head muscles, with tongue and laryngeal muscles being substantially delayed. Such a prolonged, 2- to 3-day period of regulatory gene expression preceding the onset of myosin production contrasts with the interval seen in muscles developing in axial (approximately 18 hr) and wing (approximately 1-1.5 days) locations, and is unique to head muscles. This finding suggests that ongoing interactions between head myoblasts and their surroundings, most likely neural crest cells, delay myoblast withdrawal from the mitotic pool. These descriptions define a spatiotemporal pattern of muscle regulatory gene and myosin heavy chain expression unique to head muscles. This pattern is independent of origin (somitic vs. unsegmented paraxial vs. prechordal mesoderm), position (extraocular vs. branchial vs. subpharyngeal), and fiber type (fast vs. slow) and is shared among all muscles whose precursors interact with cephalic neural crest populations. Dev Dyn 1999;216:96-112.

Sonic hedgehog controls epaxial muscle determination through Myf5 activation.

Sonic hedgehog (Shh), produced by the notochord and floor plate, is proposed to function as an inductive and trophic signal that controls somite and neural tube patterning and differentiation. To investigate Shh functions during somite myogenesis in the mouse embryo, we have analyzed the expression of the myogenic determination genes, Myf5 and MyoD, and other regulatory genes in somites of Shh null embryos and in explants of presomitic mesoderm from wild-type and Myf5 null embryos. Our findings establish that Shh has an essential inductive function in the early activation of the myogenic determination genes, Myf5 and MyoD, in the epaxial somite cells that give rise to the progenitors of the deep back muscles. Shh is not required for the activation of Myf5 and MyoD at any of the other sites of myogenesis in the mouse embryo, including the hypaxial dermomyotomal cells that give rise to the abdominal and body wall muscles, or the myogenic progenitor cells that form the limb and head muscles. Shh also functions in somites to establish and maintain the medio-lateral boundaries of epaxial and hypaxial gene expression. Myf5, and not MyoD, is the target of Shh signaling in the epaxial dermomyotome, as MyoD activation by recombinant Shh protein in presomitic mesoderm explants is defective in Myf5 null embryos. In further support of the inductive function of Shh in epaxial myogenesis, we show that Shh is not essential for the survival or the proliferation of epaxial myogenic progenitors. However, Shh is required specifically for the survival of sclerotomal cells in the ventral somite as well as for the survival of ventral and dorsal neural tube cells. We conclude, therefore, that Shh has multiple functions in the somite, including inductive functions in the activation of Myf5, leading to the determination of epaxial dermomyotomal cells to myogenesis, as well as trophic functions in the maintenance of cell survival in the sclerotome and adjacent neural tube.

Pax3 functions in cell survival and in pax7 regulation.

In developing vertebrate embryos, Pax3 is expressed in the neural tube and in the paraxial mesoderm that gives rise to skeletal muscles. Pax3 mutants develop muscular and neural tube defects; furthermore, Pax3 is essential for the proper activation of the myogenic determination factor gene, MyoD, during early muscle development and PAX3 chromosomal translocations result in muscle tumors, providing evidence that Pax3 has diverse functions in myogenesis. To investigate the specific functions of Pax3 in development, we have examined cell survival and gene expression in presomitic mesoderm, somites and neural tube of developing wild-type and Pax3 mutant (Splotch) mouse embryos. Disruption of Pax3 expression by antisense oligonucleotides significantly impairs MyoD activation by signals from neural tube/notochord and surface ectoderm in cultured presomitic mesoderm (PSM), and is accompanied by a marked increase in programmed cell death. In Pax3 mutant (Splotch) embryos, MyoD is activated normally in the hypaxial somite, but MyoD-expressing cells are disorganized and apoptosis is prevalent in newly formed somites, but not in the neural tube or mature somites. In neural tube and somite regions where cell survival is maintained, the closely related Pax7 gene is upregulated, and its expression becomes expanded into the dorsal neural tube and somites, where Pax3 would normally be expressed. These results establish that Pax3 has complementary functions in MyoD activation and inhibition of apoptosis in the somitic mesoderm and in repression of Pax7 during neural tube and somite development.

Control of somite patterning by Sonic hedgehog and its downstream signal response genes.

In the avian embryo, previous work has demonstrated that the notochord provides inductive signals to activate myoD and pax1 regulatory genes, which are expressed in the dorsal and ventral somite cells that give rise to myotomal and sclerotomal lineages. Here, we present bead implantation and antisense inhibition experiments that show that Sonic hedgehog is both a sufficient and essential notochord signal molecule for myoD and pax1 activation in somites. Furthermore, we show that genes of the Sonic hedgehog signal response pathway, specifically patched, the Sonic hedgehog receptor, and gli and gli2/4, zinc-finger transcription factors, are activated in coordination with somite formation, establishing that Sonic hedgehog response genes play a regulatory role in coordinating the response of somites to the constitutive notochord Sonic hedgehog signal. Furthermore, the expression of patched, gli and gli2/4 is differentially patterned in the somite, providing mechanisms for differentially transducing the Sonic hedgehog signal to the myotomal and sclerotomal lineages. Finally, we show that the activation of gli2/4 is controlled by the process of somite formation and signals from the surface ectoderm, whereas upregulation of patched and activation of gli is controlled by the process of somite formation and a Sonic hedgehog signal. The Sonic hedgehog signal response genes, therefore, have important functions in regulating the initiation of the Sonic hedgehog response in newly forming somites and in regulating the patterned expression of myoD and pax1 in the myotomal and sclerotomal lineages following somite formation.

Muscle determination: another key player in myogenesis?

The steps that commit multipotential somite cells to muscle differentiation are being elucidated. Recent results show that pax3 is an upstream regulator of myoD, one of the key genes in myogenic lineage determination.

Distinct signal/response mechanisms regulate pax1 and QmyoD activation in sclerotomal and myotomal lineages of quail somites.

Pax1 and QmyoD are early sclerotome and myotome-specific genes that are activated in epithelial somites of quail embryos in response to axial notochord/neural tube signals. In situ hybridization experiments reveal that the developmental kinetics of activation of pax1 and QmyoD differ greatly, suggesting that myotome and sclerotome specification are controlled by distinct developmental mechanisms. pax1 activation always occurs in somite IV throughout development, indicating that pax1 regulation is tightly coordinated with early steps in somite maturation. In contrast, QmyoD is delayed and does not occur until embryos have 12-14 somites. At this time, QmyoD is the first of the myogenic regulatory factor (MRF) genes to be activated in preexisting somites in a rapid, anterior to posterior progression until the 22 somite stage, after which time QmyoD is activated in somite I immediately following somite formation. Experiments involving transplantation of newly formed somites to ectopic sites along the anterior to posterior embryonic axis were performed to distinguish the contributions of axial signals and somite response pathways to the developmental regulation of pax1 and QmyoD. These studies show that pax1 activation is regulated by somite formation and maturation, not by the availability of axial signals, which are expressed prior to somite formation. In contrast, the delayed activation of QmyoD is controlled by developmental regulation of the production of axial signals as well as by the competence of somites to respond to these signals. These somite transplantation studies, therefore, provide a basis for understanding the different developmental kinetics of activation of pax1 and QmyoD during sclerotome and myotome specification, and suggest specific molecular models for the developmental regulation of myotome and sclerotome formation in somites through distinct signal/response pathways.

Repression of the CSF-1 receptor (c-fms proto-oncogene product) by antisense transfection induces G1-growth arrest in L6 alpha 1 rat myoblasts.

Colony Stimulating Factor (CSF-1) and the CSF-1 receptor (the c-fms product) are expressed during the proliferation of L6 alpha 1 rat myogenic cell line and both are down regulated during the formation of myotubes. In this study, we demonstrated that the expression of c-fms antisense RNA in stably transfected myoblasts repressed the CSF-1 receptor (c-fms protein) and induced a G1-growth arrest. Expression of the cyclin genes, that control passage through the G1 phase and in particular the cyclins identified as genes induced late in G1 by CSF-1 in mouse macrophages was studied in comparative Northern blot analyses of RNAs of subpopulations prepared by centrifugal elutriation of L6 alpha 1 myoblasts and induced Antifms D5 cells expressing c-fms antisense RNA. Repression of the CSF-1 receptor (c-fms product) did not affect cyclins A, B and G expression during the cell cycle. However, D-type cyclins and, at a lesser extend, cyclin E expression were dramatically altered specifically during the late G1 and early S phases, in Antifms D5 cells. These results suggest a role for the CSF-1/c-fms autocrine loop in the control of the proliferation of L6 alpha 1 rat myogenic cell line at the G1/S boundary via the D-type and E cyclins expression.

Colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) is involved in an autocrine growth control of rat myogenic cells.

Colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) and the CSF-1 receptor (the c-fms proto-oncogene product) are expressed during the proliferation of the L6 alpha 1 rat myogenic cell line and both are down-regulated during the differentiation to myotubes. Biologically active CSF-1 was shown to be secreted into the culture medium by L6 alpha 1 myoblasts and while they could not bind CSF-1, evidence was obtained for cell surface receptor-CSF-1 complexes. It was not possible to block the L6 alpha 1 proliferation by incubation with anti-CSF-1 antiserum or suramin. However, in L6 alpha 1 myoblasts that were stably transfected with an inducible anti-fms antisense construct, both c-fms protein expression and cell proliferation were more rapidly inhibited under induction and differentiation conditions than parental cells. Furthermore, under these conditions, the c-fms antisense transfected cells also entered myogenic differentiation more rapidly. These results suggest that autocrine regulation by CSF-1 that is intracellular may play a role in the proliferation of muscle cells and that its down-regulation leads to, and may be an obligatory step in, myogenesis.

Molecular cloning of CSF-1 receptor from rat myoblasts. Sequence analysis and regulation during myogenesis.

We have isolated and sequenced a cDNA (mrfms) encoding rat c-fms gene (CSF-1 receptor) from proliferating L6 alpha 1 myoblasts. The predicted amino acid sequence was highly identical with the c-fms protein found in monocytes and macrophages (98, 76 and 84% identity from mouse, cat and human c-fms proteins, respectively). The mechanisms responsible for the regulation of mrfms gene expression during myogenesis were examined. Mrfms products were observed during proliferation of L6 alpha 1 myoblasts and were downregulated during differentiation. Run-on transcription assays demonstrated that the mrfms gene was transcriptionally active only in undifferentiated myoblasts. These findings suggested that mrfms levels in L6 alpha 1 myoblasts are controlled by transcriptional mechanisms. The half-life of mrfms transcripts was found to be at least 5 hr while inhibition of protein synthesis with cycloheximide (CHX) decreased this half-life to 30 min without changes in the rate of mrfms gene transcription. In addition oncogenic transformation of L6 alpha 1 myoblasts by the v-fms induced constitutive upregulation of mrfms mRNAs, and nuclear run-on assays demonstrated that mrfms transcription was not growth-factor dependent. Furthermore, these findings with others previously published indicate that mrfms gene products may play a role in the normal and neoplastic growth of muscular cells.

Expression of CSF-1-receptor-related proteins in muscular stem cells.

We previously reported that consistent levels of c-fms-related transcripts are expressed during the growth of rat myogenic cells as well as in all neoplastic myoblasts. The present study extends this observation to mouse myogenic cells and demonstrates that a tyrosine-kinase-associated gp170, very similar or identical to the receptor for the macrophage stimulating factor CSF-1, is synthesized in myoblasts via a short-lived precursor of 115-116 kD and an immature gp130. These gene products are eliminated during the myogenic process, suggesting their role in the proliferation of muscular cells.